Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I don’t need to repeat myself just because you’re too stupid or too illiterate. Why don’t you read what you quoted about why it’s dumb to compare the dead to the living? And why don’t you stop pretending we lay eggs, fucktard?Part of Henrietta is still alive today. If you actually hold the ideal that a single celled fertilized human ovum is endowed with all the rights of personhood then why don't you think Henrietta's still living cells are not worthy of the same?
Maybe you ought to read up on her and then ponder why she has been called the immortal woman.
She isn't dead since her human cells are still alive in laboratories all over the world therefore according to your "logic" Henrietta is still a living person.I don’t need to repeat myself just because you’re too stupid or too illiterate. Why don’t you read what you quoted about why it’s dumb to compare the dead to the living? And why don’t you stop pretending we lay eggs, fucktard?
She isn't dead since her human cells are still alive in laboratories all over the world therefore according to your "logic" Henrietta is still a living person.
Read the link and you'll see that she DID NOT CONSENT. So now what are you going to do about all those human cells that you say have the rights of personhood?You are too much guy. I guess we are back to the clump of cells
The minute you confirm Henrietta’s consent, we will continue.
She’s dead, moron. The organism that was her is gone and isn’t coming back.She isn't dead since her human cells are still alive in laboratories
Read the link and you'll see that she DID NOT CONSENT. So now what are you going to do about all those human cells that you say have the rights of personhood?
The Legacy of Henrietta Lacks
www.hopkinsmedicine.org
Henrietta Lacks, Whose Cells Were Taken Without Her Consent, Is Honored by W.H.O. (Published 2021)
In a ceremony in Geneva, the World Health Organization presented an award to the family of Ms. Lacks, whose cancer cells led to world-changing advances in medical and scientific research.www.nytimes.com
So what is the difference between one Henrietta cell and a one celled zygote?She’s dead, moron. The organism that was her is gone and isn’t coming back.
You don’t understand dick if you think i was arguing that the dead live. Your random skin cells or whatever else aren’t each their own organisms. I didn’t argue otherwise.
It has to do with a one cell of a human being having all the rights of personhood which is what you are saying is the case.You have had the answer dude. Shake it off, this has nothing at all to do with abortion. Smh
One is a cancer cell that was part of the body of a dead organism.So what is the difference between one Henrietta cell and a one celled zygote?
Objectively false. That cancer cell is not going to somehow grow into a new body for Mrs. Lacks. For one thing it has fucked up DNA, so even cloning, which has never been successful with humans anyway, is already out. And even if you were able to make a Lacks clone through scifi means that clone would not be the same organism.Biologically there is absolutely no difference.
So what is the difference between one Henrietta cell and a one celled zygote?
Biologically there is absolutely no difference.
here is no difference between a one cell zygote and a single cell of Henrietta Lacks both are similarly situated after all
It has to do with a one cell of a human being having all the rights of personhood which is what you are saying is the case.
There is no difference between a one cell zygote and a single cell of Henrietta Lacks both are similarly situated after all
Yet both can be frozen solid. Funny that. Just like a fertilised egg.A differentiated cell from a cancerous tumor is very different from an undifferentiated stem cell.
Dolly was a female Finnish Dorset sheep and the first mammal cloned from an adult somatic cell. She was cloned by associates of the Roslin Institute in Scotland, using the process of nuclear transfer from a cell taken from a mammary gland.WikipediaLet me know when a piece from the body of an adult human can be made to develop into a complete separate human being of its own.
Dolly was a female Finnish Dorset sheep and the first mammal cloned from an adult somatic cell. She was cloned by associates of the Roslin Institute in Scotland, using the process of nuclear transfer from a cell taken from a mammary gland.WikipediaLet me know when a piece from the body of an adult human can be made to develop into a complete separate human being of its own.
It was a piece of the body of an adult mammal made to develop into a complete separate being.It was not a mature, differentiated cell that grew into Dolly.
And you think this methodology has been employed on humans? Really? Citation needed. What is the name of our first cloned fellow man?Dolly was a female Finnish Dorset sheep and the first mammal cloned from an adult somatic cell. She was cloned by associates of the Roslin Institute in Scotland, using the process of nuclear transfer from a cell taken from a mammary gland.Wikipedia
No. As I intimated in my reply, it can be done. The term of the question put.And you think this methodology has been employed on humans?
Oh so it's only "new" single celled humans that count huh?One is a cancer cell that was part of the body of a dead organism.
The other is the entire body of a new living organism and member of our species - a human being. Glad to clear that up.
Objectively false. That cancer cell is not going to somehow grow into a new body for Mrs. Lacks. For one thing it has fucked up DNA, so even cloning, which has never been successful with humans anyway, is already out. And even if you were able to make a Lacks clone through scifi means that clone would not be the same organism.
I'm sure it has somewhere. Just because no one submitted a scientific paper in no way means that it hasn't been done.And you think this methodology has been employed on humans? Really? Citation needed. What is the name of our first cloned fellow man?
Actually it's very close too close for your comfortYeah, no, not even close kid.
