orogenicman
Darwin was a pastafarian
- Jul 24, 2013
- 8,546
- 834
- 175
Your argument is rapidly deteriorating into flinging shit. Can't you people debate like adults?Your only argument is that other arrogant and self-proclaimed intellectuals agree with your theory. The one thing you all have in common is that you keep failing to prove anything you claim.I don't have to prove you wrong, you have to prove yourself right, and on that you fail miserably.Yes we can demonstrate the claim exactly through genetics, fossils, anatomy, morphology, physiology, and cladistics. And your claim that it isn't true is via what evidence, exactly? Please be specific.
Actually, you do. Why? Because the theory of evolution is the accepted paradigm for the origin of the diversity of life on Earth. So let's discuss who has the burden of proof, shall we:
Seismic FAQ - Main Page
8. Burden of Proof
Who has to prove what to whom? The person making the extraordinary claim has the burden of proving to the experts and to the community at large that his or her belief has more validity than the one almost everyone else accepts. You have to lobby for your opinion to be heard. Then you have to marshal experts on your side so you can convince the majority to support your claim over the one they have always supported. Finally, when you are in the majority, the burden of proof switches to the outsider who wants to challenge you with his or her unusual claim. Evolutionists had the burden of proof for half a century after Darwin, but now the burden of proof is on creationists. It is up to creationists to show why the theory of evolution is wrong and why creationism is right, and it is not up to the evolutionists to defend evolution. The burden of proof is on the Holocaust deniers to prove the Holocaust did not happen, not on Holocaust historians to prove that it did. The rationale for this is that mountains of evidence prove that both evolution and the Holocaust are facts. In other words, it is not enough to have the evidence. You must convince others of the validity of your evidence. And when you are an outsider this is the price you pay, regardless of whether you are right or wrong.
Oh poor you. Did your mother drop you on your head as a child, or did that happen later in your life?
When an adult decides to post a reasonable argument here, I'll debate him/her. The rest only get what they deserve. Care to start acting like one? Or will you settle for what you deserve?