What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

What Are You Scared of White "Conservatives?"

OP
IM2

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
49,651
Reaction score
13,847
Points
2,220
How much welfare has whitey handed out to blacks?

You might want to retract that questionsince blacks were excluded from welfare until about 1965 and whites still get the majority of welfare for the poor, farm subsidy welfare and corporate welfare handouts.
 
OP
IM2

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
49,651
Reaction score
13,847
Points
2,220
IM, You say that a lot. That whites are scared. Whites go about our business without one thought of being afraid. You want us to be afraid of you, but you don't even enter our thoughts throughout the day.
Sorry...
He and those like him seem to struggle with the math. 13 percent of any population is ill-fitted to win a war against th over somebody are you racists. Your false Gorest. Either that or he's delusional.
You keep talking about a war. Those like you represent maybe 15 percent of the white population. if there was a war, your kind would get eliminated by whites who can't stand your asses.
No, I'm not saying anything about starting a war. I'm merely pointing out the reality of where your demands will take us. People who think they can rule over others after stealing an election are delusional. It'd be a good idea to avoid bloodshed. Of course, if your plantation overseers decide to create a couple of trillion MORE in debt to pay off their most loyal voting bloc then so be it.
If they raise taxes to say they're "paying for it" expect one hell of a lot of blowbacks, bruddah.
We are here because of whites like you. No election was stolen and the only people trying to rule are those like you. You owe us money, and since everybody else has been repaid and that you will never stop paying native Americans it's time the debt you owe us got settled. It's just that simple. We will get what we are owed or the ultimate decider will destroy this country. It is written and all your talk doesn't change the penalty for not following that moral law.
I don't owe you jack shit. I have never owned slaves and you have never picked cotton, so...
Since 2000, U.S. gross domestic product lost that much as a result of discriminatory practices in a range of areas, including in education and access to business loans, according to a new study by Citigroup. Specifically, the study came up with $16 trillion in lost GDP by noting four key racial gaps between African Americans and whites:

$13 trillion lost in potential business revenue because of discriminatory lending to African American entrepreneurs, with an estimated 6.1 million jobs not generated as a result

$2.7 trillion in income lost because of disparities in wages suffered by African Americans

$218 billion lost over the past two decades because of discrimination in providing housing credit

And $90 billion to $113 billion in lifetime income lost from discrimination in accessing higher education

We can state our case for reparations on these numbers that started in the year 2000. If we only take lost income from racism starting in 2000, it equals 56,250 per black person in America. And this is money owed NOW, for things done in OUR LIFETIMES.

Now shut the fuck up with that bullshit excuse.
How much welfare has whitey handed out to blacks?

My Quaker family owes you NOTHING. We hid you, fed you, clothed you and got you to safe locations. Money has been taken from my paycheck on day 1 to continue to care for you, so stick the, "I'm untitled to your money because...." up your ass.
You owe me.
Shut up. The government made the laws and the government owes the money.
Where does the gov. get it's money??? Tell me to shut up again and I'll haunt every one of your threads with the truth...
Given the fact that we paid taxes that went to white ecoomic development for several decades, you really needto drop your silly argument.
 

Death Angel

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2016
Messages
39,018
Reaction score
22,724
Points
1,915
So I see we have a thread here talking about the African slave traders. But you see, there is no trade if no one buys. There is no slavery in America if it is not made legal by whites.

America did not have to have slavery. Whites here chose to. By making that choice, you cannot now try blaming Africans for the choice your ancestors made. Furthermore the choice to continue treating blacks as second class citizens after slavery completely removes African complocity.

"A nation is a choice. It chooses itself at fateful forks in the road by turning left or right, by giving up something or taking something -- and in the giving up and the taking, in the deciding and not deciding, the nation becomes. And ever afterwards, the nation and the people who make up the nation are defined by the fork and by the decision that was made there, as well as by the decision that was not made there. For the decision, once made, engraves itself into the landscape, engraves itself into things, into institutions, nerves, muscles, tendons; and the first decision requires a second decision, and the second decision requires a third, and it goes on and on, spiraling in an inexorable processus which distorts everything and alienates everybody.

America became America that way. Fork by fork, step by step, option by option, America or, to be more precise, the men who spoke in the name of America decided that it was going to be a white place defined negatively by the bodies and the blood of the reds and the blacks. And that decision, which was made in the 1660s and elaborated over a two-hundred-year period, foreclosed certain possibilities in America -- perhaps forever -- and set off depth charges that are still echoing and re-echoing in the commonwealth. What makes this all the more mournful is that it didn't have to happen that way. There was another road -- but that road wasn't taken. In the beginning, as we have seen, there was no race problem in America. The race problem in America was a deliberate invention of men who systematically separated blacks and whites in order to make money. This was, as Kenneth Stampp so cogently observed, a deliberate choice among several alternatives. Slavery, he said, "cannot be attributed to some deadly atmospheric miasma or some irresistible force in the South's economic evolution. The use of slaves in southern agriculture was a deliberate choice (among several alternatives) made by men who sought greater returns than they could obtain from their own labor alone, and who found other types of labor " more expensive. ...

It didn't have to happen that way. Back there, before Jim Crow, before the invention of the Negro or the white man or the words and concepts to describe them, the Colonial population consisted largely of a great mass of white and black bondsmen, who occupied roughly the same economic category and were treated with equal contempt by the lords of the plantations and legislatures. Curiously unconcerned about their color, these people worked together and relaxed together. They had essentially the same interests, the same aspirations, arid the same grievances. They conspired together and waged a common struggle against their common enemy -- the big planter apparatus and a social system that legalized terror against black and white bondsmen. No one says and no one believes that there was a Garden of Eden in Colonial America. But the available evidence, slight though it is, suggests that there were widening bonds of solidarity between the first generation of blacks and whites. And the same evidence indicates that it proved very difficult indeed to teach white people to worship their skin.


All this began to change drastically in the sixth decade of the seventeenth century .The decade of the 1660s: this was the first great fork in the making of black America. For it was at this fork that certain men decided to ground the American economic system on human slavery. To understand that great fork, one must understand first the roads leading to it -- roads that were not taken."


Africans did not do this. Africans did not decide for white colonists that blacks would be slaves. But in the rush to try discrediting the 1619 project, the Wall Street Journal writes a story and every racist here wants to cosign it.

But the 1619 Project is about AMERICAN HISTORY, not Europe and so here we will start with Pt. 1

Your posts are too long to even get read. I doubt anyone reads more than a paragraph or two. What good is a post if it doesnt get read?
I am quite sure if I posted a Thomas Sowell articke, every word would be read. This is information people here apparently need to learn and since when have we been unable to read more than 3 sentences?
No by me. Highlights and a link to the source is appropriate
 
Last edited:

Mac-7

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
30,805
Reaction score
21,403
Points
2,865
I doubt if I'd be working for the Chinese. A lot of rhings change without slavery.
Sure thing

Starting with the certainty that very few blacks would have reached America during that 400 year period

Without slavery you would have been born in Africa instead of America
 

Death Angel

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2016
Messages
39,018
Reaction score
22,724
Points
1,915
IM, You say that a lot. That whites are scared. Whites go about our business without one thought of being afraid. You want us to be afraid of you, but you don't even enter our thoughts throughout the day.
Sorry...
He and those like him seem to struggle with the math. 13 percent of any population is ill-fitted to win a war against th over somebody are you racists. Your false Gorest. Either that or he's delusional.
You keep talking about a war. Those like you represent maybe 15 percent of the white population. if there was a war, your kind would get eliminated by whites who can't stand your asses.
No, I'm not saying anything about starting a war. I'm merely pointing out the reality of where your demands will take us. People who think they can rule over others after stealing an election are delusional. It'd be a good idea to avoid bloodshed. Of course, if your plantation overseers decide to create a couple of trillion MORE in debt to pay off their most loyal voting bloc then so be it.
If they raise taxes to say they're "paying for it" expect one hell of a lot of blowbacks, bruddah.
We are here because of whites like you. No election was stolen and the only people trying to rule are those like you. You owe us money, and since everybody else has been repaid and that you will never stop paying native Americans it's time the debt you owe us got settled. It's just that simple. We will get what we are owed or the ultimate decider will destroy this country. It is written and all your talk doesn't change the penalty for not following that moral law.
I don't owe you jack shit. I have never owned slaves and you have never picked cotton, so...
Since 2000, U.S. gross domestic product lost that much as a result of discriminatory practices in a range of areas, including in education and access to business loans, according to a new study by Citigroup. Specifically, the study came up with $16 trillion in lost GDP by noting four key racial gaps between African Americans and whites:

$13 trillion lost in potential business revenue because of discriminatory lending to African American entrepreneurs, with an estimated 6.1 million jobs not generated as a result

$2.7 trillion in income lost because of disparities in wages suffered by African Americans

$218 billion lost over the past two decades because of discrimination in providing housing credit

And $90 billion to $113 billion in lifetime income lost from discrimination in accessing higher education

We can state our case for reparations on these numbers that started in the year 2000. If we only take lost income from racism starting in 2000, it equals 56,250 per black person in America. And this is money owed NOW, for things done in OUR LIFETIMES.

Now shut the fuck up with that bullshit excuse.
How much welfare has whitey handed out to blacks?

My Quaker family owes you NOTHING. We hid you, fed you, clothed you and got you to safe locations. Money has been taken from my paycheck on day 1 to continue to care for you, so stick the, "I'm untitled to your money because...." up your ass.
You owe me.
Shut up. The government made the laws and the government owes the money.
Where does the gov. get it's money??? Tell me to shut up again and I'll haunt every one of your threads with the truth...
Given the fact that we paid taxes that went to white ecoomic development for several decades, you really needto drop your silly argument.
Never seen a "white economic development"
 

Flash

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2014
Messages
46,395
Reaction score
28,152
Points
2,645
Location
Florida
Let me tell you Moon Bats what we "White Conservatives" are "afraid" of.

Democracy is a fragile thing that can be destroyed by greed.

When 51% of the voters find out that they can use the government for thievery or oppression then Democracy can be just as destructive as any other form of government.

A country can vote itself into oppression the same as being taken over by a tyrant.

In this country we have greedy Blacks and Browns, joined by some very stupid and pathetic White Guilt Moon Bats, that have the numbers to turn this country into a shithole just to satisfy their greed and we will all suffer because of it.

We White Conservatives are afraid of losing our country to a bunch of really greedy worthless welfare queens.

We already had an election stolen from us. If we don't stand up and fight all is lost and the US will become another pathetic, soulless, morally bankrupt, oppressive, failed Socialist shithole.
 

The Irish Ram

LITTLE GIRL / Ram Tough
Joined
Apr 10, 2011
Messages
18,678
Reaction score
6,983
Points
350
Location
diagonally parked in a parallel universe
I won't retract because I understand per capita...
But, regardless of the number of individuals in a group, damn near half of the black population lives off the others.
  • Children under age 18: Those under 18 were more likely to receive means-tested benefits than all other age groups.

In an average month, 39.2 percent of children received some type of means-tested
benefit, compared with 16.6 percent of people age 18 to 64 and 12.6 percent of people
65 and older.


  • The black population: At 41.6 percent, blacks were more likely to participate in government assistance programs in an average month.

The black participation rate was followed by Hispanics at 36.4 percent, Asians or Pacific
Islanders at 17.8 percent, and non-Hispanic whites at 13.2 percent.

Even though whites make up 70% of the population, 64% of black children are raised in single family circumstances, as opposed to 24% of whites. And here is the result:

Female-householder families: At 50 percent, people in female-householder families had the highest rates of government assistance participation in major means-tested programs.

You are already getting paid...
 
Last edited:

MizMolly

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2009
Messages
3,642
Reaction score
970
Points
140
Location
Arkansas
So I see we have a thread here talking about the African slave traders. But you see, there is no trade if no one buys. There is no slavery in America if it is not made legal by whites.

America did not have to have slavery. Whites here chose to. By making that choice, you cannot now try blaming Africans for the choice your ancestors made. Furthermore the choice to continue treating blacks as second class citizens after slavery completely removes African complocity.

"A nation is a choice. It chooses itself at fateful forks in the road by turning left or right, by giving up something or taking something -- and in the giving up and the taking, in the deciding and not deciding, the nation becomes. And ever afterwards, the nation and the people who make up the nation are defined by the fork and by the decision that was made there, as well as by the decision that was not made there. For the decision, once made, engraves itself into the landscape, engraves itself into things, into institutions, nerves, muscles, tendons; and the first decision requires a second decision, and the second decision requires a third, and it goes on and on, spiraling in an inexorable processus which distorts everything and alienates everybody.

America became America that way. Fork by fork, step by step, option by option, America or, to be more precise, the men who spoke in the name of America decided that it was going to be a white place defined negatively by the bodies and the blood of the reds and the blacks. And that decision, which was made in the 1660s and elaborated over a two-hundred-year period, foreclosed certain possibilities in America -- perhaps forever -- and set off depth charges that are still echoing and re-echoing in the commonwealth. What makes this all the more mournful is that it didn't have to happen that way. There was another road -- but that road wasn't taken. In the beginning, as we have seen, there was no race problem in America. The race problem in America was a deliberate invention of men who systematically separated blacks and whites in order to make money. This was, as Kenneth Stampp so cogently observed, a deliberate choice among several alternatives. Slavery, he said, "cannot be attributed to some deadly atmospheric miasma or some irresistible force in the South's economic evolution. The use of slaves in southern agriculture was a deliberate choice (among several alternatives) made by men who sought greater returns than they could obtain from their own labor alone, and who found other types of labor " more expensive. ...

It didn't have to happen that way. Back there, before Jim Crow, before the invention of the Negro or the white man or the words and concepts to describe them, the Colonial population consisted largely of a great mass of white and black bondsmen, who occupied roughly the same economic category and were treated with equal contempt by the lords of the plantations and legislatures. Curiously unconcerned about their color, these people worked together and relaxed together. They had essentially the same interests, the same aspirations, arid the same grievances. They conspired together and waged a common struggle against their common enemy -- the big planter apparatus and a social system that legalized terror against black and white bondsmen. No one says and no one believes that there was a Garden of Eden in Colonial America. But the available evidence, slight though it is, suggests that there were widening bonds of solidarity between the first generation of blacks and whites. And the same evidence indicates that it proved very difficult indeed to teach white people to worship their skin.


All this began to change drastically in the sixth decade of the seventeenth century .The decade of the 1660s: this was the first great fork in the making of black America. For it was at this fork that certain men decided to ground the American economic system on human slavery. To understand that great fork, one must understand first the roads leading to it -- roads that were not taken."


Africans did not do this. Africans did not decide for white colonists that blacks would be slaves. But in the rush to try discrediting the 1619 project, the Wall Street Journal writes a story and every racist here wants to cosign it.

But the 1619 Project is about AMERICAN HISTORY, not Europe and so here we will start with Pt. 1

Wow, white Americans were the first to enslave Africans? All slavery is wrong but you only whine about whites owning slaves.
 

BlackSand

Nobody
Joined
Oct 23, 2013
Messages
16,791
Reaction score
6,425
Points
380
Location
Wherever I May Roam
I am quite sure if I posted a Thomas Sowell articke, every word would be read. This is information people here apparently need to learn and since when have we been unable to read more than 3 sentences?
.

You provide a plethora of examples of how you can read a million sentences, examine thousands of statistics, and still come to the wrong conclusions.
It's really just funny, that in all the information you consume, and as accurate as it can be,
you still don't know what it means, or how to actually use it to arrive at a better solution.

.
 
Last edited:

Batcat

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
1,963
Reaction score
1,984
Points
1,938
IM, You say that a lot. That whites are scared. Whites go about our business without one thought of being afraid. You want us to be afraid of you, but you don't even enter our thoughts throughout the day.
Sorry...
I agree with you on your statement. I don’t spend anytime during my day worrying about being attacked by BLM rioters or attacked by some angry black people because I am white.
 

Batcat

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2020
Messages
1,963
Reaction score
1,984
Points
1,938
So I see we have a thread here talking about the African slave traders. But you see, there is no trade if no one buys. There is no slavery in America if it is not made legal by whites.

America did not have to have slavery. Whites here chose to. By making that choice, you cannot now try blaming Africans for the choice your ancestors made. Furthermore the choice to continue treating blacks as second class citizens after slavery completely removes African complocity.

"A nation is a choice. It chooses itself at fateful forks in the road by turning left or right, by giving up something or taking something -- and in the giving up and the taking, in the deciding and not deciding, the nation becomes. And ever afterwards, the nation and the people who make up the nation are defined by the fork and by the decision that was made there, as well as by the decision that was not made there. For the decision, once made, engraves itself into the landscape, engraves itself into things, into institutions, nerves, muscles, tendons; and the first decision requires a second decision, and the second decision requires a third, and it goes on and on, spiraling in an inexorable processus which distorts everything and alienates everybody.

America became America that way. Fork by fork, step by step, option by option, America or, to be more precise, the men who spoke in the name of America decided that it was going to be a white place defined negatively by the bodies and the blood of the reds and the blacks. And that decision, which was made in the 1660s and elaborated over a two-hundred-year period, foreclosed certain possibilities in America -- perhaps forever -- and set off depth charges that are still echoing and re-echoing in the commonwealth. What makes this all the more mournful is that it didn't have to happen that way. There was another road -- but that road wasn't taken. In the beginning, as we have seen, there was no race problem in America. The race problem in America was a deliberate invention of men who systematically separated blacks and whites in order to make money. This was, as Kenneth Stampp so cogently observed, a deliberate choice among several alternatives. Slavery, he said, "cannot be attributed to some deadly atmospheric miasma or some irresistible force in the South's economic evolution. The use of slaves in southern agriculture was a deliberate choice (among several alternatives) made by men who sought greater returns than they could obtain from their own labor alone, and who found other types of labor " more expensive. ...

It didn't have to happen that way. Back there, before Jim Crow, before the invention of the Negro or the white man or the words and concepts to describe them, the Colonial population consisted largely of a great mass of white and black bondsmen, who occupied roughly the same economic category and were treated with equal contempt by the lords of the plantations and legislatures. Curiously unconcerned about their color, these people worked together and relaxed together. They had essentially the same interests, the same aspirations, arid the same grievances. They conspired together and waged a common struggle against their common enemy -- the big planter apparatus and a social system that legalized terror against black and white bondsmen. No one says and no one believes that there was a Garden of Eden in Colonial America. But the available evidence, slight though it is, suggests that there were widening bonds of solidarity between the first generation of blacks and whites. And the same evidence indicates that it proved very difficult indeed to teach white people to worship their skin.


All this began to change drastically in the sixth decade of the seventeenth century .The decade of the 1660s: this was the first great fork in the making of black America. For it was at this fork that certain men decided to ground the American economic system on human slavery. To understand that great fork, one must understand first the roads leading to it -- roads that were not taken."


Africans did not do this. Africans did not decide for white colonists that blacks would be slaves. But in the rush to try discrediting the 1619 project, the Wall Street Journal writes a story and every racist here wants to cosign it.

But the 1619 Project is about AMERICAN HISTORY, not Europe and so here we will start with Pt. 1

Wow, white Americans were the first to enslave Africans? All slavery is wrong but you only whine about whites owning slaves.
History is interesting. Blacks had white slaves before Columbus “discovered” America.



 
OP
IM2

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
49,651
Reaction score
13,847
Points
2,220
So I see we have a thread here talking about the African slave traders. But you see, there is no trade if no one buys. There is no slavery in America if it is not made legal by whites.

America did not have to have slavery. Whites here chose to. By making that choice, you cannot now try blaming Africans for the choice your ancestors made. Furthermore the choice to continue treating blacks as second class citizens after slavery completely removes African complocity.

"A nation is a choice. It chooses itself at fateful forks in the road by turning left or right, by giving up something or taking something -- and in the giving up and the taking, in the deciding and not deciding, the nation becomes. And ever afterwards, the nation and the people who make up the nation are defined by the fork and by the decision that was made there, as well as by the decision that was not made there. For the decision, once made, engraves itself into the landscape, engraves itself into things, into institutions, nerves, muscles, tendons; and the first decision requires a second decision, and the second decision requires a third, and it goes on and on, spiraling in an inexorable processus which distorts everything and alienates everybody.

America became America that way. Fork by fork, step by step, option by option, America or, to be more precise, the men who spoke in the name of America decided that it was going to be a white place defined negatively by the bodies and the blood of the reds and the blacks. And that decision, which was made in the 1660s and elaborated over a two-hundred-year period, foreclosed certain possibilities in America -- perhaps forever -- and set off depth charges that are still echoing and re-echoing in the commonwealth. What makes this all the more mournful is that it didn't have to happen that way. There was another road -- but that road wasn't taken. In the beginning, as we have seen, there was no race problem in America. The race problem in America was a deliberate invention of men who systematically separated blacks and whites in order to make money. This was, as Kenneth Stampp so cogently observed, a deliberate choice among several alternatives. Slavery, he said, "cannot be attributed to some deadly atmospheric miasma or some irresistible force in the South's economic evolution. The use of slaves in southern agriculture was a deliberate choice (among several alternatives) made by men who sought greater returns than they could obtain from their own labor alone, and who found other types of labor " more expensive. ...

It didn't have to happen that way. Back there, before Jim Crow, before the invention of the Negro or the white man or the words and concepts to describe them, the Colonial population consisted largely of a great mass of white and black bondsmen, who occupied roughly the same economic category and were treated with equal contempt by the lords of the plantations and legislatures. Curiously unconcerned about their color, these people worked together and relaxed together. They had essentially the same interests, the same aspirations, arid the same grievances. They conspired together and waged a common struggle against their common enemy -- the big planter apparatus and a social system that legalized terror against black and white bondsmen. No one says and no one believes that there was a Garden of Eden in Colonial America. But the available evidence, slight though it is, suggests that there were widening bonds of solidarity between the first generation of blacks and whites. And the same evidence indicates that it proved very difficult indeed to teach white people to worship their skin.


All this began to change drastically in the sixth decade of the seventeenth century .The decade of the 1660s: this was the first great fork in the making of black America. For it was at this fork that certain men decided to ground the American economic system on human slavery. To understand that great fork, one must understand first the roads leading to it -- roads that were not taken."


Africans did not do this. Africans did not decide for white colonists that blacks would be slaves. But in the rush to try discrediting the 1619 project, the Wall Street Journal writes a story and every racist here wants to cosign it.

But the 1619 Project is about AMERICAN HISTORY, not Europe and so here we will start with Pt. 1

Wow, white Americans were the first to enslave Africans? All slavery is wrong but you only whine about whites owning slaves.
History is interesting. Blacks had white slaves before Columbus “discovered” America.



Well you might want to slow down on some of that and talk about America. Because you guys want to tell us how we weren't slaves then try talking about a million years ago. Also you might take note that the slavery was different, slaves had rights, they could earn freedom, own property and things like that. Then when you are done, try telling me how blacks implemented jim crow in America. Or perhaps you can go back to the paleozoic era and find where Africans imposed jim crow on whites too.

History is real interesting, that's why Irish historian Liam Hogan and others began writing letters to various publications telling them to stop lying about Irish slavery and yoiur website liberalsbackwardthinking is not credible. And neither is Thomas Sowell.
 
OP
IM2

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
49,651
Reaction score
13,847
Points
2,220
IM, You say that a lot. That whites are scared. Whites go about our business without one thought of being afraid. You want us to be afraid of you, but you don't even enter our thoughts throughout the day.
Sorry...
He and those like him seem to struggle with the math. 13 percent of any population is ill-fitted to win a war against th over somebody are you racists. Your false Gorest. Either that or he's delusional.
You keep talking about a war. Those like you represent maybe 15 percent of the white population. if there was a war, your kind would get eliminated by whites who can't stand your asses.
No, I'm not saying anything about starting a war. I'm merely pointing out the reality of where your demands will take us. People who think they can rule over others after stealing an election are delusional. It'd be a good idea to avoid bloodshed. Of course, if your plantation overseers decide to create a couple of trillion MORE in debt to pay off their most loyal voting bloc then so be it.
If they raise taxes to say they're "paying for it" expect one hell of a lot of blowbacks, bruddah.
We are here because of whites like you. No election was stolen and the only people trying to rule are those like you. You owe us money, and since everybody else has been repaid and that you will never stop paying native Americans it's time the debt you owe us got settled. It's just that simple. We will get what we are owed or the ultimate decider will destroy this country. It is written and all your talk doesn't change the penalty for not following that moral law.
I don't owe you jack shit. I have never owned slaves and you have never picked cotton, so...
Since 2000, U.S. gross domestic product lost that much as a result of discriminatory practices in a range of areas, including in education and access to business loans, according to a new study by Citigroup. Specifically, the study came up with $16 trillion in lost GDP by noting four key racial gaps between African Americans and whites:

$13 trillion lost in potential business revenue because of discriminatory lending to African American entrepreneurs, with an estimated 6.1 million jobs not generated as a result

$2.7 trillion in income lost because of disparities in wages suffered by African Americans

$218 billion lost over the past two decades because of discrimination in providing housing credit

And $90 billion to $113 billion in lifetime income lost from discrimination in accessing higher education

We can state our case for reparations on these numbers that started in the year 2000. If we only take lost income from racism starting in 2000, it equals 56,250 per black person in America. And this is money owed NOW, for things done in OUR LIFETIMES.

Now shut the fuck up with that bullshit excuse.
How much welfare has whitey handed out to blacks?

My Quaker family owes you NOTHING. We hid you, fed you, clothed you and got you to safe locations. Money has been taken from my paycheck on day 1 to continue to care for you, so stick the, "I'm untitled to your money because...." up your ass.
You owe me.
Shut up. The government made the laws and the government owes the money.
Where does the gov. get it's money??? Tell me to shut up again and I'll haunt every one of your threads with the truth...
Given the fact that we paid taxes that went to white ecoomic development for several decades, you really needto drop your silly argument.
Never seen a "white economic development"
Yes you have.
 
OP
IM2

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
49,651
Reaction score
13,847
Points
2,220
I am quite sure if I posted a Thomas Sowell articke, every word would be read. This is information people here apparently need to learn and since when have we been unable to read more than 3 sentences?
.

You provide a plethora of examples of how you can read a million sentences, examine thousands of statistics, and still come to the wrong conclusions.
It's really just funny, that in all the information you consume, and as accurate as it can be,
you still don't know what it means, or how to actually use it to arrive at a better solution.

.
Actually I do know what it means and the solution is for whites to recognize the truth then work toberase the racism from your population,
 

westwall

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
73,255
Reaction score
28,622
Points
2,250
Location
Nevada
I am quite sure if I posted a Thomas Sowell articke, every word would be read. This is information people here apparently need to learn and since when have we been unable to read more than 3 sentences?
.

You provide a plethora of examples of how you can read a million sentences, examine thousands of statistics, and still come to the wrong conclusions.
It's really just funny, that in all the information you consume, and as accurate as it can be,
you still don't know what it means, or how to actually use it to arrive at a better solution.

.
Actually I do know what it means and the solution is for whites to recognize the truth then work toberase the racism from your population,






Your "truth" is a warped fantasy. All you want is destruction. You have nothing constructive to add to society. You are a leech, and a troll.

Run to Africa so you can see how good you have it here.

Then STAY there!
 
OP
IM2

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
49,651
Reaction score
13,847
Points
2,220
I won't retract because I understand per capita...
But, regardless of the number of individuals in a group, damn near half of the black population lives off the others.
  • Children under age 18: Those under 18 were more likely to receive means-tested benefits than all other age groups.

In an average month, 39.2 percent of children received some type of means-tested
benefit, compared with 16.6 percent of people age 18 to 64 and 12.6 percent of people
65 and older.


  • The black population: At 41.6 percent, blacks were more likely to participate in government assistance programs in an average month.

The black participation rate was followed by Hispanics at 36.4 percent, Asians or Pacific
Islanders at 17.8 percent, and non-Hispanic whites at 13.2 percent.

Even though whites make up 70% of the population, 64% of black children are raised in single family circumstances, as opposed to 24% of whites. And here is the result:

Female-householder families: At 50 percent, people in female-householder families had the highest rates of government assistance participation in major means-tested programs.

You are already getting paid...
I understand per capita too and it's an excuse used by racists.

/
I won't retract because I understand per capita...
But, regardless of the number of individuals in a group, damn near half of the black population lives off the others.
  • Children under age 18: Those under 18 were more likely to receive means-tested benefits than all other age groups.

In an average month, 39.2 percent of children received some type of means-tested
benefit, compared with 16.6 percent of people age 18 to 64 and 12.6 percent of people
65 and older.


  • The black population: At 41.6 percent, blacks were more likely to participate in government assistance programs in an average month.

The black participation rate was followed by Hispanics at 36.4 percent, Asians or Pacific
Islanders at 17.8 percent, and non-Hispanic whites at 13.2 percent.

Even though whites make up 70% of the population, 64% of black children are raised in single family circumstances, as opposed to 24% of whites. And here is the result:

Female-householder families: At 50 percent, people in female-householder families had the highest rates of government assistance participation in major means-tested programs.

You are already getting paid...

It's damn near comedic some of things posted by you racists.

On October 24, 2013, the Kellogg Foundation sent out a press release about a report they had done entitled, “The Business Case for Racial Equity”. This was a study done by the Kellogg Foundation, using information it had studied and assessed from the Center for American Progress, National Urban League Policy Institute, Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies and the U.S. Department of Justice.

“Striving for racial equity – a world where race is no longer a factor in the distribution of opportunity – is a matter of social justice. But moving toward racial equity can generate significant economic returns as well. When people face barriers to achieving their full potential, the loss of talent, creativity, energy, and productivity is a burden not only for those disadvantaged, but for communities, businesses, governments, and the economy as a whole. Initial research on the magnitude of this burden in the United States (U.S.), as highlighted in this brief, reveals impacts in the trillions of dollars in lost earnings, avoidable public expenditures, and lost economic output.”

The Kellogg Foundation and Altarum Institute

“The Business Case for Racial Equity” Production of this brief was funded by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation. Lead author: Ani Turner, Altarum Institute. Contributors: Dolores Acevedo-Garcia, Brandeis University; Darrell Gaskin, Johns Hopkins University; Thomas LaVeist, John Hopkins University; David R. Williams, Harvard University; Laura Segal, Trust for America’s Health; and George Miller, Altarum Institute.

In 2011, DEMOS did a study named “The Racial Wealth Gap, Why Policy Matters”, which discussed the racial wealth gap, the problems associated with it along with solutions and outcomes if the gap did not exist. In this study DEMOS determined that the racial wealth gap was primarily driven by policy decisions.

“The U.S. racial wealth gap is substantial and is driven by public policy decisions. According to our analysis of the SIPP data, in 2011 the median white household had $111,146 in wealth holdings, compared to just $7,113 for the median Black household and $8,348 for the median Latino household. From the continuing impact of redlining on American homeownership to the retreat from desegregation in public education, public policy has shaped these disparities, leaving them impossible to overcome without racially-aware policy change.”

The Racial Wealth Gap, Why Policy Matters, Laura Sullivan, Tatjana Meschede, Lars Dietrich, & Thomas Shapiro institute for assets & social policy, brandeis university, Amy Traub, Catherine Ruetschlin & Tamara Draut demos

“Racial inequality in the United States today may, ultimately, be based on slavery, but it is also based on the failure of the country to take effective steps since slavery to undermine the structural racial inequality that slavery put in place. From the latter part of the nineteenth century through the first half of the twentieth century, the Jim Crow system continued to keep Blacks “in their place,” and even during and after the civil rights era no policies were adopted to dismantle the racial hierarchy that already existed.”

HOUSING DISCRIMINATION AS A BASIS FOR BLACK REPARATIONS, Jonathan Kaplan and Andrew Valls, Public Affairs Quarterly

Volume 21, Number 3, July 2007

“It will end up costing the U.S. economy as much as $1 trillion between now and 2028 for the nation to maintain its longstanding black-white racial wealth gap, according to a report released this month from the global consultancy firm McKinsey & Company. That will be roughly 4 percent of the United States GDP in 2028—just the conservative view, assuming that the wealth growth rates of African Americans will outpace white wealth growth at its current clip of 3 percent to .8 percent annually, said McKinsey. If the gap widens, however, with white wealth growing at a faster rate than black wealth instead, it could end up costing the U.S. $1.5 trillion or 6 percent of GDP according to the firm.”
Brentin Mock, “White Americans’ Hold on Wealth Is Old, Deep, and Nearly Unshakeable,” CITILAB, September 3, 2019, derived from www.citylab.com/equity/2019/09/racial-wealth-gap-history-slavery-black-white-family-income/597100/?utm_source=pocket-newtab

Why this is just a bunch of liberal jibberish to to black in order to keep them voting democrat. Those aren't the problems, what we conservatives tell you is the real problem. Why if you just had a father in the home none of this would happen.

Black Workers Still Earn Less than Their White Counterparts

As employers in the U.S. tackle issues around racism, fresh attention is being given to the racial wage gap and why black men and women, in particular, still earn substantially less than their white counterparts. Nearly 56 years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act, "we find equal pay for equal work is still not a reality," noted Jackson Gruver, a data analyst at compensation data and software firm PayScale.

Last year, PayScale analyzed differences in earnings between white men and men of color using data from a sample of 1.8 million employees surveyed between January 2017 and February 2019.

Among the findings, Gruver reported: "Even as black or African-American men climb the corporate ladder, they still make less than equally qualified white men. They are the only racial/ethnic group that does not achieve pay parity with white men at some level."

The study found that black men had the largest "uncontrolled pay gap" relative to white men, when comparing the average earnings of black men and white men in the U.S.

On average, black men earned 87 cents for every dollar a white man earned. Hispanic workers had the next largest gap, earning 91 cents for every dollar earned by white men.


This image has been reduced by 30.6%. Click to view full size.



This image has been reduced by 30.6%. Click to view full size.



To put that in perspective, the median salary of a white man in our sample is $72,900; the controlled median pay for black or African-American men is thus $71,500," Gruver said. "This suggests a $1,400 difference in pay that is likely attributable to race."

So daddy lives at home and the family still makes less than whites. Because:

NWLC calculations, based on the U.S. Census Bureau's Current Population Survey for 2016, revealed that when comparing all men and women who work full time, year-round in the U.S., women were paid just 80 cents for every dollar paid to their male counterparts. But the wage gap was even larger when looking specifically at black women who work full time, year-round—they were paid only 63 cents for every dollar paid to white, non-Hispanic men.


Stephen Miller, Black Workers Still Earn Less than Their White Counterparts, www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/compensation/pages/racial-wage-gaps-persistence-poses-challenge.aspx

So a white working couple will make 90 cents on every dollar while a black working couple makes 75 cents. To allow you to understand this reality a white female worker makes 80 cents on every dollar a white man makes. White females are demanding equal pay and rightfully so.

And you black folk really need to start taking education seriously.

Black unemployment is significantly higher than white unemployment regardless of educational attainment


The black unemployment rate is nearly or more than twice the white unemployment rate regardless of educational attainment. It is, and always has been, about twice the white unemployment rate; however, the depth of this racial inequality in the labor market rarely makes the headlines.

Over the last 12 months, the average unemployment rate for black college graduates has been 4.1 percent—nearly two times the average unemployment rate for white college graduates (2.4 percent) and equivalent to the unemployment rate of whites with an associate’s degree or who have not completed college (4.0 percent). The largest disparity is seen among those with less than a high school diploma: while whites with less than a high school diploma have an unemployment rate of 6.9 percent, the black unemployment rate is 16.6 percent—over two times the white average.

The broader significance of this disparity suggests a race penalty whereby blacks at each level of education have unemployment rates that are the same as or higher than less educated whites.

Valerie Wilson, Black unemployment is significantly higher than white unemployment regardless of educational attainment, www.epi.org/publication/black-unemployment-educational-attainment/

African Americans are paid less than whites at every education level

While the economy continues to improve and wages are finally beginning to inch up for most Americans, African Americans are still being paid less than whites at every education level.
As you can see from the chart below, while a college education results in higher wages—both for whites and blacks—it does not eliminate the black-white wage gap. African Americans are still earning less than whites at every level of educational attainment. A recent EPI report, Black-white wage gaps expand with rising wage inequality, shows that this gap persists even after controlling for years of experience, region of the country, and whether one lives in an urban or rural area. In fact, since 1979, the gaps between black and white workers have grown the most among workers with a bachelor’s degree or higher—the most educated workers.

Valerie Wilson, African Americans are paid less than whites at every education level, www.epi.org/publication/african-americans
 
OP
IM2

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
49,651
Reaction score
13,847
Points
2,220
I am quite sure if I posted a Thomas Sowell articke, every word would be read. This is information people here apparently need to learn and since when have we been unable to read more than 3 sentences?
.

You provide a plethora of examples of how you can read a million sentences, examine thousands of statistics, and still come to the wrong conclusions.
It's really just funny, that in all the information you consume, and as accurate as it can be,
you still don't know what it means, or how to actually use it to arrive at a better solution.

.
Actually I do know what it means and the solution is for whites to recognize the truth then work toberase the racism from your population,






Your "truth" is a warped fantasy. All you want is destruction. You have nothing constructive to add to society. You are a leech, and a troll.

Run to Africa so you can see how good you have it here.

Then STAY there!
No son, that's your truth. And your truth has created a dysfunctional nation full whites suffering from psychosis who are pissing off everybody else because you're trying to force your delusions on everybody else. I was born here and I want to see a better nation, not a return to some bullshhit that you believe happened that never did. So if that's something you don't like, pack your bags and go back to Europe. Apparently Europe was not so good for your ancestors. That's why you are here now.
 

irosie91

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2012
Messages
75,904
Reaction score
8,621
Points
2,030
How much welfare has whitey handed out to blacks?

You might want to retract that questionsince blacks were excluded from welfare until about 1965 and whites still get the majority of welfare for the poor, farm subsidy welfare and corporate welfare handouts.
blacks were excluded from welfare until 1965? To what welfare programs do you
refer? There was very little family welfare for anyone before 1965. As to the
current welfare thing-----in ABSOLUTE numbers there are more impoverished
"whiteys" in the USA than impoverished "blacks" (I am basing the statement on the
OLD definition of "white" "black" in which black meant "NEGROID" with family background
in subsaharan africa). Of course TODAY----most of the welfare does go to SELF DETERMINED
"black" people.
 

Bootney Lee Farnsworth

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
34,137
Reaction score
18,145
Points
1,915
Location
Tejas
We, all white people, are scared that black people will consider us friends instead of enemies for no other reason than that we share a country. Then, we would be obligated to associate with you darkies and that is beneath our station in life.
:beer:

Associating with lessers should always scare we, the racial elite.
:banana:
 

The Irish Ram

LITTLE GIRL / Ram Tough
Joined
Apr 10, 2011
Messages
18,678
Reaction score
6,983
Points
350
Location
diagonally parked in a parallel universe
I won't retract because I understand per capita...
But, regardless of the number of individuals in a group, damn near half of the black population lives off the others.
  • Children under age 18: Those under 18 were more likely to receive means-tested benefits than all other age groups.

In an average month, 39.2 percent of children received some type of means-tested
benefit, compared with 16.6 percent of people age 18 to 64 and 12.6 percent of people
65 and older.


  • The black population: At 41.6 percent, blacks were more likely to participate in government assistance programs in an average month.

The black participation rate was followed by Hispanics at 36.4 percent, Asians or Pacific
Islanders at 17.8 percent, and non-Hispanic whites at 13.2 percent.

Even though whites make up 70% of the population, 64% of black children are raised in single family circumstances, as opposed to 24% of whites. And here is the result:

Female-householder families: At 50 percent, people in female-householder families had the highest rates of government assistance participation in major means-tested programs.

You are already getting paid...
I understand per capita too and it's an excuse used by racists.

/
I won't retract because I understand per capita...
But, regardless of the number of individuals in a group, damn near half of the black population lives off the others.
  • Children under age 18: Those under 18 were more likely to receive means-tested benefits than all other age groups.

In an average month, 39.2 percent of children received some type of means-tested
benefit, compared with 16.6 percent of people age 18 to 64 and 12.6 percent of people
65 and older.


  • The black population: At 41.6 percent, blacks were more likely to participate in government assistance programs in an average month.

The black participation rate was followed by Hispanics at 36.4 percent, Asians or Pacific
Islanders at 17.8 percent, and non-Hispanic whites at 13.2 percent.

Even though whites make up 70% of the population, 64% of black children are raised in single family circumstances, as opposed to 24% of whites. And here is the result:

Female-householder families: At 50 percent, people in female-householder families had the highest rates of government assistance participation in major means-tested programs.

You are already getting paid...

It's damn near comedic some of things posted by you racists.

On October 24, 2013, the Kellogg Foundation sent out a press release about a report they had done entitled, “The Business Case for Racial Equity”. This was a study done by the Kellogg Foundation, using information it had studied and assessed from the Center for American Progress, National Urban League Policy Institute, Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies and the U.S. Department of Justice.

“Striving for racial equity – a world where race is no longer a factor in the distribution of opportunity – is a matter of social justice. But moving toward racial equity can generate significant economic returns as well. When people face barriers to achieving their full potential, the loss of talent, creativity, energy, and productivity is a burden not only for those disadvantaged, but for communities, businesses, governments, and the economy as a whole. Initial research on the magnitude of this burden in the United States (U.S.), as highlighted in this brief, reveals impacts in the trillions of dollars in lost earnings, avoidable public expenditures, and lost economic output.”

The Kellogg Foundation and Altarum Institute

“The Business Case for Racial Equity” Production of this brief was funded by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation. Lead author: Ani Turner, Altarum Institute. Contributors: Dolores Acevedo-Garcia, Brandeis University; Darrell Gaskin, Johns Hopkins University; Thomas LaVeist, John Hopkins University; David R. Williams, Harvard University; Laura Segal, Trust for America’s Health; and George Miller, Altarum Institute.

In 2011, DEMOS did a study named “The Racial Wealth Gap, Why Policy Matters”, which discussed the racial wealth gap, the problems associated with it along with solutions and outcomes if the gap did not exist. In this study DEMOS determined that the racial wealth gap was primarily driven by policy decisions.

“The U.S. racial wealth gap is substantial and is driven by public policy decisions. According to our analysis of the SIPP data, in 2011 the median white household had $111,146 in wealth holdings, compared to just $7,113 for the median Black household and $8,348 for the median Latino household. From the continuing impact of redlining on American homeownership to the retreat from desegregation in public education, public policy has shaped these disparities, leaving them impossible to overcome without racially-aware policy change.”

The Racial Wealth Gap, Why Policy Matters, Laura Sullivan, Tatjana Meschede, Lars Dietrich, & Thomas Shapiro institute for assets & social policy, brandeis university, Amy Traub, Catherine Ruetschlin & Tamara Draut demos

“Racial inequality in the United States today may, ultimately, be based on slavery, but it is also based on the failure of the country to take effective steps since slavery to undermine the structural racial inequality that slavery put in place. From the latter part of the nineteenth century through the first half of the twentieth century, the Jim Crow system continued to keep Blacks “in their place,” and even during and after the civil rights era no policies were adopted to dismantle the racial hierarchy that already existed.”

HOUSING DISCRIMINATION AS A BASIS FOR BLACK REPARATIONS, Jonathan Kaplan and Andrew Valls, Public Affairs Quarterly

Volume 21, Number 3, July 2007

“It will end up costing the U.S. economy as much as $1 trillion between now and 2028 for the nation to maintain its longstanding black-white racial wealth gap, according to a report released this month from the global consultancy firm McKinsey & Company. That will be roughly 4 percent of the United States GDP in 2028—just the conservative view, assuming that the wealth growth rates of African Americans will outpace white wealth growth at its current clip of 3 percent to .8 percent annually, said McKinsey. If the gap widens, however, with white wealth growing at a faster rate than black wealth instead, it could end up costing the U.S. $1.5 trillion or 6 percent of GDP according to the firm.”
Brentin Mock, “White Americans’ Hold on Wealth Is Old, Deep, and Nearly Unshakeable,” CITILAB, September 3, 2019, derived from www.citylab.com/equity/2019/09/racial-wealth-gap-history-slavery-black-white-family-income/597100/?utm_source=pocket-newtab

Why this is just a bunch of liberal jibberish to to black in order to keep them voting democrat. Those aren't the problems, what we conservatives tell you is the real problem. Why if you just had a father in the home none of this would happen.

Black Workers Still Earn Less than Their White Counterparts

As employers in the U.S. tackle issues around racism, fresh attention is being given to the racial wage gap and why black men and women, in particular, still earn substantially less than their white counterparts. Nearly 56 years after the passage of the Civil Rights Act, "we find equal pay for equal work is still not a reality," noted Jackson Gruver, a data analyst at compensation data and software firm PayScale.

Last year, PayScale analyzed differences in earnings between white men and men of color using data from a sample of 1.8 million employees surveyed between January 2017 and February 2019.

Among the findings, Gruver reported: "Even as black or African-American men climb the corporate ladder, they still make less than equally qualified white men. They are the only racial/ethnic group that does not achieve pay parity with white men at some level."

The study found that black men had the largest "uncontrolled pay gap" relative to white men, when comparing the average earnings of black men and white men in the U.S.

On average, black men earned 87 cents for every dollar a white man earned. Hispanic workers had the next largest gap, earning 91 cents for every dollar earned by white men.


This image has been reduced by 30.6%. Click to view full size.



This image has been reduced by 30.6%. Click to view full size.



To put that in perspective, the median salary of a white man in our sample is $72,900; the controlled median pay for black or African-American men is thus $71,500," Gruver said. "This suggests a $1,400 difference in pay that is likely attributable to race."

So daddy lives at home and the family still makes less than whites. Because:

NWLC calculations, based on the U.S. Census Bureau's Current Population Survey for 2016, revealed that when comparing all men and women who work full time, year-round in the U.S., women were paid just 80 cents for every dollar paid to their male counterparts. But the wage gap was even larger when looking specifically at black women who work full time, year-round—they were paid only 63 cents for every dollar paid to white, non-Hispanic men.


Stephen Miller, Black Workers Still Earn Less than Their White Counterparts, www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/compensation/pages/racial-wage-gaps-persistence-poses-challenge.aspx

So a white working couple will make 90 cents on every dollar while a black working couple makes 75 cents. To allow you to understand this reality a white female worker makes 80 cents on every dollar a white man makes. White females are demanding equal pay and rightfully so.

And you black folk really need to start taking education seriously.

Black unemployment is significantly higher than white unemployment regardless of educational attainment


The black unemployment rate is nearly or more than twice the white unemployment rate regardless of educational attainment. It is, and always has been, about twice the white unemployment rate; however, the depth of this racial inequality in the labor market rarely makes the headlines.

Over the last 12 months, the average unemployment rate for black college graduates has been 4.1 percent—nearly two times the average unemployment rate for white college graduates (2.4 percent) and equivalent to the unemployment rate of whites with an associate’s degree or who have not completed college (4.0 percent). The largest disparity is seen among those with less than a high school diploma: while whites with less than a high school diploma have an unemployment rate of 6.9 percent, the black unemployment rate is 16.6 percent—over two times the white average.

The broader significance of this disparity suggests a race penalty whereby blacks at each level of education have unemployment rates that are the same as or higher than less educated whites.

Valerie Wilson, Black unemployment is significantly higher than white unemployment regardless of educational attainment, www.epi.org/publication/black-unemployment-educational-attainment/

African Americans are paid less than whites at every education level

While the economy continues to improve and wages are finally beginning to inch up for most Americans, African Americans are still being paid less than whites at every education level.
As you can see from the chart below, while a college education results in higher wages—both for whites and blacks—it does not eliminate the black-white wage gap. African Americans are still earning less than whites at every level of educational attainment. A recent EPI report, Black-white wage gaps expand with rising wage inequality, shows that this gap persists even after controlling for years of experience, region of the country, and whether one lives in an urban or rural area. In fact, since 1979, the gaps between black and white workers have grown the most among workers with a bachelor’s degree or higher—the most educated workers.

Valerie Wilson, African Americans are paid less than whites at every education level, www.epi.org/publication/african-americans
Every bit of that bullshit was produced by George Soros to divide this country. The "Center for American Progress" is his. Nothing he does is good for America, including the garbage you blacks keep buying into. And he just pledged to give you another 20 million dollars to whip you up and get you to burn your own communities down. There is your reparations.

He named BLM. He gave the money to Acorn to pass on to you. He has you bought and paid for. You are doing exactly what he has paid for you to do.
You have voluntarily enslaved yourself to a white man. And you damage your own country in doing so...
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$191.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top