Likkmee
Gold Member
Tha't not red, it's orange. Trump Corps ancestors did it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Nile floods every year, perhaps one year was worse than the othersthey predate the great flood
There was no great flood. There is no world wide flood footprint.
The flood is about a flood of the Euphrates River Basin circa 2900 BC as memorialized in the legends and folklore of Sumer.
Do you have a point?
Bent pyramid, not red
Technically God qualifies as an alien, so yea he is correct
God's not an alien, because aliens aren't imaginary.Technically God qualifies as an alien, so yea he is correct
Actually since God was clearly not from Earth, he qualifies as an alien. So if you believe in God you also believe in aliensGod's not an alien, because aliens aren't imaginary.Technically God qualifies as an alien, so yea he is correct
You're assuming that a god nobody's ever seen actually exists.Actually since God was clearly not from Earth, he qualifies as an alien. So if you believe in God you also believe in aliensGod's not an alien, because aliens aren't imaginary.Technically God qualifies as an alien, so yea he is correct
Wrong again-----the idea that the Egyptians were BLACK---not mixed---BLACK---the nubian Pharaohs were black-----the ancient Egyptians were Caucasian.They were actually more asian-----------and then you have that whole Alexander the Great leaving the Ptolemy line in control of Egypt thing----only in the last 1500 years or so did Egypt start to darken up and not achieve anything worth noting.
Humans are like dogs---different breeds that are related. We just call them different races.
The earliest Egyptians were the Anu or Annu people.
Remember that Egypt had some 8 or 9 Nubian Pharaohs. They were definitely black.
Egypt had been invaded at times by Nubians and, of course beings of the same
species INTERBREED, Insisting that the ancient Egyptians were "BLACK" is
a black nationalist thing that became fashionable sometime in the first half of
the 20th century and really a BIGGIE circa 1970's. The "person of color" BS
is a throwback to those perverse and destructive times.
No one is insisting that ancient Egyptians were black. It appears that they were a mixed race people from ancient times.
Person of color is not a 1970s concept.
Wrong again-----the idea that the Egyptians were BLACK---not mixed---BLACK---the nubian Pharaohs were black-----the ancient Egyptians were Caucasian.They were actually more asian-----------and then you have that whole Alexander the Great leaving the Ptolemy line in control of Egypt thing----only in the last 1500 years or so did Egypt start to darken up and not achieve anything worth noting.
Humans are like dogs---different breeds that are related. We just call them different races.
The earliest Egyptians were the Anu or Annu people.
Remember that Egypt had some 8 or 9 Nubian Pharaohs. They were definitely black.
Egypt had been invaded at times by Nubians and, of course beings of the same
species INTERBREED, Insisting that the ancient Egyptians were "BLACK" is
a black nationalist thing that became fashionable sometime in the first half of
the 20th century and really a BIGGIE circa 1970's. The "person of color" BS
is a throwback to those perverse and destructive times.
No one is insisting that ancient Egyptians were black. It appears that they were a mixed race people from ancient times.
Person of color is not a 1970s concept.
was VERY PROMINENT in the black nationalist literature in the 60s when I was doing
SOCIOLOGY in undergraduate school. AS to the idiot designation "Person of Color"
its nascence certainly was circa 1970 at a time when people STARTED looking for
any tenuous reason to FIND some "color" in family background. Mixed race is easy
to ascertain GEOGRAPHICALLY------humans INTERACT----the closer they are
geographically, the more MIXED they are. The other factor in Africa and later on Asia and
after that Europe and then the americas is THE SLAVE TRADE-----for at least 5000 years
the arab slavers spread caravans of ABED from the southern part of Africa to more prosperous parts of the world. I should add that I did enough sociology to claim it as a major---but I claimed biology...........the two subjects do "INTERSECT". Some sociologists INSIST that the word
MASRI means "black person"-----and some other interesting configurations of the term
MITZRAIM were bandied about (it's a bunch of sophistry equivalent to the "person of color"
BS )
your "response" is "non-responsive" There CERTAINLY is now and also thruout theWrong again-----the idea that the Egyptians were BLACK---not mixed---BLACK---the nubian Pharaohs were black-----the ancient Egyptians were Caucasian.They were actually more asian-----------and then you have that whole Alexander the Great leaving the Ptolemy line in control of Egypt thing----only in the last 1500 years or so did Egypt start to darken up and not achieve anything worth noting.
Humans are like dogs---different breeds that are related. We just call them different races.
The earliest Egyptians were the Anu or Annu people.
Remember that Egypt had some 8 or 9 Nubian Pharaohs. They were definitely black.
Egypt had been invaded at times by Nubians and, of course beings of the same
species INTERBREED, Insisting that the ancient Egyptians were "BLACK" is
a black nationalist thing that became fashionable sometime in the first half of
the 20th century and really a BIGGIE circa 1970's. The "person of color" BS
is a throwback to those perverse and destructive times.
No one is insisting that ancient Egyptians were black. It appears that they were a mixed race people from ancient times.
Person of color is not a 1970s concept.
was VERY PROMINENT in the black nationalist literature in the 60s when I was doing
SOCIOLOGY in undergraduate school. AS to the idiot designation "Person of Color"
its nascence certainly was circa 1970 at a time when people STARTED looking for
any tenuous reason to FIND some "color" in family background. Mixed race is easy
to ascertain GEOGRAPHICALLY------humans INTERACT----the closer they are
geographically, the more MIXED they are. The other factor in Africa and later on Asia and
after that Europe and then the americas is THE SLAVE TRADE-----for at least 5000 years
the arab slavers spread caravans of ABED from the southern part of Africa to more prosperous parts of the world. I should add that I did enough sociology to claim it as a major---but I claimed biology...........the two subjects do "INTERSECT". Some sociologists INSIST that the word
MASRI means "black person"-----and some other interesting configurations of the term
MITZRAIM were bandied about (it's a bunch of sophistry equivalent to the "person of color"
BS )
So what? What do you expect from Black Nationalists? You sure get exercised over the fucking obvious.
Most Arabs are light olive complexion except along the coasts where they intermarried with East Africans or people from the Indus Valley. Trade existed long before Islam.
Slavery was pretty much universal at one time.. Nobody marched slaves across the Sahara.
your "response" is "non-responsive" There CERTAINLY is now and also thruout theWrong again-----the idea that the Egyptians were BLACK---not mixed---BLACK---the nubian Pharaohs were black-----the ancient Egyptians were Caucasian.They were actually more asian-----------and then you have that whole Alexander the Great leaving the Ptolemy line in control of Egypt thing----only in the last 1500 years or so did Egypt start to darken up and not achieve anything worth noting.
Humans are like dogs---different breeds that are related. We just call them different races.
The earliest Egyptians were the Anu or Annu people.
Remember that Egypt had some 8 or 9 Nubian Pharaohs. They were definitely black.
Egypt had been invaded at times by Nubians and, of course beings of the same
species INTERBREED, Insisting that the ancient Egyptians were "BLACK" is
a black nationalist thing that became fashionable sometime in the first half of
the 20th century and really a BIGGIE circa 1970's. The "person of color" BS
is a throwback to those perverse and destructive times.
No one is insisting that ancient Egyptians were black. It appears that they were a mixed race people from ancient times.
Person of color is not a 1970s concept.
was VERY PROMINENT in the black nationalist literature in the 60s when I was doing
SOCIOLOGY in undergraduate school. AS to the idiot designation "Person of Color"
its nascence certainly was circa 1970 at a time when people STARTED looking for
any tenuous reason to FIND some "color" in family background. Mixed race is easy
to ascertain GEOGRAPHICALLY------humans INTERACT----the closer they are
geographically, the more MIXED they are. The other factor in Africa and later on Asia and
after that Europe and then the americas is THE SLAVE TRADE-----for at least 5000 years
the arab slavers spread caravans of ABED from the southern part of Africa to more prosperous parts of the world. I should add that I did enough sociology to claim it as a major---but I claimed biology...........the two subjects do "INTERSECT". Some sociologists INSIST that the word
MASRI means "black person"-----and some other interesting configurations of the term
MITZRAIM were bandied about (it's a bunch of sophistry equivalent to the "person of color"
BS )
So what? What do you expect from Black Nationalists? You sure get exercised over the fucking obvious.
Most Arabs are light olive complexion except along the coasts where they intermarried with East Africans or people from the Indus Valley. Trade existed long before Islam.
Slavery was pretty much universal at one time.. Nobody marched slaves across the Sahara.
20 th century a really extensive islamo-nazi propaganda effort to white wash "arabs"
out of the slave trade in which they were PROMINENT for 5000 years. One of the
important messages to BLACK americans was "YOU ARE REALLY MUSLIM" and somehow
your heritage was stolen-------arabic names became really BIG for new born black kids and
islamic costume flourished ------I am old but was a really precocious reader. The
propaganda that you spew was sent around in little seedy pamphlets when I was a kid.
I am well schooled in islamo-nazi BS (that and superman----I have 4 brothers)
"marched across the Sahara" ? damn straight they were. The ISHMAELITES were
into it-------that and extensive trade east and west.
Stop! You just don't get basics. The world changes in many ways. At one time, Egypt was actually the BREAD BASKET and shipped grains to europe mainly ancient Rome.
I am fascinated, surada, with your statementyour "response" is "non-responsive" There CERTAINLY is now and also thruout theWrong again-----the idea that the Egyptians were BLACK---not mixed---BLACK---the nubian Pharaohs were black-----the ancient Egyptians were Caucasian.They were actually more asian-----------and then you have that whole Alexander the Great leaving the Ptolemy line in control of Egypt thing----only in the last 1500 years or so did Egypt start to darken up and not achieve anything worth noting.
Humans are like dogs---different breeds that are related. We just call them different races.
The earliest Egyptians were the Anu or Annu people.
Remember that Egypt had some 8 or 9 Nubian Pharaohs. They were definitely black.
Egypt had been invaded at times by Nubians and, of course beings of the same
species INTERBREED, Insisting that the ancient Egyptians were "BLACK" is
a black nationalist thing that became fashionable sometime in the first half of
the 20th century and really a BIGGIE circa 1970's. The "person of color" BS
is a throwback to those perverse and destructive times.
No one is insisting that ancient Egyptians were black. It appears that they were a mixed race people from ancient times.
Person of color is not a 1970s concept.
was VERY PROMINENT in the black nationalist literature in the 60s when I was doing
SOCIOLOGY in undergraduate school. AS to the idiot designation "Person of Color"
its nascence certainly was circa 1970 at a time when people STARTED looking for
any tenuous reason to FIND some "color" in family background. Mixed race is easy
to ascertain GEOGRAPHICALLY------humans INTERACT----the closer they are
geographically, the more MIXED they are. The other factor in Africa and later on Asia and
after that Europe and then the americas is THE SLAVE TRADE-----for at least 5000 years
the arab slavers spread caravans of ABED from the southern part of Africa to more prosperous parts of the world. I should add that I did enough sociology to claim it as a major---but I claimed biology...........the two subjects do "INTERSECT". Some sociologists INSIST that the word
MASRI means "black person"-----and some other interesting configurations of the term
MITZRAIM were bandied about (it's a bunch of sophistry equivalent to the "person of color"
BS )
So what? What do you expect from Black Nationalists? You sure get exercised over the fucking obvious.
Most Arabs are light olive complexion except along the coasts where they intermarried with East Africans or people from the Indus Valley. Trade existed long before Islam.
Slavery was pretty much universal at one time.. Nobody marched slaves across the Sahara.
20 th century a really extensive islamo-nazi propaganda effort to white wash "arabs"
out of the slave trade in which they were PROMINENT for 5000 years. One of the
important messages to BLACK americans was "YOU ARE REALLY MUSLIM" and somehow
your heritage was stolen-------arabic names became really BIG for new born black kids and
islamic costume flourished ------I am old but was a really precocious reader. The
propaganda that you spew was sent around in little seedy pamphlets when I was a kid.
I am well schooled in islamo-nazi BS (that and superman----I have 4 brothers)
"marched across the Sahara" ? damn straight they were. The ISHMAELITES were
into it-------that and extensive trade east and west.
I am not the least bit surprised that you are well schooled in Islamo Nazi BS. Naturally you would be.
The Arabs couldn't afford to feed large numbers of slaves and had no plantation sized farms. Neither could the Jews so their slave holdings were also limited and subject to religious rules.
Muslims were more numerous in East Africa and North Africa (like Libya) not so much in West Africa.
The popularity of Arabic names in the US is of no real signifigance.