We’re Going to Defend Taiwan?

You have proof? Hard evidence?

Didn't think so.

How about the fact Zionists in Berlin during WWI gave England the formula for synthetic acetone for cordite, and stole the Zimmerman letter to get the US into the war, all in exchange for the Balfour Declaration.
Why else would England make a Balfour Declaration about a Palestine they did not yet occupy?
 
Ukraine did not put NATO nukes in its territory

As for your other complaints there are international courts for that

That is not the point.
The point is Zelensky wanted to and would have if Russia had not invaded.
Russia already won in the world court over the Ukraine's oil theft in 2012, and the Ukraine never paid up.
 
How about the fact Zionists in Berlin during WWI gave England the formula for synthetic acetone for cordite, and stole the Zimmerman letter to get the US into the war, all in exchange for the Balfour Declaration.
Why else would England make a Balfour Declaration about a Palestine they did not yet occupy?

Thanks for that, anti-Semitic, anti-American Russian troll
 
That is not the point.
The point is Zelensky wanted to and would have if Russia had not invaded.
Russia already won in the world court over the Ukraine's oil theft in 2012, and the Ukraine never paid up.

Keep clinging to your propaganda, Russian troll. You'll get your stale bread and cold borscht soon enough!
 
How about the fact Zionists in Berlin during WWI gave England the formula for synthetic acetone for cordite, and stole the Zimmerman letter to get the US into the war, all in exchange for the Balfour Declaration.
Why else would England make a Balfour Declaration about a Palestine they did not yet occupy?

Yet how in the early 1980s did the Reagan Admin. manage to secure approval from Congress to sell AWACSs early warning radar planes to Saudi Arabia despite the vehement objections of Israel and the Jewish lobby in the U.S.?
 
Why do you think UN investigators have any credibility?

Problem is no one has any credibility.
If the rebels stockpile chemical weapons and Assad attack the depot and blows them up, it is going to look like Assad used chemical weapons.
 
Thats bullshit

NATO has no need to place nukes in ukraine

and russia cant invade based on something that didnt happen

I don't know. Apparently part of their justification for invading was imaginary Nazis.
 
Yet how in the early 1980s did the Reagan Admin. manage to secure approval from Congress to sell AWACSs early warning radar planes to Saudi Arabia despite the vehement objections of Israel and the Jewish lobby in the U.S.?

Probably by giving even more to Israel, secretly, or by Saudi Arabia and Israel coming to a secret pact on the side.
Then their "vehement objections" would have just been theater.
 
Probably by giving even more to Israel, secretly, or by Saudi Arabia and Israel coming to a secret pact on the side.
Then their "vehement objections" would have just been theater.

In other words you have nothing.

You're probably not even Jewish.
 
Thats bullshit

NATO has no need to place nukes in ukraine

and russia cant invade based on something that didnt happen

Yes NATO dearly wants to and has constantly tried to put nukes on Russia's border.
Once that happens, a first strike becomes possible, as the retaliatory strike capability would greatly diminished.

And yes, Russia most certainly can and should invade on what Zelensky said he wanted to happen, in violation of treaties.
 
Probably by giving even more to Israel, secretly, or by Saudi Arabia and Israel coming to a secret pact on the side.
Then their "vehement objections" would have just been theater.
Israel doesn't fly E-3 Sentry AWACS aircraft.

Israel uses E-2 Hawkeye AWACS aircraft (same as the U.S.navy) for a key reason. The Hawkeyes are designed to fit into the hangars of aircraft carriers which means they are much more compact and can more easily fit into hardened aircraft shelters.
 
You've never studied airplane crashes obviously.

I have.

I have never paid much attention to the Pentagon hit on 9/11, but the security camera image did not look like a plane, and these stills do not look like a plane hit.
What is your explanation?
 
Too easy:

The vast amount of flammable material in the WTC towers caused the blaze to grow far, far hotter than one fed solely by jet fuel.

There is not supposed to be anything in the WTC that was flammable at all, much less hotter than jet fuel.
 
Yes NATO dearly wants to and has constantly tried to put nukes on Russia's border.
Once that happens, a first strike becomes possible, as the retaliatory strike capability would greatly diminished.

And yes, Russia most certainly can and should invade on what Zelensky said he wanted to happen, in violation of treaties.
We haven't needed short range nukes for many decades so there would be no point in putting them on Russia's border.

Putin had no justification for invading period, NATO has never posed a threat to Russia in any way other than stopping the Russians should they invade or otherwise attack NATO.
 
There is not supposed to be anything in the WTC that was flammable at all, much less hotter than jet fuel.
Horse shit. Paper, wood and fabric and especially carpets all burn.

You also had a serious wind tunnel effect due to the blowing out of windows along with long hallways.
 

Forum List

Back
Top