the left isn't being truthful when they claim the US has no reason to bomb Iran's military sites .

[Vrenn]

Bill Nye the science guy isn't a good source.

You don't know what you're talking about.

Deni Ellis Béchard is Scientific American’s senior writer for technology. He is author of 10 books and has received a Commonwealth Writers’ Prize, a Midwest Book Award and a Nautilus Book Award for investigative journalism. He holds two master’s degrees in literature, as well as a master’s degree in biology from Harvard University. His most recent novel, We Are Dreams in the Eternal Machine, explores the ways that artificial intelligence could transform humanity. You can follow him on X, Instagram and Bluesky @denibechard
More by Deni Ellis Béchard

Thank you for embarrassing yourself. Like your Idol, you are too stupid to read

 

[Delldude]

Thank you for embarrassing yourself. Like your Idol, you are too stupid to read.

LOL..... your link doesn't open....


All that horseshit and no mention of his nuke creds.

 

[Vrenn]

LOL..... your link doesn't open....


All that horseshit and no mention of his nuke creds.

Funny, the link is gone now. I wonder why?


but seriously, it you do some research you you would see this.
Iran was nowhere close to a nuclear bomb, experts say

 

[Delldude]

Funny, the link is gone now. I wonder why?

Still showing in post #119.

If Iran is nowhere near a nuke why are they sitting by letting their country be leveled not giving up their nuclear ambitions?

And you're dead wrong on your statement.

 

[Vrenn]

Still showing in post #119.

If Iran is nowhere near a nuke why are they sitting by letting their country be leveled not giving up their nuclear ambitions?

And you're dead wrong on your statement.

Since you are totally ignoring the need for a complete set up Aluminum Pipes and that they are only Produced in just about 5 countries that means that they unable to produce anymore 238 to235 until they get replacements. I really don't see any of the 5 giving or selling then to Iran.

You magats have nothing to say but you say it anyway to surge the background noise.

 

[Delldude]

Since you are totally ignoring the need for a complete set up Aluminum Pipes and that they are only Produced in just about 5 countries that means that they unable to produce anymore 238 to235 until they get replacements. I really don't see any of the 5 giving or selling then to Iran.

You magats have nothing to say but you say it anyway to surge the background noise.

Since you are totally ignoring what you previously posted.....

 

[Vrenn]

Since you are totally ignoring what you previously posted.....

I previously reported the lack of Aluminum Tubing that on 5 countries can produce. Now, I don't know of any of the 5 that will never sell or give Iran. But you would rather keep gaslighting and face the facts. Nothing to see here since it's the normal way lf MAGAt discussion.

 

[Delldude]

I previously reported the lack of Aluminum Tubing that on 5 countries can produce. Now, I don't know of any of the 5 that will never sell or give Iran. But you would rather keep gaslighting and face the facts. Nothing to see here since it's the normal way lf MAGAt discussion.

Still has Jack Shit to do with your original claim.

 

[Vrenn]

Still has Jack Shit to do with your original claim.

Gaslighting is suppose to make you look smarter? End of conversation.

 

[Delldude]

 

[Delldude]

Actually, it's much quicker to go from 0 to 60 than it's going from 60 tp 90; I do hope that what you meant. Otherwise , I think you need read it from a Scientist point of veiw

There is no technical barrier facing the Iranians. It is the early stages of enrichment that consume the most energy and the process becomes easier down the line. Industry data shows that more than half of the effort needed to enrich uranium to 90% is spent getting from 0.7% to 4%. When enrichment reaches 20%, the threshold for what counts as “highly enriched uranium”, and a level Iran has produced at Natanz in the past, about 90% of the work towards weapons-grade uranium is done.

The process gets easier because less material has to be moved around at higher levels of enrichment. A plant that enriches uranium to 4% with 5,000 centrifuges may need only 1,500 to reach 20% enrichment. From there, several hundred centrifuges are sufficient to reach the 90% needed for a nuclear bomb. Use 5,000 throughout and the rate of enrichment accelerates dramatically.

Iran's uranium enrichment programme: the science explained

The more enriched the uranium, the less is needed for a nuclear weapon

www.theguardian.com

 

[Delldude]

It's worth noting that as soon as Trump announced in 2018 that he was withdrawing from the deal, Schumer switched his position and began claiming that Obama's deal had been a success.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Iran didn't attack anyone, as far as I know.

Then you are willfully ignorant. Iran was actively involved in combat, training and supplying the terrorists in Iraq who were killing Americans. Iran sponsors Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Somalia, The Palestine Authority in the West Bank, Black September and several other terrorist groups over the last fifty years. A god case could be made the Iran attacked the UK when the "diplomats" in the embassy in London opened fire on passersby and demonstrators on public grounds.

 

[Vrenn]

Then you are willfully ignorant. Iran was actively involved in combat, training and supplying the terrorists in Iraq who were killing Americans. Iran sponsors Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Somalia, The Palestine Authority in the West Bank, Black September and several other terrorist groups over the last fifty years. A god case could be made the Iran attacked the UK when the "diplomats" in the embassy in London opened fire on passersby and demonstrators on public grounds.

And you are about 70% correct. Had you left the PLO out and included Hamas I would have agreed with you. But you decided to use your party partican crap that keeps things burning.

 

[Zavulon]

Then you are willfully ignorant. Iran was actively involved in combat, training and supplying the terrorists in Iraq who were killing Americans. Iran sponsors Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Somalia, The Palestine Authority in the West Bank, Black September and several other terrorist groups over the last fifty years.

First of all, Houthis are in Yemen, non in Somalia, they just support local Ash-Shabaab militants. And yes, it's OK. The USA supporterted not only militants, but even states (like Iraq and Israel), who have been fighting wars of aggression against Iran.

Second, you still didn't demonstrate the aggressive war (not just "active foreign policy" by supporting certain groups) stared by Iran.

A god case could be made the Iran attacked the UK when the "diplomats" in the embassy in London opened fire on passersby and demonstrators on public grounds.

It's still not "war".
So, America started many more wars of aggression in recent years.

 

[Hafar1014]

hYour illusion is that people support terrorists more than Israel.

Te left does and it takes a special kind of stupidity to be OK with Iraians fanatics having nuclear weapons

 

[Vrenn]

Te left does and it takes a special kind of stupidity to be OK with Iraians fanatics having nuclear weapons

Let me guess how you came to this conclusion.

1. Now, what would be the dumbest most insane thing I could say.
2. You just lost another braincell when the answer pops into your head
3. Quickly, you type it

 

[Zavulon]

Te left does and it takes a special kind of stupidity to be OK with Iraians fanatics having nuclear weapons

C'mon. All reasonable people do know that American or Russian fanatics are nothing better. Actually, Iran never started an aggressive war.