Were there ever 20 people working on Obama, or Hillary, or any other Democrat???

[healthmyths]

Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.

"There's a lot we don't know," he told the National Association of Realtors convention in Washington. "We have 20 people working on Trump, we're going to do a book, we're doing articles about every phase of his life," he added.
The Washington Post Has Assembled An Army Of Reporters To Investigate Everything Trump

Here we have one of the MOST public figures in the last 30 years seen by over 1 billion people over 185 episodes of the "Apprentice" The Apprentice (U.S. TV series) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and yet this single paper is dedicating 20 people to unearth dirt?

Where was the same scrutiny for Obama? John Kerry?
Why didn't these papers perform the same investigation effort to uncover whatever on Obama?

A nation-wide network of researchers has sprung up to attempt to fill in the blanks, but at every opportunity Obama’s high-priced lawyers have built walls around various records or simply made them disappear. It is estimated that Obama’s legal team has now spent well over $1.4 million dollars blocking access to documents every American should have access to.
The question is why would he spend so much money to do this?

The president who campaigned for a more “open government” and “full disclosure”
will not unseal his medical records, his school records, his birth records or his passport records.
He will not release his Harvard records,
his Columbia College records,
or his Occidental College records—
he will not even release his Columbia College thesis.
All his legislative records from the Illinois State Senate are missing and
he claims his scheduling records during those State Senate years are lost as well.
In addition, no one can find his school records for the elite K-12 college prep school, Punahou School, he attended in Hawaii.

What is he hiding? Well, for starters, some of these records will shed light on his citizenship and birth.

For example, Obama’s application to Punahou School – now mysteriously missing –
would likely contain a birth certificate. And, according to attorney Gary Kreep, “his Occidental College records are important as they may show he attended there as a foreign exchange student.” Indeed, Obama used his Indonesian name “Barry Soetoro” while attending Occidental. Kreep has filed lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility to be president and as part of his lawsuit he requested Obama’s records from Occidental. However, Obama’s lawyers quickly moved to stop Occidental from honoring this request.
The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues | Obama Social Security Numbers

WHERE ARE OBAMA's RECORDS?

OR is this another example of Main Stream Media BIAS?
The same MSM that studies have shown:
That in 2008 , 1,160 or 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters
So in reality why would these "journalists" write negative stories about Obama and positive about his opponent?
They wouldn't. They gave money to Obama for his election!

And here is a personal anecdote about one of those editors...
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush.
He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??
But when it came to Obama?
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!
So why would NewsWeek or any of the other MSM be objective and produce "objective" information on which people base opinions.
But the proof is here:
This study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press. The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans. Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors,
Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election
Finally here is this article describing HOW POLLING is affected by the media:
Partisanship and race probably influence the MSM’s “slobbering love affair” with Obama.
MSM denizens are overwhelmingly left-wing Democrats, which this site’s readers know very well.
Left-wing Democrats in the MSM likely accept the belief that racism motivates any criticism of Obama.
Since they are loath to express any sentiment that could be so construed, they sing his praises and refuse to report anything that could be considered critical of him. (Expect the MSM to laud Obama’s deal with Iran.)

Given the MSM’s infatuation with Obama and the fact that many Americans still rely on the MSM for the news, is there any wonder that polls show public approval of his job performance, and especially that perceptions of him as a person, remain higher than they might otherwise be?
Articles: Why So Many People Regard Obama Positively

 

[NYcarbineer]

I thought Foxnews was the most watched cable news network.

I thought conservatives dominated talk radio.

I thought the Right had several thousand anti-liberal anti-Democrat anti-Obama sites on the internet.

 

[PredFan]

Yeah I warned Trump supporters about the Clinton machine, and the State Run Media. They haven't even begun going after Trump yet.

 

[MarathonMike]

The Washington compost has deteriorated into a shameless left wing rag. Their circulation is down nearly 40% since 2009 a fact easily verifiable with a google search. This all out blitz on Trump reveals a couple of things. First and foremost it reveals that the Post along with the NY Times have spit on their journalistic credo for fairness and objectivity. They desperately want to RESHAPE OPINION with their biased reporting.
The second thing: it's all about ego. The Post wants to be the Liberal darling once again as when they brought down Nixon. They feel that if they bring down the Trump Elephant, it will be glory days again.

This is exactly what Jefferson warned about with the statement "The only security of all is in a free press". Does this sound like a free press to anyone?

 

[Dana7360]

Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.

"There's a lot we don't know," he told the National Association of Realtors convention in Washington. "We have 20 people working on Trump, we're going to do a book, we're doing articles about every phase of his life," he added.
The Washington Post Has Assembled An Army Of Reporters To Investigate Everything Trump

Here we have one of the MOST public figures in the last 30 years seen by over 1 billion people over 185 episodes of the "Apprentice" The Apprentice (U.S. TV series) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and yet this single paper is dedicating 20 people to unearth dirt?

Where was the same scrutiny for Obama? John Kerry?
Why didn't these papers perform the same investigation effort to uncover whatever on Obama?

A nation-wide network of researchers has sprung up to attempt to fill in the blanks, but at every opportunity Obama’s high-priced lawyers have built walls around various records or simply made them disappear. It is estimated that Obama’s legal team has now spent well over $1.4 million dollars blocking access to documents every American should have access to.
The question is why would he spend so much money to do this?

The president who campaigned for a more “open government” and “full disclosure”
will not unseal his medical records, his school records, his birth records or his passport records.
He will not release his Harvard records,
his Columbia College records,
or his Occidental College records—
he will not even release his Columbia College thesis.
All his legislative records from the Illinois State Senate are missing and
he claims his scheduling records during those State Senate years are lost as well.
In addition, no one can find his school records for the elite K-12 college prep school, Punahou School, he attended in Hawaii.

What is he hiding? Well, for starters, some of these records will shed light on his citizenship and birth.

For example, Obama’s application to Punahou School – now mysteriously missing –
would likely contain a birth certificate. And, according to attorney Gary Kreep, “his Occidental College records are important as they may show he attended there as a foreign exchange student.” Indeed, Obama used his Indonesian name “Barry Soetoro” while attending Occidental. Kreep has filed lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility to be president and as part of his lawsuit he requested Obama’s records from Occidental. However, Obama’s lawyers quickly moved to stop Occidental from honoring this request.
The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues | Obama Social Security Numbers

WHERE ARE OBAMA's RECORDS?

OR is this another example of Main Stream Media BIAS?
The same MSM that studies have shown:
That in 2008 , 1,160 or 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters
So in reality why would these "journalists" write negative stories about Obama and positive about his opponent?
They wouldn't. They gave money to Obama for his election!

And here is a personal anecdote about one of those editors...
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush.
He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??
But when it came to Obama?
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!
So why would NewsWeek or any of the other MSM be objective and produce "objective" information on which people base opinions.
But the proof is here:
This study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press. The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans. Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors,
Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election
Finally here is this article describing HOW POLLING is affected by the media:
Partisanship and race probably influence the MSM’s “slobbering love affair” with Obama.
MSM denizens are overwhelmingly left-wing Democrats, which this site’s readers know very well.
Left-wing Democrats in the MSM likely accept the belief that racism motivates any criticism of Obama.
Since they are loath to express any sentiment that could be so construed, they sing his praises and refuse to report anything that could be considered critical of him. (Expect the MSM to laud Obama’s deal with Iran.)

Given the MSM’s infatuation with Obama and the fact that many Americans still rely on the MSM for the news, is there any wonder that polls show public approval of his job performance, and especially that perceptions of him as a person, remain higher than they might otherwise be?
Articles: Why So Many People Regard Obama Positively

What makes you think you have any right to tell a private business what they can or can't do?

You don't own that business. You have absolutely no say in how they run their business and what jobs employees should have or do. That's the job of the people who put their hard earned money up to buy, own and run that business. Not you.

If you don't like the fact that a private business has the right to do as they please within our laws, then you should look no farther than conservatives and ronald reagan. You conservatives removed the laws that govern our press and media. If you wanted the Fairness Doctrine gone then you wanted one sided and slanted news.

You got what you conservatives wanted. You're just too short sighted to realize that what you do for yourselves, you do for all in America. So if you all can have large teams of people investigating democratic politicians, then others can have large teams of people investigating republican politicians.

You only have yourselves to blame. You put private business and money before everything else then when it comes back to bite you, you whine about it.

I have absolutely no sympathy for you.

You got what you worked so hard for.

 

[healthmyths]

Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.

"There's a lot we don't know," he told the National Association of Realtors convention in Washington. "We have 20 people working on Trump, we're going to do a book, we're doing articles about every phase of his life," he added.
The Washington Post Has Assembled An Army Of Reporters To Investigate Everything Trump

Here we have one of the MOST public figures in the last 30 years seen by over 1 billion people over 185 episodes of the "Apprentice" The Apprentice (U.S. TV series) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and yet this single paper is dedicating 20 people to unearth dirt?

Where was the same scrutiny for Obama? John Kerry?
Why didn't these papers perform the same investigation effort to uncover whatever on Obama?

A nation-wide network of researchers has sprung up to attempt to fill in the blanks, but at every opportunity Obama’s high-priced lawyers have built walls around various records or simply made them disappear. It is estimated that Obama’s legal team has now spent well over $1.4 million dollars blocking access to documents every American should have access to.
The question is why would he spend so much money to do this?

The president who campaigned for a more “open government” and “full disclosure”
will not unseal his medical records, his school records, his birth records or his passport records.
He will not release his Harvard records,
his Columbia College records,
or his Occidental College records—
he will not even release his Columbia College thesis.
All his legislative records from the Illinois State Senate are missing and
he claims his scheduling records during those State Senate years are lost as well.
In addition, no one can find his school records for the elite K-12 college prep school, Punahou School, he attended in Hawaii.

What is he hiding? Well, for starters, some of these records will shed light on his citizenship and birth.

For example, Obama’s application to Punahou School – now mysteriously missing –
would likely contain a birth certificate. And, according to attorney Gary Kreep, “his Occidental College records are important as they may show he attended there as a foreign exchange student.” Indeed, Obama used his Indonesian name “Barry Soetoro” while attending Occidental. Kreep has filed lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility to be president and as part of his lawsuit he requested Obama’s records from Occidental. However, Obama’s lawyers quickly moved to stop Occidental from honoring this request.
The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues | Obama Social Security Numbers

WHERE ARE OBAMA's RECORDS?

OR is this another example of Main Stream Media BIAS?
The same MSM that studies have shown:
That in 2008 , 1,160 or 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters
So in reality why would these "journalists" write negative stories about Obama and positive about his opponent?
They wouldn't. They gave money to Obama for his election!

And here is a personal anecdote about one of those editors...
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush.
He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??
But when it came to Obama?
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!
So why would NewsWeek or any of the other MSM be objective and produce "objective" information on which people base opinions.
But the proof is here:
This study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press. The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans. Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors,
Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election
Finally here is this article describing HOW POLLING is affected by the media:
Partisanship and race probably influence the MSM’s “slobbering love affair” with Obama.
MSM denizens are overwhelmingly left-wing Democrats, which this site’s readers know very well.
Left-wing Democrats in the MSM likely accept the belief that racism motivates any criticism of Obama.
Since they are loath to express any sentiment that could be so construed, they sing his praises and refuse to report anything that could be considered critical of him. (Expect the MSM to laud Obama’s deal with Iran.)

Given the MSM’s infatuation with Obama and the fact that many Americans still rely on the MSM for the news, is there any wonder that polls show public approval of his job performance, and especially that perceptions of him as a person, remain higher than they might otherwise be?
Articles: Why So Many People Regard Obama Positively

What makes you think you have any right to tell a private business what they can or can't do?

You don't own that business. You have absolutely no say in how they run their business and what jobs employees should have or do. That's the job of the people who put their hard earned money up to buy, own and run that business. Not you.

If you don't like the fact that a private business has the right to do as they please within our laws, then you should look no farther than conservatives and ronald reagan. You conservatives removed the laws that govern our press and media. If you wanted the Fairness Doctrine gone then you wanted one sided and slanted news.

You got what you conservatives wanted. You're just too short sighted to realize that what you do for yourselves, you do for all in America. So if you all can have large teams of people investigating democratic politicians, then others can have large teams of people investigating republican politicians.

You only have yourselves to blame. You put private business and money before everything else then when it comes back to bite you, you whine about it.

I have absolutely no sympathy for you.

You got what you worked so hard for.

Never in my mind was it whining or complaining about the BIAS of MSM being put in check!
What I am doing is pointing out to idiots like YOU that believe every single word of the BIASED MSM is true. That everything they write/show about Obama
is honest and objective!
Come on! Obviously you are one of those truly ignorant people that agreed with this "hard nosed" objective journalist of the MSM... who said:
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- of Bush ...Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’

Besides this thread was never intended for mindless obamabots like you!
It was intended for people still making up their minds and hopefully shedding the exposure of extreme bias as found in the Washington Post when it comes
to Trump versus the same "objectivity" for Hillary. You are pathetically lost.
The growing number of people recognizing the MSM has been BIASED in presenting stories about Obama and his agenda.
Case in point... not one MSM has ever ever questioned Obama's statement "46 million uninsured Americans" that want and need health insurance!
You believe that number as do a lot of your fellow idiots.
You never questioned though nor did the MSM that figure!
Never realized 10 million of the 46 million were not LEGAL citizens!
Never realized or understood the failure of Obama's Medicaid administration to enroll 14 million of those "46 million" that all they needed to do was register!
Finally you and other idiots never questioned that 18 million "uninsured' under 34 making over $50,000 NEVER WANTED OR NEEDED health insurance!
Yet you and the MSM continually supported that "46 million uninsured" Americans and now what do we have?
Insurance companies quitting. Fewer people covered. Higher premiums!
And this is just ONE example of the biased MSM NOT doing their job because THEY think as Thomas... Obama's sort of God! GEEZ!!!

 

[healthmyths]

I thought Foxnews was the most watched cable news network.

I thought conservatives dominated talk radio.

I thought the Right had several thousand anti-liberal anti-Democrat anti-Obama sites on the internet.

So you in your BIASED thinking see Fox News as subjective? Is that right?
So if Fox News is subjective... Then what is ABC,CBS,NBC, NYT,Washington Post, and far more left winged biased MSM outlets?
And YES conservatives DO dominate talk radio NO question about that.
And YES there are several thousand conservative web sites. I agree!

It is for those above reasons there is some objectivity in the news. But certainly not from what is commonly known as the Main Stream Media!

According to philosopher Noam Chomsky, media organizations with an elite audience such as CBS News and The New York Times, successful corporations with the assets necessary to engage in original reporting, set the tone for other smaller news organizations which lack resources by creating conversations that cascade down to smaller news organizations using the Associated Press and other means of aggregation. An elite mainstream sets the agenda and smaller organizations parrot it.[1]

And there fore this is the reason for my statement above because idiots like you STILL believe in that "elite mainstream" that tells you what to believe!
This is the same elite that did the following which again YOU don't understand but this is NOT for you because you are too far gone!

In 2008 , 1,160 or 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC [MSM!!!]contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters
So in reality why would these "journalists" write negative stories about Obama and positive about his opponent?
They wouldn't. They gave money to Obama for his election!

American public distrust in the media
A 2012 Gallup poll found that Americans' distrust in the media had hit a new high, with 60% saying they had little or no trust in the mass media to report the news fully, accurately, and fairly. Distrust had increased since the previous few years, when Americans were already more negative about the media than they had been in the years before 2004.[11]
Mainstream media - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So tell me again the Objectivity of the MSM and the "elites" that sets what YOU believe in!

 

[Dana7360]

Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.

"There's a lot we don't know," he told the National Association of Realtors convention in Washington. "We have 20 people working on Trump, we're going to do a book, we're doing articles about every phase of his life," he added.
The Washington Post Has Assembled An Army Of Reporters To Investigate Everything Trump

Here we have one of the MOST public figures in the last 30 years seen by over 1 billion people over 185 episodes of the "Apprentice" The Apprentice (U.S. TV series) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and yet this single paper is dedicating 20 people to unearth dirt?

Where was the same scrutiny for Obama? John Kerry?
Why didn't these papers perform the same investigation effort to uncover whatever on Obama?

A nation-wide network of researchers has sprung up to attempt to fill in the blanks, but at every opportunity Obama’s high-priced lawyers have built walls around various records or simply made them disappear. It is estimated that Obama’s legal team has now spent well over $1.4 million dollars blocking access to documents every American should have access to.
The question is why would he spend so much money to do this?

The president who campaigned for a more “open government” and “full disclosure”
will not unseal his medical records, his school records, his birth records or his passport records.
He will not release his Harvard records,
his Columbia College records,
or his Occidental College records—
he will not even release his Columbia College thesis.
All his legislative records from the Illinois State Senate are missing and
he claims his scheduling records during those State Senate years are lost as well.
In addition, no one can find his school records for the elite K-12 college prep school, Punahou School, he attended in Hawaii.

What is he hiding? Well, for starters, some of these records will shed light on his citizenship and birth.

For example, Obama’s application to Punahou School – now mysteriously missing –
would likely contain a birth certificate. And, according to attorney Gary Kreep, “his Occidental College records are important as they may show he attended there as a foreign exchange student.” Indeed, Obama used his Indonesian name “Barry Soetoro” while attending Occidental. Kreep has filed lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility to be president and as part of his lawsuit he requested Obama’s records from Occidental. However, Obama’s lawyers quickly moved to stop Occidental from honoring this request.
The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues | Obama Social Security Numbers

WHERE ARE OBAMA's RECORDS?

OR is this another example of Main Stream Media BIAS?
The same MSM that studies have shown:
That in 2008 , 1,160 or 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters
So in reality why would these "journalists" write negative stories about Obama and positive about his opponent?
They wouldn't. They gave money to Obama for his election!

And here is a personal anecdote about one of those editors...
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush.
He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??
But when it came to Obama?
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!
So why would NewsWeek or any of the other MSM be objective and produce "objective" information on which people base opinions.
But the proof is here:
This study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press. The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans. Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors,
Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election
Finally here is this article describing HOW POLLING is affected by the media:
Partisanship and race probably influence the MSM’s “slobbering love affair” with Obama.
MSM denizens are overwhelmingly left-wing Democrats, which this site’s readers know very well.
Left-wing Democrats in the MSM likely accept the belief that racism motivates any criticism of Obama.
Since they are loath to express any sentiment that could be so construed, they sing his praises and refuse to report anything that could be considered critical of him. (Expect the MSM to laud Obama’s deal with Iran.)

Given the MSM’s infatuation with Obama and the fact that many Americans still rely on the MSM for the news, is there any wonder that polls show public approval of his job performance, and especially that perceptions of him as a person, remain higher than they might otherwise be?
Articles: Why So Many People Regard Obama Positively

What makes you think you have any right to tell a private business what they can or can't do?

You don't own that business. You have absolutely no say in how they run their business and what jobs employees should have or do. That's the job of the people who put their hard earned money up to buy, own and run that business. Not you.

If you don't like the fact that a private business has the right to do as they please within our laws, then you should look no farther than conservatives and ronald reagan. You conservatives removed the laws that govern our press and media. If you wanted the Fairness Doctrine gone then you wanted one sided and slanted news.

You got what you conservatives wanted. You're just too short sighted to realize that what you do for yourselves, you do for all in America. So if you all can have large teams of people investigating democratic politicians, then others can have large teams of people investigating republican politicians.

You only have yourselves to blame. You put private business and money before everything else then when it comes back to bite you, you whine about it.

I have absolutely no sympathy for you.

You got what you worked so hard for.

Never in my mind was it whining or complaining about the BIAS of MSM being put in check!
What I am doing is pointing out to idiots like YOU that believe every single word of the BIASED MSM is true. That everything they write/show about Obama
is honest and objective!
Come on! Obviously you are one of those truly ignorant people that agreed with this "hard nosed" objective journalist of the MSM... who said:
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- of Bush ...Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’

Besides this thread was never intended for mindless obamabots like you!
It was intended for people still making up their minds and hopefully shedding the exposure of extreme bias as found in the Washington Post when it comes
to Trump versus the same "objectivity" for Hillary. You are pathetically lost.
The growing number of people recognizing the MSM has been BIASED in presenting stories about Obama and his agenda.
Case in point... not one MSM has ever ever questioned Obama's statement "46 million uninsured Americans" that want and need health insurance!
You believe that number as do a lot of your fellow idiots.
You never questioned though nor did the MSM that figure!
Never realized 10 million of the 46 million were not LEGAL citizens!
Never realized or understood the failure of Obama's Medicaid administration to enroll 14 million of those "46 million" that all they needed to do was register!
Finally you and other idiots never questioned that 18 million "uninsured' under 34 making over $50,000 NEVER WANTED OR NEEDED health insurance!
Yet you and the MSM continually supported that "46 million uninsured" Americans and now what do we have?
Insurance companies quitting. Fewer people covered. Higher premiums!
And this is just ONE example of the biased MSM NOT doing their job because THEY think as Thomas... Obama's sort of God! GEEZ!!!

I try to have an honest conversation and you just lie.

I tried to read your reply but can't get past thes lie in the first paragraph so I stopped reading.

If you want to talk with me then you should do so in an honest and mature manner.

I could careless what MSN says. Or what the Washington Post says.

I don't pay any attention to most of the news out there. It's all tabloid trash with a sprinkle of actual news.

I don't read MSN nor do I read the Washington Post. I just believe in the constitution and support their right to free speech and freedom of the press. Apparently you don't.

I don't care what people write about any politician. Since the Fairness Doctrine was removed by you conservatives, I don't trust much of our news that we have today.

I think for myself. I don't need some tabloid media outlet telling me what to think. I just want the facts.

What does Obama have to do with any of this?

If you can't have a mature and honest conversation then please, don't reply to my posts. You're wasting your time. I won't read lies and personal attacks.

When you lie and personally attack someone it's only you saying that the other person is right, you don't have an honest and mature reply so you sink to childish levels of lies and personal attacks.

Hey, if that's all you've got, go for it but you're showing all honest, mature adults what a childish liar you are.

Oh by the way, your OP was nothing but whining. You and the author demanding that a private business conduct their company the way you want. Not the way the owners want. So stop demanding and whining about 20 reporters out to investigate trump and demanding that the same amount be put on democratic candidates. Which I'm sure fox news, britebart, world net daily and a very long list of conservative media outlets have teams of much more than 20 people investigating democratic politicians and candidates.

 

[Siete]

yeah, thats pretty bad ... 20 people on poor little Dummie ...errr Donnie


House Republicans should investigate his financial background for 3 years and have 9 hearings attempting to convict him.

 

[healthmyths]

Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.

"There's a lot we don't know," he told the National Association of Realtors convention in Washington. "We have 20 people working on Trump, we're going to do a book, we're doing articles about every phase of his life," he added.
The Washington Post Has Assembled An Army Of Reporters To Investigate Everything Trump

Here we have one of the MOST public figures in the last 30 years seen by over 1 billion people over 185 episodes of the "Apprentice" The Apprentice (U.S. TV series) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and yet this single paper is dedicating 20 people to unearth dirt?

Where was the same scrutiny for Obama? John Kerry?
Why didn't these papers perform the same investigation effort to uncover whatever on Obama?

A nation-wide network of researchers has sprung up to attempt to fill in the blanks, but at every opportunity Obama’s high-priced lawyers have built walls around various records or simply made them disappear. It is estimated that Obama’s legal team has now spent well over $1.4 million dollars blocking access to documents every American should have access to.
The question is why would he spend so much money to do this?

The president who campaigned for a more “open government” and “full disclosure”
will not unseal his medical records, his school records, his birth records or his passport records.
He will not release his Harvard records,
his Columbia College records,
or his Occidental College records—
he will not even release his Columbia College thesis.
All his legislative records from the Illinois State Senate are missing and
he claims his scheduling records during those State Senate years are lost as well.
In addition, no one can find his school records for the elite K-12 college prep school, Punahou School, he attended in Hawaii.

What is he hiding? Well, for starters, some of these records will shed light on his citizenship and birth.

For example, Obama’s application to Punahou School – now mysteriously missing –
would likely contain a birth certificate. And, according to attorney Gary Kreep, “his Occidental College records are important as they may show he attended there as a foreign exchange student.” Indeed, Obama used his Indonesian name “Barry Soetoro” while attending Occidental. Kreep has filed lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility to be president and as part of his lawsuit he requested Obama’s records from Occidental. However, Obama’s lawyers quickly moved to stop Occidental from honoring this request.
The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues | Obama Social Security Numbers

WHERE ARE OBAMA's RECORDS?

OR is this another example of Main Stream Media BIAS?
The same MSM that studies have shown:
That in 2008 , 1,160 or 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters
So in reality why would these "journalists" write negative stories about Obama and positive about his opponent?
They wouldn't. They gave money to Obama for his election!

And here is a personal anecdote about one of those editors...
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush.
He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??
But when it came to Obama?
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!
So why would NewsWeek or any of the other MSM be objective and produce "objective" information on which people base opinions.
But the proof is here:
This study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press. The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans. Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors,
Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election
Finally here is this article describing HOW POLLING is affected by the media:
Partisanship and race probably influence the MSM’s “slobbering love affair” with Obama.
MSM denizens are overwhelmingly left-wing Democrats, which this site’s readers know very well.
Left-wing Democrats in the MSM likely accept the belief that racism motivates any criticism of Obama.
Since they are loath to express any sentiment that could be so construed, they sing his praises and refuse to report anything that could be considered critical of him. (Expect the MSM to laud Obama’s deal with Iran.)

Given the MSM’s infatuation with Obama and the fact that many Americans still rely on the MSM for the news, is there any wonder that polls show public approval of his job performance, and especially that perceptions of him as a person, remain higher than they might otherwise be?
Articles: Why So Many People Regard Obama Positively

What makes you think you have any right to tell a private business what they can or can't do?

You don't own that business. You have absolutely no say in how they run their business and what jobs employees should have or do. That's the job of the people who put their hard earned money up to buy, own and run that business. Not you.

If you don't like the fact that a private business has the right to do as they please within our laws, then you should look no farther than conservatives and ronald reagan. You conservatives removed the laws that govern our press and media. If you wanted the Fairness Doctrine gone then you wanted one sided and slanted news.

You got what you conservatives wanted. You're just too short sighted to realize that what you do for yourselves, you do for all in America. So if you all can have large teams of people investigating democratic politicians, then others can have large teams of people investigating republican politicians.

You only have yourselves to blame. You put private business and money before everything else then when it comes back to bite you, you whine about it.

I have absolutely no sympathy for you.

You got what you worked so hard for.

Never in my mind was it whining or complaining about the BIAS of MSM being put in check!
What I am doing is pointing out to idiots like YOU that believe every single word of the BIASED MSM is true. That everything they write/show about Obama
is honest and objective!
Come on! Obviously you are one of those truly ignorant people that agreed with this "hard nosed" objective journalist of the MSM... who said:
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- of Bush ...Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’

Besides this thread was never intended for mindless obamabots like you!
It was intended for people still making up their minds and hopefully shedding the exposure of extreme bias as found in the Washington Post when it comes
to Trump versus the same "objectivity" for Hillary. You are pathetically lost.
The growing number of people recognizing the MSM has been BIASED in presenting stories about Obama and his agenda.
Case in point... not one MSM has ever ever questioned Obama's statement "46 million uninsured Americans" that want and need health insurance!
You believe that number as do a lot of your fellow idiots.
You never questioned though nor did the MSM that figure!
Never realized 10 million of the 46 million were not LEGAL citizens!
Never realized or understood the failure of Obama's Medicaid administration to enroll 14 million of those "46 million" that all they needed to do was register!
Finally you and other idiots never questioned that 18 million "uninsured' under 34 making over $50,000 NEVER WANTED OR NEEDED health insurance!
Yet you and the MSM continually supported that "46 million uninsured" Americans and now what do we have?
Insurance companies quitting. Fewer people covered. Higher premiums!
And this is just ONE example of the biased MSM NOT doing their job because THEY think as Thomas... Obama's sort of God! GEEZ!!!

I try to have an honest conversation and you just lie.

I tried to read your reply but can't get past thes lie in the first paragraph so I stopped reading.

If you want to talk with me then you should do so in an honest and mature manner.

I could careless what MSN says. Or what the Washington Post says.

I don't pay any attention to most of the news out there. It's all tabloid trash with a sprinkle of actual news.

I don't read MSN nor do I read the Washington Post. I just believe in the constitution and support their right to free speech and freedom of the press. Apparently you don't.

I don't care what people write about any politician. Since the Fairness Doctrine was removed by you conservatives, I don't trust much of our news that we have today.

I think for myself. I don't need some tabloid media outlet telling me what to think. I just want the facts.

What does Obama have to do with any of this?

If you can't have a mature and honest conversation then please, don't reply to my posts. You're wasting your time. I won't read lies and personal attacks.

When you lie and personally attack someone it's only you saying that the other person is right, you don't have an honest and mature reply so you sink to childish levels of lies and personal attacks.

Hey, if that's all you've got, go for it but you're showing all honest, mature adults what a childish liar you are.

Oh by the way, your OP was nothing but whining. You and the author demanding that a private business conduct their company the way you want. Not the way the owners want. So stop demanding and whining about 20 reporters out to investigate trump and demanding that the same amount be put on democratic candidates. Which I'm sure fox news, britebart, world net daily and a very long list of conservative media outlets have teams of much more than 20 people investigating democratic politicians and candidates.

First of ALL I really am pissed when people obviously devoid of any research capability call me a "LIAR"!
And then you make up bullshit about me wanting to censor the MSM. NOT ONE mention of it!
But my post wasn't for idiots like you that have your mind made up for you before you and then you have the audacity to say "tabloid trash" when you completely typify that "trash" by calling me a LIAR and making up premises that I'm after censorship!
NOT ONE comment of mine unlike your comrades EVER wanted censorship of the MEDIA!

I want to show people other then you that can't understand the simple premise of biased news by the MSM has influenced people like you.

Are you telling me YOUR opinion of me was based on the material I provided..which all came from sources NOT from me?
You are telling me that I made up Evan Thomas quote about Obama being sort of a God... and prior to that he took pride on bashing Bush..."that's our job"?

Don't you for a second comprehend that when you have news sources like the above who for one president it was ok to bash for the other 'he's a god" that's biased?
Or the fact 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats"... had no bearing on Obama's election?

It is people like you that MAKE up the "trashy tabloid" material! NOT ONE comment I made wasn't sourced!
But idiots like you calling me a LIAR and wanting Censorship... have NOTHING to back that up!

AGAIN for your simple mind.... I wrote this topic to show the bias in what many people use to get information to form opinions.
That simple. If you can't see that this bias influenced idiots obviously like you that ignored Obama's telling you in his own words he was going to fool you and trick you and lie to you...here in his words... READ it because you obviously heard this before...
This from the guy the MSM put into office because idiots like you that Obama's people actually thanked like "Gruber..."Stupidity of the American Voter" voted for him!

I've frequently quoted Obama from his autobiography, "Dreams from My Father"...published July 18,1995 page 94 -95
"Of course either way you needed some luck. That's what Pablo had lacked, mostly, not having his driver's license that day, a cop with nothing
better to do than to check the trunk of his car..
Or Bruce not finding his way back from too many bad acid trips, winding up in a funny farm.
Or Duke not walking away from that car wreck....

I had tried to explain some of this to my mother once, the role of luck in the world, the spin of the wheel.
It was at the start of my senior year in high school; she was back in Hawaii her field work completed and one day she had marched into my room
wanting to know the details of Pablo's arrest.
I had given her a reassuring smile and patted her hand told her not to worry, I wouldn't do anything stupid.
It was usually an effective tactic, another one of those tricks I had learned.
People were satisfied so long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves.
They were more than satisfied.
They were revealed.
Such a pleasant surprise to find a well-mannered young black man who didn't seem angry all the time."

And you idiots or "stupid voters" fell for it!

 

[Siete]

Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.

"There's a lot we don't know," he told the National Association of Realtors convention in Washington. "We have 20 people working on Trump, we're going to do a book, we're doing articles about every phase of his life," he added.
The Washington Post Has Assembled An Army Of Reporters To Investigate Everything Trump

Here we have one of the MOST public figures in the last 30 years seen by over 1 billion people over 185 episodes of the "Apprentice" The Apprentice (U.S. TV series) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and yet this single paper is dedicating 20 people to unearth dirt?

Where was the same scrutiny for Obama? John Kerry?
Why didn't these papers perform the same investigation effort to uncover whatever on Obama?

A nation-wide network of researchers has sprung up to attempt to fill in the blanks, but at every opportunity Obama’s high-priced lawyers have built walls around various records or simply made them disappear. It is estimated that Obama’s legal team has now spent well over $1.4 million dollars blocking access to documents every American should have access to.
The question is why would he spend so much money to do this?

The president who campaigned for a more “open government” and “full disclosure”
will not unseal his medical records, his school records, his birth records or his passport records.
He will not release his Harvard records,
his Columbia College records,
or his Occidental College records—
he will not even release his Columbia College thesis.
All his legislative records from the Illinois State Senate are missing and
he claims his scheduling records during those State Senate years are lost as well.
In addition, no one can find his school records for the elite K-12 college prep school, Punahou School, he attended in Hawaii.

What is he hiding? Well, for starters, some of these records will shed light on his citizenship and birth.

For example, Obama’s application to Punahou School – now mysteriously missing –
would likely contain a birth certificate. And, according to attorney Gary Kreep, “his Occidental College records are important as they may show he attended there as a foreign exchange student.” Indeed, Obama used his Indonesian name “Barry Soetoro” while attending Occidental. Kreep has filed lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility to be president and as part of his lawsuit he requested Obama’s records from Occidental. However, Obama’s lawyers quickly moved to stop Occidental from honoring this request.
The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues | Obama Social Security Numbers

WHERE ARE OBAMA's RECORDS?

OR is this another example of Main Stream Media BIAS?
The same MSM that studies have shown:
That in 2008 , 1,160 or 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters
So in reality why would these "journalists" write negative stories about Obama and positive about his opponent?
They wouldn't. They gave money to Obama for his election!

And here is a personal anecdote about one of those editors...
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush.
He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??
But when it came to Obama?
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!
So why would NewsWeek or any of the other MSM be objective and produce "objective" information on which people base opinions.
But the proof is here:
This study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press. The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans. Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors,
Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election
Finally here is this article describing HOW POLLING is affected by the media:
Partisanship and race probably influence the MSM’s “slobbering love affair” with Obama.
MSM denizens are overwhelmingly left-wing Democrats, which this site’s readers know very well.
Left-wing Democrats in the MSM likely accept the belief that racism motivates any criticism of Obama.
Since they are loath to express any sentiment that could be so construed, they sing his praises and refuse to report anything that could be considered critical of him. (Expect the MSM to laud Obama’s deal with Iran.)

Given the MSM’s infatuation with Obama and the fact that many Americans still rely on the MSM for the news, is there any wonder that polls show public approval of his job performance, and especially that perceptions of him as a person, remain higher than they might otherwise be?
Articles: Why So Many People Regard Obama Positively

What makes you think you have any right to tell a private business what they can or can't do?

You don't own that business. You have absolutely no say in how they run their business and what jobs employees should have or do. That's the job of the people who put their hard earned money up to buy, own and run that business. Not you.

If you don't like the fact that a private business has the right to do as they please within our laws, then you should look no farther than conservatives and ronald reagan. You conservatives removed the laws that govern our press and media. If you wanted the Fairness Doctrine gone then you wanted one sided and slanted news.

You got what you conservatives wanted. You're just too short sighted to realize that what you do for yourselves, you do for all in America. So if you all can have large teams of people investigating democratic politicians, then others can have large teams of people investigating republican politicians.

You only have yourselves to blame. You put private business and money before everything else then when it comes back to bite you, you whine about it.

I have absolutely no sympathy for you.

You got what you worked so hard for.

Never in my mind was it whining or complaining about the BIAS of MSM being put in check!
What I am doing is pointing out to idiots like YOU that believe every single word of the BIASED MSM is true. That everything they write/show about Obama
is honest and objective!
Come on! Obviously you are one of those truly ignorant people that agreed with this "hard nosed" objective journalist of the MSM... who said:
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- of Bush ...Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’

Besides this thread was never intended for mindless obamabots like you!
It was intended for people still making up their minds and hopefully shedding the exposure of extreme bias as found in the Washington Post when it comes
to Trump versus the same "objectivity" for Hillary. You are pathetically lost.
The growing number of people recognizing the MSM has been BIASED in presenting stories about Obama and his agenda.
Case in point... not one MSM has ever ever questioned Obama's statement "46 million uninsured Americans" that want and need health insurance!
You believe that number as do a lot of your fellow idiots.
You never questioned though nor did the MSM that figure!
Never realized 10 million of the 46 million were not LEGAL citizens!
Never realized or understood the failure of Obama's Medicaid administration to enroll 14 million of those "46 million" that all they needed to do was register!
Finally you and other idiots never questioned that 18 million "uninsured' under 34 making over $50,000 NEVER WANTED OR NEEDED health insurance!
Yet you and the MSM continually supported that "46 million uninsured" Americans and now what do we have?
Insurance companies quitting. Fewer people covered. Higher premiums!
And this is just ONE example of the biased MSM NOT doing their job because THEY think as Thomas... Obama's sort of God! GEEZ!!!

I try to have an honest conversation and you just lie.

I tried to read your reply but can't get past thes lie in the first paragraph so I stopped reading.

If you want to talk with me then you should do so in an honest and mature manner.

I could careless what MSN says. Or what the Washington Post says.

I don't pay any attention to most of the news out there. It's all tabloid trash with a sprinkle of actual news.

I don't read MSN nor do I read the Washington Post. I just believe in the constitution and support their right to free speech and freedom of the press. Apparently you don't.

I don't care what people write about any politician. Since the Fairness Doctrine was removed by you conservatives, I don't trust much of our news that we have today.

I think for myself. I don't need some tabloid media outlet telling me what to think. I just want the facts.

What does Obama have to do with any of this?

If you can't have a mature and honest conversation then please, don't reply to my posts. You're wasting your time. I won't read lies and personal attacks.

When you lie and personally attack someone it's only you saying that the other person is right, you don't have an honest and mature reply so you sink to childish levels of lies and personal attacks.

Hey, if that's all you've got, go for it but you're showing all honest, mature adults what a childish liar you are.

Oh by the way, your OP was nothing but whining. You and the author demanding that a private business conduct their company the way you want. Not the way the owners want. So stop demanding and whining about 20 reporters out to investigate trump and demanding that the same amount be put on democratic candidates. Which I'm sure fox news, britebart, world net daily and a very long list of conservative media outlets have teams of much more than 20 people investigating democratic politicians and candidates.

First of ALL I really am pissed when people obviously devoid of any research capability call me a "LIAR"!
And then you make up bullshit about me wanting to censor the MSM. NOT ONE mention of it!
But my post wasn't for idiots like you that have your mind made up for you before you and then you have the audacity to say "tabloid trash" when you completely typify that "trash" by calling me a LIAR and making up premises that I'm after censorship!
NOT ONE comment of mine unlike your comrades EVER wanted censorship of the MEDIA!

I want to show people other then you that can't understand the simple premise of biased news by the MSM has influenced people like you.

Are you telling me YOUR opinion of me was based on the material I provided..which all came from sources NOT from me?
You are telling me that I made up Evan Thomas quote about Obama being sort of a God... and prior to that he took pride on bashing Bush..."that's our job"?

Don't you for a second comprehend that when you have news sources like the above who for one president it was ok to bash for the other 'he's a god" that's biased?
Or the fact 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats"... had no bearing on Obama's election?

It is people like you that MAKE up the "trashy tabloid" material! NOT ONE comment I made wasn't sourced!
But idiots like you calling me a LIAR and wanting Censorship... have NOTHING to back that up!

AGAIN for your simple mind.... I wrote this topic to show the bias in what many people use to get information to form opinions.
That simple. If you can't see that this bias influenced idiots obviously like you that ignored Obama's telling you in his own words he was going to fool you and trick you and lie to you...here in his words... READ it because you obviously heard this before...
This from the guy the MSM put into office because idiots like you that Obama's people actually thanked like "Gruber..."Stupidity of the American Voter" voted for him!

I've frequently quoted Obama from his autobiography, "Dreams from My Father"...published July 18,1995 page 94 -95
"Of course either way you needed some luck. That's what Pablo had lacked, mostly, not having his driver's license that day, a cop with nothing
better to do than to check the trunk of his car..
Or Bruce not finding his way back from too many bad acid trips, winding up in a funny farm.
Or Duke not walking away from that car wreck....

I had tried to explain some of this to my mother once, the role of luck in the world, the spin of the wheel.
It was at the start of my senior year in high school; she was back in Hawaii her field work completed and one day she had marched into my room
wanting to know the details of Pablo's arrest.
I had given her a reassuring smile and patted her hand told her not to worry, I wouldn't do anything stupid.
It was usually an effective tactic, another one of those tricks I had learned.
People were satisfied so long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves.
They were more than satisfied.
They were revealed.
Such a pleasant surprise to find a well-mannered young black man who didn't seem angry all the time."

And you idiots or "stupid voters" fell for it!

idiot Maximus calling others idiots ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


oh, the irony.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Given the MSM’s infatuation with Obama and the fact that many Americans still rely on the MSM for the news, is there any wonder that polls show public approval of his job performance, and especially that perceptions of him as a person, remain higher than they might otherwise be?
Articles: Why So Many People Regard Obama Positively

Bezos, who owns the Washington Compost, is a Tech industry Master of the Universe who thinks he can destroy a popular candidate that wants to end the current racket by sending scores of his journalists, the vermin hordes of pestilence, to attack and ruin any threatening candidates.

We the People are fools if we buy any of his 100% bullshit compost.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.

"There's a lot we don't know," he told the National Association of Realtors convention in Washington. "We have 20 people working on Trump, we're going to do a book, we're doing articles about every phase of his life," he added.
The Washington Post Has Assembled An Army Of Reporters To Investigate Everything Trump

Here we have one of the MOST public figures in the last 30 years seen by over 1 billion people over 185 episodes of the "Apprentice" The Apprentice (U.S. TV series) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and yet this single paper is dedicating 20 people to unearth dirt?

Where was the same scrutiny for Obama? John Kerry?
Why didn't these papers perform the same investigation effort to uncover whatever on Obama?

A nation-wide network of researchers has sprung up to attempt to fill in the blanks, but at every opportunity Obama’s high-priced lawyers have built walls around various records or simply made them disappear. It is estimated that Obama’s legal team has now spent well over $1.4 million dollars blocking access to documents every American should have access to.
The question is why would he spend so much money to do this?

The president who campaigned for a more “open government” and “full disclosure”
will not unseal his medical records, his school records, his birth records or his passport records.
He will not release his Harvard records,
his Columbia College records,
or his Occidental College records—
he will not even release his Columbia College thesis.
All his legislative records from the Illinois State Senate are missing and
he claims his scheduling records during those State Senate years are lost as well.
In addition, no one can find his school records for the elite K-12 college prep school, Punahou School, he attended in Hawaii.

What is he hiding? Well, for starters, some of these records will shed light on his citizenship and birth.

For example, Obama’s application to Punahou School – now mysteriously missing –
would likely contain a birth certificate. And, according to attorney Gary Kreep, “his Occidental College records are important as they may show he attended there as a foreign exchange student.” Indeed, Obama used his Indonesian name “Barry Soetoro” while attending Occidental. Kreep has filed lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility to be president and as part of his lawsuit he requested Obama’s records from Occidental. However, Obama’s lawyers quickly moved to stop Occidental from honoring this request.
The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues | Obama Social Security Numbers

WHERE ARE OBAMA's RECORDS?

OR is this another example of Main Stream Media BIAS?
The same MSM that studies have shown:
That in 2008 , 1,160 or 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters
So in reality why would these "journalists" write negative stories about Obama and positive about his opponent?
They wouldn't. They gave money to Obama for his election!

And here is a personal anecdote about one of those editors...
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush.
He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??
But when it came to Obama?
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!
So why would NewsWeek or any of the other MSM be objective and produce "objective" information on which people base opinions.
But the proof is here:
This study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press. The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans. Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors,
Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election
Finally here is this article describing HOW POLLING is affected by the media:
Partisanship and race probably influence the MSM’s “slobbering love affair” with Obama.
MSM denizens are overwhelmingly left-wing Democrats, which this site’s readers know very well.
Left-wing Democrats in the MSM likely accept the belief that racism motivates any criticism of Obama.
Since they are loath to express any sentiment that could be so construed, they sing his praises and refuse to report anything that could be considered critical of him. (Expect the MSM to laud Obama’s deal with Iran.)

Given the MSM’s infatuation with Obama and the fact that many Americans still rely on the MSM for the news, is there any wonder that polls show public approval of his job performance, and especially that perceptions of him as a person, remain higher than they might otherwise be?
Articles: Why So Many People Regard Obama Positively

What makes you think you have any right to tell a private business what they can or can't do?

You don't own that business. You have absolutely no say in how they run their business and what jobs employees should have or do. That's the job of the people who put their hard earned money up to buy, own and run that business. Not you.

If you don't like the fact that a private business has the right to do as they please within our laws, then you should look no farther than conservatives and ronald reagan. You conservatives removed the laws that govern our press and media. If you wanted the Fairness Doctrine gone then you wanted one sided and slanted news.

You got what you conservatives wanted. You're just too short sighted to realize that what you do for yourselves, you do for all in America. So if you all can have large teams of people investigating democratic politicians, then others can have large teams of people investigating republican politicians.

You only have yourselves to blame. You put private business and money before everything else then when it comes back to bite you, you whine about it.

I have absolutely no sympathy for you.

You got what you worked so hard for.

Never in my mind was it whining or complaining about the BIAS of MSM being put in check!
What I am doing is pointing out to idiots like YOU that believe every single word of the BIASED MSM is true. That everything they write/show about Obama
is honest and objective!
Come on! Obviously you are one of those truly ignorant people that agreed with this "hard nosed" objective journalist of the MSM... who said:
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- of Bush ...Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’

Besides this thread was never intended for mindless obamabots like you!
It was intended for people still making up their minds and hopefully shedding the exposure of extreme bias as found in the Washington Post when it comes
to Trump versus the same "objectivity" for Hillary. You are pathetically lost.
The growing number of people recognizing the MSM has been BIASED in presenting stories about Obama and his agenda.
Case in point... not one MSM has ever ever questioned Obama's statement "46 million uninsured Americans" that want and need health insurance!
You believe that number as do a lot of your fellow idiots.
You never questioned though nor did the MSM that figure!
Never realized 10 million of the 46 million were not LEGAL citizens!
Never realized or understood the failure of Obama's Medicaid administration to enroll 14 million of those "46 million" that all they needed to do was register!
Finally you and other idiots never questioned that 18 million "uninsured' under 34 making over $50,000 NEVER WANTED OR NEEDED health insurance!
Yet you and the MSM continually supported that "46 million uninsured" Americans and now what do we have?
Insurance companies quitting. Fewer people covered. Higher premiums!
And this is just ONE example of the biased MSM NOT doing their job because THEY think as Thomas... Obama's sort of God! GEEZ!!!

I try to have an honest conversation and you just lie.

I tried to read your reply but can't get past thes lie in the first paragraph so I stopped reading.

If you want to talk with me then you should do so in an honest and mature manner.

I could careless what MSN says. Or what the Washington Post says.

I don't pay any attention to most of the news out there. It's all tabloid trash with a sprinkle of actual news.

I don't read MSN nor do I read the Washington Post. I just believe in the constitution and support their right to free speech and freedom of the press. Apparently you don't.

I don't care what people write about any politician. Since the Fairness Doctrine was removed by you conservatives, I don't trust much of our news that we have today.

I think for myself. I don't need some tabloid media outlet telling me what to think. I just want the facts.

What does Obama have to do with any of this?

If you can't have a mature and honest conversation then please, don't reply to my posts. You're wasting your time. I won't read lies and personal attacks.

When you lie and personally attack someone it's only you saying that the other person is right, you don't have an honest and mature reply so you sink to childish levels of lies and personal attacks.

Hey, if that's all you've got, go for it but you're showing all honest, mature adults what a childish liar you are.

Oh by the way, your OP was nothing but whining. You and the author demanding that a private business conduct their company the way you want. Not the way the owners want. So stop demanding and whining about 20 reporters out to investigate trump and demanding that the same amount be put on democratic candidates. Which I'm sure fox news, britebart, world net daily and a very long list of conservative media outlets have teams of much more than 20 people investigating democratic politicians and candidates.

First of ALL I really am pissed when people obviously devoid of any research capability call me a "LIAR"!
And then you make up bullshit about me wanting to censor the MSM. NOT ONE mention of it!
But my post wasn't for idiots like you that have your mind made up for you before you and then you have the audacity to say "tabloid trash" when you completely typify that "trash" by calling me a LIAR and making up premises that I'm after censorship!
NOT ONE comment of mine unlike your comrades EVER wanted censorship of the MEDIA!

I want to show people other then you that can't understand the simple premise of biased news by the MSM has influenced people like you.

Are you telling me YOUR opinion of me was based on the material I provided..which all came from sources NOT from me?
You are telling me that I made up Evan Thomas quote about Obama being sort of a God... and prior to that he took pride on bashing Bush..."that's our job"?

Don't you for a second comprehend that when you have news sources like the above who for one president it was ok to bash for the other 'he's a god" that's biased?
Or the fact 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats"... had no bearing on Obama's election?

It is people like you that MAKE up the "trashy tabloid" material! NOT ONE comment I made wasn't sourced!
But idiots like you calling me a LIAR and wanting Censorship... have NOTHING to back that up!

AGAIN for your simple mind.... I wrote this topic to show the bias in what many people use to get information to form opinions.
That simple. If you can't see that this bias influenced idiots obviously like you that ignored Obama's telling you in his own words he was going to fool you and trick you and lie to you...here in his words... READ it because you obviously heard this before...
This from the guy the MSM put into office because idiots like you that Obama's people actually thanked like "Gruber..."Stupidity of the American Voter" voted for him!

I've frequently quoted Obama from his autobiography, "Dreams from My Father"...published July 18,1995 page 94 -95
"Of course either way you needed some luck. That's what Pablo had lacked, mostly, not having his driver's license that day, a cop with nothing
better to do than to check the trunk of his car..
Or Bruce not finding his way back from too many bad acid trips, winding up in a funny farm.
Or Duke not walking away from that car wreck....

I had tried to explain some of this to my mother once, the role of luck in the world, the spin of the wheel.
It was at the start of my senior year in high school; she was back in Hawaii her field work completed and one day she had marched into my room
wanting to know the details of Pablo's arrest.
I had given her a reassuring smile and patted her hand told her not to worry, I wouldn't do anything stupid.
It was usually an effective tactic, another one of those tricks I had learned.
People were satisfied so long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves.
They were more than satisfied.
They were revealed.
Such a pleasant surprise to find a well-mannered young black man who didn't seem angry all the time."

And you idiots or "stupid voters" fell for it!

idiot Maximus calling others idiots ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


oh, the irony.

Wow, an irony-plex, lol

 

[Siete]

Given the MSM’s infatuation with Obama and the fact that many Americans still rely on the MSM for the news, is there any wonder that polls show public approval of his job performance, and especially that perceptions of him as a person, remain higher than they might otherwise be?
Articles: Why So Many People Regard Obama Positively

Bezos, who owns the Washington Compost, is a Tech industry Master of the Universe who thinks he can destroy a popular candidate that wants to end the current racket by sending scores of his journalists, the vermin hordes of pestilence, to attack and ruin any threatening candidates.

We the People are fools if we buy any of his 100% bullshit compost.

Fox News often uses WaPo as a source ...

 

[JimBowie1958]

Given the MSM’s infatuation with Obama and the fact that many Americans still rely on the MSM for the news, is there any wonder that polls show public approval of his job performance, and especially that perceptions of him as a person, remain higher than they might otherwise be?
Articles: Why So Many People Regard Obama Positively

Bezos, who owns the Washington Compost, is a Tech industry Master of the Universe who thinks he can destroy a popular candidate that wants to end the current racket by sending scores of his journalists, the vermin hordes of pestilence, to attack and ruin any threatening candidates.

We the People are fools if we buy any of his 100% bullshit compost.

Fox News often uses WaPo as a source ...

Well, all I can say to that is...

 

[there4eyeM]

They should put twenty people on every candidate. Journalists need jobs!

 

[Siete]

You know, some of the media is among the worst people I’ve ever met,” Trump continued. “I mean a pretty good percentage is really a terrible group of people. They write lies, they write false stories. They know they’re false. It makes no difference. And frankly I don’t call it thin-skinned, I’m angry.”



Trump opened the door ... by his own standards the Media has the right to assault him.

He can dish it out, but can't take it. He's a weak candidate for President.

 

[Timmy]

Are t there like 200 FBI agents looking over Hillary's emails?

Poor Donald'. Can't take the big boy heat .

 

[there4eyeM]

He may even be correct about what the media are (the term is a plural). So what? We should know what bias a news source has, and we should always remember every source has a bias.

 

[edthecynic]

this single paper is dedicating 20 people to unearth dirt?

Will you whining crybabies ever stop playing the VICTIM??????
And you must think Trump is dirty if you think that anyone who researches for a book on him will only find dirt.

BTW, the VRC has never had less than 1,000 "reporters" researching the Clintons!!!