- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,659
- 52,016
- 3,600
First, there is no misinformation. There is just information. If you cannot process both sides of an argument and need to depend on people to do your thinking for you what fucking good are you?A nurse's training didn't protect her from vaccine misinformation?
I took some liberties with the subject line of the article, mainly by placing a question mark at the end of the first sentence as opposed to a period.
As a registered nurse, this woman had to attend nursing school and take classes where, I assume, textbooks are still used to teach nursing students about viruses, bacteria, and chemistry, not to mention anatomy and the functions of all our internal organs.
Despite that, this nurse refused to take the vaccine and supposedly succumbed to misinformation before succumbing to the Covid-19 virus and died as a result of the infection?
Tell me how a woman with professional nursing training and a state certification that she would need in order to work in the field of nursing falls prey to misinformation? With her training she should easily be able to tell the difference between objective medical facts and unsubstantiated claims posted on websites that lack medical credibility simply because anyone can post there.
It sounds to me like this woman never should have been certified as a registered nurse in the first place. Perhaps her certification was forged. If I was in the medical field in Idaho, I sure would look into that possibility.
A nurse's training didn't protect her from vaccine misinformation. Now, she's one of the victims of Covid-19 | CNN
Natalie Rise was a registered nurse in Idaho who loved her job as a home health care worker before she decided to stay at home with her special-needs twins, according to her brother, Daryl Rise.www.cnn.com