what did the russians do to control the ballot box.... ?

[Valerie]

All three intel agencies agree that Putin personally ordered the hack

Russia gave the information to WikiLeaks

Trump: 'I love WikiLeaks’


"russia if you're listening I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 us secretary of state correspondence emails that are missing, I think you will probably be rewarded...” < candidate trump



The key findings from the US intelligence report on the Russia hack, decoded

 

[PoliticalChic]

When you can't dispute the truth, you dispute the site.

You are a paragon of government school 'education.'

You don't know how to even post the truth, and you dispute sites as well.

So what school did you go to in Mother Russia?

"...you dispute the site."

Offhand, I can't recall doing so.


Can you?



And....btw....here is the same story from the NYTImes:
"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal"
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0



Shall I await your retraction of your post.....or are you simply a Liberal?

 

[Valerie]

Full transcript: FBI Director James Comey testifies on Russian interference in 2016 election


"The Russian active measures campaign may have begun as early as 2015, when Russian intelligence services launched a series of spear fishing attacks designed to penetrate the computers of a broad array of Washington based Democratic and Republican party organizations, think tanks and other entities. This continued at least through the winter of 2016.

While at first the hacking may have been intended solely for the collection of foreign intelligence. In mid-2016 the Russians weapon eyes the stolen data and used platforms established by the Intel services, such as D.C. leaks in existing third-party channels like WikiLeaks to dump the documents. The stolen documents were almost uniformly damaging to the candidate Putin despised, Hillary Clinton. And by forcing her campaign to constantly respond to the daily drip of disclosures, the releases greatly benefited Donald Trump's campaign.

None of these facts is seriously in question. And they're reflected in the consensus conclusion of our intelligence agencies.

We will never know whether the Russian intervention was determinative in such a close election. Indeed, it is unknowable in a campaign to which so many small changes could have dictated a different result. More importantly, and for the purposes of our investigation, it simply does not matter.



What does matter is this, the Russians successfully meddled in our democracy and our intelligence agencies have concluded they will do so again. Ours is not the first democracy to be attacked by the Russians in this way. Russian intelligence has been simile interfering in the internal and political affairs of our European and other allies for decades.


SCHIFF: What is striking here is the degree to which the Russians were willing to undertake such an audacious and risky action against the most powerful nation on Earth. That ought to be a warning to us that if we thought that the Russians would not dare to so blatantly interfere in our affairs, we were wrong.

And if we do not do our very best to understand how the Russians accomplished this unprecedented attack on our democracy and what we need to do to protect ourselves in the future, we will only have ourselves to blame.

We know a lot about the Russian operation, about the way they amplified the damage their hacking and dumping of stolen documents was causing through the use of slick propaganda like R.T., the Kremlin's media arm. But there is a lot we don't know.

Most important, we do not yet know whether the Russians have the help of U.S. citizens including people associated with the Trump campaign. Many of the Trump's campaign personnel, including the president himself, have ties to Russia and Russian interests. This is of course no crime. On the other hand, if the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it aided or abetted the Russians, it would not only be a serious crime, it would also represent one of the most shocking betrayals of democracy in history."

 

[PoliticalChic]

Full transcript: FBI Director James Comey testifies on Russian interference in 2016 election


"The Russian active measures campaign may have begun as early as 2015, when Russian intelligence services launched a series of spear fishing attacks designed to penetrate the computers of a broad array of Washington based Democratic and Republican party organizations, think tanks and other entities. This continued at least through the winter of 2016.

While at first the hacking may have been intended solely for the collection of foreign intelligence. In mid-2016 the Russians weapon eyes the stolen data and used platforms established by the Intel services, such as D.C. leaks in existing third-party channels like WikiLeaks to dump the documents. The stolen documents were almost uniformly damaging to the candidate Putin despised, Hillary Clinton. And by forcing her campaign to constantly respond to the daily drip of disclosures, the releases greatly benefited Donald Trump's campaign.

None of these facts is seriously in question. And they're reflected in the consensus conclusion of our intelligence agencies.

We will never know whether the Russian intervention was determinative in such a close election. Indeed, it is unknowable in a campaign to which so many small changes could have dictated a different result. More importantly, and for the purposes of our investigation, it simply does not matter.



What does matter is this, the Russians successfully meddled in our democracy and our intelligence agencies have concluded they will do so again. Ours is not the first democracy to be attacked by the Russians in this way. Russian intelligence has been simile interfering in the internal and political affairs of our European and other allies for decades.


SCHIFF: What is striking here is the degree to which the Russians were willing to undertake such an audacious and risky action against the most powerful nation on Earth. That ought to be a warning to us that if we thought that the Russians would not dare to so blatantly interfere in our affairs, we were wrong.

And if we do not do our very best to understand how the Russians accomplished this unprecedented attack on our democracy and what we need to do to protect ourselves in the future, we will only have ourselves to blame.

We know a lot about the Russian operation, about the way they amplified the damage their hacking and dumping of stolen documents was causing through the use of slick propaganda like R.T., the Kremlin's media arm. But there is a lot we don't know.

Most important, we do not yet know whether the Russians have the help of U.S. citizens including people associated with the Trump campaign. Many of the Trump's campaign personnel, including the president himself, have ties to Russia and Russian interests. This is of course no crime. On the other hand, if the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it aided or abetted the Russians, it would not only be a serious crime, it would also represent one of the most shocking betrayals of democracy in history."

Gads, Liberals are stupid.


Note the use of escapey terms such as "may have" and "We will never know" and "there is a lot we don't know" and "we do not yet know whether" and "it would not only be a serious crime."


And after posting nothing of a factual basis pertaining to this issue, you quote this:
"None of these facts is seriously in question."


I used to ask "are you Liberals this stupid ????"

You've provided the answer....in the affirmative.




Now......it is more than telling that you avoided answering this pertinent query:
How would any US official know what Putin wanted?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

If there weren't evidence of it , Trump wouldn't be under investigation for his possible ties to it now would he, dope?

Investigating doesn't mean guilt does it? They have reason to believe, no evidence yet, otherwise you wouldn't need to investigate.

Where did I say it meant guilt?
Can you read?

PC is asserting that there is no evidence that Russia was behind the hacking and subsequent release of information.

I'm asserting that if that were true, then how can Trump be under investigation for his connection to something that isn't real?

"PC is asserting that there is no evidence that Russia was behind the hacking and subsequent release of information."

That's a fact...just as you've been revealed as a lying low-life is a fact.


Here, more folks asserting that there is no such evidencde:

"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.

TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart






-------------------------------------------------------------------

"While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states."
FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is no evidence of the slander that the Russians and the Trump campaign collaborated.....
So saith Clapper, Comey, Rogers...and Michael Morrell.

Morrell....presumed head of the CIA in a Hillary presidency....

"Morrell wrote an op-ed for the New York Times back in August where he both announced his support for Hillary Clinton and argued that Trump was a puppet of Vladimir Putin, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.” However, he’s now changed his tune and believes that Mr. Trump is not only innocent of any collaboration with Russia but he further argued that the “Trump dossier” released a few months ago is likely a fraud. "
Intelligence Chiefs say NO Evidence of Trump-Russia Connection

Answer my question, idiot.

How can Trump be under investigation for connections to something that doesn't exist?

"You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?


Post any quote from me that says that.....or change your avi to 'LyingScum."

^Dumbass got herself backed into a corner.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Full transcript: FBI Director James Comey testifies on Russian interference in 2016 election


"The Russian active measures campaign may have begun as early as 2015, when Russian intelligence services launched a series of spear fishing attacks designed to penetrate the computers of a broad array of Washington based Democratic and Republican party organizations, think tanks and other entities. This continued at least through the winter of 2016.

While at first the hacking may have been intended solely for the collection of foreign intelligence. In mid-2016 the Russians weapon eyes the stolen data and used platforms established by the Intel services, such as D.C. leaks in existing third-party channels like WikiLeaks to dump the documents. The stolen documents were almost uniformly damaging to the candidate Putin despised, Hillary Clinton. And by forcing her campaign to constantly respond to the daily drip of disclosures, the releases greatly benefited Donald Trump's campaign.

None of these facts is seriously in question. And they're reflected in the consensus conclusion of our intelligence agencies.

We will never know whether the Russian intervention was determinative in such a close election. Indeed, it is unknowable in a campaign to which so many small changes could have dictated a different result. More importantly, and for the purposes of our investigation, it simply does not matter.



What does matter is this, the Russians successfully meddled in our democracy and our intelligence agencies have concluded they will do so again. Ours is not the first democracy to be attacked by the Russians in this way. Russian intelligence has been simile interfering in the internal and political affairs of our European and other allies for decades.


SCHIFF: What is striking here is the degree to which the Russians were willing to undertake such an audacious and risky action against the most powerful nation on Earth. That ought to be a warning to us that if we thought that the Russians would not dare to so blatantly interfere in our affairs, we were wrong.

And if we do not do our very best to understand how the Russians accomplished this unprecedented attack on our democracy and what we need to do to protect ourselves in the future, we will only have ourselves to blame.

We know a lot about the Russian operation, about the way they amplified the damage their hacking and dumping of stolen documents was causing through the use of slick propaganda like R.T., the Kremlin's media arm. But there is a lot we don't know.

Most important, we do not yet know whether the Russians have the help of U.S. citizens including people associated with the Trump campaign. Many of the Trump's campaign personnel, including the president himself, have ties to Russia and Russian interests. This is of course no crime. On the other hand, if the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it aided or abetted the Russians, it would not only be a serious crime, it would also represent one of the most shocking betrayals of democracy in history."

Gads, Liberals are stupid.


Note the use of escapey terms such as "may have" and "We will never know" and "there is a lot we don't know" and "we do not yet know whether" and "it would not only be a serious crime."


And after posting nothing of a factual basis pertaining to this issue, you quote this:
"None of these facts is seriously in question."


I used to ask "are you Liberals this stupid ????"

You've provided the answer....in the affirmative.




Now......it is more than telling that you avoided answering this pertinent query:
How would any US official know what Putin wanted?

"None of these facts is seriously in question."

That means the Russian hacking indeed happened, dope. There is no question.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Investigating doesn't mean guilt does it? They have reason to believe, no evidence yet, otherwise you wouldn't need to investigate.

Where did I say it meant guilt?
Can you read?

PC is asserting that there is no evidence that Russia was behind the hacking and subsequent release of information.

I'm asserting that if that were true, then how can Trump be under investigation for his connection to something that isn't real?

"PC is asserting that there is no evidence that Russia was behind the hacking and subsequent release of information."

That's a fact...just as you've been revealed as a lying low-life is a fact.


Here, more folks asserting that there is no such evidencde:

"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.

TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart






-------------------------------------------------------------------

"While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states."
FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is no evidence of the slander that the Russians and the Trump campaign collaborated.....
So saith Clapper, Comey, Rogers...and Michael Morrell.

Morrell....presumed head of the CIA in a Hillary presidency....

"Morrell wrote an op-ed for the New York Times back in August where he both announced his support for Hillary Clinton and argued that Trump was a puppet of Vladimir Putin, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.” However, he’s now changed his tune and believes that Mr. Trump is not only innocent of any collaboration with Russia but he further argued that the “Trump dossier” released a few months ago is likely a fraud. "
Intelligence Chiefs say NO Evidence of Trump-Russia Connection

Answer my question, idiot.

How can Trump be under investigation for connections to something that doesn't exist?

"You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?


Post any quote from me that says that.....or change your avi to 'LyingScum."

^Dumbass got herself backed into a corner.

Since you are the one backed into the corner, the appellation applies only to you...true?




Orrrrrrrr.......do you have any such post by me that says what you have stated?

"You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?


Post any quote from me that says that.....or change your avi to 'LyingScum."

 

[Hutch Starskey]

How come 10 years ago the internet wasn't so full of "Americans" who claimed to love Russia?

"Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton’s Foundation Bags $145 Million"
Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton's Foundation Bags $145 Million - Breitbart

Deflection.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Where did I say it meant guilt?
Can you read?

PC is asserting that there is no evidence that Russia was behind the hacking and subsequent release of information.

I'm asserting that if that were true, then how can Trump be under investigation for his connection to something that isn't real?

"PC is asserting that there is no evidence that Russia was behind the hacking and subsequent release of information."

That's a fact...just as you've been revealed as a lying low-life is a fact.


Here, more folks asserting that there is no such evidencde:

"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.

TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart






-------------------------------------------------------------------

"While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states."
FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is no evidence of the slander that the Russians and the Trump campaign collaborated.....
So saith Clapper, Comey, Rogers...and Michael Morrell.

Morrell....presumed head of the CIA in a Hillary presidency....

"Morrell wrote an op-ed for the New York Times back in August where he both announced his support for Hillary Clinton and argued that Trump was a puppet of Vladimir Putin, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.” However, he’s now changed his tune and believes that Mr. Trump is not only innocent of any collaboration with Russia but he further argued that the “Trump dossier” released a few months ago is likely a fraud. "
Intelligence Chiefs say NO Evidence of Trump-Russia Connection

Answer my question, idiot.

How can Trump be under investigation for connections to something that doesn't exist?

"You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?


Post any quote from me that says that.....or change your avi to 'LyingScum."

^Dumbass got herself backed into a corner.

Since you are the one backed into the corner, the appellation applies only to you...true?




Orrrrrrrr.......do you have any such post by me that says what you have stated?

"You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?


Post any quote from me that says that.....or change your avi to 'LyingScum."

I've broken down the meaning of that statement several times for you. You never addressed it.

 

[francoHFW]

By total FoxRushdupes. How's the Hillary special prosecutor coming, dupe? BERNIE says the DNC stuff was Bs ferchrissake.

The only dupes lost in Nov.
Until the DFL quits looking for scapegoats and Russian bogymen and come to the realization that the party strayed too far left and lost independents and tax paying blue collar workers get used to the agony of defeat.
Seems at this point the left is doubling down on stupid. Good luck with all that.

Do you believe that Clinton was hurt by the release of hacked emails?

I believe Hillary was "hurt" by people uncovering her illegal private server and telling the world about what she had done.
I believe her campaign was hurt when someone uncovered the collusion with CNN and corruption within her campaign.
I beleive that had she not been complicit and corrupt and a ******* liar she would have easily beaten Trump.
What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.
Does anyone find it extremely hypocritical of the LIBs to now tell everyone that "it doesn't matter how any possible 'dirt' on Trump is turned up. Leaking classified information and giving it to the WAPO/NYT so they can EXPOSE TRUMP!!!!! is just fine now but having the truth come out about Hillary is wrong!
******* hypocrites!
I can't WAIT for the DEMs to stand on the White House steps in a month and tell the world that in fact there is ZERO evidence that anyone on the Trump campaign had any 'nefarious' involvement with the Russians either before or after the election.
And that in fact there are a number of people working in the intelligence agencies who are going to face federal criminal charges for leaking classified information.

What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.

Someone?
You act as if that is still a mystery. You know who did it but won't admit it. I don't blame you thought as that admission would blow the entire narrative.

I ask that question to see the various tortured responses I get to a rather simple question.

The Russians were behind the hacking. That is established fact.

The release of that material hurt Clinton with voters. Even you admit that just not who released it.

By default then, if the leak hurt Clinton, it had to have helped Trump. The Russians helped Trump. The only question left then is, did the Trump campaign and it's members work in concert with the Russians?

I 100% totally agree that the hackers were either Russian or more likely Romanian who sold gave the hacked emails to Putin. I don't care who released "damaging information" about the *****.
The FACT there was "damaging information" is the point asshole!
Yes by default the "damaging information" exposing one candidate will help the candidate who did not have any "damaging information" to expose.
One and one make two!
The FBI REPEATEDLY warned the DNC that their email server was in danger of being hacked. The 'man-buns' in Hillary's campaign hired to keep the DNCs emails from being hacked REFUSED to allow the FBI experts come in and put up up-to-date firewalls.
Blame the ***** Rooy Mook and Hillary for their **** up. NOT the Russians or Trump.

...and our ridiculous punditocracy, which made mountains out of irrelevant molehills for almost a year.......

 

[francoHFW]

maybe Putin sent in about 300,000 Russian dwarfs to break into the polling stations after midnite? and somehow they were able to break into the voting machines?

It's fascinating how republicans won't accept that it's possible for a charasmatic billionaire to release damaging information about the democdratic candidate in order to sway the electorate and change their votes.

So now you're accusing President Trump of "releasing damaging information" about Hillary. WOW!
That's a new one!
BTW, whoever released the "damaging information" couldn't have "released damaging information" if there was no "damaging information" on Hillary.
That's like basic logic right?
Why wouldn't voters change their votes when they found out what a gucking piece of shit corrupt liar their candidate turned out to be.
Seems to me to be basic logic.
If I have decided to vote for someone then it turns out the candidate is a ******* corrupt liar why would I still vote for them.
The stupid ***** Robby Mook refused to even campaign in the Rust Belt.
Was he afraid of the Russian military surrounding Wisconsin?

The NYTimes released this 'damaging information' about Bill's wife some 20 years ago:

"Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady -- a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation -- is a congenital liar."
Essay;Blizzard of Lies


A number of dolts still haven't incorporated that information.

That's not the NYT, that's a RW schmuck writing IN the NYT. Dupes used to RW BILGE don't get that lie.

"That's not the NYT, ..."

That was the easiest I ever caught you lying, blanko.


Here's more of same from the NYTimes:

"...a congenital liar.

Drip by drip, like Whitewater torture, the case is being made that she is compelled to mislead, and to ensnare her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit.

1. Remember the story she told about studying The Wall Street Journal to explain her 10,000 percent profit in 1979 commodity trading? We now know that was a lie told to turn aside accusations that as the Governor's wife she profited corruptly, her account being run by a lawyer for state poultry interests through a disreputable broker.

She lied for good reason: To admit otherwise would be to confess taking, and paying taxes on, what some think amounted to a $100,000 bribe."
Essay;Blizzard of Lies



Admit you lied, blanko.

Or, change your avi to 'CongenitalLiar.'

Safire is not the NYT, dupe. Go back to your "fair and balanced" bs, dupe. Same old fake RW news...

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's fascinating how republicans won't accept that it's possible for a charasmatic billionaire to release damaging information about the democdratic candidate in order to sway the electorate and change their votes.

So now you're accusing President Trump of "releasing damaging information" about Hillary. WOW!
That's a new one!
BTW, whoever released the "damaging information" couldn't have "released damaging information" if there was no "damaging information" on Hillary.
That's like basic logic right?
Why wouldn't voters change their votes when they found out what a gucking piece of shit corrupt liar their candidate turned out to be.
Seems to me to be basic logic.
If I have decided to vote for someone then it turns out the candidate is a ******* corrupt liar why would I still vote for them.
The stupid ***** Robby Mook refused to even campaign in the Rust Belt.
Was he afraid of the Russian military surrounding Wisconsin?

The NYTimes released this 'damaging information' about Bill's wife some 20 years ago:

"Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady -- a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation -- is a congenital liar."
Essay;Blizzard of Lies


A number of dolts still haven't incorporated that information.

That's not the NYT, that's a RW schmuck writing IN the NYT. Dupes used to RW BILGE don't get that lie.

"That's not the NYT, ..."

That was the easiest I ever caught you lying, blanko.


Here's more of same from the NYTimes:

"...a congenital liar.

Drip by drip, like Whitewater torture, the case is being made that she is compelled to mislead, and to ensnare her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit.

1. Remember the story she told about studying The Wall Street Journal to explain her 10,000 percent profit in 1979 commodity trading? We now know that was a lie told to turn aside accusations that as the Governor's wife she profited corruptly, her account being run by a lawyer for state poultry interests through a disreputable broker.

She lied for good reason: To admit otherwise would be to confess taking, and paying taxes on, what some think amounted to a $100,000 bribe."
Essay;Blizzard of Lies



Admit you lied, blanko.

Or, change your avi to 'CongenitalLiar.'

Safire is not the NYT, dupe. Go back to your "fair and balanced" bs, dupe. Same old fake RW news...

Does the link lead to the NYTimes?

Admit you lied, blanko.

Or, change your avi to 'CongenitalLiar.'

 

[radical right]

"Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton’s Foundation Bags $145 Million"
Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton's Foundation Bags $145 Million - Breitbart

Deflection.

And it;s already been well established that Uranium One bought a 20% share, not HALF. Whenever somebody posts from 1) Breitbart and 2) the half of US output lie.

And this part they always leave out:

Clinton’s State Department was one of eight agencies to review the deal,

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton’s Foundation Bags $145 Million"
Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton's Foundation Bags $145 Million - Breitbart

Deflection.

And it;s already been well established that Uranium One bought a 20% share, not HALF. Whenever somebody posts from 1) Breitbart and 2) the half of US output lie.

Let's put a stake through your heart.....as, clearly there is no brain to target.


"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html



Now....wipe that egg off your face, and the drool off your chin.

No...wait......it was an improvement.

 

[radical right]

Maybe a conservative like Political Chic can explain, if Hillary was in Putin's pocket, selling "half our uranium" to the Russians. Why would Putin back Trump? Their mutual admiration for each other is the stuff of legends. Plus the NSA picked up the Russians celebrating the Trump victory.

 

[francoHFW]

"Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton’s Foundation Bags $145 Million"
Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton's Foundation Bags $145 Million - Breitbart

Deflection.

And it;s already been well established that Uranium One bought a 20% share, not HALF. Whenever somebody posts from 1) Breitbart and 2) the half of US output lie.

Let's put a stake through your heart.....as, clearly there is no brain to target.


"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html



Now....wipe that egg off your face, and the drool off your chin.

No...wait......it was an improvement.

ALL investigated, NADA, dupe.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Maybe a conservative like Political Chic can explain, if Hillary was in Putin's pocket, selling "half our uranium" to the Russians. Why would Putin back Trump? Their mutual admiration for each other is the stuff of legends. Plus the NSA picked up the Russians celebrating the Trump victory.

I fully understand why you'd like to change the subject....but....no.

The reason that the Uranium deal was brought up was to prove that Bill's wife was more than willing to turn over an essential resource to a potential enemy for her own personal aggrandizement.

I'll wait while you look up the words that you don't understand.




Now....first thing I proved was what a low-life crook Bill's wife is....and has no desire to support and protect the United States of America....

...and next, that Breitbart had the revelations correct....

...and third that I don't dispute sources other than proving them wrong...

...and next that you are a dunce.


Enough of a beating....?


As for that RR crossing sign of yours, it reminds all that in the case of your mental ability.....the gates are down, the lights are flashing, but the train isn't coming.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton’s Foundation Bags $145 Million"
Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton's Foundation Bags $145 Million - Breitbart

Deflection.

And it;s already been well established that Uranium One bought a 20% share, not HALF. Whenever somebody posts from 1) Breitbart and 2) the half of US output lie.

Let's put a stake through your heart.....as, clearly there is no brain to target.


"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html



Now....wipe that egg off your face, and the drool off your chin.

No...wait......it was an improvement.

ALL investigated, NADA, dupe.

And so, yet one more "is not, isssss nootttttt!" post from a brain-dead Liberal simpleton.

Bill's wife: a career criminal and, directly from the NYTimes....a "congenital liar."

And those statements from the Times about her being the bagwoman in the uranium deal......
...all true, as is the fact that you are a lying moron.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Maybe a conservative like Political Chic can explain, if Hillary was in Putin's pocket, selling "half our uranium" to the Russians. Why would Putin back Trump? Their mutual admiration for each other is the stuff of legends. Plus the NSA picked up the Russians celebrating the Trump victory.

"Why would Putin back Trump?"

Any evidence he did?

The very same amount of evidence that you have a measurable IQ.

Not a smidgen.





"Their mutual admiration for each other is the stuff of legends."
Oooo....look....a blind squirrel finds an acorn: Legend....exactly....like the Legend of BigFoot.

 

[francoHFW]

"Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton’s Foundation Bags $145 Million"
Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton's Foundation Bags $145 Million - Breitbart

Deflection.

And it;s already been well established that Uranium One bought a 20% share, not HALF. Whenever somebody posts from 1) Breitbart and 2) the half of US output lie.

Let's put a stake through your heart.....as, clearly there is no brain to target.


"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html



Now....wipe that egg off your face, and the drool off your chin.

No...wait......it was an improvement.

ALL investigated, NADA, dupe.

And so, yet one more "is not, isssss nootttttt!" post from a brain-dead Liberal simpleton.

Bill's wife: a career criminal and, directly from the NYTimes....a "congenital liar."

And those statements from the Times about her being the bagwoman in the uranium deal......
...all true, as is the fact that you are a lying moron.

I'll go with the US justice system over your bs hate propagandists, dupe/conspiracy nutjob. lol