What would you do with the second amendment?

[Bob Blaylock]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

As long as the Second Amendment remains in effect, every single one of your so-called “sensible gun regulations” is blatantly unconstitutional and illegal. But then that sort of lawlessness and corruption is exactly what your side is all about.

 

[danielpalos]

Muster the militia until security improves!

 

[rightwinger]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

Sounds like you have a desire to infringe.

Background Checks, Registration, required training, licensing.......it is what our founders wanted

 

[rightwinger]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

As long as the Second Amendment remains in effect, every single one of your so-called “sensible gun regulations” is blatantly unconstitutional and illegal. But then that sort of lawlessness and corruption is exactly what your side is all about.

Afraid they are not

Even the courts dont agree with you. Nothing prevents government from regulating guns

 

[danielpalos]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

Sounds like you have a desire to infringe.

Background Checks, Registration, required training, licensing.......it is what our founders wanted

Our Second Amendment is clear as to what is Necessary.

 

[blackhawk]

Leave it as it is.

 

[rightwinger]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

Sounds like you have a desire to infringe.

Background Checks, Registration, required training, licensing.......it is what our founders wanted

Our Second Amendment is clear as to what is Necessary.

Yes it is clear what is necessary

A well regulated militia, being necessary to a free state

Well regulated militias need to register their members, train them, know what kind of weapons their members carry

 

[Rustic]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

Sounds like you have a desire to infringe.

Background Checks, Registration, required training, licensing.......it is what our founders wanted

Na, not under progressives terms...

 

[Doc1]

Come up my dive to take my weapons. We'll see what happens. I've already fought for you. Come see what happens when I fight for me.

 

[Rustic]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

Sounds like you have a desire to infringe.

Background Checks, Registration, required training, licensing.......it is what our founders wanted

Our Second Amendment is clear as to what is Necessary.

Yes it is clear what is necessary

A well regulated militia, being necessary to a free state

Well regulated militias need to register their members, train them, know what kind of weapons their members carry

Read it in the context of the era... you Might learn something for once.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

Once again we already do, both the democrats and republicans don't want to enforce them.

 

[my2¢]

I'd leave it up to states, same as the Republican position on abortion.

 

[Wacky Quacky]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

As long as the Second Amendment remains in effect, every single one of your so-called “sensible gun regulations” is blatantly unconstitutional and illegal. But then that sort of lawlessness and corruption is exactly what your side is all about.

Is preventing felons from owning guns unconstitutional?

Is preventing people from owning anti-aircraft ordinance unconstitutional?

Is preventing people from easily purchasing grenades unconstitutional?

Are background checks unconstitutional?

People love to throw out the whole "shall not be infringed" line, but in reality its already been infringed upon. The only question is was it reasonable. Republicans seem to have drawn a line in sand and declared that what we have now is an acceptable amount of infringement. But any more infringement, no matter how small or reasonable, is tantamount to confiscating guns.

 

[sparky]

Let's get to the end game. What should the Constitution say, if anything, about guns and what power should the Federal government have to regulate them?

legislate every able bodied 18 yr old to solicit a state militia & receive proper firearms training

those that opt to serve in said militia receive college incentives

~S~

 

[kaz]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

As long as the Second Amendment remains in effect, every single one of your so-called “sensible gun regulations” is blatantly unconstitutional and illegal. But then that sort of lawlessness and corruption is exactly what your side is all about.

Is preventing felons from owning guns unconstitutional?

Is preventing people from owning anti-aircraft ordinance unconstitutional?

Is preventing people from easily purchasing grenades unconstitutional?

Are background checks unconstitutional?

People love to throw out the whole "shall not be infringed" line, but in reality its already been infringed upon. The only question is was it reasonable. Republicans seem to have drawn a line in sand and declared that what we have now is an acceptable amount of infringement. But any more infringement, no matter how small or reasonable, is tantamount to confiscating guns.

Your first question is fundamentally different from the others in that the Constitution actually says with due process of law you can suspend someone's Constitutional rights. Leftists never grasp that, it's pathetic. Anyway, carry on ...

 

[kaz]

Let's get to the end game. What should the Constitution say, if anything, about guns and what power should the Federal government have to regulate them?

legislate every able bodied 18 yr old to solicit a state militia & receive proper firearms training

those that opt to serve in said militia receive college incentives

~S~

It sounds like you're trying to be funny somehow, but it just sounds like you're stupid

 

[rightwinger]

Leave it alone and institute sensible gun regulations

Sounds like you have a desire to infringe.

Background Checks, Registration, required training, licensing.......it is what our founders wanted

Our Second Amendment is clear as to what is Necessary.

Yes it is clear what is necessary

A well regulated militia, being necessary to a free state

Well regulated militias need to register their members, train them, know what kind of weapons their members carry

Read it in the context of the era... you Might learn something for once.

The context of well regulated hasn’t changed

Well regulated has never meant a bunch of gun nuts running around

 

[Rustic]

Sounds like you have a desire to infringe.

Background Checks, Registration, required training, licensing.......it is what our founders wanted

Our Second Amendment is clear as to what is Necessary.

Yes it is clear what is necessary

A well regulated militia, being necessary to a free state

Well regulated militias need to register their members, train them, know what kind of weapons their members carry

Read it in the context of the era... you Might learn something for once.

The context of well regulated hasn’t changed

Well regulated has never meant a bunch of gun nuts running around

There you go again, reading it out of context. The federal government has no right to know what individual firearm ownership is.

 

[westwall]

Sounds like you have a desire to infringe.

Background Checks, Registration, required training, licensing.......it is what our founders wanted

Our Second Amendment is clear as to what is Necessary.

Yes it is clear what is necessary

A well regulated militia, being necessary to a free state

Well regulated militias need to register their members, train them, know what kind of weapons their members carry

Read it in the context of the era... you Might learn something for once.

The context of well regulated hasn’t changed

Well regulated has never meant a bunch of gun nuts running around

Well regulated meant "In Good Working Order". You also see that exact same wording on clocks of the era.

 

[whitehall]

What would you do with the 1st Amendment? Poll most colleges in America and you could find support for repealing freedom of speech and freedom of religious expression for that matter. Be very careful about which part of the Constitution you want to do away with.