Where is this mountain of evidence for evolution?

[eots]

what is amazing to me is how smart bacteria are and their ability to adapt,organize,communicate...have to wonder where the source of such intelligence ,how it could of first developed

You're incorrectly and ignorantly assigning human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Bacteria communication and self-organization in the context of Network theory has been investigated by Eshel Ben-Jacobresearch group at Tel Aviv University which developed afractal model of bacterial colony and identified linguistic and social patterns in colony lifecycle [1] (also see Ben-Jacob's bacteria).
Microbial intelligence - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You're ignorantly trying to assign human attributes to bacteria. Consider looking to sources outside of wiki for science information.

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

 

[Hollie]

what is amazing to me is how smart bacteria are and their ability to adapt,organize,communicate...have to wonder where the source of such intelligence ,how it could of first developed

You're incorrectly and ignorantly assigning human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Bacteria communication and self-organization in the context of Network theory has been investigated by Eshel Ben-Jacobresearch group at Tel Aviv University which developed afractal model of bacterial colony and identified linguistic and social patterns in colony lifecycle [1] (also see Ben-Jacob's bacteria).
Microbial intelligence - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You're ignorantly trying to assign human attributes to bacteria. Consider looking to sources outside of wiki for science information.

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

 

[sealybobo]

I haven't seen it. What I mean by evidence is factual Information that supports the theory. I've never seen any. So. Here is a definition of a fact.

fact

\ˈfakt\noun
: something that truly exists or happens : something that has actual existence

: a true piece of information

Full Definition
1
:a thing done: as

a obsolete :feat

b :crime <accessory after the fact>

c archaic :action
2
archaic :performance, doing
3
:the quality of being actual :actuality <a question of fact hinges on evidence>
4
a :something that has actual existence <space exploration is now a fact>

b :an actual occurrence <prove the fact of damage>
5
:a piece of information presented as having objective reality
— in fact

Now. Can someone show me one piece of factual evidence? Just one will do.

There are more species that have gone extinct than exist today. Bird fish mammals insects reptiles etc. There are 1 million different beatles. How do you think all the diverse life started?

There weren't always dairy cows. And dinosaurs dont exist anymore. Neither do trilobite's. So god planted the trilobite seed 2 billion years ago and they died out then dinosaurs 1 billion and they died out all before we were here. We only came to be 1 million years ago. Where were we 2 billion years ago and what evidence do you have to believe? Certainly not facts logic or science.

 

[sealybobo]

Still waiting for that evidence. What's the matter? You chicken?

Where were humans 2 billion years ago when trilobite's ruled the world? If we werent here yet where were we and how did we get Herr? You may not like sciences theory but your hypothesis doesnt make any logical sense.

 

[Mr.Right]

Still waiting for that evidence. What's the matter? You chicken?

Where were humans 2 billion years ago when trilobite's ruled the world? If we werent here yet where were we and how did we get Herr? You may not like sciences theory but your hypothesis doesnt make any logical sense.

You're delusional. There are many problems with evolution. You might want to read up on problems with dating methods. Different dating methods give different results for the same samples. Also, the values they use for radiometric dating are based on assumptions. How can anything based on assumptions be at all accurate. The fact is there is not one single solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

 

[cnm]

You can't even control your own contradictions about inter-species fertility, or the lack of it.

Your ignorance has stopped being amusing and is now boring.

 

[sealybobo]

Still waiting for that evidence. What's the matter? You chicken?

Where were humans 2 billion years ago when trilobite's ruled the world? If we werent here yet where were we and how did we get Herr? You may not like sciences theory but your hypothesis doesnt make any logical sense.

You're delusional. There are many problems with evolution. You might want to read up on problems with dating methods. Different dating methods give different results for the same samples. Also, the values they use for radiometric dating are based on assumptions. How can anything based on assumptions be at all accurate. The fact is there is not one single solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Yet you take advantage of all the medical breakthroughs made by the evidence.

The guy who discovered carbon dating also discovered led was poisoning us. You should continue drinking from led cups and give your kids led toys and paint your home with led paint if you dont believe the sciences. But you'll believe science when you want or need to.

I wish we had an actual scientist who can explain exactly why you are wrong.

You say not one solid piece of scientific evidence when there's mountains of it.

Enough there is scientific consensus on it. I've explained some but you just blew it all off so not gonna keep repeating myself.

There is zero evidence for god scientific or otherwise.

 

[sealybobo]

what is amazing to me is how smart bacteria are and their ability to adapt,organize,communicate...have to wonder where the source of such intelligence ,how it could of first developed

You're incorrectly and ignorantly assigning human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Bacteria communication and self-organization in the context of Network theory has been investigated by Eshel Ben-Jacobresearch group at Tel Aviv University which developed afractal model of bacterial colony and identified linguistic and social patterns in colony lifecycle [1] (also see Ben-Jacob's bacteria).
Microbial intelligence - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You're ignorantly trying to assign human attributes to bacteria. Consider looking to sources outside of wiki for science information.

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

 

[Hollie]

Still waiting for that evidence. What's the matter? You chicken?

Where were humans 2 billion years ago when trilobite's ruled the world? If we werent here yet where were we and how did we get Herr? You may not like sciences theory but your hypothesis doesnt make any logical sense.

You're delusional. There are many problems with evolution. You might want to read up on problems with dating methods. Different dating methods give different results for the same samples. Also, the values they use for radiometric dating are based on assumptions. How can anything based on assumptions be at all accurate. The fact is there is not one single solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

What problems are there with evolution? Be specific and provide verifiable examples.

What are the problems you allude to with dating methods? Be specific and provide verifiable examples.

The fact is, aside from your nonsense claim that "there is not one single solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.", you have been given a wealth of data that there obviously is. You do a huge disservice to religion and to thinking humans in general with your pointless and irrational stupidity.

Really, dude. Just go drink the Kool-Aid and end the self-hate you choose to wallow in.

 

[guno]

The biblers suffer from
Christophrenia: Diseases of the Radical Christian Right

Christophrenia Diseases of the Radical Christian Right The Sirens Chronicles

 

[Hollie]

The biblers suffer from
Christophrenia: Diseases of the Radical Christian Right

Christophrenia Diseases of the Radical Christian Right The Sirens Chronicles

"Hospitalization has proven effective in that it protects society from the Christophrenic’s often visceral ideas of divine vengeance and Social Darwinism."

 

[Mr.Right]

Lik

You're incorrectly and ignorantly assigning human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Bacteria communication and self-organization in the context of Network theory has been investigated by Eshel Ben-Jacobresearch group at Tel Aviv University which developed afractal model of bacterial colony and identified linguistic and social patterns in colony lifecycle [1] (also see Ben-Jacob's bacteria).
Microbial intelligence - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You're ignorantly trying to assign human attributes to bacteria. Consider looking to sources outside of wiki for science information.

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The problem is, for creationists to accept evolution, they can no longer accept everything in the bible as truth. This is not a matter of science for them but a matter of absolute blind faith.

It's worth addressing what the fundamentalist has to lose by conceding evolution as the means for diversity of life on the planet and by conceding to non-literal bible tales. Evolution being true means there was no historical Adam and Eve. If there was no Adam and Eve, there is no original sin. If there is no original sin, there is no need to be saved. If there is no need for salvation, there is no need for their religion. That's why they will resist, to the bitter end, in spite of the bibles' tales being absurdities of nature, using any means necessary to protect their dogma.

Completely true.

The opposition to Evolution comes from religion, not science. Religion has a vested interest in discrediting Evolution because they can claim the only explanation to the origins of mankind.

Except that "god did it" is not an explanation.

True.

Particularly given the fact that there is no 'god' as perceived by theists.

 

[sealybobo]

The biblers suffer from
Christophrenia: Diseases of the Radical Christian Right

Christophrenia Diseases of the Radical Christian Right The Sirens Chronicles

I've asked how they think the millions of species extinct or not wound up on earth and what evidence they used to come up with that conclusion and I haven't heard back from them yet.

 

[sealybobo]

Lik

Bacteria communication and self-organization in the context of Network theory has been investigated by Eshel Ben-Jacobresearch group at Tel Aviv University which developed afractal model of bacterial colony and identified linguistic and social patterns in colony lifecycle [1] (also see Ben-Jacob's bacteria).
Microbial intelligence - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You're ignorantly trying to assign human attributes to bacteria. Consider looking to sources outside of wiki for science information.

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

They are creationalist scientists? Not science. They dont follow the scientific method. Sorry.

 

[cnm]

I wish we had an actual scientist who can explain exactly why you [Mr.Right] are wrong.

Orogenicman.

But he can't do anything about it, invincible ignorance is in fact invincible.

 

[Hollie]

Lik

Bacteria communication and self-organization in the context of Network theory has been investigated by Eshel Ben-Jacobresearch group at Tel Aviv University which developed afractal model of bacterial colony and identified linguistic and social patterns in colony lifecycle [1] (also see Ben-Jacob's bacteria).
Microbial intelligence - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You're ignorantly trying to assign human attributes to bacteria. Consider looking to sources outside of wiki for science information.

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

What "many"? Be specific and provide relevant examples.

"Respected scientists" shilling for fundamentalist ministries are frequently fringe loons.

I trust you can provide specific details of the papers and related support material your "many" respected scientists have submitted for peer review to science publications such as the journal Nature for example.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The fundamental mistake theists make is to attempt to view the fact of evolution in the context of an 'immutable' earth.

 

[cnm]

Lik

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

No there aren't, there are a few taking advantage of the gullible batshit crazies, they are either mocked unmercifully or ignored by the rest of the scientific community.

 

[Mr.Right]

Lik

You're ignorantly trying to assign human attributes to bacteria. Consider looking to sources outside of wiki for science information.

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence.
Ben Jacob E1, Becker I, Shapira Y, Levine H.
Author information

Abstract
Bacteria have developed intricate communication capabilities (e.g. quorum-sensing, chemotactic signaling and plasmid exchange) to cooperatively self-organize into highly structured colonies with elevated environmental adaptability. We propose that bacteria use their intracellular flexibility, involving signal transduction networks and genomic plasticity, to collectively maintain linguistic communication: self and shared interpretations of chemical cues, exchange of chemical messages (semantic) and dialogues (pragmatic). Meaning-based communication permits colonial identity, intentional behavior (e.g. pheromone-based courtship for mating), purposeful alteration of colony structure (e.g. formation of fruiting bodies), decision-making (e.g. to sporulate) and the recognition and identification of other colonies - features we might begin to associate with a bacterial social intelligence. Such a social intelligence, should it exist, would require going beyond communication to encompass unknown additional intracellular processes to generate inheritable colonial memory and commonly shared genomic context.
Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. - PubMed - NCBI


15276612

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

You ignorantly assign human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Mr right said there isnt one solid piece of scientific evidence for evolution.

Wait? The dude doesnt accept any scientific evidence. Its not that it doesnt exist. He just doesnt like any of it.

If only men 2000 years ago wrote about it then he'd believe because they were so smart back then. Lol

Like I daid. You're delusional. There are many respected scientists who think evolution is wrong. I guess they're scientific illiterates too?

They are creationalist scientists? Not science. They dont follow the scientific method. Sorry.

Many of them are atheists. They don't believe in Creation, yet the believe that Darwin got it wrong.