Votto
Diamond Member
- Oct 31, 2012
- 69,317
- 78,194
- 3,605
Pat Gray calls Cory Booker an ‘antichrist’ after shocking ‘what we need is not from on high’ speech | Blaze Media
‘He’s an antichrist. ... Maybe not the Antichrist, but he’s an antichrist.’
www.theblaze.com
The article above I think is an example of the main difference between Republicans and Democrats. Now, when I say Republicans and Democrats, I am speaking specifically amongst voters and not those running, although there may be parallels there as well.
During the Michigan Democratic Women's Caucus Legacy Luncheon, Democrat Sen. Cory Booker (N.J.) quite literally shouted a speech, in which he implored Democrats to become "foot soldiers for democracy" and warned of "darkness and wind" facing the nation ahead of the midterms.
At one point in his 25-minute fire-and-brimstone jeremiad, Booker, gesturing upward, bellowed, “What we need is not from on high!”
Democrats are largely areligious, and therefore, seek government to fix all their problems. In reality, their politics becomes their religion at that point. This is why losing an election to them is like losing their very soul. It is because if they lose an election, they lose the "collective" soul of society, a term we have heard from other democrats like Obama as he referred to the nation's collective salvation, which of course, can only be found in the democrat party.
This is why when Trump was nearly assassinated, we saw 1/3 of democrats polled saying that they had wished he had been shot dead. It is akin to Christians approving of other Christians willingly being thrown to the lions in order to preserve their religious faith as well, as in times of old. Both are willing to approve of human sacrifice for the greatest ultimate good they believe in.
The same can be said for the assassination of Charley Kirk, where have the nation seemed to gloat on social media, posting horrible, horrible things about Charlie as they did a celebration lap. But they did not stop with Charlie, then they went after his widow with equal, if not more, ferocity, accusing her of being involved in the assassination of her husband along with the evil Joooos.
Interestingly, both the assassination of Trump and that of Kirk also had conspiracy theories running along with it, to help those who might be of faith still embrace the murderous Left-wing lunacy. You had people believing that the assassination of Trump was staged, as well as the notion that the Jooooos really murdered Charlie, just to broaden the murderous DNC tent for as many people as they can get in their tent as they can.
It then also stands to reason that there is absolutely no evil that the DNC would not engage in to promote their collective salvation, whatever they deem that to be, and then lie about supporting it with various conspiracy theories to try and cover their trail, because deep down they know they are wrong but don't really care.
Conversely, those of faith understand that government is not the source of their salvation. In fact, they are often the exact opposite. For the person of faith, government is a necessary evil that must be limited as much as possible. This is why the person of faith adopts the Founding Fathers model of a limited government, as where the Left never stops seeking to empower government at every turn. It has always puzzled me, for example, how the Left can promote the government having continued absolute power by favoring the government rounding up all the guns, even with Trump in power whom they deem the most perverse and evil man in recorded history. Think of it, it would be like the Jews of Nazi Germany protesting that Hitler needed to round up all the guns from their citizens in order to give them to Hitler.
Pure lunacy.
Last edited:
