Zone1 What makes Christianity different from other religions?

[hobelim]

You believe Paul was tortured to promote Christianity or that Paul chose to subvert the message of Christ so that Paul could commit blasphemy?

No, It was to insure that the Jewish people would never accept Jesus as the messiah and to curse the Gentiles like you would can't see through his bullshit story about a trinity that became an innocent sacrificial Jewish man.

Seriously? You don't "see' anything wrong with the human sacrifice of your beloved Jesus, even if it all pretense?

 

[ding]

What dilemma? Masochism?

The thorn in his side? His struggle against homosexual tendencies which was the basis of his self loathing?

Like you?

I knew you had no clue. You arguing Paul was tortured into writing those letters or Paul knowingly committing blasphemy is proof you have no clue of Paul explaining his dilemma and choice. Because he was quite clear about his options and choice. He had nothing to gain and everything to lose which makes him a credible witness.

 

[ding]

No, It was to insure that the Jewish people would never accept Jesus as the messiah and to curse the Gentiles like you would can't see through his bullshit story about a trinity that became an innocent sacrificial Jewish man.

Seriously? You don't "see' anything wrong with human sacrifice, of your beloved Jesus, even if it all pretense?

Too funny. The first Christians were Jewish. You are all over the map flailing around.

 

[hobelim]

You arguing Paul was tortured into writing those letters or Paul knowingly committing blasphemy is proof you have no clue of Paul explaining his dilemma and choice. Because he was quite clear about his options and choice. He had nothing to gain and everything to lose which makes him a credible witness

Baloney.

If he promoted the same literal interpretation of Divine law that Jesus lived and died opposing he was just a liar.

 

[ding]

Baloney. If he promoted the same literal interpretation of divine law that Jesus lived and died opposing he was just a liar.

Paul had nothing to gain and everything to lose.

 

[hobelim]

The first Christians were Jewish

Right and argued with Paul about the necessity of converts complying with the Law. The WAY that Jesus taught.

And as I have shown you they believed Jesus was the Messiah, a Jewish man chosen by God "to convey all of his commands" (Deut 18:18) They proclaimed the belief that Jesus was The Holy One OF GOD. Not God. Jn 6:68

 

[hobelim]

Paul had nothing to gain and everything to lose.

You mean just like you who has made sinfulness, defying the law of God, by worshipping a trinity, and desecrating the words of Jesus, by claiming it can be made by human hands and eaten, a deliberate choice?

That just goes to show that some people are not too swift.

 

[ding]

Right and argued with Paul about the necessity of converts complying with the Law. The WAY that Jesus taught.

And as I have shown you they believed Jesus was the Messiah, a Jewish man chosen by God "to convey all of his commands" (Deut 18:18) They proclaimed the belief that Jesus was The Holy One OF GOD. Not God. Jn 6:68

Incorrect. Christians worshipped Jesus as God. The first Christians worshipped Jesus as God after Jesus rose from the dead.

There are no exact numbers for how many Jews converted to Christianity at its beginning, but early estimates suggest a range from a few hundred to a thousand, with some sources citing the thousands converted on the Day of Pentecost. While the early Jesus movement was largely Jewish, the overall percentage of Jewish converts remained small, with the movement quickly becoming predominantly Gentile.

 

[ding]

You mean just like you who has made sinfulness, defying the law of God, by worshipping a trinity, and desecrating the words of Jesus, by claiming it can be made by human hands and eaten, a deliberate choice?

That just goes to show that some people are not too swift.

If you were aware of Paul’s assessment, you’d know how dumb that statement is. But you aren’t aware of Paul’s assessment because you are a fake. C’mon fake religious scholar, what did Paul say about his options and choice?

 

[hobelim]

C’mon fake religious scholar, what did Paul say about his options and choice?

I say that it doesn't make a difference.

The fact is that Paul claimed that by fulfilling the Law Jesus made it obsolete. He claimed that Jesus was God in the flesh, and exhorted early Christians to submit to the governing authorities WHEN NERO WAS CAEASR.

This shows he did not know that Jesus taught another WAY to understand and follow the Law that fulfills the promise of life that had been lost to time ever since the death of Moses, he was a Jewish apostate by teaching that God took on human form, and a shill of the Romans by telling Christians to submit to governing "authorities".

Is it really any wonder why he was a deceitful self loathing guilt ridden masochistic homophobic misogynist?

 

[ding]

I say that it doesn't make a difference.

The fact is that Paul claimed that by fulfilling the Law Jesus made it obsolete. He claimed that Jesus was God in the flesh, and exhorted early Christians to submit to the governing authorities WHEN NERO WAS CAEASR.

This shows he did not know that Jesus taught another WAY to understand and follow the Law that fulfills the promise of life that had been lost to time ever since the death of Moses, he was a Jewish apostate by teaching that God took on human form, and a shill of the Romans by telling Christians to submit to governing "authorities".

So you still can’t find the passage. Paul had nothing to gain and everything to lose.

 

[ding]

I say that it doesn't make a difference.

The fact is that Paul claimed that by fulfilling the Law Jesus made it obsolete. He claimed that Jesus was God in the flesh, and exhorted early Christians to submit to the governing authorities WHEN NERO WAS CAEASR.

This shows he did not know that Jesus taught another WAY to understand and follow the Law that fulfills the promise of life that had been lost to time ever since the death of Moses, he was a Jewish apostate by teaching that God took on human form, and a shill of the Romans by telling Christians to submit to governing "authorities".

Is it really any wonder why he was a deceitful self loathing guilt ridden masochistic homophobic misogynist?

That’s some conspiracy theory you have there. What did Paul gain from that?

 

[hobelim]

So you still can’t find the passage. Paul had nothing to gain and everything to lose.

One a person loses their soul they really do have nothing to gain or lose by perpetuating evil. Right? Its not like you will ever confess that what you do at mass is idolatry, a sin under penalty of death because you are already dead.

 

[ding]

One a person loses their soul they really do have nothing to gain or to lose by perpetuating evil.

What did Paul have to gain?

 

[ding]

Its not like you will ever confess that what you do at mass is idolatry, a sin under penalty of death because you are already dead.

What did Paul have to gain by preaching Jesus is God?

 

[hobelim]

What did Paul have to gain?

Who can say? The same sadistic pleasure any narcissist gets when they **** up other peoples lives?

 

[ding]

and exhorted early Christians to submit to the governing authorities WHEN NERO WAS CAEASR.

What did Paul have to gain from that?

 

[hobelim]

What did Paul have to gain by preaching Jesus is God?

He made sure the Jewish people would dismiss Jesus out of hand as a drunken raving lunatic spewing hubris.

 

[ding]

Who can say? The same sadistic pleasure any narcissist gets when they **** up other peoples lives?

So he had nothing to gain?

 

[ding]

He made sure the Jewish people would dismiss Jesus out of hand as a drunken raving lunatic spewing hubris.

What did Paul gain from that?