Who are these people who want to tell women what to do in their private lives?

[JakeStarkey]

Murder is a legal term. Abortion is a medical term. Your opinion is . . . only your opinion, and is neither a medical nor a legal term.

Removing a kidney is a medical procedure...removing the kidney with the intent to end the life of the human being is murder.

Until it's your body, your RISK, you have NO right to say what a woman is going to do with hers?

The Supreme court decided this 47 years ago.

Sure, so the man should have the legal right to abort all future financial support if the child should the female decide to take the pregnancy full term?

Equality for all

Fallacy of false equivalency. You really don't understand.

Equality is not a fallacy. Their are two adults involved in each pregnancy. Only one is allowed no decision in it. The male.

Fallacy of definition, fallacy of false equivalency. Your problem is women get pregnant, you don't. You do not understand.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Guys, get a wife to be to sign a pre-nup.

Do not screw out of marriage.

Be real men.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The far right and alt right hate women, obviously.

 

[2aguy]

The far right and alt right hate women, obviously.

And of course the fact that the left treats women as little more than sex organs for their personal pleasure......that escapes you......the left pushes sex without responsibility.....have sex, get the woman pregnant...the woman has a duty to kill the baby.....hollywood....want the part in the movie....take off your clothes and simulate sex in the role, and it doesn't matter that the left would destroy any other business that did that to women....as long as they can destroy and control businesses at their whim...

 

[JakeStarkey]

Guys, get a wife to be to sign a pre-nup.

Do not screw out of marriage.

Be real men.

Am I the only man on this Board who has only had sex with his wife in the bonds of marriage?

 

[there4eyeM]

Don't know who 'alt-right' is. Don't know who 'libs' are. Do know I'm not either. Am devilishly pleased to see the type of posters that violently disagree with me.

 

[Pop23]

Removing a kidney is a medical procedure...removing the kidney with the intent to end the life of the human being is murder.

Until it's your body, your RISK, you have NO right to say what a woman is going to do with hers?

The Supreme court decided this 47 years ago.

Sure, so the man should have the legal right to abort all future financial support if the child should the female decide to take the pregnancy full term?

Equality for all

Fallacy of false equivalency. You really don't understand.

Equality is not a fallacy. Their are two adults involved in each pregnancy. Only one is allowed no decision in it. The male.

Fallacy of definition, fallacy of false equivalency. Your problem is women get pregnant, you don't. You do not understand.

Got it.

We can treat people differently because of their biological difference.

Is that correct Jake? Or are you going to run from it later?

 

[Pop23]

Guys, get a wife to be to sign a pre-nup.

Do not screw out of marriage.

Be real men.

Am I the only man on this Board who has only had sex with his wife in the bonds of marriage?

What does marriage have to do with this?

You nuts?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Until it's your body, your RISK, you have NO right to say what a woman is going to do with hers?

The Supreme court decided this 47 years ago.

Sure, so the man should have the legal right to abort all future financial support if the child should the female decide to take the pregnancy full term?

Equality for all

Fallacy of false equivalency. You really don't understand.

Equality is not a fallacy. Their are two adults involved in each pregnancy. Only one is allowed no decision in it. The male.

Fallacy of definition, fallacy of false equivalency. Your problem is women get pregnant, you don't. You do not understand.

Got it. We can treat people differently because of their biological difference. Is that correct Jake? Or are you going to run from it later?

You were running away, and I tripped you. Your fallacy of false equivalency was explained above. Don't have sex if you are afraid of being responsible . . . hmmm?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Guys, get a wife to be to sign a pre-nup.

Do not screw out of marriage.

Be real men.

Am I the only man on this Board who has only had sex with his wife in the bonds of marriage?

What does marriage have to do with this? You nuts?

You don't know God, obviously. OK.

 

[oreo]

I really don't know how the Reich wing thinks today. Some of you have a Taliwacker mentality.

Do you really believe there is a District Court Judge out there, that has lived his/her life in court, making decisions on a daily basis, while defending and protecting the U.S. Constitution, that is just waiting for the day, that he/she would be appointed to the U.S. Supreme court just so they can overturn Roe V Wade? A Supreme court decision that was made 47 years ago.

Most of the U.S. Supreme court nominees are YOUNG--and have lived their lives with Roe V Wade, and have no Religious Prejudice toward it. Now if a 90 year old man gets appointed to the court there may be actually something to worry about--LOL But that's never going to happen.

Including with this nominee Niel Gorsuch. If top leaders within the Democrat party voted for him in 2006, a Bush appointee, when they could have easily rejected him, because they were the majority during that time, it's very clear that he passed their litmus test on Women's rights.

Here Are the Democrats Who Voted for Neil Gorsuch as a Circuit Court Judge in 2006

 

[Political Junky]

Don't know who 'alt-right' is. Don't know who 'libs' are. Do know I'm not either. Am devilishly pleased to see the type of posters that violently disagree with me.

The alt-right, or alternative right, is a loose group of people with far-right ideologies who reject mainstream conservatism in the United States. White nationalist Richard Spencer coined the term in 2010 to define a movement centered on white nationalism, and has been accused of doing so to whitewash overt racism, white supremacism, and neo-Nazism.

Alt-right - Wikipedia

 

[2aguy]

Don't know who 'alt-right' is. Don't know who 'libs' are. Do know I'm not either. Am devilishly pleased to see the type of posters that violently disagree with me.

This is an actual detailed look at the alt-right free speech movement...

An Establishment Conservative's Guide To The Alt-Right

Previously an obscure subculture, the alt-right burst onto the national political scene in 2015. Although initially small in number, the alt-right has a youthful energy and jarring, taboo-defying rhetoric that have boosted its membership and made it impossible to ignore.

It has already triggered a string of fearful op-eds and hit pieces from both Left and Right: Lefties dismiss it as racist, while the conservative press, always desperate to avoid charges of bigotry from the Left, has thrown these young readers and voters to the wolves as well.

National Review attacked them as bitter members of the white working-class who worship “father-Führer” Donald Trump. Betsy Woodruff of The Daily Beast attacked Rush Limbaugh for sympathising with the “white supremacist alt-right.” BuzzFeed begrudgingly acknowledged that the movement has a “great feel for how the internet works,” while simultaneously accusing them of targeting “blacks, Jews, women, Latinos and Muslims.”

The amount of column inches generated by the alt-right is a testament to their cultural punch. But so far, no one has really been able to explain the movement’s appeal and reach without desperate caveats and virtue-signalling to readers.


Part of this is down to the alt-right’s addiction to provocation. The alt-right is a movement born out of the youthful, subversive, underground edges of the internet. 4chan and 8chan are hubs of alt-right activity. For years, members of these forums – political and non-political – have delighted in attention-grabbing, juvenile pranks. Long before the alt-right, 4channers turned trolling the national media into an in-house sport.

Having once defended gamers, another group accused of harbouring the worst dregs of human society, we feel compelled to take a closer look at the force that’s alarming so many. Are they really just the second coming of 1980s skinheads, or something more subtle?

We’ve spent the past month tracking down the elusive, often anonymous members of the alt-right, and working out exactly what they stand for.

THE INTELLECTUALS
There are many things that separate the alternative right from old-school racist skinheads (to whom they are often idiotically compared), but one thing stands out above all else: intelligence. Skinheads, by and large, are low-information, low-IQ thugs driven by the thrill of violence and tribal hatred. The alternative right are a much smarter group of people — which perhaps suggests why the Left hates them so much. They’re dangerously bright.

The origins of the alternative right can be found in thinkers as diverse as Oswald Spengler, H.L Mencken, Julius Evola, Sam Francis, and the paleoconservative movement that rallied around the presidential campaigns of Pat Buchanan. The French New Right also serve as a source of inspiration for many leaders of the alt-right.

The media empire of the modern-day alternative right coalesced around Richard Spencer during his editorship of Taki’s Magazine. In 2010, Spencer founded AlternativeRight.com, which would become a center of alt-right thought.

Alongside other nodes like Steve Sailer’s blog, VDARE and American Renaissance, AlternativeRight.com became a gathering point for an eclectic mix of renegades who objected to the established political consensus in some form or another. All of these websites have been accused of racism.

 

[Chuz Life]

What is the difference between living sperm, living eggs and a fertilized egg?

Do you seriously not know the difference or are you simply being facetious?

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

A fetus is not a baby in terms of murder, Chuz. It is not an independent living entity. Only if it, as part of the pregnant woman's body, is illegally and criminally terminated can a person be prosecuted. That is not changing anytime soon.

A person who murders a pregnant woman can be charged with double murder...

Our fetal homicide laws do not support your denials about that.

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[JakeStarkey]

What is the difference between living sperm, living eggs and a fertilized egg?

Do you seriously not know the difference or are you simply being facetious?

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

A fetus is not a baby in terms of murder, Chuz. It is not an independent living entity. Only if it, as part of the pregnant woman's body, is illegally and criminally terminated can a person be prosecuted. That is not changing anytime soon.

A person who murders a pregnant woman can be charged with double murder...Our fetal homicide laws do not support your denials about that. Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Of course they do. No murder without harming a pregnant woman. She takes precedent over the fetus.

 

[Chuz Life]

What is the difference between living sperm, living eggs and a fertilized egg?

Do you seriously not know the difference or are you simply being facetious?

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

A fetus is not a baby in terms of murder, Chuz. It is not an independent living entity. Only if it, as part of the pregnant woman's body, is illegally and criminally terminated can a person be prosecuted. That is not changing anytime soon.

A person who murders a pregnant woman can be charged with double murder...Our fetal homicide laws do not support your denials about that. Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Of course they do. No murder without harming a pregnant woman. She takes precedent over the fetus.

You are (as usual) wrong again.

The case where a guy who tricked his girlfriend into eating pancakes laced with an abortifacient being a good example. He was initially charged with the MURDER of that child - even though the mother was not targeted or physically harmed at all.

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[JakeStarkey]

What is the difference between living sperm, living eggs and a fertilized egg?

Do you seriously not know the difference or are you simply being facetious?

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

A fetus is not a baby in terms of murder, Chuz. It is not an independent living entity. Only if it, as part of the pregnant woman's body, is illegally and criminally terminated can a person be prosecuted. That is not changing anytime soon.

A person who murders a pregnant woman can be charged with double murder...Our fetal homicide laws do not support your denials about that. Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Of course they do. No murder without harming a pregnant woman. She takes precedent over the fetus.

You are (as usual) wrong again. The case where a guy who tricked his girlfriend into eating pancakes laced with an abortifacient being a good example. He was initially charged with the MURDER of that child - even though the mother was not targeted or physically harmed at all.

Only because the foetus was dependent on the mother. What was the final charge? Chuz, I am so glad you are here so I can correct you regularly, because you are regularly wrong on this issue.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

This is what the GOP wants to Bring to Our USA......Welcome to Fundamentalist Hell

View image on Twitter

Follow
#1 Rachel ✔ @rachel

Arkansas just passed a law that will let a rapist sue his victim for having an abortion. welcome to hell. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/02/02/new-law-lets-dads-veto-abortions.html …

9:10 PM - 2 Feb 2017

 

[TheDude]

I am I am...................

Personally I believe both sides have a point, though liberals often lie to support theirs. I believe in compromise on the subject. A woman can reject her responsibility and human life two times first trimester. They agree to have their waste of mothering parts removed the second time. If that doesn't work for them, then they're free to seek an abortion on the black market.

Additionally, the USA taxpayer DOES NOT pay for abortions, nor support any entity that supports abortion (e.g., "planned parenthood" code for "unplanned irresponsible non-mothers".)

 

[Chuz Life]

Do you seriously not know the difference or are you simply being facetious?

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

A fetus is not a baby in terms of murder, Chuz. It is not an independent living entity. Only if it, as part of the pregnant woman's body, is illegally and criminally terminated can a person be prosecuted. That is not changing anytime soon.

A person who murders a pregnant woman can be charged with double murder...Our fetal homicide laws do not support your denials about that. Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

Of course they do. No murder without harming a pregnant woman. She takes precedent over the fetus.

You are (as usual) wrong again. The case where a guy who tricked his girlfriend into eating pancakes laced with an abortifacient being a good example. He was initially charged with the MURDER of that child - even though the mother was not targeted or physically harmed at all.

Only because the foetus was dependent on the mother. What was the final charge? Chuz, I am so glad you are here so I can correct you regularly, because you are regularly wrong on this issue.

You are moving the goal posts AGAIN.

Dodge, twist and spin all you want. The laws do not require that the woman also be harmed and THAT was what you claimed.

Sent from my SM-N920V using USMessageBoard.com mobile app