what did the russians do to control the ballot box.... ?

[meaner gene]

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

Many republicans welcomed Putin's interferance.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There is nothing new in the current revelations about the career criminal and congenital liar.

I recommend this book:

\

Published 20 years ago.....

Some reviews:

"How anyone can take Hillary seriously as a presidential candidate after reading this defies logic."

"....the unscrupulous things, dishonest things, and just morally wrong things, she has done. She is able to lie and deceive without blinking an eye, and is given to aggression against anyone questioning her past. This is a bad news lady, but a well written book. But for the grace of their pals around Washington, both Clintons would be in jail, were they named anything else.....read it and decide for yourself."

"People should know that James Stewart was actually invited by Hillary Clinton to write this expose. When the truth became far less flattering than she would have scripted she attempted to control the author's work.
Mr. Stewart refused any intervention and went on to publish the book with out the blessing of the wicked witch of the east.
The attention to detail is flawless. The accuracy is frightening and the truth is impossible to ignore."



Yet, note the fools who still defend this witch.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The only dupes lost in Nov.
Until the DFL quits looking for scapegoats and Russian bogymen and come to the realization that the party strayed too far left and lost independents and tax paying blue collar workers get used to the agony of defeat.
Seems at this point the left is doubling down on stupid. Good luck with all that.

Do you believe that Clinton was hurt by the release of hacked emails?

I believe Hillary was "hurt" by people uncovering her illegal private server and telling the world about what she had done.
I believe her campaign was hurt when someone uncovered the collusion with CNN and corruption within her campaign.
I beleive that had she not been complicit and corrupt and a ******* liar she would have easily beaten Trump.
What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.
Does anyone find it extremely hypocritical of the LIBs to now tell everyone that "it doesn't matter how any possible 'dirt' on Trump is turned up. Leaking classified information and giving it to the WAPO/NYT so they can EXPOSE TRUMP!!!!! is just fine now but having the truth come out about Hillary is wrong!
******* hypocrites!
I can't WAIT for the DEMs to stand on the White House steps in a month and tell the world that in fact there is ZERO evidence that anyone on the Trump campaign had any 'nefarious' involvement with the Russians either before or after the election.
And that in fact there are a number of people working in the intelligence agencies who are going to face federal criminal charges for leaking classified information.

What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.

Someone?
You act as if that is still a mystery. You know who did it but won't admit it. I don't blame you thought as that admission would blow the entire narrative.

I ask that question to see the various tortured responses I get to a rather simple question.

The Russians were behind the hacking. That is established fact.

The release of that material hurt Clinton with voters. Even you admit that just not who released it.

By default then, if the leak hurt Clinton, it had to have helped Trump. The Russians helped Trump. The only question left then is, did the Trump campaign and it's members work in concert with the Russians?

I 100% totally agree that the hackers were either Russian or more likely Romanian who sold gave the hacked emails to Putin. I don't care who released "damaging information" about the *****.
The FACT there was "damaging information" is the point asshole!
Yes by default the "damaging information" exposing one candidate will help the candidate who did not have any "damaging information" to expose.
One and one make two!
The FBI REPEATEDLY warned the DNC that their email server was in danger of being hacked. The 'man-buns' in Hillary's campaign hired to keep the DNCs emails from being hacked REFUSED to allow the FBI experts come in and put up up-to-date firewalls.
Blame the ***** Rooy Mook and Hillary for their **** up. NOT the Russians or Trump.

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

"The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."


Sooo......did you eat the fortune cookie after you copied this???



There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

That makes you a liar and a fool.
True?

Facts here:

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?


BTW....this is from PBS

 

[PoliticalChic]

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

Many republicans welcomed Putin's interferance.

What interference would that be?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Do you believe that Clinton was hurt by the release of hacked emails?

I believe Hillary was "hurt" by people uncovering her illegal private server and telling the world about what she had done.
I believe her campaign was hurt when someone uncovered the collusion with CNN and corruption within her campaign.
I beleive that had she not been complicit and corrupt and a ******* liar she would have easily beaten Trump.
What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.
Does anyone find it extremely hypocritical of the LIBs to now tell everyone that "it doesn't matter how any possible 'dirt' on Trump is turned up. Leaking classified information and giving it to the WAPO/NYT so they can EXPOSE TRUMP!!!!! is just fine now but having the truth come out about Hillary is wrong!
******* hypocrites!
I can't WAIT for the DEMs to stand on the White House steps in a month and tell the world that in fact there is ZERO evidence that anyone on the Trump campaign had any 'nefarious' involvement with the Russians either before or after the election.
And that in fact there are a number of people working in the intelligence agencies who are going to face federal criminal charges for leaking classified information.

What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.

Someone?
You act as if that is still a mystery. You know who did it but won't admit it. I don't blame you thought as that admission would blow the entire narrative.

I ask that question to see the various tortured responses I get to a rather simple question.

The Russians were behind the hacking. That is established fact.

The release of that material hurt Clinton with voters. Even you admit that just not who released it.

By default then, if the leak hurt Clinton, it had to have helped Trump. The Russians helped Trump. The only question left then is, did the Trump campaign and it's members work in concert with the Russians?

I 100% totally agree that the hackers were either Russian or more likely Romanian who sold gave the hacked emails to Putin. I don't care who released "damaging information" about the *****.
The FACT there was "damaging information" is the point asshole!
Yes by default the "damaging information" exposing one candidate will help the candidate who did not have any "damaging information" to expose.
One and one make two!
The FBI REPEATEDLY warned the DNC that their email server was in danger of being hacked. The 'man-buns' in Hillary's campaign hired to keep the DNCs emails from being hacked REFUSED to allow the FBI experts come in and put up up-to-date firewalls.
Blame the ***** Rooy Mook and Hillary for their **** up. NOT the Russians or Trump.

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

"The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."


Sooo......did you eat the fortune cookie after you copied this???



There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

That makes you a liar and a fool.
True?

Facts here:

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?


BTW....this is from PBS

Do you believe that Clinton was hurt by the release of hacked emails?

I believe Hillary was "hurt" by people uncovering her illegal private server and telling the world about what she had done.
I believe her campaign was hurt when someone uncovered the collusion with CNN and corruption within her campaign.
I beleive that had she not been complicit and corrupt and a ******* liar she would have easily beaten Trump.
What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.
Does anyone find it extremely hypocritical of the LIBs to now tell everyone that "it doesn't matter how any possible 'dirt' on Trump is turned up. Leaking classified information and giving it to the WAPO/NYT so they can EXPOSE TRUMP!!!!! is just fine now but having the truth come out about Hillary is wrong!
******* hypocrites!
I can't WAIT for the DEMs to stand on the White House steps in a month and tell the world that in fact there is ZERO evidence that anyone on the Trump campaign had any 'nefarious' involvement with the Russians either before or after the election.
And that in fact there are a number of people working in the intelligence agencies who are going to face federal criminal charges for leaking classified information.

What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.

Someone?
You act as if that is still a mystery. You know who did it but won't admit it. I don't blame you thought as that admission would blow the entire narrative.

I ask that question to see the various tortured responses I get to a rather simple question.

The Russians were behind the hacking. That is established fact.

The release of that material hurt Clinton with voters. Even you admit that just not who released it.

By default then, if the leak hurt Clinton, it had to have helped Trump. The Russians helped Trump. The only question left then is, did the Trump campaign and it's members work in concert with the Russians?

I 100% totally agree that the hackers were either Russian or more likely Romanian who sold gave the hacked emails to Putin. I don't care who released "damaging information" about the *****.
The FACT there was "damaging information" is the point asshole!
Yes by default the "damaging information" exposing one candidate will help the candidate who did not have any "damaging information" to expose.
One and one make two!
The FBI REPEATEDLY warned the DNC that their email server was in danger of being hacked. The 'man-buns' in Hillary's campaign hired to keep the DNCs emails from being hacked REFUSED to allow the FBI experts come in and put up up-to-date firewalls.
Blame the ***** Rooy Mook and Hillary for their **** up. NOT the Russians or Trump.

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

"The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."


Sooo......did you eat the fortune cookie after you copied this???



There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

That makes you a liar and a fool.
True?

Facts here:

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?


BTW....this is from PBS

There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

Again, like I said, you have to deny that or your narrative crumbles.

It is accepted as fact. It is the entire basis for the current investigation into the Trump campaign and it's members.

You can deny it all you like but it won't stop the investigation.

 

[Papageorgio]

maybe Putin sent in about 300,000 Russian dwarfs to break into the polling stations after midnite? and somehow they were able to break into the voting machines?

It's fascinating how republicans won't accept that it's possible for a charasmatic billionaire to release damaging information about the democdratic candidate in order to sway the electorate and change their votes.

It could be possible, but you need proof. Just like I needed proof for many other issues. Let them investigate, let them do what they need.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

maybe Putin sent in about 300,000 Russian dwarfs to break into the polling stations after midnite? and somehow they were able to break into the voting machines?

It's fascinating how republicans won't accept that it's possible for a charasmatic billionaire to release damaging information about the democdratic candidate in order to sway the electorate and change their votes.

It could be possible, but you need proof. Just like I needed proof for many other issues. Let them investigate, let them do what they need.

It could be possible that the Intel community and the FBI are lying. Not likely though.

 

[Papageorgio]

maybe Putin sent in about 300,000 Russian dwarfs to break into the polling stations after midnite? and somehow they were able to break into the voting machines?

It's fascinating how republicans won't accept that it's possible for a charasmatic billionaire to release damaging information about the democdratic candidate in order to sway the electorate and change their votes.

It could be possible, but you need proof. Just like I needed proof for many other issues. Let them investigate, let them do what they need.

It could be possible that the Intel community and the FBI are lying. Not likely though.

We need proof not hearsay. Give me proof, not hearsay. You also have no link to Trump. Facts, not goofy theories.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

Many republicans welcomed Putin's interferance.

\Make sure and keep your tinfoil hat polished.

 

[dannyboys]

Not a thing.
....the proof that this 'fake news' tale of Russia changing the course of our election....

a. The day before any leaks, wikileaks or otherwise, the RealClearPolitics had Hillary at 48%

b. The election result gave Hillary 48.08% per the election.

Soooo......where is any....ANY....result due to Russia, Putin, Wiki, or Mickey Mouse????

Without GOP BS propaganda for 25 years, she would have won by 30 pts...That's all you morons have...

Yeah, how DARE the GOP tell people the truth about Hillary, instead of just letting them believe her lies?

Truth my ass. How's her special prosecutor and lock her up coming along, idiot dupe?

Ah, yes. The liberal battle cry of "If I'm not in jail, I didn't do anything wrong!" And you wonder why leftists are viewed as immoral scum bags.

Let me clarify the concept of "truth" for you, jackwagon, since I know it's not something you deal with very much:

Were the e-mails real? Yes.

Did the Democrats in question ACTUALLY write the words that we were told were in them? Yes.

Were the e-mails, in any way, tampered with or changed to make them sound worse, or has such a thing even been alleged? No.

So yes, the release of the e-mails and attribution to Hillary's campaign staff and allies was, in fact, telling the truth.

Take notes. You may have to deal with the truth at some point in the future, and it will save time if you kinda understand it now.

Yup, and those e-mails were ALL irrelevant staffers BSing about things they had no power to do and there is no evidence that anything actually happened in the real world. Ask Bernie, not his supporters who were fooled by endless hours of pundits going on and on about nothing, dupe.

Thanks for confirming that Hillary hired "irrelevant staffers" asshole.
Maybe if she hadn't hired that ***** Robby Mook who refused to campaign in the Rust Belt and hadn't hired 'man-bun' computer dummies who thought they were smarter than the FBI computer experts she might have done better.

 

[dannyboys]

And that in fact there are a number of people working in the intelligence agencies who are going to face federal criminal charges for leaking classified information.

Didn't Trump leak that we had secret bases in Saudi Arabia, and that the CIA had been hacked by foreigners? Leaking is leaking? Right?

Anyone can Google the "secret bases" in KSA dummy!The CIA/NSA/FBI and all the other "intelligence" agencies have been "hacked" for decades!
It's not CNN BREAKING NEWS!!!!! dummy.

 

[dannyboys]

The only dupes lost in Nov.
Until the DFL quits looking for scapegoats and Russian bogymen and come to the realization that the party strayed too far left and lost independents and tax paying blue collar workers get used to the agony of defeat.
Seems at this point the left is doubling down on stupid. Good luck with all that.

Do you believe that Clinton was hurt by the release of hacked emails?

I believe Hillary was "hurt" by people uncovering her illegal private server and telling the world about what she had done.
I believe her campaign was hurt when someone uncovered the collusion with CNN and corruption within her campaign.
I beleive that had she not been complicit and corrupt and a ******* liar she would have easily beaten Trump.
What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.
Does anyone find it extremely hypocritical of the LIBs to now tell everyone that "it doesn't matter how any possible 'dirt' on Trump is turned up. Leaking classified information and giving it to the WAPO/NYT so they can EXPOSE TRUMP!!!!! is just fine now but having the truth come out about Hillary is wrong!
******* hypocrites!
I can't WAIT for the DEMs to stand on the White House steps in a month and tell the world that in fact there is ZERO evidence that anyone on the Trump campaign had any 'nefarious' involvement with the Russians either before or after the election.
And that in fact there are a number of people working in the intelligence agencies who are going to face federal criminal charges for leaking classified information.

What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.

Someone?
You act as if that is still a mystery. You know who did it but won't admit it. I don't blame you thought as that admission would blow the entire narrative.

I ask that question to see the various tortured responses I get to a rather simple question.

The Russians were behind the hacking. That is established fact.

The release of that material hurt Clinton with voters. Even you admit that just not who released it.

By default then, if the leak hurt Clinton, it had to have helped Trump. The Russians helped Trump. The only question left then is, did the Trump campaign and it's members work in concert with the Russians?

I 100% totally agree that the hackers were either Russian or more likely Romanian who sold gave the hacked emails to Putin. I don't care who released "damaging information" about the *****.
The FACT there was "damaging information" is the point asshole!
Yes by default the "damaging information" exposing one candidate will help the candidate who did not have any "damaging information" to expose.
One and one make two!
The FBI REPEATEDLY warned the DNC that their email server was in danger of being hacked. The 'man-buns' in Hillary's campaign hired to keep the DNCs emails from being hacked REFUSED to allow the FBI experts come in and put up up-to-date firewalls.
Blame the ***** Rooy Mook and Hillary for their **** up. NOT the Russians or Trump.

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

If any REP behaves the way Hillary did I welcome their defeat and public disgrace.
The next time it happens be sure to let us all know OK?

 

[dannyboys]

I believe Hillary was "hurt" by people uncovering her illegal private server and telling the world about what she had done.
I believe her campaign was hurt when someone uncovered the collusion with CNN and corruption within her campaign.
I beleive that had she not been complicit and corrupt and a ******* liar she would have easily beaten Trump.
What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.
Does anyone find it extremely hypocritical of the LIBs to now tell everyone that "it doesn't matter how any possible 'dirt' on Trump is turned up. Leaking classified information and giving it to the WAPO/NYT so they can EXPOSE TRUMP!!!!! is just fine now but having the truth come out about Hillary is wrong!
******* hypocrites!
I can't WAIT for the DEMs to stand on the White House steps in a month and tell the world that in fact there is ZERO evidence that anyone on the Trump campaign had any 'nefarious' involvement with the Russians either before or after the election.
And that in fact there are a number of people working in the intelligence agencies who are going to face federal criminal charges for leaking classified information.

What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.

Someone?
You act as if that is still a mystery. You know who did it but won't admit it. I don't blame you thought as that admission would blow the entire narrative.

I ask that question to see the various tortured responses I get to a rather simple question.

The Russians were behind the hacking. That is established fact.

The release of that material hurt Clinton with voters. Even you admit that just not who released it.

By default then, if the leak hurt Clinton, it had to have helped Trump. The Russians helped Trump. The only question left then is, did the Trump campaign and it's members work in concert with the Russians?

I 100% totally agree that the hackers were either Russian or more likely Romanian who sold gave the hacked emails to Putin. I don't care who released "damaging information" about the *****.
The FACT there was "damaging information" is the point asshole!
Yes by default the "damaging information" exposing one candidate will help the candidate who did not have any "damaging information" to expose.
One and one make two!
The FBI REPEATEDLY warned the DNC that their email server was in danger of being hacked. The 'man-buns' in Hillary's campaign hired to keep the DNCs emails from being hacked REFUSED to allow the FBI experts come in and put up up-to-date firewalls.
Blame the ***** Rooy Mook and Hillary for their **** up. NOT the Russians or Trump.

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

"The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."


Sooo......did you eat the fortune cookie after you copied this???



There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

That makes you a liar and a fool.
True?

Facts here:

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?


BTW....this is from PBS

I believe Hillary was "hurt" by people uncovering her illegal private server and telling the world about what she had done.
I believe her campaign was hurt when someone uncovered the collusion with CNN and corruption within her campaign.
I beleive that had she not been complicit and corrupt and a ******* liar she would have easily beaten Trump.
What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.
Does anyone find it extremely hypocritical of the LIBs to now tell everyone that "it doesn't matter how any possible 'dirt' on Trump is turned up. Leaking classified information and giving it to the WAPO/NYT so they can EXPOSE TRUMP!!!!! is just fine now but having the truth come out about Hillary is wrong!
******* hypocrites!
I can't WAIT for the DEMs to stand on the White House steps in a month and tell the world that in fact there is ZERO evidence that anyone on the Trump campaign had any 'nefarious' involvement with the Russians either before or after the election.
And that in fact there are a number of people working in the intelligence agencies who are going to face federal criminal charges for leaking classified information.

What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.

Someone?
You act as if that is still a mystery. You know who did it but won't admit it. I don't blame you thought as that admission would blow the entire narrative.

I ask that question to see the various tortured responses I get to a rather simple question.

The Russians were behind the hacking. That is established fact.

The release of that material hurt Clinton with voters. Even you admit that just not who released it.

By default then, if the leak hurt Clinton, it had to have helped Trump. The Russians helped Trump. The only question left then is, did the Trump campaign and it's members work in concert with the Russians?

I 100% totally agree that the hackers were either Russian or more likely Romanian who sold gave the hacked emails to Putin. I don't care who released "damaging information" about the *****.
The FACT there was "damaging information" is the point asshole!
Yes by default the "damaging information" exposing one candidate will help the candidate who did not have any "damaging information" to expose.
One and one make two!
The FBI REPEATEDLY warned the DNC that their email server was in danger of being hacked. The 'man-buns' in Hillary's campaign hired to keep the DNCs emails from being hacked REFUSED to allow the FBI experts come in and put up up-to-date firewalls.
Blame the ***** Rooy Mook and Hillary for their **** up. NOT the Russians or Trump.

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

"The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."


Sooo......did you eat the fortune cookie after you copied this???



There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

That makes you a liar and a fool.
True?

Facts here:

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?


BTW....this is from PBS

There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

Again, like I said, you have to deny that or your narrative crumbles.

It is accepted as fact. It is the entire basis for the current investigation into the Trump campaign and it's members.

You can deny it all you like but it won't stop the investigation.

There's not one ******* REP in the country who has any wish to stop the investigation/s into Trump and his campaign staff.
In FACT they WELCOME the results of the investigation/s.
Everyone should carefully notice the closer this whole LIB wet dream bullshit fantasy comes to being completed the louder the LIB are screaming that these investigations must be cancelled! An independent special prosecutor MUST take over.
Then when the SP is close to completing their investigation we would see the LIBs screaming that the SP is CORRUPT!!!! and in the tank for President Trump.
These assholes will NEVER stop no matter how much they are proven to be ******* morons!

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Do you believe that Clinton was hurt by the release of hacked emails?

I believe Hillary was "hurt" by people uncovering her illegal private server and telling the world about what she had done.
I believe her campaign was hurt when someone uncovered the collusion with CNN and corruption within her campaign.
I beleive that had she not been complicit and corrupt and a ******* liar she would have easily beaten Trump.
What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.
Does anyone find it extremely hypocritical of the LIBs to now tell everyone that "it doesn't matter how any possible 'dirt' on Trump is turned up. Leaking classified information and giving it to the WAPO/NYT so they can EXPOSE TRUMP!!!!! is just fine now but having the truth come out about Hillary is wrong!
******* hypocrites!
I can't WAIT for the DEMs to stand on the White House steps in a month and tell the world that in fact there is ZERO evidence that anyone on the Trump campaign had any 'nefarious' involvement with the Russians either before or after the election.
And that in fact there are a number of people working in the intelligence agencies who are going to face federal criminal charges for leaking classified information.

What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.

Someone?
You act as if that is still a mystery. You know who did it but won't admit it. I don't blame you thought as that admission would blow the entire narrative.

I ask that question to see the various tortured responses I get to a rather simple question.

The Russians were behind the hacking. That is established fact.

The release of that material hurt Clinton with voters. Even you admit that just not who released it.

By default then, if the leak hurt Clinton, it had to have helped Trump. The Russians helped Trump. The only question left then is, did the Trump campaign and it's members work in concert with the Russians?

I 100% totally agree that the hackers were either Russian or more likely Romanian who sold gave the hacked emails to Putin. I don't care who released "damaging information" about the *****.
The FACT there was "damaging information" is the point asshole!
Yes by default the "damaging information" exposing one candidate will help the candidate who did not have any "damaging information" to expose.
One and one make two!
The FBI REPEATEDLY warned the DNC that their email server was in danger of being hacked. The 'man-buns' in Hillary's campaign hired to keep the DNCs emails from being hacked REFUSED to allow the FBI experts come in and put up up-to-date firewalls.
Blame the ***** Rooy Mook and Hillary for their **** up. NOT the Russians or Trump.

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

"The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."


Sooo......did you eat the fortune cookie after you copied this???



There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

That makes you a liar and a fool.
True?

Facts here:

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?


BTW....this is from PBS

You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials.

The FBI is completely wrong about this. You know the truth.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Someone?
You act as if that is still a mystery. You know who did it but won't admit it. I don't blame you thought as that admission would blow the entire narrative.

I ask that question to see the various tortured responses I get to a rather simple question.

The Russians were behind the hacking. That is established fact.

The release of that material hurt Clinton with voters. Even you admit that just not who released it.

By default then, if the leak hurt Clinton, it had to have helped Trump. The Russians helped Trump. The only question left then is, did the Trump campaign and it's members work in concert with the Russians?

I 100% totally agree that the hackers were either Russian or more likely Romanian who sold gave the hacked emails to Putin. I don't care who released "damaging information" about the *****.
The FACT there was "damaging information" is the point asshole!
Yes by default the "damaging information" exposing one candidate will help the candidate who did not have any "damaging information" to expose.
One and one make two!
The FBI REPEATEDLY warned the DNC that their email server was in danger of being hacked. The 'man-buns' in Hillary's campaign hired to keep the DNCs emails from being hacked REFUSED to allow the FBI experts come in and put up up-to-date firewalls.
Blame the ***** Rooy Mook and Hillary for their **** up. NOT the Russians or Trump.

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

"The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."


Sooo......did you eat the fortune cookie after you copied this???



There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

That makes you a liar and a fool.
True?

Facts here:

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?


BTW....this is from PBS

Someone?
You act as if that is still a mystery. You know who did it but won't admit it. I don't blame you thought as that admission would blow the entire narrative.

I ask that question to see the various tortured responses I get to a rather simple question.

The Russians were behind the hacking. That is established fact.

The release of that material hurt Clinton with voters. Even you admit that just not who released it.

By default then, if the leak hurt Clinton, it had to have helped Trump. The Russians helped Trump. The only question left then is, did the Trump campaign and it's members work in concert with the Russians?

I 100% totally agree that the hackers were either Russian or more likely Romanian who sold gave the hacked emails to Putin. I don't care who released "damaging information" about the *****.
The FACT there was "damaging information" is the point asshole!
Yes by default the "damaging information" exposing one candidate will help the candidate who did not have any "damaging information" to expose.
One and one make two!
The FBI REPEATEDLY warned the DNC that their email server was in danger of being hacked. The 'man-buns' in Hillary's campaign hired to keep the DNCs emails from being hacked REFUSED to allow the FBI experts come in and put up up-to-date firewalls.
Blame the ***** Rooy Mook and Hillary for their **** up. NOT the Russians or Trump.

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

"The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."


Sooo......did you eat the fortune cookie after you copied this???



There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

That makes you a liar and a fool.
True?

Facts here:

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?


BTW....this is from PBS

There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

Again, like I said, you have to deny that or your narrative crumbles.

It is accepted as fact. It is the entire basis for the current investigation into the Trump campaign and it's members.

You can deny it all you like but it won't stop the investigation.

There's not one ******* REP in the country who has any wish to stop the investigation/s into Trump and his campaign staff.
In FACT they WELCOME the results of the investigation/s.
Everyone should carefully notice the closer this whole LIB wet dream bullshit fantasy comes to being completed the louder the LIB are screaming that these investigations must be cancelled! An independent special prosecutor MUST take over.
Then when the SP is close to completing their investigation we would see the LIBs screaming that the SP is CORRUPT!!!! and in the tank for President Trump.
These assholes will NEVER stop no matter how much they are proven to be ******* morons!

I never said there were. That's actually what I said. Russian interference is accepted by most.
I was responding to PC and her cotinued assertions that it didn't happen.

Perhaps you should harass her rather than me.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Do you believe that Clinton was hurt by the release of hacked emails?

I believe Hillary was "hurt" by people uncovering her illegal private server and telling the world about what she had done.
I believe her campaign was hurt when someone uncovered the collusion with CNN and corruption within her campaign.
I beleive that had she not been complicit and corrupt and a ******* liar she would have easily beaten Trump.
What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.
Does anyone find it extremely hypocritical of the LIBs to now tell everyone that "it doesn't matter how any possible 'dirt' on Trump is turned up. Leaking classified information and giving it to the WAPO/NYT so they can EXPOSE TRUMP!!!!! is just fine now but having the truth come out about Hillary is wrong!
******* hypocrites!
I can't WAIT for the DEMs to stand on the White House steps in a month and tell the world that in fact there is ZERO evidence that anyone on the Trump campaign had any 'nefarious' involvement with the Russians either before or after the election.
And that in fact there are a number of people working in the intelligence agencies who are going to face federal criminal charges for leaking classified information.

What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.

Someone?
You act as if that is still a mystery. You know who did it but won't admit it. I don't blame you thought as that admission would blow the entire narrative.

I ask that question to see the various tortured responses I get to a rather simple question.

The Russians were behind the hacking. That is established fact.

The release of that material hurt Clinton with voters. Even you admit that just not who released it.

By default then, if the leak hurt Clinton, it had to have helped Trump. The Russians helped Trump. The only question left then is, did the Trump campaign and it's members work in concert with the Russians?

I 100% totally agree that the hackers were either Russian or more likely Romanian who sold gave the hacked emails to Putin. I don't care who released "damaging information" about the *****.
The FACT there was "damaging information" is the point asshole!
Yes by default the "damaging information" exposing one candidate will help the candidate who did not have any "damaging information" to expose.
One and one make two!
The FBI REPEATEDLY warned the DNC that their email server was in danger of being hacked. The 'man-buns' in Hillary's campaign hired to keep the DNCs emails from being hacked REFUSED to allow the FBI experts come in and put up up-to-date firewalls.
Blame the ***** Rooy Mook and Hillary for their **** up. NOT the Russians or Trump.

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

If any REP behaves the way Hillary did I welcome their defeat and public disgrace.
The next time it happens be sure to let us all know OK?

You would welcome foreign interference in our elections?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I believe Hillary was "hurt" by people uncovering her illegal private server and telling the world about what she had done.
I believe her campaign was hurt when someone uncovered the collusion with CNN and corruption within her campaign.
I beleive that had she not been complicit and corrupt and a ******* liar she would have easily beaten Trump.
What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.
Does anyone find it extremely hypocritical of the LIBs to now tell everyone that "it doesn't matter how any possible 'dirt' on Trump is turned up. Leaking classified information and giving it to the WAPO/NYT so they can EXPOSE TRUMP!!!!! is just fine now but having the truth come out about Hillary is wrong!
******* hypocrites!
I can't WAIT for the DEMs to stand on the White House steps in a month and tell the world that in fact there is ZERO evidence that anyone on the Trump campaign had any 'nefarious' involvement with the Russians either before or after the election.
And that in fact there are a number of people working in the intelligence agencies who are going to face federal criminal charges for leaking classified information.

What the LIBs are whining about is someone, doesn't really matter who, uncovered what Hillary was/is.
What the LIBs are really pissed off about is not what Hillary had done so much as someone uncovered the truth and told everyone.

Someone?
You act as if that is still a mystery. You know who did it but won't admit it. I don't blame you thought as that admission would blow the entire narrative.

I ask that question to see the various tortured responses I get to a rather simple question.

The Russians were behind the hacking. That is established fact.

The release of that material hurt Clinton with voters. Even you admit that just not who released it.

By default then, if the leak hurt Clinton, it had to have helped Trump. The Russians helped Trump. The only question left then is, did the Trump campaign and it's members work in concert with the Russians?

I 100% totally agree that the hackers were either Russian or more likely Romanian who sold gave the hacked emails to Putin. I don't care who released "damaging information" about the *****.
The FACT there was "damaging information" is the point asshole!
Yes by default the "damaging information" exposing one candidate will help the candidate who did not have any "damaging information" to expose.
One and one make two!
The FBI REPEATEDLY warned the DNC that their email server was in danger of being hacked. The 'man-buns' in Hillary's campaign hired to keep the DNCs emails from being hacked REFUSED to allow the FBI experts come in and put up up-to-date firewalls.
Blame the ***** Rooy Mook and Hillary for their **** up. NOT the Russians or Trump.

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

"The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."


Sooo......did you eat the fortune cookie after you copied this???



There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

That makes you a liar and a fool.
True?

Facts here:

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?


BTW....this is from PBS

You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials.

The FBI is completely wrong about this. You know the truth.

1. "You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?

Is it because I smacked your knuckles....again.....by proving that there is no evidence....nor will there ever be.....that "It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."

That's your quote...and I utterly destroyed it.




2. I've noticed that you alternate between bafflement and falsification, leaving an observer with the impression of one on a bungee cord.

Or, in your case, a dope on a rope.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

maybe Putin sent in about 300,000 Russian dwarfs to break into the polling stations after midnite? and somehow they were able to break into the voting machines?

It's fascinating how republicans won't accept that it's possible for a charasmatic billionaire to release damaging information about the democdratic candidate in order to sway the electorate and change their votes.

It could be possible, but you need proof. Just like I needed proof for many other issues. Let them investigate, let them do what they need.

It could be possible that the Intel community and the FBI are lying. Not likely though.

We need proof not hearsay. Give me proof, not hearsay. You also have no link to Trump. Facts, not goofy theories.

The FBI isn't investigating hearsay. Trump wouldn't be involved if it weren't accepted that the Russians were behind the hacking and release. It's the nature of the relationship of Trump's people with the Russians during the campaign that is being investigated.

I don't know what "proof" you're looking for other than serious people are taking this very seriously. Do you imagine they're doing this on a whim?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Someone?
You act as if that is still a mystery. You know who did it but won't admit it. I don't blame you thought as that admission would blow the entire narrative.

I ask that question to see the various tortured responses I get to a rather simple question.

The Russians were behind the hacking. That is established fact.

The release of that material hurt Clinton with voters. Even you admit that just not who released it.

By default then, if the leak hurt Clinton, it had to have helped Trump. The Russians helped Trump. The only question left then is, did the Trump campaign and it's members work in concert with the Russians?

I 100% totally agree that the hackers were either Russian or more likely Romanian who sold gave the hacked emails to Putin. I don't care who released "damaging information" about the *****.
The FACT there was "damaging information" is the point asshole!
Yes by default the "damaging information" exposing one candidate will help the candidate who did not have any "damaging information" to expose.
One and one make two!
The FBI REPEATEDLY warned the DNC that their email server was in danger of being hacked. The 'man-buns' in Hillary's campaign hired to keep the DNCs emails from being hacked REFUSED to allow the FBI experts come in and put up up-to-date firewalls.
Blame the ***** Rooy Mook and Hillary for their **** up. NOT the Russians or Trump.

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

"The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."


Sooo......did you eat the fortune cookie after you copied this???



There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

That makes you a liar and a fool.
True?

Facts here:

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?


BTW....this is from PBS

You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials.

The FBI is completely wrong about this. You know the truth.

1. "You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?

Is it because I smacked your knuckles....again.....by proving that there is no evidence....nor will there ever be.....that "It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."

That's your quote...and I utterly destroyed it.




2. I've noticed that you alternate between bafflement and falsification, leaving an observer with the impression of one on a bungee cord.

Or, in your case, a dope on a rope.

If there weren't evidence of it , Trump wouldn't be under investigation for his possible ties to it now would he, dope?

 

[Papageorgio]

maybe Putin sent in about 300,000 Russian dwarfs to break into the polling stations after midnite? and somehow they were able to break into the voting machines?

It's fascinating how republicans won't accept that it's possible for a charasmatic billionaire to release damaging information about the democdratic candidate in order to sway the electorate and change their votes.

It could be possible, but you need proof. Just like I needed proof for many other issues. Let them investigate, let them do what they need.

It could be possible that the Intel community and the FBI are lying. Not likely though.

We need proof not hearsay. Give me proof, not hearsay. You also have no link to Trump. Facts, not goofy theories.

The FBI isn't investigating hearsay. Trump wouldn't be involved if it weren't accepted that the Russians were behind the hacking and release. It's the nature of the relationship of Trump's people with the Russians during the campaign that is being investigated.

I don't know what "proof" you're looking for other than serious people are taking this very seriously. Do you imagine they're doing this on a whim?

Again, let the "serious" people that are taking this very "seriously" investigate and come up with "serious" evidence. Then I'll take a look at it "seriously", until then I will treat it like the 2000 election, the 2004 election, Obama is a Muslim, Obama was born in Kenya and Benghazi, it is all rubbish.