what did the russians do to control the ballot box.... ?

[Papageorgio]

I 100% totally agree that the hackers were either Russian or more likely Romanian who sold gave the hacked emails to Putin. I don't care who released "damaging information" about the *****.
The FACT there was "damaging information" is the point asshole!
Yes by default the "damaging information" exposing one candidate will help the candidate who did not have any "damaging information" to expose.
One and one make two!
The FBI REPEATEDLY warned the DNC that their email server was in danger of being hacked. The 'man-buns' in Hillary's campaign hired to keep the DNCs emails from being hacked REFUSED to allow the FBI experts come in and put up up-to-date firewalls.
Blame the ***** Rooy Mook and Hillary for their **** up. NOT the Russians or Trump.

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

"The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."


Sooo......did you eat the fortune cookie after you copied this???



There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

That makes you a liar and a fool.
True?

Facts here:

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?


BTW....this is from PBS

You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials.

The FBI is completely wrong about this. You know the truth.

1. "You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?

Is it because I smacked your knuckles....again.....by proving that there is no evidence....nor will there ever be.....that "It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."

That's your quote...and I utterly destroyed it.




2. I've noticed that you alternate between bafflement and falsification, leaving an observer with the impression of one on a bungee cord.

Or, in your case, a dope on a rope.

If there weren't evidence of it , Trump wouldn't be under investigation for his possible ties to it now would he, dope?

Investigating doesn't mean guilt does it? They have reason to believe, no evidence yet, otherwise you wouldn't need to investigate.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I 100% totally agree that the hackers were either Russian or more likely Romanian who sold gave the hacked emails to Putin. I don't care who released "damaging information" about the *****.
The FACT there was "damaging information" is the point asshole!
Yes by default the "damaging information" exposing one candidate will help the candidate who did not have any "damaging information" to expose.
One and one make two!
The FBI REPEATEDLY warned the DNC that their email server was in danger of being hacked. The 'man-buns' in Hillary's campaign hired to keep the DNCs emails from being hacked REFUSED to allow the FBI experts come in and put up up-to-date firewalls.
Blame the ***** Rooy Mook and Hillary for their **** up. NOT the Russians or Trump.

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

"The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."


Sooo......did you eat the fortune cookie after you copied this???



There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

That makes you a liar and a fool.
True?

Facts here:

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?


BTW....this is from PBS

You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials.

The FBI is completely wrong about this. You know the truth.

1. "You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?

Is it because I smacked your knuckles....again.....by proving that there is no evidence....nor will there ever be.....that "It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."

That's your quote...and I utterly destroyed it.




2. I've noticed that you alternate between bafflement and falsification, leaving an observer with the impression of one on a bungee cord.

Or, in your case, a dope on a rope.

If there weren't evidence of it , Trump wouldn't be under investigation for his possible ties to it now would he, dope?

"You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?



When you began lying the Dead Sea was just a bit under the weather.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

"The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."


Sooo......did you eat the fortune cookie after you copied this???



There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

That makes you a liar and a fool.
True?

Facts here:

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?


BTW....this is from PBS

You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials.

The FBI is completely wrong about this. You know the truth.

1. "You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?

Is it because I smacked your knuckles....again.....by proving that there is no evidence....nor will there ever be.....that "It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."

That's your quote...and I utterly destroyed it.




2. I've noticed that you alternate between bafflement and falsification, leaving an observer with the impression of one on a bungee cord.

Or, in your case, a dope on a rope.

If there weren't evidence of it , Trump wouldn't be under investigation for his possible ties to it now would he, dope?

"You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?



When you began lying the Dead Sea was just a bit under the weather.

Hmm...you won't touch my last post, huh.
I don't blame you. Your narrative would crumble.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."


Sooo......did you eat the fortune cookie after you copied this???



There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

That makes you a liar and a fool.
True?

Facts here:

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?


BTW....this is from PBS

You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials.

The FBI is completely wrong about this. You know the truth.

1. "You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?

Is it because I smacked your knuckles....again.....by proving that there is no evidence....nor will there ever be.....that "It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."

That's your quote...and I utterly destroyed it.




2. I've noticed that you alternate between bafflement and falsification, leaving an observer with the impression of one on a bungee cord.

Or, in your case, a dope on a rope.

If there weren't evidence of it , Trump wouldn't be under investigation for his possible ties to it now would he, dope?

"You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?



When you began lying the Dead Sea was just a bit under the weather.

Hmm...you won't touch my last post, huh.
I don't blame you. Your narrative would crumble.

"You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked.

Why on Earth would you accept that type of attack on our system? Will an equivalent attack on a Republican candidate be required before you find fault with the tactic?

"The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."


Sooo......did you eat the fortune cookie after you copied this???



There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

That makes you a liar and a fool.
True?

Facts here:

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?


BTW....this is from PBS

You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials.

The FBI is completely wrong about this. You know the truth.

1. "You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?

Is it because I smacked your knuckles....again.....by proving that there is no evidence....nor will there ever be.....that "It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."

That's your quote...and I utterly destroyed it.




2. I've noticed that you alternate between bafflement and falsification, leaving an observer with the impression of one on a bungee cord.

Or, in your case, a dope on a rope.

If there weren't evidence of it , Trump wouldn't be under investigation for his possible ties to it now would he, dope?

Investigating doesn't mean guilt does it? They have reason to believe, no evidence yet, otherwise you wouldn't need to investigate.

Where did I say it meant guilt?
Can you read?

PC is asserting that there is no evidence that Russia was behind the hacking and subsequent release of information.

I'm asserting that if that were true, then how can Trump be under investigation for his connection to something that isn't real?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials.

The FBI is completely wrong about this. You know the truth.

1. "You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?

Is it because I smacked your knuckles....again.....by proving that there is no evidence....nor will there ever be.....that "It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."

That's your quote...and I utterly destroyed it.




2. I've noticed that you alternate between bafflement and falsification, leaving an observer with the impression of one on a bungee cord.

Or, in your case, a dope on a rope.

If there weren't evidence of it , Trump wouldn't be under investigation for his possible ties to it now would he, dope?

"You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?



When you began lying the Dead Sea was just a bit under the weather.

Hmm...you won't touch my last post, huh.
I don't blame you. Your narrative would crumble.

"You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?

You said there was no evidence of Russian hacking.
If that were true Then how can Trump be under investigation for his ties to something that's not real?

It's pretty simple but I understand why you can't and won't answer.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"The hacking was a crime.
It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."


Sooo......did you eat the fortune cookie after you copied this???



There is zero evidence of what you claim....either that it was a foreign govt., or that it influenced the electorate.

That makes you a liar and a fool.
True?

Facts here:

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?


BTW....this is from PBS

You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials.

The FBI is completely wrong about this. You know the truth.

1. "You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?

Is it because I smacked your knuckles....again.....by proving that there is no evidence....nor will there ever be.....that "It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."

That's your quote...and I utterly destroyed it.




2. I've noticed that you alternate between bafflement and falsification, leaving an observer with the impression of one on a bungee cord.

Or, in your case, a dope on a rope.

If there weren't evidence of it , Trump wouldn't be under investigation for his possible ties to it now would he, dope?

Investigating doesn't mean guilt does it? They have reason to believe, no evidence yet, otherwise you wouldn't need to investigate.

Where did I say it meant guilt?
Can you read?

PC is asserting that there is no evidence that Russia was behind the hacking and subsequent release of information.

I'm asserting that if that were true, then how can Trump be under investigation for his connection to something that isn't real?

"PC is asserting that there is no evidence that Russia was behind the hacking and subsequent release of information."

That's a fact...just as you've been revealed as a lying low-life is a fact.


Here, more folks asserting that there is no such evidencde:

"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.

TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart






-------------------------------------------------------------------

"While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states."
FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is no evidence of the slander that the Russians and the Trump campaign collaborated.....
So saith Clapper, Comey, Rogers...and Michael Morrell.

Morrell....presumed head of the CIA in a Hillary presidency....

"Morrell wrote an op-ed for the New York Times back in August where he both announced his support for Hillary Clinton and argued that Trump was a puppet of Vladimir Putin, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.” However, he’s now changed his tune and believes that Mr. Trump is not only innocent of any collaboration with Russia but he further argued that the “Trump dossier” released a few months ago is likely a fraud. "
Intelligence Chiefs say NO Evidence of Trump-Russia Connection

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. "You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?

Is it because I smacked your knuckles....again.....by proving that there is no evidence....nor will there ever be.....that "It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."

That's your quote...and I utterly destroyed it.




2. I've noticed that you alternate between bafflement and falsification, leaving an observer with the impression of one on a bungee cord.

Or, in your case, a dope on a rope.

If there weren't evidence of it , Trump wouldn't be under investigation for his possible ties to it now would he, dope?

"You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?



When you began lying the Dead Sea was just a bit under the weather.

Hmm...you won't touch my last post, huh.
I don't blame you. Your narrative would crumble.

"You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?

You said there was no evidence of Russian hacking.
If that were true Then how can Trump be under investigation for his ties to something that's not real?

It's pretty simple but I understand why you can't and won't answer.

1. I proved that there is no evidence.

2. "You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?


It's because you're a lying sleaze....isn't it.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials.

The FBI is completely wrong about this. You know the truth.

1. "You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?

Is it because I smacked your knuckles....again.....by proving that there is no evidence....nor will there ever be.....that "It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."

That's your quote...and I utterly destroyed it.




2. I've noticed that you alternate between bafflement and falsification, leaving an observer with the impression of one on a bungee cord.

Or, in your case, a dope on a rope.

If there weren't evidence of it , Trump wouldn't be under investigation for his possible ties to it now would he, dope?

Investigating doesn't mean guilt does it? They have reason to believe, no evidence yet, otherwise you wouldn't need to investigate.

Where did I say it meant guilt?
Can you read?

PC is asserting that there is no evidence that Russia was behind the hacking and subsequent release of information.

I'm asserting that if that were true, then how can Trump be under investigation for his connection to something that isn't real?

"PC is asserting that there is no evidence that Russia was behind the hacking and subsequent release of information."

That's a fact...just as you've been revealed as a lying low-life is a fact.


Here, more folks asserting that there is no such evidencde:

"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.

TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart






-------------------------------------------------------------------

"While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states."
FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is no evidence of the slander that the Russians and the Trump campaign collaborated.....
So saith Clapper, Comey, Rogers...and Michael Morrell.

Morrell....presumed head of the CIA in a Hillary presidency....

"Morrell wrote an op-ed for the New York Times back in August where he both announced his support for Hillary Clinton and argued that Trump was a puppet of Vladimir Putin, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.” However, he’s now changed his tune and believes that Mr. Trump is not only innocent of any collaboration with Russia but he further argued that the “Trump dossier” released a few months ago is likely a fraud. "
Intelligence Chiefs say NO Evidence of Trump-Russia Connection

Answer my question, idiot.

How can Trump be under investigation for connections to something that doesn't exist?

 

[Valerie]

Late Friday afternoon, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released a declassified version of its report on Russia’s interference in the US presidential election. The report, which draws on intelligence gathered by the FBI, CIA, and NSA, concludes with “high confidence” that “Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election” that included hacking the personal email accounts of Democratic Party officials and political figures.

According to the report, Putin’s aim was to impugn Hillary Clinton’s credibility and boost Donald Trump’s chances of winning the election, and more broadly to make the US electoral system look shady and untrustworthy.

Much of this has already been reported publicly. But there are some key findings in this report, such as the precise nature of the link between WikiLeaks and the Russian hackers, that hadn’t been disclosed before.

Here’s a guide to the report — its most important findings and, in particular, the new and important disclosures it contains.

The key findings from the US intelligence report on the Russia hack, decoded

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. "You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?

Is it because I smacked your knuckles....again.....by proving that there is no evidence....nor will there ever be.....that "It was perpetrated by a foreign govt with the intention of influencing our electoral process. It worked."

That's your quote...and I utterly destroyed it.




2. I've noticed that you alternate between bafflement and falsification, leaving an observer with the impression of one on a bungee cord.

Or, in your case, a dope on a rope.

If there weren't evidence of it , Trump wouldn't be under investigation for his possible ties to it now would he, dope?

Investigating doesn't mean guilt does it? They have reason to believe, no evidence yet, otherwise you wouldn't need to investigate.

Where did I say it meant guilt?
Can you read?

PC is asserting that there is no evidence that Russia was behind the hacking and subsequent release of information.

I'm asserting that if that were true, then how can Trump be under investigation for his connection to something that isn't real?

"PC is asserting that there is no evidence that Russia was behind the hacking and subsequent release of information."

That's a fact...just as you've been revealed as a lying low-life is a fact.


Here, more folks asserting that there is no such evidencde:

"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report.

TODD: I understand that, but does it exist?

CLAPPER: Not to my knowledge.

TODD: If it existed, it would have been in the report?

CLAPPER: This could have unfolded or become available in the time since I left the government. But at the time, we had no evidence of such collusion.


TODD: But at this point, what’s not proven is the idea of collusion?

CLAPPER: that’s correct."
Fmr Obama DNI Clapper: Evidence of Trump-Russian Collusion Doesn't Exist to His 'Knowledge' - Breitbart






-------------------------------------------------------------------

"While many Democrats frequently say Russia “hacked” the presidential election, National Security Administration Director Adm. Michael Rogers and FBI Director James Comey both confirmed today that Russian activities had no impact on tallying votes in states."
FBI, NSA: 'No evidence' Russia manipulated US vote tallying - The American Mirror


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is no evidence of the slander that the Russians and the Trump campaign collaborated.....
So saith Clapper, Comey, Rogers...and Michael Morrell.

Morrell....presumed head of the CIA in a Hillary presidency....

"Morrell wrote an op-ed for the New York Times back in August where he both announced his support for Hillary Clinton and argued that Trump was a puppet of Vladimir Putin, “In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.” However, he’s now changed his tune and believes that Mr. Trump is not only innocent of any collaboration with Russia but he further argued that the “Trump dossier” released a few months ago is likely a fraud. "
Intelligence Chiefs say NO Evidence of Trump-Russia Connection

Answer my question, idiot.

How can Trump be under investigation for connections to something that doesn't exist?

"You're right.
There's no investigation into Russian hacking and the nature of the relationship between Trump's people and Russian officials."

Why are you pretending that I said that?


Post any quote from me that says that.....or change your avi to 'LyingScum."

 

[xyz]

How come 10 years ago the internet wasn't so full of "Americans" who claimed to love Russia?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Late Friday afternoon, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released a declassified version of its report on Russia’s interference in the US presidential election. The report, which draws on intelligence gathered by the FBI, CIA, and NSA, concludes with “high confidence” that “Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election” that included hacking the personal email accounts of Democratic Party officials and political figures.

According to the report, Putin’s aim was to impugn Hillary Clinton’s credibility and boost Donald Trump’s chances of winning the election, and more broadly to make the US electoral system look shady and untrustworthy.

Much of this has already been reported publicly. But there are some key findings in this report, such as the precise nature of the link between WikiLeaks and the Russian hackers, that hadn’t been disclosed before.

Here’s a guide to the report — its most important findings and, in particular, the new and important disclosures it contains.

The key findings from the US intelligence report on the Russia hack, decoded

"....concludes with “high confidence” that “Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election”


Let's take a quantum leap and pretend that you have a functioning brain.

How would any US official know that?




And....there's this:
"What we saw on display today," Rosen reported, "was the difficulty that lawmakers have in holding James Comey to a consistent, coherent standard about what he discloses about FBI investigations.

Director Comey seems at times to make up 'Comey's rules' as he goes along.

He confirmed that FBI agents are investigating coordination between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.

But when it came to aspects of this story that are of equal public interest, such as whether Obama aides improperly accessed the names of Americans swept up in foreign surveillance, or whether they leaked classified material to the press, Comey's own criteria of unusual circumstances and public interest suddenly didn't apply. He couldn't confirm whether FBI agents are also investigating these things." Bill O'Reilly: The O'Reilly Factor - Tuesday, March 21, 2017

 

[PoliticalChic]

How come 10 years ago the internet wasn't so full of "Americans" who claimed to love Russia?

"Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton’s Foundation Bags $145 Million"
Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton's Foundation Bags $145 Million - Breitbart

 

[xyz]

How come 10 years ago the internet wasn't so full of "Americans" who claimed to love Russia?

"Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton’s Foundation Bags $145 Million"
Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton's Foundation Bags $145 Million - Breitbart

Interesting idea to quote a site that has close relations to the Russian intelligence services.

 

[PoliticalChic]

How come 10 years ago the internet wasn't so full of "Americans" who claimed to love Russia?

"Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton’s Foundation Bags $145 Million"
Devastating Timeline Reveals the Transfer of Half of U.S. Uranium Output to Russia as Hillary Clinton's Foundation Bags $145 Million - Breitbart

Interesting idea to quote a site that has close relations to the Russian intelligence services.

When you can't dispute the truth, you dispute the site.

You are a paragon of government school 'education.'

 

[xyz]

When you can't dispute the truth, you dispute the site.

You are a paragon of government school 'education.'

You don't know how to even post the truth, and you dispute sites as well.

So what school did you go to in Mother Russia?

 

[LeftofLeft]

can someone explain this ?

where there russian operatives (e.g. the black panthers) at the polling sites ? did they mess with with electronic ballots. where they having secret russian meetings convincing obama supporters to vote for hillary ?

what specifically did they do to throw our election.

Apparently, they're accused of accessing and releasing completely true information, which allegedly changed some people's minds about who to vote for.

I know, the horror, right?

So if someone HACKED your personal information, and published it, you wouldn't have a problem.

Why don't you give us all your usernames and passwords, if you don't have any need of privacy rights?

Scenario I: Russians hack the Democrats and release information. The content of that information exposes all sorts of corruption including debate questions being handed in advance to the Democrat Candidate and referring to Latinos as a collective Taco Bowl.

Scenario II: Russians hack the Democrats and release information. The content of that information exposes a plan to appoint Republicans to cabinet positions to foster a new era of cooperation and a new outreach campaign to Latinos.

In both cases, the Russians hack the Democrats yet only one scenario is true. Questions for Democrats: would both of these hacks yield the same result on the Election outcome? According to you people, it is the hack that impacted the election yet you ignore the role of the content.

 

[washamericom]

Don't worry.
After President Trump has ferreted out every ******* seditious traitor in the intelligence agencies he'll turn his attention to a 'new hobby'. That will be to have a special prosecutor go after the Clintons.
The pair will spend every ******* penny they grifted over the years to stay out of federal prison.

And they'll find Obama's Kenyan birth certificate? Right?

that would be great, or chicagobama could have just shown the one he supposedly has, or had, the one in hawaii.

 

[washamericom]

maybe Putin sent in about 300,000 Russian dwarfs to break into the polling stations after midnite? and somehow they were able to break into the voting machines?

It's fascinating how republicans won't accept that it's possible for a charasmatic billionaire to release damaging information about the democdratic candidate in order to sway the electorate and change their votes.

So now you're accusing President Trump of "releasing damaging information" about Hillary. WOW!
That's a new one!
BTW, whoever released the "damaging information" couldn't have "released damaging information" if there was no "damaging information" on Hillary.
That's like basic logic right?
Why wouldn't voters change their votes when they found out what a gucking piece of shit corrupt liar their candidate turned out to be.
Seems to me to be basic logic.
If I have decided to vote for someone then it turns out the candidate is a ******* corrupt liar why would I still vote for them.
The stupid ***** Robby Mook refused to even campaign in the Rust Belt.
Was he afraid of the Russian military surrounding Wisconsin?

The NYTimes released this 'damaging information' about Bill's wife some 20 years ago:

"Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady -- a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation -- is a congenital liar."
Essay;Blizzard of Lies


A number of dolts still haven't incorporated that information.

and remember how Hillary would prefer to take hard questions from a 12-14 year old girl instead of the adult reporters?,,,being u know the little girls would ask questions like,,,,"So Miss Hillary, what did you have for breakfast this morning",,,and " what do you prefer, Burger King or Wendys",,,and of course,,,,"Miss Hillary, my hero, why did you forgive your husband Bill for having sex with at least 12 other women during your time of marriage"???

did anyone ever ask her boxers or briefs ?