No other White House has ever done this!!

[JLW]

Everything that the media says is a lie meant to influence stupid people.
Catch on?

Poor Baby...Can't handle the truth.

 

[Billiejeens]

Poor Baby...Can't handle the truth.

I can
Routinely.

 

[Billiejeens]

Well, look at his "cabinet meetings", which often start by going around the table, giving every cabinet member a full opportunity to shower him with shameless adoration.

One would normally have to be viewing a documentary on North Korea to see craven behavior at that level. I suspect they all need to take a shower after those meetings.

Unlike you, they simply all love the US and the things that President Trump is doing for its betterment.

 

[Leo123]

Trump is a fascist murderer. And he wants oraise ?

Limey lies again.

 

[westwall]

You hate the media and I see why.

The media is fundamentally important to a free country because it serves as a critical pillar of democracy, primarily by holding power accountable, ensuring transparency, and informing the public

Watchdog Role: The media investigates and reports on the actions of government officials, corporations, and other powerful entities [1, 2]. By uncovering corruption, inefficiency, and abuses of power, it helps prevent those in power from acting with impunity

Checks and Balances: Along with the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, the media acts as an informal fourth branch of government. It provides an essential check on power dynamics and reinforces institutional accountability

• Transparency:The media shines a light on government operations and decision-making processes [1]. This transparency builds trust (when the information is accurate and reliable) and allows the public to scrutinize how their country is run [1].
  • Platform for Discourse: A free press facilitates an open exchange of ideas and opinions, which is vital for a healthy, functioning democracy [2]. It allows minority voices to be heard and encourages robust debate on important social and political issues [1].

Ultimately, a robust and independent media is crucial for safeguarding the principles of self-governance and individual liberties in a free society

The media is heavily biased, thus they are NOT a check on the government. Unless it's a conservative government. Then they outright lie to the people to push their agenda.

And morons, like you, lap it up.

 

[BULLDOG]

Everything that the media says is a lie meant to influence stupid people.
Catch on?

A lot of stupid people say the same thing.

 

[BULLDOG]

You mean he should stop doing the things people voted him in for, such as opposing the agenda of the Left and "socialist/communists', etc.

He was barely elected.

 

[Billiejeens]

A lot of stupid people say the same thing.

Correct
You do.

 

[Billiejeens]

He was barely elected.

It was overwhelming.
Because - math

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Well, look at his "cabinet meetings", which often start by going around the table, giving every cabinet member a full opportunity to shower him with shameless adoration.

One would normally have to be viewing a documentary on North Korea to see craven behavior at that level. I suspect they all need to take a shower after those meetings.

Some of them may want a career after trump is dead. That will come back to haunt them.

 

[BULLDOG]

It was overwhelming.
Because - math

add this up.

No — Donald Trump’s 2024 victory was decisive in the Electoral College but not a landslide by historical standards. His margin in the popular vote was very narrow, and analysts widely describe the election as close rather than overwhelming.

---

Why 2024 Was​

• Popular Vote Margin
  
  • Trump defeated Kamala Harris by about 1.5–1.6% of the popular vote, one of the smallest winning margins in modern history.
  • He received 49.7% of the vote, meaning he did not secure an outright majority.
• Electoral College
  
  • Trump won enough swing states to secure the presidency, but his Electoral College margin was not historically large compared to landslides like Ronald Reagan in 1984 or Lyndon Johnson in 1964.
  • Analysts note that just 0.15% of voters in key states determined the outcome, underscoring how fragile the victory was.
• Perception vs. Reality
  
  • Trump and his allies called the win a “landslide” and “mandate,” but commentators pushed back, pointing out the razor-thin margins.
  • On election night, the map looked favorable to Trump early, which gave the impression of a sweeping win, but the final numbers told a different story.
• Historical Comparison
  
  • True landslides are usually defined by double-digit popular vote margins or overwhelming Electoral College victories.
  • For example:
    • LBJ in 1964: 22.6% popular vote margin.
    • Reagan in 1984: 18.2% margin and 525 Electoral College votes.
  • Trump’s 2024 margin was nowhere near these levels.

---

Bottom Line​

Trump’s 2024 win was strategic and decisive in battleground states, but numerically narrow. It gave him the presidency and political momentum, yet it falls far short of being considered a landslide in U.S. electoral history.

 

[healthmyths]

What if 92% of shit you do is stupid? Should MSM report 50% of their show on the 8% of not stupid stuff?

I took journalism courses where we were taught the 5 "Ws".... to be reported by a reporter...
Who... was the story about
where...did the story take place
when...what was the time, date, etc.
what... exactly what happened... "man held up bank"...
why... the exact reason for the activity.
BUT it was the "why" that has taken precedence. And the "why" has become not a fact but an opinion!
CASE in point... You and the majority of people during Covid honestly believe due to the reporting of the "why" by the biased
MSM that Trump told people to "drink bleach"! I bet you believe that right?
BUT the MSM didn't ever say Trump never said "drink bleach".
They just didn't cover the false statement "spread by the biased MSM"!
Google search."Trump said "drink bleach"...
Google Search
About 27,300 results (0.23
But a Google search Trump never said "drink bleach".
About 22,200 results (0.24s)
So why does a falsehood have more belief than the truth...i..e. Trump NEVER said "drink bleach"!
Using that analogy... how many more stories have the biased MSM that donated 96% to Hillary and 90% to Biden?

 

[Billiejeens]

add this up.

No — Donald Trump’s 2024 victory was decisive in the Electoral College but not a landslide by historical standards. His margin in the popular vote was very narrow, and analysts widely describe the election as close rather than overwhelming.

---

Why 2024 Was​

• Popular Vote Margin
  • Trump defeated Kamala Harris by about 1.5–1.6% of the popular vote, one of the smallest winning margins in modern history.
  • He received 49.7% of the vote, meaning he did not secure an outright majority.
• Electoral College
  • Trump won enough swing states to secure the presidency, but his Electoral College margin was not historically large compared to landslides like Ronald Reagan in 1984 or Lyndon Johnson in 1964.
  • Analysts note that just 0.15% of voters in key states determined the outcome, underscoring how fragile the victory was.
• Perception vs. Reality
  • Trump and his allies called the win a “landslide” and “mandate,” but commentators pushed back, pointing out the razor-thin margins.
  • On election night, the map looked favorable to Trump early, which gave the impression of a sweeping win, but the final numbers told a different story.
• Historical Comparison
  • True landslides are usually defined by double-digit popular vote margins or overwhelming Electoral College victories.
  • For example:
    • LBJ in 1964: 22.6% popular vote margin.
    • Reagan in 1984: 18.2% margin and 525 Electoral College votes.
  • Trump’s 2024 margin was nowhere near these levels.

---

Bottom Line​

Trump’s 2024 win was strategic and decisive in battleground states, but numerically narrow. It gave him the presidency and political momentum, yet it falls far short of being considered a landslide in U.S. electoral history.

You poor idiot.

 

[healthmyths]

What if 92% of shit you do is stupid? Should MSM report 50% of their show on the 8% of not stupid stuff?

I took journalism courses where we were taught the 5 "Ws".... to be reported by a reporter...
Who... was the story about
where...did the story take place
when...what was the time, date, etc.
what... exactly what happened... "man held up bank"...
why... the exact reason for the activity.
BUT it was the "why" that has taken precedence. And the "why" has become not a fact but an opinion!
CASE in point... You and the majority of people during Covid honestly believe due to the reporting of the "why" by the biased
MSM that Trump told people to "drink bleach"! I bet you believe that right?
BUT the MSM didn't ever say Trump never said "drink bleach".
They just didn't cover the false statement "spread by the biased MSM"!
Google search."Trump said "drink bleach"...
Google Search
About 27,300 results (0.23
But a Google search Trump never said "drink bleach".
About 22,200 results (0.24s)
So why does a falsehood have more belief than the truth...i..e. Trump NEVER said "drink bleach"!
Using that analogy... how many more stories have the biased MSM that donated 96% to Hillary and 90% to Biden?

 

[BULLDOG]

I took journalism courses where we were taught the 5 "Ws".... to be reported by a reporter...
Who... was the story about
where...did the story take place
when...what was the time, date, etc.
what... exactly what happened... "man held up bank"...
why... the exact reason for the activity.
BUT it was the "why" that has taken precedence. And the "why" has become not a fact but an opinion!
CASE in point... You and the majority of people during Covid honestly believe due to the reporting of the "why" by the biased
MSM that Trump told people to "drink bleach"! I bet you believe that right?
BUT the MSM didn't ever say Trump never said "drink bleach".
They just didn't cover the false statement "spread by the biased MSM"!
Google search."Trump said "drink bleach"...
Google Search
About 27,300 results (0.23
But a Google search Trump never said "drink bleach".
About 22,200 results (0.24s)
So why does a falsehood have more belief than the truth...i..e. Trump NEVER said "drink bleach"!
Using that analogy... how many more stories have the biased MSM that donated 96% to Hillary and 90% to Biden?

He didn't say drink it. The damn fool said to inject it.

 

[BULLDOG]

You poor idiot.

Which part do you believe to be untrue?

 

[Billiejeens]

Which part do you believe to be untrue?

The Spin

 

[Stryder50]

He was barely elected.

Same could be said for his predecessor, and the buffoon elected before him.
Assuming either of those two clowns actually garnered that many votes without ballot/count cheating !

 

[Clipper]

{f trump doesn't like bad press, he should quit doing such petty, hateful things.

Oh, don't worry. Trump, with the help of the goons he surrounds himself with are done being petty. They haven't even scratched the surface of what they have in store for us.

 

[Crepitus]

Visit this site that is definitely a biased web site.... out of necessity!

Media Offenders

Explore the Media Bias Tracker that fact checks and holds Fake News accountable. False claims debunked, Hall of Shame for serial offenders, Leaderboard of networks ranked by Repeated Lies. Stay informed, stay accurate.

www.whitehouse.gov

The biased MSM that has ...
Media Research Center finds 92% negative coverage of Trump in first 100 days
A recent analysis by the Media Research Center has revealed that 92% of the major network media coverage of President Donald Trump during his first 100 days in office was negative.

Media Research Center finds 92% negative coverage of Trump in first 100 days

A recent analysis by the Media Research Center has revealed that 92% of the major network media coverage of President Donald Trump during his first 100 days in

abc3340.com

Key Findings from MRC Studies

• High Percentage of Negative Coverage: Multiple MRC analyses have consistently reported that 90% or more of the coverage on the major networks' evening news programs regarding Donald Trump has been negative.
• Comparison to Other Administrations: One study noted a significant contrast with coverage of President Joe Biden's first 100 days, which was found to be 59% positive.
• Scope of Analysis: The MRC reports state that the analysis focused on "explicitly evaluative statements" from journalists, anchors, and non-partisan sources, while excluding comments from partisan sources like elected officials.
• 
  
• ABC, NBC and CBS slap Trump with 92% negative coverage as 100th day of second term approaches, study finds

Donations by to Hillary/Biden by MSM...

Journalists shower Hillary Clinton with campaign cash​

Journalists shower Hillary Clinton with campaign cash – Center for Public Integrity

New Yorker television critic Emily Nussbaum, a newly minted Pulitzer Prize winner, spent the Republican National Convention pen-pricking presidential nominee Donald Trump as a misogynist shyster running an “ugly and xenophobic campaign.” What Nussbaum didn’t disclose in her dispatches: she...

publicintegrity.org

• Overall Industry Giving: The broader "internet and communication" industry has historically shown a strong preference for Democratic candidates. In the 2020 cycle, approximately 90% of contributions went to left-leaning politicians while only 9% went to Republicans.

Tracking 2024 election contributions and spending | USAFacts

A majority of funding for the 2024 election — over 65%, or nearly $5.6 billion — comes from political action committees, also known as PACs.

usafacts.org

Finally... those of you that trust the biased MSM.... maybe you should comprehend this study!

Negative news receives more attention
because of a psychological phenomenon called negativity bias, which makes people more attuned to threats and negative stimuli.

Why We’re Drawn to Bad News

We’re wired to focus on bad news, but drowning in negativity isn’t doing us any favors. Learn how to take control of news consumption—without feeling overwhelmed.

www.psychologytoday.com

You anti-Trump MSM news lovers... are totally being manipulated!

How is it their fault he did nothing positive in those 100 days?