What is the definition of "assault weapon?"

[M14 Shooter]

You fail to forget so is a automatic machine gun and yet they are heavily regulated, so remember that and know a semi-automatic like AR-15’s could face same regulations...

Not without infringing on the right to keep and bear arms.
"All bearable arms".

 

[M14 Shooter]

You fail to forget so is a automatic machine gun...

M16s are not in common use for the raditionally legal purposes of a firearm-- and thus, are not bearable arms.
That a non-bearable arm can be so regulated in no way means a bearable arm can.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Not without infringing on the right to keep and bear arms.
"All bearable arms".

And you haven’t even won that case seeing a Uzi is a bearable arm and it is regulated and was done so under a Republican!

 

[M14 Shooter]

And you haven’t even won that case seeing a Uzi is a bearable arm...

Fully-automatic"Uzis" are not in common use for the traditionally legal purposes of a firearm-- and thus, are not bearable arms.
That a non-bearable arm can be so regulated in no way means a bearable arm can.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

M16s are not in common use for the transitionally legal purposes of a firearm-- and thus, are not bearable arms.
That a non-bearable arm can be so regulated in no way means a bearable arm can.

If Congress and the Whote House can put the Ar-15 on the same list as the machine gun ( Uzi ) then it will be done…

What you consider bearable and not bearable can be debated but we already have firearms you can not obtain unless you meet certain requirements…

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Fully-automatic"Uzis" are not in common use for the traditionally legal purposes of a firearm-- and thus, are not bearable arms.
That a non-bearable arm can be so regulated in no way means a bearable arm can.

They were taken out of use because the danger they caused but you can still buy a machine gun with certain permits, see how this works?

You truly believe you will win this one?

 

[M14 Shooter]

If Congress and the Whote House can put the Ar-15 on the same list as the machine gun ( Uzi ) then it will be done…

Not without infringing on the right to keep and bear arms.

What you consider bearable and not bearable can be debated...

The USSC has already set the standard: In common use for the traditionally legal purposes of a firearm.

Thus, the difference between a bearable arms and a non-bearable arm.

That a non-bearable arm can be so regulated in no way means a bearable arm can.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You truly believe you will win this one?

Absolutely. "All bearable arms".

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Not without infringing on the right to keep and bear arms.

The USSC has already set the standard: In common use for the traditionally legal purposes of a firearm.

Thus, the difference between a bearable arms and a non-bearable arm.

That a non-bearable arm can be so regulated in no way means a bearable arm can.

Assault Gun Ban Made Permanent : U.S. Embargoes 43 Military-Style Weapons, Including AK-47s and Uzis

The vast majority of assault weapons barred from importation since spring will be banned permanently from the United States, the government announced Friday.

www.latimes.com

Absolutely. "All bearable arms".

Nope, you will lose and when you do blame George H.W. Bush and Reagan for this being allowed…

 

[M14 Shooter]

Nope, you will lose...

Your argument fails here:
That a non-bearable arm can be so regulated in no way means a bearable arm can.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

Your argument fails here:
That a non-bearable arm can be so regulated in no way means a bearable arm can.

U.S. Government has done it before and will again…

 

[bripat9643]

A weapon very few people would have been in possession of.

Only because few people had a use for such a weapon, just as now few people have a use for an anti-tank missile

 

[M14 Shooter]

U.S. Government has done it before and will again…

It has. To non-bearable arms.
That a non-bearable arm can be so regulated in no way means a bearable arm can.
Thus, your argument fails.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

It has. To non-bearable arms.
That a non-bearable arm can be so regulated in no way means a bearable arm can.
Thus, your argument fails.

Try again because you need to read that list and AR-15’s can be added if the House, Senate and the Oval Office decide to do it and no Republican will remove it after it is done…

 

[M14 Shooter]

Try again ...

There's no need.
You rest on a flawed argument.
That a non-bearable arm can be so regulated in no way means a bearable arm can.

 

[Devils_Advocate]

There's no need.
You rest on a flawed argument.
That a non-bearable arm can be so regulated in no way means a bearable arm can.

We will see and you can thank Reagan and Bush Sr. for this idea…

 

[M14 Shooter]

We will see....

We won't
Because the Democrats know your argument is flawed and won't embarass themselves by passing legislation they know will be struck.

 

[Briss]

Try again because you need to read that list and AR-15’s can be added if the House, Senate and the Oval Office decide to do it and no Republican will remove it after it is done…

As long as they justify their decision, fine. But cosmetics is not justification.

 

[M14 Shooter]

As long as they justify their decision, fine. But cosmetics is not justification.

Indeed.
They need to demonstrate the necessity for and efficacy of placing a certain group of semi-automatic rifles on the NFA list, while leaving the rest -- all of which have the same capability as the other group-- off the list --- and that said necessity matches that of the need to have M16s and M60s on that list.
This is impossible to do.

 

[Billy000]

Only because few people had a use for such a weapon, just as now few people have a use for an anti-tank missile

Well, regardless of the reason, the fact remains about the very limited use.