Where is this mountain of evidence for evolution?

[sealybobo]

Lik

You're ignorantly trying to assign human attributes to bacteria. Consider looking to sources outside of wiki for science information.

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

What "many"? Be specific and provide relevant examples.

"Respected scientists" shilling for fundamentalist ministries are frequently fringe loons.

I trust you can provide specific details of the papers and related support material your "many" respected scientists have submitted for peer review to science publications such as the journal Nature for example.

When they show us their sources you know they failed the peer review or will. Usually right off the bat. Scientists probably only need to read 2 paragraph to find the fatal flaw.

 

[sealybobo]

Lik

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

They are creationalist scientists? Not science. They dont follow the scientific method. Sorry.

Many of them are atheists. They don't believe in Creation, yet the believe that Darwin got it wrong.

What is their/your theory? I've asked a few times now.

 

[Mr.Right]

Lik

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

They are creationalist scientists? Not science. They dont follow the scientific method. Sorry.

Many of them are atheists. They don't believe in Creation, yet the believe that Darwin got it wrong.

What is their/your theory? I've asked a few times now.

And I'll continue to ignore that question. This is about evidence for evolution. I still haven't seen any.

 

[Hollie]

Lik

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

They are creationalist scientists? Not science. They dont follow the scientific method. Sorry.

Many of them are atheists. They don't believe in Creation, yet the believe that Darwin got it wrong.

What "many"? As usual, you just come across as a blowhard and a buffoon.

 

[sealybobo]

Lik

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

They are creationalist scientists? Not science. They dont follow the scientific method. Sorry.

Many of them are atheists. They don't believe in Creation, yet the believe that Darwin got it wrong.

Where was man 2 billion years ago when trilobite's ruled? Or 1 billion when dinosaurs ruled.

We were not here yet. We've only been here 1 million years. How do your scientists say we got here? Ants birds tigers rats snakes wolves. None of us were around 2 billion years ago. How do you explain where we all came from?

 

[Hollie]

Lik

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

They are creationalist scientists? Not science. They dont follow the scientific method. Sorry.

Many of them are atheists. They don't believe in Creation, yet the believe that Darwin got it wrong.

What is their/your theory? I've asked a few times now.

And I'll continue to ignore that question. This is about evidence for evolution. I still haven't seen any.

You won't find any at the extremist creation ministries. They have an interest in keeping people like you as scientific illiterates.

 

[sealybobo]

Lik

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

They are creationalist scientists? Not science. They dont follow the scientific method. Sorry.

Many of them are atheists. They don't believe in Creation, yet the believe that Darwin got it wrong.

What is their/your theory? I've asked a few times now.

And I'll continue to ignore that question. This is about evidence for evolution. I still haven't seen any.

Because you can't! Because if you were intellectually honest and answered the god damn questions we've asked we would help you see how stupid your thinking is. So why do we believe science? Because their logic is better than your no logic.

 

[sealybobo]

Lik
Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

They are creationalist scientists? Not science. They dont follow the scientific method. Sorry.

Many of them are atheists. They don't believe in Creation, yet the believe that Darwin got it wrong.

What is their/your theory? I've asked a few times now.

And I'll continue to ignore that question. This is about evidence for evolution. I still haven't seen any.

You won't find any at the extremist creation ministries. They have an interest in keeping people like you as scientific illiterates.

Can you believe the asshole won't answer questions that are harmful to his cause? I'm done with Mr wrong.

 

[orogenicman]

what is amazing to me is how smart bacteria are and their ability to adapt,organize,communicate...have to wonder where the source of such intelligence ,how it could of first developed

Yeah, those protein coatings must have the IQ of an Einstein.

Evolution myths The bacterial flagellum is irreducibly complex - life - 16 April 2008 - New Scientist

 

[sealybobo]

Lik
Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

They are creationalist scientists? Not science. They dont follow the scientific method. Sorry.

Many of them are atheists. They don't believe in Creation, yet the believe that Darwin got it wrong.

What is their/your theory? I've asked a few times now.

And I'll continue to ignore that question. This is about evidence for evolution. I still haven't seen any.

You won't find any at the extremist creation ministries. They have an interest in keeping people like you as scientific illiterates.

He asked for evidence. I point out that trilobite's were here 2 billion years ago and humans werent. We see we are much different than cavemen and that's just 100,000 years ago. Imagine what we were 500,000 years ago. Evolution makes sense.

And what is Mr wrong saying happened? God put us here 100,000 years ago as fully evolved humans? How does he think humans got here?

I could maybe understand how its hard to believe we are related to cold blooded animals bugs and even living trees but how else can they explain it? They can't with any evidence. All evidence is in our corner. Their only answer is god did it. But no evidence is ever given for their imaginary big brother.

Its like the Truman show but god watches 24/7. Creepy.

 

[orogenicman]

Still waiting for that evidence. What's the matter? You chicken?

Where were humans 2 billion years ago when trilobite's ruled the world? If we werent here yet where were we and how did we get Herr? You may not like sciences theory but your hypothesis doesnt make any logical sense.

You're delusional. There are many problems with evolution. You might want to read up on problems with dating methods. Different dating methods give different results for the same samples. Also, the values they use for radiometric dating are based on assumptions. How can anything based on assumptions be at all accurate. The fact is there is not one single solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Lying for Jesus is still lying. There are over a dozen dating methods, many of which overlap, many of which are used to corroborate one another. It is untrue that samples dated by different methods give different results (within statistical error) unless there is sample contamination or problems with the equipment at the time of analysis. The techniques themselves are valid and have been and are being used by laboratories around the world. Mr. Wrong would have us believe that laboratories are in the habit of spending millions of dollars each year on analytical techniques that don't work. And that just doesn't happen.

 

[sealybobo]

Lik

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

They are creationalist scientists? Not science. They dont follow the scientific method. Sorry.

Many of them are atheists. They don't believe in Creation, yet the believe that Darwin got it wrong.

What is their/your theory? I've asked a few times now.

And I'll continue to ignore that question. This is about evidence for evolution. I still haven't seen any.

Have you seen the cosmos? On a molecular level we are all made up of atoms and DNA and we recycle energy the same way.

Maybe you have to watch the Cosmos because they explain it beautifully how every living thing on earth is made of basically the same stuff. Add that to all the diversity on this planet and evolution makes sense.

I would love to know when and how the animal split off and one became cold blooded and the other warm. I'm sure science knows.

 

[orogenicman]

Lik

Bacteria communication and self-organization in the context of Network theory has been investigated by Eshel Ben-Jacobresearch group at Tel Aviv University which developed afractal model of bacterial colony and identified linguistic and social patterns in colony lifecycle [1] (also see Ben-Jacob's bacteria).
Microbial intelligence - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You're ignorantly trying to assign human attributes to bacteria. Consider looking to sources outside of wiki for science information.

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

Whether or not any scientists believe that evolution is wrong doesn't mean that they are respected. The bulk of scientists who don't accept evolution are, in fact, still respected for valid works they have done, but not for their position on evolution. And the fact remains that there are few of these scientists, not many. And every single one of them are evangelical creationist Christians.

 

[orogenicman]

Lik

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

They are creationalist scientists? Not science. They dont follow the scientific method. Sorry.

Many of them are atheists. They don't believe in Creation, yet the believe that Darwin got it wrong.

Name one.

 

[Tuatara]

I remember reading a book by Dawkins where he talks about a fellow scientist who happens to be a creationist. The scientist said all evidence points towards evolution but I'm gong with creationism just to be safe. He didn't say some evidence or most evidence, he stated all evidence. Sometimes even a creationist knows there is evidence for evolution. I will try and find the name.

 

[S.J.]

After 78 pages of prevaricating, the only thing you self proclaimed intellectuals can come up with is comments like "prove me wrong", "you're not smart enough to understand", "I already gave you proof, go back and find it", "you're fondling your dick". So much for your intellect.

Ignorance of the facts on your part is no ones fault but your own.

Thanks for confirming. Your posts are probably the best example.

You poor dear. Your tender sensibilities are offended by those evilutionists who dare challenge the superstitions that cause you to live in trembling fear of angry gawds.

If nothing else, this thread has served to display the profound ignorance of the religious zealot who lives in fear and denial of contingent reality.

Thanks for confirming (again).

I just find it remarkable that faced with facts supporting biological evolution, you're left stuttering and mumbling as you simply have no counter argument.

I DON'T find it amazing that when you're challenged to provide proof and can't, your only response is personal attacks and empty remarks. BTW, I'm still waiting for you to explain how one species became another.

 

[cnm]

[...] BTW, I'm still waiting for you to explain how one species became another.

You've had that explained. How about you explaining why you can't understand it?

 

[sealybobo]

Ignorance of the facts on your part is no ones fault but your own.

Thanks for confirming. Your posts are probably the best example.

You poor dear. Your tender sensibilities are offended by those evilutionists who dare challenge the superstitions that cause you to live in trembling fear of angry gawds.

If nothing else, this thread has served to display the profound ignorance of the religious zealot who lives in fear and denial of contingent reality.

Thanks for confirming (again).

I just find it remarkable that faced with facts supporting biological evolution, you're left stuttering and mumbling as you simply have no counter argument.

I DON'T find it amazing that when you're challenged to provide proof and can't, your only response is personal attacks and empty remarks. BTW, I'm still waiting for you to explain how one species became another.

Mutation. Happens over millions of years. One species has babies and one offspring ends up living in the cold so they become warm blooded and the other that lives in the heat becomes cold blooded.

How do we now have blacks asians and whites? Didn't we all come from Adam and Noah?

 

[orogenicman]

Lik

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

They are creationalist scientists? Not science. They dont follow the scientific method. Sorry.

Many of them are atheists. They don't believe in Creation, yet the believe that Darwin got it wrong.

What is their/your theory? I've asked a few times now.

And I'll continue to ignore that question. This is about evidence for evolution. I still haven't seen any.

You asked in the OP "where is this mountain of evidence for evolution"? So the question is not whether or not evolution is a valid scientific theory. The question you asked is where is the evidence? We've provided much of that evidence, and you have not accepted it with no reasonable explanation as to why? The fact that you have provided no reasonable explanation is not only disrespectful of those who have made the effort to answer your question, it is a clear indication that you are not actually wanting to know the answer to your own question. In which case, your OP is merely a ruse, an excuse to bring your own religious beliefs into the science forum in order to ridicule science and those who support it (which you have done with abandon). And so all you have done is set up a thread for the purpose of spamming the forum. And that is against the rules.

 

[S.J.]

[...] BTW, I'm still waiting for you to explain how one species became another.

You've had that explained. How about you explaining why you can't understand it?

You haven't explained a damn thing.