Where is this mountain of evidence for evolution?

[eots]

You're incorrectly and ignorantly assigning human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Bacteria communication and self-organization in the context of Network theory has been investigated by Eshel Ben-Jacobresearch group at Tel Aviv University which developed afractal model of bacterial colony and identified linguistic and social patterns in colony lifecycle [1] (also see Ben-Jacob's bacteria).
Microbial intelligence - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You're ignorantly trying to assign human attributes to bacteria. Consider looking to sources outside of wiki for science information.

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

using literal interpations of bible is no argument to support evolution

 

[eots]

Lik

You're ignorantly trying to assign human attributes to bacteria. Consider looking to sources outside of wiki for science information.

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

Whether or not any scientists believe that evolution is wrong doesn't mean that they are respected. The bulk of scientists who don't accept evolution are, in fact, still respected for valid works they have done, but not for their position on evolution. And the fact remains that there are few of these scientists, not many. And every single one of them are evangelical creationist Christians.

not true

 

[cnm]

Ok, now explain how one turned into another.
Crickets chirping.

How come you don't understand the explanations?

Damn. Forgot again!

Invincibly ignorant batshit crazy.

Sooner or later I'll get it.

 

[cnm]

How come you can't even explain which bit you don't understand?

 

[cnm]

Doh!

I remember now.

 

[eots]

Science will question evolution increasingly as we gain more knowledge until the inevitable concision is reached we live in an infinite and intelligent universe..

 

[eots]

Thanks for confirming. Your posts are probably the best example.

You poor dear. Your tender sensibilities are offended by those evilutionists who dare challenge the superstitions that cause you to live in trembling fear of angry gawds.

If nothing else, this thread has served to display the profound ignorance of the religious zealot who lives in fear and denial of contingent reality.

Thanks for confirming (again).

I just find it remarkable that faced with facts supporting biological evolution, you're left stuttering and mumbling as you simply have no counter argument.

I DON'T find it amazing that when you're challenged to provide proof and can't, your only response is personal attacks and empty remarks. BTW, I'm still waiting for you to explain how one species became another.

Mutation. Happens over millions of years. One species has babies and one offspring ends up living in the cold so they become warm blooded and the other that lives in the heat becomes cold blooded.

How do we now have blacks asians and whites? Didn't we all come from Adam and Noah?

lol..evidence of this is...

 

[orogenicman]

Lik

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

Whether or not any scientists believe that evolution is wrong doesn't mean that they are respected. The bulk of scientists who don't accept evolution are, in fact, still respected for valid works they have done, but not for their position on evolution. And the fact remains that there are few of these scientists, not many. And every single one of them are evangelical creationist Christians.

not true

Yes it is true. If you doubt it, name one that is not an evangelical Creationist Christian.

 

[orogenicman]

Bacteria communication and self-organization in the context of Network theory has been investigated by Eshel Ben-Jacobresearch group at Tel Aviv University which developed afractal model of bacterial colony and identified linguistic and social patterns in colony lifecycle [1] (also see Ben-Jacob's bacteria).
Microbial intelligence - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You're ignorantly trying to assign human attributes to bacteria. Consider looking to sources outside of wiki for science information.

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

using literal interpations of bible is no argument to support evolution

It is also no argument against evolution.

 

[eots]

Atheist philosopher of physics on why ID is a reasonable idea
Atheist philosopher of physics on why ID is a reasonable idea Uncommon Descent

 

[eots]

Peer-Reviewed Articles Supporting Intelligent Design


Intelligent Design: A scientific theory that holds that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause rather than undirected process such as natural selection.
Peer-Reviewed Articles Supporting Intelligent Design Center for Science and Culture

 

[Tuatara]

Apart from anything else, this thread is about evidence not proof. If you want proof you'll need a mathematics thread.

Not that that has any chance of penetrating the layers of invincible ignorance surrounding the crazies.

Your "evidence" is speculation. Your "proof" is non-existent. Next?

The evidence is fact. Those species exist. Another one who can't separate evidence from theory. They can't even explain why they can't understand explanations.

Oh well, batshit crazies, what would we do without them?

Ok, now explain how one turned into another.

Read the links or do you need your hand held through that? If you need more info google is your friend.

 

[eots]

Apart from anything else, this thread is about evidence not proof. If you want proof you'll need a mathematics thread.

Not that that has any chance of penetrating the layers of invincible ignorance surrounding the crazies.

Your "evidence" is speculation. Your "proof" is non-existent. Next?

The evidence is fact. Those species exist. Another one who can't separate evidence from theory. They can't even explain why they can't understand explanations.

Oh well, batshit crazies, what would we do without them?

Ok, now explain how one turned into another.

Read the links or do you need your hand held through that? If you need more info google is your friend.

you mean you can not..

 

[Tuatara]

Atheist philosopher of physics on why ID is a reasonable idea
Atheist philosopher of physics on why ID is a reasonable idea Uncommon Descent

Book is yet to be published and there are only online reviews so we cannot comment on this work but there was this..

"This is a brave and important book. Monton does not defend 'intelligent design' as true -- he thinks it is most likely false. Instead, he defends it as a hypothesis worth taking seriously. He argues convincingly that it can be formulated as a scientifically testable hypothesis, and that there is some important empirical evidence for it -- not as much evidence as its supporters claim there is, but some evidence.


Is this supposed to be one of the many atheists who believes in creationism? We are still waiting for that list.

 

[orogenicman]

Atheist philosopher of physics on why ID is a reasonable idea
Atheist philosopher of physics on why ID is a reasonable idea Uncommon Descent

Erm, Bradley Monton is (was) a philosophy professor at University of Colorado. He is not a scientist, and is no longer teaching there because he is being investigated for sexual harassment and misconduct.

Try again. This time try finding a SCIENTIST who is qualified/certified in a RELEVANT scientific discipline, (I.e., geologist, biologist, medical researcher, etc.).

 

[Tuatara]

Apart from anything else, this thread is about evidence not proof. If you want proof you'll need a mathematics thread.

Not that that has any chance of penetrating the layers of invincible ignorance surrounding the crazies.

Your "evidence" is speculation. Your "proof" is non-existent. Next?

The evidence is fact. Those species exist. Another one who can't separate evidence from theory. They can't even explain why they can't understand explanations.

Oh well, batshit crazies, what would we do without them?

Ok, now explain how one turned into another.

Read the links or do you need your hand held through that? If you need more info google is your friend.

you mean you can not..

Yes I can but it would not be a 3 word sentence which you and your ilk are looking for. You have all demonstrated that you refuse to read any of the body of work in the links provided and that you do not understand basic concepts of science. I am not a scientist so I felt for a better explanation on anything to do with evolution that it should be left up to a scientist to explain it. There have been several links to papers, articles and videos explaining the many complexities of evolution yet none of you take the time to actually read or watch them. This is demonstrated in your questions which have nothing to do with the content provided.

 

[Mr.Right]

Your "evidence" is speculation. Your "proof" is non-existent. Next?

The evidence is fact. Those species exist. Another one who can't separate evidence from theory. They can't even explain why they can't understand explanations.

Oh well, batshit crazies, what would we do without them?

Ok, now explain how one turned into another.

Read the links or do you need your hand held through that? If you need more info google is your friend.

you mean you can not..

Yes I can but it would not be a 3 word sentence which you and your ilk are looking for. You have all demonstrated that you refuse to read any of the body of work in the links provided and that you do not understand basic concepts of science. I am not a scientist so I felt for a better explanation on anything to do with evolution that it should be left up to a scientist to explain it. There have been several links to papers, articles and videos explaining the many complexities of evolution yet none of you take the time to actually read or watch them. This is demonstrated in your questions which have nothing to do with the content provided.

Most of us have already seen this evidence. We find it lacking. If you are gullible enough to believe it, that's your problem.

 

[Tuatara]

The evidence is fact. Those species exist. Another one who can't separate evidence from theory. They can't even explain why they can't understand explanations.

Oh well, batshit crazies, what would we do without them?

Ok, now explain how one turned into another.

Read the links or do you need your hand held through that? If you need more info google is your friend.

you mean you can not..

Yes I can but it would not be a 3 word sentence which you and your ilk are looking for. You have all demonstrated that you refuse to read any of the body of work in the links provided and that you do not understand basic concepts of science. I am not a scientist so I felt for a better explanation on anything to do with evolution that it should be left up to a scientist to explain it. There have been several links to papers, articles and videos explaining the many complexities of evolution yet none of you take the time to actually read or watch them. This is demonstrated in your questions which have nothing to do with the content provided.

Most of us have already seen this evidence. We find it lacking. If you are gullible enough to believe it, that's your problem.

Thanks for proving me right. Notice no mention of any content of actual evolutionary data.

 

[eots]

Atheist philosopher of physics on why ID is a reasonable idea
Atheist philosopher of physics on why ID is a reasonable idea Uncommon Descent

Erm, Bradley Monton is (was) a philosophy professor at University of Colorado. He is not a scientist, and is no longer teaching there because he is being investigated for sexual harassment and misconduct.

Try again. This time try finding a SCIENTIST who is qualified/certified in a RELEVANT scientific discipline, (I.e., geologist, biologist, medical researcher, etc.).

 

[eots]

Atheist philosopher of physics on why ID is a reasonable idea
Atheist philosopher of physics on why ID is a reasonable idea Uncommon Descent

Erm, Bradley Monton is (was) a philosophy professor at University of Colorado. He is not a scientist, and is no longer teaching there because he is being investigated for sexual harassment and misconduct.

Try again. This time try finding a SCIENTIST who is qualified/certified in a RELEVANT scientific discipline, (I.e., geologist, biologist, medical researcher, etc.).

He lays it out perfectly...