We Need Socialism.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Stay dumb!

Keep whining, loser.

 

[dblack]

Do you see anything wrong with this?
The 3 Richest Americans Hold More Wealth Than Bottom 50% Of The Country, Study Finds

Why did we give them that much wealth?

 

[gipper]

Why did we give them that much wealth?

A lot of truth here…built fortunes on war.

The same tiny group of people — only around 1,000 billionaires — have built their fortunes this way. And no billionaire is publicly admitting this and working to oppose it. The wealthiest people are driving everyone else toward World War Three. The wealthiest people also market hatred toward their targets in order to make the entire operation a product of ‘democracy’ — not of what they sneeringly call ‘autocracy’ (even though such individuals as Putin, Xi, and Khamenei aren’t autocrats but truly represent their public — which ours DON’T).
WW3: Daniel Davis is too good for U.S-&-allied ‘news’-media, so here he is:

 

[dblack]

A lot of truth here…built fortunes on war.

We're giving them money for war? How so?

 

[gipper]

We're giving them money for war? How so?

 

[dblack]

Seriously. What do you mean by that?

 

[gipper]

Seriously. What do you mean by that?

You really need it explained?

 

[dblack]

You really need it explained?

Yep. It's always assumed, but rarely challenged. Walk me through it.

 

[gipper]

Yep. It's always assumed, but rarely challenged. Walk me through it.

It’s rather simple. Billionaires control the government and the politicians. Many earn enormous wealth directing government policies that directly benefit them. War is a huge wealth generator. So, they push for war.

 

[gipper]

Yep. It's always assumed, but rarely challenged. Walk me through it.

This might help too. Ike thought the war machine was stealing from the poor. Now who benefits from trillions spent on the war machine?

“Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.”—President Dwight D. Eisenhower (April 16, 1953)

 

[Highlight]

ie .... as long as we see the government as our caretaker (and our master).

Watch the documentary "The Corporation." I would rather have the government as our "caretakers and masters" that private companies. Who aren't answerable to anybody.

 

[dblack]

Watch the documentary "The Corporation." I would rather have the government as our "caretakers and masters" that private companies. Who aren't answerable to anybody.

Same answer as before. You're a fool to enslave yourself to either. But if that's what you want, I won't stop you. Just don't try to drag me into your dystopia.

 

[Highlight]

It’s rather simple. Billionaires control the government and the politicians. Many earn enormous wealth directing government policies that directly benefit them. War is a huge wealth generator. So, they push for war.

I agree. But on to a different topic, it would appear that somebody has changed at least some of my "Like" icons to "Disagree" icons. I found one on one of your replies. I changed it back. I wonder who changed them. Or where else they may have appeared. Also, somewhere I gave you a link to a couple videos. Did you watch them? Or were they removed.

 

[Highlight]

So 19 American families have the same net worth ($2. 6 trillion) as 110 million Americans–no problem, there’s an app that resolves that.

Did the 19 families steal it from the 110 million Americans? How?

Maybe gippertwat can stop sobbing for a minute and explain?

Yes, they did. Through wage slavery.

 

[dblack]

I wonder if a two-tiered system would work...

I'm thinking a setup where people who wanted a government caretaker could sign up for that. Those who signed up would lose some of their liberty, but they'd have the rock solid promise that the government would take care of them. Those who didn't sign up are free to do as they choose, but there's no government safety net coddling them. They're on their own.

 

[Highlight]

Choose to work paycheck to paycheck......


No, you moron. Your link says:

To learn more about the people who use these programs, we analyzed employment data from 11 states and Census data.

We found:

About 70% worked full time

That's talking about the people who use the program.

Man are you stupid.



Yep, I don't like it either. But as authors have said repeatedly. If you took all the money we have and evenly distributed it....it would take 10 to 20 years for the rich to be rich again.

Why worry about what others have? If I have a million dollars....I'm set. I don't need 100 million.


No slaver to blame for that.

Awww......did I wuin you day?


Help what?

Nobody chooses to work from paycheck to paycheck.

 

[dblack]

I agree. But on to a different topic, it would appear that somebody has changed at least some of my "Like" icons to "Disagree" icons. I found one on one of your replies. I changed it back. I wonder who changed them. Or where else they may have appeared. Also, somewhere I gave you a link to a couple videos. Did you watch them? Or were they removed.

Don't flatter yourself. There's no board conspiracy to suppress you. You probably just fat-fingered something. I do it all the time.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Nobody chooses to work from paycheck to paycheck.

Sure, don't address the rest of the post.

And yes, some people do.

 

[gipper]

I agree. But on to a different topic, it would appear that somebody has changed at least some of my "Like" icons to "Disagree" icons. I found one on one of your replies. I changed it back. I wonder who changed them. Or where else they may have appeared. Also, somewhere I gave you a link to a couple videos. Did you watch them? Or were they removed.

Interesting. I’ve received several “Disagrees” from you to posts I’d thought you’d agree to.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yes, they did. Through wage slavery.

What's wage slavery?