We have six days until snap/food stamp cards might run out of money…predictions

Food stamps are abused.
1) People on food stamps buy high-end meat at Whole Foods when they SHOULD be buying ground beef at Safeway.

2) People who COULD be working full-time choose not to because part-time with food stamps is more appealing to them.

3) Baby daddies think they’re doing “their part” by getting their baby mamas onto food stamps instead of supporting their own baby.
 
For a family of five, it’s over $1000 a month.

Horse shit on the $1000 per month.

It will be more because yes…

Wait for it…

There are more people to feed.

WW

1761482627810.webp
 
Blue cities burn.

I'll bring the popcorn.

Considering that red states and republican voters overwhelmingly use SNAP I will be curious to see which cities are the ones to burn first.
 
Horse shit on the $1000 per month.

It will be more because yes…

Wait for it…

There are more people to feed.

WW

View attachment 1177496


Your attachment says $174 per person. X5 IS CLOSE TO $1000/MO as other poster suggested. ($870).

Single mother 5-kids ~= $1000.

To eat on $250/wk for 6, don't buy junk, cook at home. Heat up leftovers, eggs bread milk butter will need to buy several times per month? Kids bring P&J to school lunches only. $1 for milk per kid? Or is that all free too?
 
When you yank the carpet out from under someone with little or no notice, you have to understand they may react. It could be food stamps, it could be tariffs, it could be health insurance, it could be international military assistance.

That's what this administration has done since it started its second season term. Presumably they have decided that ripping off every single band aid at the same time will result in something positive in the long run.

They will, in turn, react with heavy-handed authoritarianism. They have planned for that as well. We'll see what that looks like. This is what America voted for -- whether it realized it or not -- so this is what it gets. Elections have consequences.
It is Democrats who are blocking SNAP and WIC. Starving children instead of passing a clean CR so those hungry kids can be leverage in the Democrats' fight for illegal border crossers, the reluctant to work, and PBS.
 
Horse shit on the $1000 per month.

It will be more because yes…

Wait for it…

There are more people to feed.

WW

View attachment 1177496
Well, duh…I said the $1000 (which is non-taxable, so it’s equivalent to a person having to EARN $1,300) is for a family of five. Plenty baby mamas have three and four kids before they’re 30.

Other people work just part-time - enough to keep food stamps going - while they still live with THEIR mothers. It is not uncommon for a 40-year-old unmarried woman to have five children ranging from 2 years old to 22 years old, with the 22-year old not working at all because SHE has a baby, and the 18-year-old working part-time only. The multiple fathers are paying nothing, and all seven are on food stamps.

We need to put a stop to this system.
 
Considering that red states and republican voters overwhelmingly use SNAP I will be curious to see which cities are the ones to burn first.
For every "White" Riot there are dozens of "Black" Riots... even during difficult times...

The Odds are greatly in favor of Black (Blue) cities rioting long-before and far more extensively than White (Red) cities.

Given the extensive history supporting just that perspective in the 20th and 21st centuries your remark was disingenuous.
 
15th post
Why is Schumer gonna starve millions of Americans to death?
 
Well, duh…I said the $1000 (which is non-taxable, so it’s equivalent to a person having to EARN $1,300) is for a family of five. Plenty baby mamas have three and four kids before they’re 30.

Other people work just part-time - enough to keep food stamps going - while they still live with THEIR mothers. It is not uncommon for a 40-year-old unmarried woman to have five children ranging from 2 years old to 22 years old, with the 22-year old not working at all because SHE has a baby, and the 18-year-old working part-time only. The multiple fathers are paying nothing, and all seven are on food stamps.

We need to put a stop to this system.
Being a special ed teacher in a largely Hispanic district, a large percent of my students' families are on the dole.

I have one high school female, who lives with her mother and two older sisters. Just getting her to come to school is like pulling teeth. She sees her mom and sisters still in bedclothes or still in bed when she gets up and dresses for the day and thinks it is unfair that she has to go to "work."

One sister is on the chubby but normal scale. Mom, the student, and the other sister are literally morbidly obese. The student is so obese that I doubt she could carry a pregnancy to term, plus she's not exactly a magnet for the boys. So she won't be following mom's example of having babies with no man around except for donating the sperm, and then collecting lifetime welfare.

Other than the obesity, it's a pretty typical situation. Less corpulant women often do have a man in the home, working hard at an under-the-table job, while the women use SNAP and WIC to buy supplies for their seasonal tamale business.

They are a hard working bunch, by and large, but the Democrats managed to make them dependent anyway.
 
In theory that is how it is supposed to work, but what you missed is that inflation keeps the mid/lower incomes from gaining or even keeping up with the wealthy. The top 10% or so have investments that always gain on inflation, while those in the lower 50% live "hand to mouth" barely staying solvent. I'm fine helping out the lower 50% with ACA subsidies paid for with spending cuts like the DOGE savings. The top tax rate should be 40%, and the capital gains tax break should be eliminated to start paying down the $38T debt.

View attachment 1177458
I favor steady capital formation by the middle class. The lower class needs to improve their lifestyle, mainly their health. The rich sow capital and reap profits. The middle class is their primary target customer. If the middle class saves just a bit more instead of buying every shiny new thing the rich produce more capital will accumulate there and less will flow back to the rich. Consider that the black community has buying power of over a $Trillion/yr, which they largely spend on shiny thing. Little is saved so the black community is always struggling to achieve the capital needed to advance.
 
I favor steady capital formation by the middle class. The lower class needs to improve their lifestyle, mainly their health. The rich sow capital and reap profits. The middle class is their primary target customer. If the middle class saves just a bit more instead of buying every shiny new thing the rich produce more capital will accumulate there and less will flow back to the rich. Consider that the black community has buying power of over a $Trillion/yr, which they largely spend on shiny thing. Little is saved so the black community is always struggling to achieve the capital needed to advance.
Biden's inflation cost US families $11,400 in buying power. Most people can't buy a house or afford healthcare insurance. Family formation and birthrates are falling off a cliff. Yet the top 10 % are gaining wealth. Its a house of cards unless something is fixed.

Americans need an extra $11,400 today just to afford the basics​

 
Back
Top Bottom