Where is this mountain of evidence for evolution?

[Hollie]

You're obligated, as far as that goes, to present your evidence. As has been done on this thread.

Go back and read the OP. The topic is evolution and your lack of evidence. Did you have a problem understanding it?

And it your burden to prove your claim that the evidence doesn't exist. Did all the museum collections, gene sequencers, laboratories, scientific publications, university classes, and libraries on the planet mysteriously disappear? To date, all we've gotten from you is meaningless one-liners.

Oh really? That's pretty good. You make a claim you can't prove, but I have to DISprove it? Perfect!

That's a good one. Gee, if I was the only scientist on the planet supporting the theory of evolution, you might conceivably have a point. But I'm not, and you don't. You are the one who claims that the most successful scientific theory of all time is bogus, but have given not one thread of evidence to support your claim. At the point, it is clear that you refuse to support it because you have nothing to support. So all you can do is sit there fondling your dick, all the while smiling because you think you've made some kind scientific breakthrough. And I think that is rather sick. But again, if you are comfortable in that position, that is on you.

After 78 pages of prevaricating, the only thing you self proclaimed intellectuals can come up with is comments like "prove me wrong", "you're not smart enough to understand", "I already gave you proof, go back and find it", "you're fondling your dick". So much for your intellect.

Ignorance of the facts on your part is no ones fault but your own.

 

[Hollie]

what is amazing to me is how smart bacteria are and their ability to adapt,organize,communicate...have to wonder where the source of such intelligence ,how it could of first developed

You're incorrectly and ignorantly assigning human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

 

[eots]

You're obligated, as far as that goes, to present your evidence. As has been done on this thread.

Go back and read the OP. The topic is evolution and your lack of evidence. Did you have a problem understanding it?

And it your burden to prove your claim that the evidence doesn't exist. Did all the museum collections, gene sequencers, laboratories, scientific publications, university classes, and libraries on the planet mysteriously disappear? To date, all we've gotten from you is meaningless one-liners.

Oh really? That's pretty good. You make a claim you can't prove, but I have to DISprove it? Perfect!

That's a good one. Gee, if I was the only scientist on the planet supporting the theory of evolution, you might conceivably have a point. But I'm not, and you don't. You are the one who claims that the most successful scientific theory of all time is bogus, but have given not one thread of evidence to support your claim. At the point, it is clear that you refuse to support it because you have nothing to support. So all you can do is sit there fondling your dick, all the while smiling because you think you've made some kind scientific breakthrough. And I think that is rather sick. But again, if you are comfortable in that position, that is on you.

After 78 pages of prevaricating, the only thing you self proclaimed intellectuals can come up with is comments like "prove me wrong", "you're not smart enough to understand", "I already gave you proof, go back and find it", "you're fondling your dick". So much for your intellect.

this is a Gem

 

[eots]

what is amazing to me is how smart bacteria are and their ability to adapt,organize,communicate...have to wonder where the source of such intelligence ,how it could of first developed

You're incorrectly and ignorantly assigning human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Bacteria communication and self-organization in the context of Network theory has been investigated by Eshel Ben-Jacobresearch group at Tel Aviv University which developed afractal model of bacterial colony and identified linguistic and social patterns in colony lifecycle [1] (also see Ben-Jacob's bacteria).
Microbial intelligence - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[Hollie]

what is amazing to me is how smart bacteria are and their ability to adapt,organize,communicate...have to wonder where the source of such intelligence ,how it could of first developed

You're incorrectly and ignorantly assigning human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Bacteria communication and self-organization in the context of Network theory has been investigated by Eshel Ben-Jacobresearch group at Tel Aviv University which developed afractal model of bacterial colony and identified linguistic and social patterns in colony lifecycle [1] (also see Ben-Jacob's bacteria).
Microbial intelligence - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You're ignorantly trying to assign human attributes to bacteria. Consider looking to sources outside of wiki for science information.

 

[Hollie]

Go back and read the OP. The topic is evolution and your lack of evidence. Did you have a problem understanding it?

And it your burden to prove your claim that the evidence doesn't exist. Did all the museum collections, gene sequencers, laboratories, scientific publications, university classes, and libraries on the planet mysteriously disappear? To date, all we've gotten from you is meaningless one-liners.

Oh really? That's pretty good. You make a claim you can't prove, but I have to DISprove it? Perfect!

That's a good one. Gee, if I was the only scientist on the planet supporting the theory of evolution, you might conceivably have a point. But I'm not, and you don't. You are the one who claims that the most successful scientific theory of all time is bogus, but have given not one thread of evidence to support your claim. At the point, it is clear that you refuse to support it because you have nothing to support. So all you can do is sit there fondling your dick, all the while smiling because you think you've made some kind scientific breakthrough. And I think that is rather sick. But again, if you are comfortable in that position, that is on you.

After 78 pages of prevaricating, the only thing you self proclaimed intellectuals can come up with is comments like "prove me wrong", "you're not smart enough to understand", "I already gave you proof, go back and find it", "you're fondling your dick". So much for your intellect.

this is a Gem

Yeah. A gem. Pearls before swine, child.

 

[S.J.]

Go back and read the OP. The topic is evolution and your lack of evidence. Did you have a problem understanding it?

And it your burden to prove your claim that the evidence doesn't exist. Did all the museum collections, gene sequencers, laboratories, scientific publications, university classes, and libraries on the planet mysteriously disappear? To date, all we've gotten from you is meaningless one-liners.

Oh really? That's pretty good. You make a claim you can't prove, but I have to DISprove it? Perfect!

That's a good one. Gee, if I was the only scientist on the planet supporting the theory of evolution, you might conceivably have a point. But I'm not, and you don't. You are the one who claims that the most successful scientific theory of all time is bogus, but have given not one thread of evidence to support your claim. At the point, it is clear that you refuse to support it because you have nothing to support. So all you can do is sit there fondling your dick, all the while smiling because you think you've made some kind scientific breakthrough. And I think that is rather sick. But again, if you are comfortable in that position, that is on you.

After 78 pages of prevaricating, the only thing you self proclaimed intellectuals can come up with is comments like "prove me wrong", "you're not smart enough to understand", "I already gave you proof, go back and find it", "you're fondling your dick". So much for your intellect.

Ignorance of the facts on your part is no ones fault but your own.

Thanks for confirming. Your posts are probably the best example.

 

[Hollie]

And it your burden to prove your claim that the evidence doesn't exist. Did all the museum collections, gene sequencers, laboratories, scientific publications, university classes, and libraries on the planet mysteriously disappear? To date, all we've gotten from you is meaningless one-liners.

Oh really? That's pretty good. You make a claim you can't prove, but I have to DISprove it? Perfect!

That's a good one. Gee, if I was the only scientist on the planet supporting the theory of evolution, you might conceivably have a point. But I'm not, and you don't. You are the one who claims that the most successful scientific theory of all time is bogus, but have given not one thread of evidence to support your claim. At the point, it is clear that you refuse to support it because you have nothing to support. So all you can do is sit there fondling your dick, all the while smiling because you think you've made some kind scientific breakthrough. And I think that is rather sick. But again, if you are comfortable in that position, that is on you.

After 78 pages of prevaricating, the only thing you self proclaimed intellectuals can come up with is comments like "prove me wrong", "you're not smart enough to understand", "I already gave you proof, go back and find it", "you're fondling your dick". So much for your intellect.

Ignorance of the facts on your part is no ones fault but your own.

Thanks for confirming. Your posts are probably the best example.

You poor dear. Your tender sensibilities are offended by those evilutionists who dare challenge the superstitions that cause you to live in trembling fear of angry gawds.

If nothing else, this thread has served to display the profound ignorance of the religious zealot who lives in fear and denial of contingent reality.

 

[S.J.]

Oh really? That's pretty good. You make a claim you can't prove, but I have to DISprove it? Perfect!

That's a good one. Gee, if I was the only scientist on the planet supporting the theory of evolution, you might conceivably have a point. But I'm not, and you don't. You are the one who claims that the most successful scientific theory of all time is bogus, but have given not one thread of evidence to support your claim. At the point, it is clear that you refuse to support it because you have nothing to support. So all you can do is sit there fondling your dick, all the while smiling because you think you've made some kind scientific breakthrough. And I think that is rather sick. But again, if you are comfortable in that position, that is on you.

After 78 pages of prevaricating, the only thing you self proclaimed intellectuals can come up with is comments like "prove me wrong", "you're not smart enough to understand", "I already gave you proof, go back and find it", "you're fondling your dick". So much for your intellect.

Ignorance of the facts on your part is no ones fault but your own.

Thanks for confirming. Your posts are probably the best example.

You poor dear. Your tender sensibilities are offended by those evilutionists who dare challenge the superstitions that cause you to live in trembling fear of angry gawds.

If nothing else, this thread has served to display the profound ignorance of the religious zealot who lives in fear and denial of contingent reality.

Thanks for confirming (again).

 

[Hollie]

That's a good one. Gee, if I was the only scientist on the planet supporting the theory of evolution, you might conceivably have a point. But I'm not, and you don't. You are the one who claims that the most successful scientific theory of all time is bogus, but have given not one thread of evidence to support your claim. At the point, it is clear that you refuse to support it because you have nothing to support. So all you can do is sit there fondling your dick, all the while smiling because you think you've made some kind scientific breakthrough. And I think that is rather sick. But again, if you are comfortable in that position, that is on you.

After 78 pages of prevaricating, the only thing you self proclaimed intellectuals can come up with is comments like "prove me wrong", "you're not smart enough to understand", "I already gave you proof, go back and find it", "you're fondling your dick". So much for your intellect.

Ignorance of the facts on your part is no ones fault but your own.

Thanks for confirming. Your posts are probably the best example.

You poor dear. Your tender sensibilities are offended by those evilutionists who dare challenge the superstitions that cause you to live in trembling fear of angry gawds.

If nothing else, this thread has served to display the profound ignorance of the religious zealot who lives in fear and denial of contingent reality.

Thanks for confirming (again).

I just find it remarkable that faced with facts supporting biological evolution, you're left stuttering and mumbling as you simply have no counter argument.

 

[Mr.Right]

I take science over faith! The Isis takes faith.

Evolution ceases to be science when it becomes faith, faith that one species magically morphed into another. When "science" can prove that claim, we can accept that "science". Until then, I respectfully decline to accept speculation from self-proclaimed intellectuals who are so full of themselves they insist on presenting their speculation as fact, which it is NOT.

I'm not seeing the other half of this conversation, because I have the idiot on ignore. But it sounds like you're tearing him a new one.

Wrong. Now putting you on ignore. Loser.

You put me on ignore? THANK YOU SO MUCH!

 

[orogenicman]

so the short answer is never..the bacteria remains a bacteria

Brilliant. But irrelevant.

Hardly. Eots is right on the mark here but your pride simply refuses to admit the possibility that you are wrong.

On the mark? The principles of evolution have allowed us to not only discover the agents of disease, but have allowed us to discover antibiotics, and how the resistance to them works so we can develop better treatments. You don't have to believe it. You can just thank all those tireless lab workers who are trying to make your life better. So no he is not only not on the mark, he is flat out wrong.

That's Devil-talk.

The lab workers didn't discover antibiotics. God did!

Did the lab workers create the human body? The human mind? The ability to think, to research, to find, to discover, to invent? Or did God do that, Toro?

And you have evidence for that claim? Look, claiming that god did anything is meaningless because it is impossible to prove.

 

[orogenicman]

what is amazing to me is how smart bacteria are and their ability to adapt,organize,communicate...have to wonder where the source of such intelligence ,how it could of first developed

Yeah, those protein coatings must have the IQ of an Einstein.

 

[orogenicman]

I am going to ask the moderators to move this thread to the religion forum, because it is clearly not about science: A creationist created the forum for the sole purpose of promoting denialism and attacking science, nothing more. They aren't interested in talking about the science, and not one of them have done so. If the moderators had been doing their jobs in the first place, it wouldn't be here.

I'm glad they are doing this here. We need to have this conversation out loud and in public. Leave it in the science forum! Expose them.

I make every christian tell me right away if they believe non christians go to hell. See what type of crazy I'm deading with.

It doesn't belong in the science forum.

 

[orogenicman]

Go back and read the OP. The topic is evolution and your lack of evidence. Did you have a problem understanding it?

And it your burden to prove your claim that the evidence doesn't exist. Did all the museum collections, gene sequencers, laboratories, scientific publications, university classes, and libraries on the planet mysteriously disappear? To date, all we've gotten from you is meaningless one-liners.

Oh really? That's pretty good. You make a claim you can't prove, but I have to DISprove it? Perfect!

That's a good one. Gee, if I was the only scientist on the planet supporting the theory of evolution, you might conceivably have a point. But I'm not, and you don't. You are the one who claims that the most successful scientific theory of all time is bogus, but have given not one thread of evidence to support your claim. At the point, it is clear that you refuse to support it because you have nothing to support. So all you can do is sit there fondling your dick, all the while smiling because you think you've made some kind scientific breakthrough. And I think that is rather sick. But again, if you are comfortable in that position, that is on you.

After 78 pages of prevaricating, the only thing you self proclaimed intellectuals can come up with is comments like "prove me wrong", "you're not smart enough to understand", "I already gave you proof, go back and find it", "you're fondling your dick". So much for your intellect.

this is a Gem

He was making a point, which obviously went over your pointy little head.

 

[orogenicman]

what is amazing to me is how smart bacteria are and their ability to adapt,organize,communicate...have to wonder where the source of such intelligence ,how it could of first developed

You're incorrectly and ignorantly assigning human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Bacteria communication and self-organization in the context of Network theory has been investigated by Eshel Ben-Jacobresearch group at Tel Aviv University which developed afractal model of bacterial colony and identified linguistic and social patterns in colony lifecycle [1] (also see Ben-Jacob's bacteria).
Microbial intelligence - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The fact that bacteria chemically communicate and self-organize has nothing to do with intelligence. Bacteria do not have Facebook.

 

[orogenicman]

He thinks by flooding us over and over with like-minded people repeating the same speculation that it will somehow give his unproven claims some validity. It doesn't, it's still speculation, no matter how many times he says it.

You think that repeatedly declaring as bogus the most successful, most widely accepted scientific theory in history makes you look intelligent. You think that it is acceptable for you to use logical fallacies such as a special pleading that your claims should not be subject to the same rigorous testing that the theory of evolution and all other scientific theories undergo. And no doubt you will deny that you do this, but you most certainly do. A number of us here have posted a lot of easily available information on the theory of evolution to support the science. You merely declare it "speculation" sans any explanation or evidence whatsoever that that is the case. And you do this because you think you are special, that your arguments somehow don't require support. That is not acceptable, not to me, nor to any reasonable person. Because all you are doing is trolling. I am not the only person on these forums to take you to task for this behavior. And I for one am sick and tired of it.

You say that you aren't denying it for religious reasons. I don't believe that for a moment, but for the sake of argument, let's say that you don't deny it on religious grounds. Alright then, on what grounds do you deny it (other than sophomoric hand waving); then provide us, in detail, with your explanation for the diversity of life on Earth that is not faith-based. Do that, and we can continue our discussion. Do it not, continue these insulting one line denials that are the hallmark of creationist denialism, and I will be filing that complaint for trolling that I promised you. It is up to you.

In other words, if I can't prove you wrong by proving some other theory (not faith-based) I'm obligated to accept YOUR theory?

Scientific theories stand or fall on their own merit. You deny the reality of evolution, SJ. So what is your explanation? What merits your denial?

BUMP

<crickets chirping>

 

[eots]

And it your burden to prove your claim that the evidence doesn't exist. Did all the museum collections, gene sequencers, laboratories, scientific publications, university classes, and libraries on the planet mysteriously disappear? To date, all we've gotten from you is meaningless one-liners.

Oh really? That's pretty good. You make a claim you can't prove, but I have to DISprove it? Perfect!

That's a good one. Gee, if I was the only scientist on the planet supporting the theory of evolution, you might conceivably have a point. But I'm not, and you don't. You are the one who claims that the most successful scientific theory of all time is bogus, but have given not one thread of evidence to support your claim. At the point, it is clear that you refuse to support it because you have nothing to support. So all you can do is sit there fondling your dick, all the while smiling because you think you've made some kind scientific breakthrough. And I think that is rather sick. But again, if you are comfortable in that position, that is on you.

After 78 pages of prevaricating, the only thing you self proclaimed intellectuals can come up with is comments like "prove me wrong", "you're not smart enough to understand", "I already gave you proof, go back and find it", "you're fondling your dick". So much for your intellect.

this is a Gem

Yeah. A gem. Pearls before swine, child.

lol...look who is the alien conspiracy theorist now..

 

[eots]

what is amazing to me is how smart bacteria are and their ability to adapt,organize,communicate...have to wonder where the source of such intelligence ,how it could of first developed

You're incorrectly and ignorantly assigning human attributes to bacteria as you do your gawds.

Bacteria communication and self-organization in the context of Network theory has been investigated by Eshel Ben-Jacobresearch group at Tel Aviv University which developed afractal model of bacterial colony and identified linguistic and social patterns in colony lifecycle [1] (also see Ben-Jacob's bacteria).
Microbial intelligence - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

The fact that bacteria chemically communicate and self-organize has nothing to do with intelligence. Bacteria do not have Facebook.

oh please do elaborate...

 

[eots]

what is amazing to me is how smart bacteria are and their ability to adapt,organize,communicate...have to wonder where the source of such intelligence ,how it could of first developed

Yeah, those protein coatings must have the IQ of an Einstein.