Were there ever 20 people working on Obama, or Hillary, or any other Democrat???

[NYcarbineer]

How many people did Ken Starr have working for him?

 

[edthecynic]

Are t there like 200 FBI agents looking over Hillary's emails?

Poor Donald'. Can't take the big boy heat .

And 301 GOP congressmen on a witch hunt, er, er, er, I mean "investigating" her every move.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Trump sent detectives to Hawaii to try to dig up dirt on Obama's birth. For fuck's sake.

20? How many more were actively engaged in the birther movement?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Are t there like 200 FBI agents looking over Hillary's emails?

Poor Donald'. Can't take the big boy heat .

And 301 GOP congressmen on a witch hunt, er, er, er, I mean "investigating" her every move.

Some bimbo mouthpiece for Trump said the other day that Hillary has never been vetted over Benghazi.

 

[candycorn]

Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.

"There's a lot we don't know," he told the National Association of Realtors convention in Washington. "We have 20 people working on Trump, we're going to do a book, we're doing articles about every phase of his life," he added.
The Washington Post Has Assembled An Army Of Reporters To Investigate Everything Trump

Here we have one of the MOST public figures in the last 30 years seen by over 1 billion people over 185 episodes of the "Apprentice" The Apprentice (U.S. TV series) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and yet this single paper is dedicating 20 people to unearth dirt?

Where was the same scrutiny for Obama? John Kerry?
Why didn't these papers perform the same investigation effort to uncover whatever on Obama?

A nation-wide network of researchers has sprung up to attempt to fill in the blanks, but at every opportunity Obama’s high-priced lawyers have built walls around various records or simply made them disappear. It is estimated that Obama’s legal team has now spent well over $1.4 million dollars blocking access to documents every American should have access to.
The question is why would he spend so much money to do this?

The president who campaigned for a more “open government” and “full disclosure”
will not unseal his medical records, his school records, his birth records or his passport records.
He will not release his Harvard records,
his Columbia College records,
or his Occidental College records—
he will not even release his Columbia College thesis.
All his legislative records from the Illinois State Senate are missing and
he claims his scheduling records during those State Senate years are lost as well.
In addition, no one can find his school records for the elite K-12 college prep school, Punahou School, he attended in Hawaii.

What is he hiding? Well, for starters, some of these records will shed light on his citizenship and birth.

For example, Obama’s application to Punahou School – now mysteriously missing –
would likely contain a birth certificate. And, according to attorney Gary Kreep, “his Occidental College records are important as they may show he attended there as a foreign exchange student.” Indeed, Obama used his Indonesian name “Barry Soetoro” while attending Occidental. Kreep has filed lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility to be president and as part of his lawsuit he requested Obama’s records from Occidental. However, Obama’s lawyers quickly moved to stop Occidental from honoring this request.
The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues | Obama Social Security Numbers

WHERE ARE OBAMA's RECORDS?

OR is this another example of Main Stream Media BIAS?
The same MSM that studies have shown:
That in 2008 , 1,160 or 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters
So in reality why would these "journalists" write negative stories about Obama and positive about his opponent?
They wouldn't. They gave money to Obama for his election!

And here is a personal anecdote about one of those editors...
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush.
He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??
But when it came to Obama?
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!
So why would NewsWeek or any of the other MSM be objective and produce "objective" information on which people base opinions.
But the proof is here:
This study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press. The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans. Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors,
Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election
Finally here is this article describing HOW POLLING is affected by the media:
Partisanship and race probably influence the MSM’s “slobbering love affair” with Obama.
MSM denizens are overwhelmingly left-wing Democrats, which this site’s readers know very well.
Left-wing Democrats in the MSM likely accept the belief that racism motivates any criticism of Obama.
Since they are loath to express any sentiment that could be so construed, they sing his praises and refuse to report anything that could be considered critical of him. (Expect the MSM to laud Obama’s deal with Iran.)

Given the MSM’s infatuation with Obama and the fact that many Americans still rely on the MSM for the news, is there any wonder that polls show public approval of his job performance, and especially that perceptions of him as a person, remain higher than they might otherwise be?
Articles: Why So Many People Regard Obama Positively

So let me get this straight….Drumpf…the private individual who launched an investigation on his own sending people into Hawaii to look for a birth certificate….

Is upset that the legitimate press is poking into his past and reporting the truth?

 

[Timmy]

Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.

"There's a lot we don't know," he told the National Association of Realtors convention in Washington. "We have 20 people working on Trump, we're going to do a book, we're doing articles about every phase of his life," he added.
The Washington Post Has Assembled An Army Of Reporters To Investigate Everything Trump

Here we have one of the MOST public figures in the last 30 years seen by over 1 billion people over 185 episodes of the "Apprentice" The Apprentice (U.S. TV series) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and yet this single paper is dedicating 20 people to unearth dirt?

Where was the same scrutiny for Obama? John Kerry?
Why didn't these papers perform the same investigation effort to uncover whatever on Obama?

A nation-wide network of researchers has sprung up to attempt to fill in the blanks, but at every opportunity Obama’s high-priced lawyers have built walls around various records or simply made them disappear. It is estimated that Obama’s legal team has now spent well over $1.4 million dollars blocking access to documents every American should have access to.
The question is why would he spend so much money to do this?

The president who campaigned for a more “open government” and “full disclosure”
will not unseal his medical records, his school records, his birth records or his passport records.
He will not release his Harvard records,
his Columbia College records,
or his Occidental College records—
he will not even release his Columbia College thesis.
All his legislative records from the Illinois State Senate are missing and
he claims his scheduling records during those State Senate years are lost as well.
In addition, no one can find his school records for the elite K-12 college prep school, Punahou School, he attended in Hawaii.

What is he hiding? Well, for starters, some of these records will shed light on his citizenship and birth.

For example, Obama’s application to Punahou School – now mysteriously missing –
would likely contain a birth certificate. And, according to attorney Gary Kreep, “his Occidental College records are important as they may show he attended there as a foreign exchange student.” Indeed, Obama used his Indonesian name “Barry Soetoro” while attending Occidental. Kreep has filed lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility to be president and as part of his lawsuit he requested Obama’s records from Occidental. However, Obama’s lawyers quickly moved to stop Occidental from honoring this request.
The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues | Obama Social Security Numbers

WHERE ARE OBAMA's RECORDS?

OR is this another example of Main Stream Media BIAS?
The same MSM that studies have shown:
That in 2008 , 1,160 or 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters
So in reality why would these "journalists" write negative stories about Obama and positive about his opponent?
They wouldn't. They gave money to Obama for his election!

And here is a personal anecdote about one of those editors...
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush.
He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??
But when it came to Obama?
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!
So why would NewsWeek or any of the other MSM be objective and produce "objective" information on which people base opinions.
But the proof is here:
This study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press. The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans. Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors,
Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election
Finally here is this article describing HOW POLLING is affected by the media:
Partisanship and race probably influence the MSM’s “slobbering love affair” with Obama.
MSM denizens are overwhelmingly left-wing Democrats, which this site’s readers know very well.
Left-wing Democrats in the MSM likely accept the belief that racism motivates any criticism of Obama.
Since they are loath to express any sentiment that could be so construed, they sing his praises and refuse to report anything that could be considered critical of him. (Expect the MSM to laud Obama’s deal with Iran.)

Given the MSM’s infatuation with Obama and the fact that many Americans still rely on the MSM for the news, is there any wonder that polls show public approval of his job performance, and especially that perceptions of him as a person, remain higher than they might otherwise be?
Articles: Why So Many People Regard Obama Positively

So let me get this straight….Drumpf…the private individual who launched an investigation on his own sending people into Hawaii to look for a birth certificate….

Is upset that the legitimate press is poking into his past and reporting the truth?

How old is that trump photo? He's been using it for years !!! He's so superficial!

 

[there4eyeM]

Oh, now you've gone too far!
Donald Trump, superficial? How COULD you?

 

[easyt65]

Just shows the desperation of Liberals and just how much they fear Trump.

 

[there4eyeM]

The American political scene; too funny to weep, too sad to laugh.

 

[healthmyths]

The American political scene; too funny to weep, too sad to laugh.

I'm sure you thought Obama was the best thing since slice bread didn't you?
Remember HE HAD NO EXECUTIVE experience! Zilch. Nada. Zero....
Yet he became the Chief Executive officer of a $3 trillion enterprise known as the US government!
See what kind of mess we have NOW because this idiot told us:
I want to bankrupt the health insurance companies.
I want to bankrupt utilities.
I want to throw coal workers out of work.
BUT remember those 2/10th of 1% of Americans i.e. Transgenders ....700,000 .... they have to be able to use either bathroom! It's Obama's law!
The most frequently cited estimate is that 700,000 people in the United States, or about 0.2 to 0.3 percent of the population, are transgender, - See more at: Bruce Jenner's Transition: How Many Americans Are Transgender?

 

[there4eyeM]

The American political scene; too funny to weep, too sad to laugh.

I'm sure you thought Obama was the best thing since slice bread didn't you?
Remember HE HAD NO EXECUTIVE experience! Zilch. Nada. Zero....
Yet he became the Chief Executive officer of a $3 trillion enterprise known as the US government!
See what kind of mess we have NOW because this idiot told us:
I want to bankrupt the health insurance companies.
I want to bankrupt utilities.
I want to throw coal workers out of work.
BUT remember those 2/10th of 1% of Americans i.e. Transgenders ....700,000 .... they have to be able to use either bathroom! It's Obama's law!
The most frequently cited estimate is that 700,000 people in the United States, or about 0.2 to 0.3 percent of the population, are transgender, - See more at: Bruce Jenner's Transition: How Many Americans Are Transgender?

To state this as being sure of it makes it clear that we can all be sure of how little you know.

 

[healthmyths]

this single paper is dedicating 20 people to unearth dirt?

Will you whining crybabies ever stop playing the VICTIM??????
And you must think Trump is dirty if you think that anyone who researches for a book on him will only find dirt.

BTW, the VRC has never had less than 1,000 "reporters" researching the Clintons!!!

Where in the hell did you come up with that number "1,000"????
My god you people are stupid!
MY facts are from Bob Woodward who said:
Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.

"There's a lot we don't know," he told the National Association of Realtors convention in Washington. "We have 20 people working on Trump, we're going to do a book, we're doing articles about every phase of his life," he added.
The Washington Post Has Assembled An Army Of Reporters To Investigate Everything Trump

 

[hadit]

There's no question that what used to be known as the MSM is biased in favor of democrats. That's glaringly obvious. The good news, however, is that they are becoming increasingly irrelevant in today's world and don't seem to realize it.

 

[Correll]

I thought Foxnews was the most watched cable news network.

I thought conservatives dominated talk radio.

I thought the Right had several thousand anti-liberal anti-Democrat anti-Obama sites on the internet.

Foxnews is the most watched because it is the only network serving it's niche market, ie a half of America, while the rest fight over the other half.

COnservatives dominate talk radio, because the rest of media and pop culture is saturated with Leftist Propaganda.

 

[whitehall]

In a free country we count on the media to be the second set of checks and balances of government power. Unfortunately for Americans the media chose to become an arm of the democrat party in mid 20th century and probably well before. LBJ was a devious politician who wasn't afraid to use illegal tactics which were relatively common against political enemies but the Washington Post went after Nixon. Fast forward to the 1990's when Bill Clinton was guilty as Arkansas A.G. of exposing himself to a female co-worker and paid a hefty fine. When he decided to run for president investigative reporters could have had a great time digging up stuff on the old Bubba but they declined. As a matter of fact the media decided to bury stories about Bill Clinton and make fun of allegations by women who claimed they were victimized or brutalized by him. That's the way the system worked going back to FDR and LBJ and JFK.,the media circled the wagons around democrats and attacked republicans. The media bias continues and Hillary is protected while 20 Washington Post reporters admittedly are assigned to dig up dirt on Trump.

 

[healthmyths]

There's no question that what used to be known as the MSM is biased in favor of democrats. That's glaringly obvious. The good news, however, is that they are becoming increasingly irrelevant in today's world and don't seem to realize it.

The point of the thread was to share with those that didn't comprehend their MSM sources were so biased. These people are the ones this thread was intended.
Obamatrons are so stupid they never read any background. And as I've pointed out several times the MSM donated to Obama! So why would they write bad stories?
Consequently the stupid things Obama has done to destroy industries in this country go without notice...except for people like myself and obviously you!
What we have to do is get more people like ourselves to recognize this BIASED media has grossly misinformed Americans.
In so many ways ABC,CBS,NBC,etc. have done a gross disservice to journalism.
Real quick illustration. Watched ABC news other nite... another cop killing another black guy. GEEZ the way ABC,et.al. tell it it happens ALL THE TIME!
I mean we have an epidemic on our hands. Every day someone in the USA some bad ass white cop kills a innocent unarmed black guy!
Bullshit!!!!
FACTS that ABC,et.al. keep forgetting to state and they make it sound like it is THE RULE...HAPPENS ALL the TIME...
the website killedbypolice.net found that police have killed 1,186 people in 2015 (the U.S. government currently does not track how many people are killed in police encounters.) From this extremely left wing biased source: Here’s How Many People Police Killed In 2015
A) We don't know how many of the police were actually BLACK policemen!
B) We don't know how many of the 1,186 killed were BLACKs.
C) We don't know how many of the 1,186 killed were actually resisting arrest i.e. were armed themselves.
No we don't know! But we do know from ABC news it happens ALL the TIME.... white cop kills black innocent guy.

See what I mean? Oh by the way...

• Nationwide, law enforcement made an estimated 13,120,947 arrests (except traffic violations) in 2010. Of these arrests, 552,077 were for violent crimes and 1,643,962 were for property crimes. Arrests

All the time... out of 13,120,947 arrests... 1,186 killed. HAPPENS ALL the TIME right??? 0.009039%

 

[NYcarbineer]

I thought Foxnews was the most watched cable news network.

I thought conservatives dominated talk radio.

I thought the Right had several thousand anti-liberal anti-Democrat anti-Obama sites on the internet.

Foxnews is the most watched because it is the only network serving it's niche market, ie a half of America, while the rest fight over the other half.

COnservatives dominate talk radio, because the rest of media and pop culture is saturated with Leftist Propaganda.

Now I'm literally laughing out loud at your demented opinion that rightwing talk radio is NOT propaganda.

You are too stupid for words. We need to commission a word inventer to come with words extreme enough to accurately describe your level of stupidity.

 

[rightwinger]

This thread is bullshit

There are hundreds of reporters looking into Trump

 

[Correll]

I thought Foxnews was the most watched cable news network.

I thought conservatives dominated talk radio.

I thought the Right had several thousand anti-liberal anti-Democrat anti-Obama sites on the internet.

Foxnews is the most watched because it is the only network serving it's niche market, ie a half of America, while the rest fight over the other half.

COnservatives dominate talk radio, because the rest of media and pop culture is saturated with Leftist Propaganda.

Now I'm literally laughing out loud at your demented opinion that rightwing talk radio is NOT propaganda.

You are too stupid for words. We need to commission a word inventer to come with words extreme enough to accurately describe your level of stupidity.

I actually made no comment on the content of rightwing talk radio.

The irony of you calling me stupid in a post where the only point of "mine" you address is one that was created by your inability to communicate, is wonderfully hilarious, and I am sure, beyond your comprehension.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Post Associate Editor Bob Woodward revealed Wednesday that the Post has assigned 20 staffers to Trump. In addition the paper plans a book.

"There's a lot we don't know," he told the National Association of Realtors convention in Washington. "We have 20 people working on Trump, we're going to do a book, we're doing articles about every phase of his life," he added.
The Washington Post Has Assembled An Army Of Reporters To Investigate Everything Trump

Here we have one of the MOST public figures in the last 30 years seen by over 1 billion people over 185 episodes of the "Apprentice" The Apprentice (U.S. TV series) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and yet this single paper is dedicating 20 people to unearth dirt?

Where was the same scrutiny for Obama? John Kerry?
Why didn't these papers perform the same investigation effort to uncover whatever on Obama?

A nation-wide network of researchers has sprung up to attempt to fill in the blanks, but at every opportunity Obama’s high-priced lawyers have built walls around various records or simply made them disappear. It is estimated that Obama’s legal team has now spent well over $1.4 million dollars blocking access to documents every American should have access to.
The question is why would he spend so much money to do this?

The president who campaigned for a more “open government” and “full disclosure”
will not unseal his medical records, his school records, his birth records or his passport records.
He will not release his Harvard records,
his Columbia College records,
or his Occidental College records—
he will not even release his Columbia College thesis.
All his legislative records from the Illinois State Senate are missing and
he claims his scheduling records during those State Senate years are lost as well.
In addition, no one can find his school records for the elite K-12 college prep school, Punahou School, he attended in Hawaii.

What is he hiding? Well, for starters, some of these records will shed light on his citizenship and birth.

For example, Obama’s application to Punahou School – now mysteriously missing –
would likely contain a birth certificate. And, according to attorney Gary Kreep, “his Occidental College records are important as they may show he attended there as a foreign exchange student.” Indeed, Obama used his Indonesian name “Barry Soetoro” while attending Occidental. Kreep has filed lawsuits challenging Obama’s eligibility to be president and as part of his lawsuit he requested Obama’s records from Occidental. However, Obama’s lawyers quickly moved to stop Occidental from honoring this request.
The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues | Obama Social Security Numbers

WHERE ARE OBAMA's RECORDS?

OR is this another example of Main Stream Media BIAS?
The same MSM that studies have shown:
That in 2008 , 1,160 or 85% of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters
So in reality why would these "journalists" write negative stories about Obama and positive about his opponent?
They wouldn't. They gave money to Obama for his election!

And here is a personal anecdote about one of those editors...
The Editor of NewsWeek, Evan Thomas was once asked about George Bush and this is his response.
"our job is to bash the president[Bush], that's what we do." Evan Thomas responding to a question on whether the media's unfair to Bush on the TV talk show Inside Washington, February 2, 2007.He-Could-Go-All-The-Way: 'Today' Cheers Obama's Football Play

RIGHT HIS job was to BASH Bush.
He is a journalist. Unbiased. Objective. Professional. RIGHT??
But when it came to Obama?
This same hard-nosed "bashing journalist"- Editor of NewsWeek gushed about Obama.....
"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."
Newsweek’s Evan Thomas: Obama Is ‘Sort of God’
A professional NEWS editor calling a mortal man "sort of God"??? That's not reporting, that's gushing!
So why would NewsWeek or any of the other MSM be objective and produce "objective" information on which people base opinions.
But the proof is here:
This study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press. The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans. Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors,
Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election
Finally here is this article describing HOW POLLING is affected by the media:
Partisanship and race probably influence the MSM’s “slobbering love affair” with Obama.
MSM denizens are overwhelmingly left-wing Democrats, which this site’s readers know very well.
Left-wing Democrats in the MSM likely accept the belief that racism motivates any criticism of Obama.
Since they are loath to express any sentiment that could be so construed, they sing his praises and refuse to report anything that could be considered critical of him. (Expect the MSM to laud Obama’s deal with Iran.)

Given the MSM’s infatuation with Obama and the fact that many Americans still rely on the MSM for the news, is there any wonder that polls show public approval of his job performance, and especially that perceptions of him as a person, remain higher than they might otherwise be?
Articles: Why So Many People Regard Obama Positively

lol

A truly idiotic thread premise.