- Thread starter
- #321
Who thinks the ******** will beat Houston on Sunday?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Moral Case Against Football
Is it immoral to consume violent entertainment that can result in dire, even deadly consequences for its participants? Is it immoral to cheer for a dazzling show knowing it could cause its stars to develop dementia or memory loss or depression?
That is to say, is it immoral to watch football?
In a punchy new manifesto, New York Times bestselling author Steve Almond argues that it is.
The Moral Case Against Football
It's all about money and violence.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Washington Post says it will stop calling Washington's football team the "Redskins" on its editorial page.
The paper's editorial board announced Friday that it will refrain from using the term that it says "unquestionably offends not only many Native Americans but many other Americans, too."
The board noted that it has been speaking out against the Redskins name since 1992. Redskins spokesman Tony Wyllie said the announcement was therefore "no surprise" to the team.
Several major newspapers have stopped using the name altogether.
Redskins owner Dan Snyder has vowed never to change the name, saying it honors Native Americans.
Washington Post Bans Redskins From Editorials
Most famously of all, Marshall was the last owner to accept a black player—fully 15 years after the ban was lifted. And his team drafted an African-American then (in 1961) only because it was forced to by the government—the then-new stadium that we call RFK Stadium today was built on Department of Interior land, which permitted the Kennedy administration to order the lessee (the team) to adhere to federal nondiscrimination policies. In other words, Marshall wasn’t merely a standard-issue racist of the time, like H.L. Mencken or countless others. He was diseased. He seethed with hatred of nonwhite people. And “Redskins” is his handiwork. Because “Braves” wasn’t quite descriptive enough.
The Racist Redskins - The Daily Beast
Progress is slow - but it's still progress. The man who named the Washington Redskins team, George Preston Marshall, was a diseased racist. His racist legacy should die.
Then we must assume they will not mention nor cover the Yankees, Indians, Raiders, Braves, Buccaneers, Cowboys, Chiefs, Vikings, Steelers, Texans, Pirates, Saints, Padres, Browns, Packers.... the list goes on, Heaven forbid. So petty for such a group of well educated intellectuals. Must be an election year the left has once again played the racist card, whoops now who is the racist?
What's wrong with those names? They don't sound racist to me. Actually, Indians is funny, because Columbus was too fucking dumb to know what continent he was on (thought he was in India) - so he called the natives Indians. White people should be more ashamed/embarrassed by that than Native Americans.
This country has lost its mind. Someone is offended by everything. This is lunacy.
What's wrong with those names? They don't sound racist to me. Actually, Indians is funny, because Columbus was too fucking dumb to know what continent he was on (thought he was in India) - so he called the natives Indians. White people should be more ashamed/embarrassed by that than Native Americans.
Actually Viking is a misrepresentation as well. The people were Norse...... Swedes, Danes, and Fins. To go "a-viking" was their term for raiding.
White people should be embarrassed that we didn't either force your people to assimilate, leave the country, or die. Maybe we can fix that. The cholera blankets didn't work but maybe some Ebola blankets will.
You're such a kind and considerate person - and sooo open-minded. I made a voodoo doll that looks like Dan Snyder. I'll be really for the Sunday game.
You're such a kind and considerate person - and sooo open-minded. I made a voodoo doll that looks like Dan Snyder. I'll be really for the Sunday game.
Your pagan rituals didn't work 300 years ago and they won't work now. Honestly people like are you are what cause others to look down on other races.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Washington Post says it will stop calling Washington's football team the "Redskins" on its editorial page.
The paper's editorial board announced Friday that it will refrain from using the term that it says "unquestionably offends not only many Native Americans but many other Americans, too."
The board noted that it has been speaking out against the Redskins name since 1992. Redskins spokesman Tony Wyllie said the announcement was therefore "no surprise" to the team.
Several major newspapers have stopped using the name altogether.
Redskins owner Dan Snyder has vowed never to change the name, saying it honors Native Americans.
Washington Post Bans Redskins From Editorials
Most famously of all, Marshall was the last owner to accept a black player—fully 15 years after the ban was lifted. And his team drafted an African-American then (in 1961) only because it was forced to by the government—the then-new stadium that we call RFK Stadium today was built on Department of Interior land, which permitted the Kennedy administration to order the lessee (the team) to adhere to federal nondiscrimination policies. In other words, Marshall wasn’t merely a standard-issue racist of the time, like H.L. Mencken or countless others. He was diseased. He seethed with hatred of nonwhite people. And “Redskins” is his handiwork. Because “Braves” wasn’t quite descriptive enough.
The Racist Redskins - The Daily Beast
Progress is slow - but it's still progress. The man who named the Washington Redskins team, George Preston Marshall, was a diseased racist. His racist legacy should die.
Conservatives and their myth of 'political correctness.'
Not to mention the hypocrisy of the right, where private businesses should be allowed to 'do what they want' except when private businesses do something conservatives don't like.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Washington Post says it will stop calling Washington's football team the "Redskins" on its editorial page.
The paper's editorial board announced Friday that it will refrain from using the term that it says "unquestionably offends not only many Native Americans but many other Americans, too."
The board noted that it has been speaking out against the Redskins name since 1992. Redskins spokesman Tony Wyllie said the announcement was therefore "no surprise" to the team.
Several major newspapers have stopped using the name altogether.
Redskins owner Dan Snyder has vowed never to change the name, saying it honors Native Americans.
Washington Post Bans Redskins From Editorials
Most famously of all, Marshall was the last owner to accept a black player—fully 15 years after the ban was lifted. And his team drafted an African-American then (in 1961) only because it was forced to by the government—the then-new stadium that we call RFK Stadium today was built on Department of Interior land, which permitted the Kennedy administration to order the lessee (the team) to adhere to federal nondiscrimination policies. In other words, Marshall wasn’t merely a standard-issue racist of the time, like H.L. Mencken or countless others. He was diseased. He seethed with hatred of nonwhite people. And “Redskins” is his handiwork. Because “Braves” wasn’t quite descriptive enough.
The Racist Redskins - The Daily Beast
Progress is slow - but it's still progress. The man who named the Washington Redskins team, George Preston Marshall, was a diseased racist. His racist legacy should die.
Look, Redskin YOU are a conquered people.
Deal with it.