Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

[Soupnazi630]

Other than bizarre, unsupported claims

Nobody has provided ANY evidence that Oswald received help

The House Select Committee on Assassinations did. They ruled the Kennedy assassination a conspiracy. I thought you supported everything that government does. What gives?

They did not actually. They ruled on nothing, they concluded a probable conspiracy based on ONE and ONLY ONE piece of evidence which has long since been debunked.

And why the hell would you think any such thing?

 

[westwall]

Other than bizarre, unsupported claims

Nobody has provided ANY evidence that Oswald received help

The House Select Committee on Assassinations did. They ruled the Kennedy assassination a conspiracy. I thought you supported everything that government does. What gives?

They did not actually. They ruled on nothing, they concluded a probable conspiracy based on ONE and ONLY ONE piece of evidence which has long since been debunked.

And why the hell would you think any such thing?

Here is a link to the actual document.


The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy.

1. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Soviet Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.
2. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Cuban Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.
3. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that anti-Castro Cuban groups, as groups, were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
4. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the national syndicate of organized crime, as a group, was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
5. The Secret Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.

Summary of Findings

 

[Soupnazi630]

Other than bizarre, unsupported claims

Nobody has provided ANY evidence that Oswald received help

The House Select Committee on Assassinations did. They ruled the Kennedy assassination a conspiracy. I thought you supported everything that government does. What gives?

They did not actually. They ruled on nothing, they concluded a probable conspiracy based on ONE and ONLY ONE piece of evidence which has long since been debunked.

And why the hell would you think any such thing?

Here is a link to the actual document.


The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy.

1. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Soviet Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.
2. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Cuban Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.
3. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that anti-Castro Cuban groups, as groups, were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
4. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the national syndicate of organized crime, as a group, was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
5. The Secret Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.

Summary of Findings

Yes exactly. As i said the House Select Committee on assassination found evidence of a probable conspiracy.

If you click the link you will find that this conclusion is based on one piece of evidence only which is an acoustical recording.

Unfortunately later analysis shows that the interpretation of that acoustical evidence was wrong.

John F. Kennedy assassination Dictabelt recording - Wikipedia

In the end due to the fact that the HSCA had only this piece of evidence for their conclusion and it has been debunked the fact remains no credible evidence exists of a conspiracy.

 

[westwall]

Other than bizarre, unsupported claims

Nobody has provided ANY evidence that Oswald received help

The House Select Committee on Assassinations did. They ruled the Kennedy assassination a conspiracy. I thought you supported everything that government does. What gives?

They did not actually. They ruled on nothing, they concluded a probable conspiracy based on ONE and ONLY ONE piece of evidence which has long since been debunked.

And why the hell would you think any such thing?

Here is a link to the actual document.


The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy.

1. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Soviet Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.
2. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Cuban Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.
3. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that anti-Castro Cuban groups, as groups, were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
4. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the national syndicate of organized crime, as a group, was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
5. The Secret Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.

Summary of Findings

Yes exactly. As i said the House Select Committee on assassination found evidence of a probable conspiracy.

If you click the link you will find that this conclusion is based on one piece of evidence only which is an acoustical recording.

Unfortunately later analysis shows that the interpretation of that acoustical evidence was wrong.

John F. Kennedy assassination Dictabelt recording - Wikipedia

In the end due to the fact that the HSCA had only this piece of evidence for their conclusion and it has been debunked the fact remains no credible evidence exists of a conspiracy.

Wiki is not a credible source. Please find a more credible link that shows the audio recording is a fabrication.

I did find this source which refutes what you claim

Contributors
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications
Description
At the time of the assassination of President Kennedy, the Dallas police recorded sounds from an open microphone; these sounds have been previously analyzed by two research groups at the request of the House Select Committee on Assassinations. Both groups concluded with 95% probability that the recordings contained acoustic impulses which provide evidence for the existence of a shot from the grassy knoll area of Dealey Plaza. On the basis of these results and since shots definitely were fired from the Texas School Book Depository, the House Committee concluded that "scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy."
https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10264/report-of-the-committee-on-ballistic-acoustics

 

[Soupnazi630]

Other than bizarre, unsupported claims

Nobody has provided ANY evidence that Oswald received help

The House Select Committee on Assassinations did. They ruled the Kennedy assassination a conspiracy. I thought you supported everything that government does. What gives?

They did not actually. They ruled on nothing, they concluded a probable conspiracy based on ONE and ONLY ONE piece of evidence which has long since been debunked.

And why the hell would you think any such thing?

Here is a link to the actual document.


The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy.

1. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Soviet Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.
2. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Cuban Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.
3. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that anti-Castro Cuban groups, as groups, were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
4. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the national syndicate of organized crime, as a group, was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
5. The Secret Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.

Summary of Findings

Yes exactly. As i said the House Select Committee on assassination found evidence of a probable conspiracy.

If you click the link you will find that this conclusion is based on one piece of evidence only which is an acoustical recording.

Unfortunately later analysis shows that the interpretation of that acoustical evidence was wrong.

John F. Kennedy assassination Dictabelt recording - Wikipedia

In the end due to the fact that the HSCA had only this piece of evidence for their conclusion and it has been debunked the fact remains no credible evidence exists of a conspiracy.

Wiki is not a credible source. Please find a more credible link that shows the audio recording is a fabrication.

I did find this source which refutes what you claim

Contributors
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications
Description
At the time of the assassination of President Kennedy, the Dallas police recorded sounds from an open microphone; these sounds have been previously analyzed by two research groups at the request of the House Select Committee on Assassinations. Both groups concluded with 95% probability that the recordings contained acoustic impulses which provide evidence for the existence of a shot from the grassy knoll area of Dealey Plaza. On the basis of these results and since shots definitely were fired from the Texas School Book Depository, the House Committee concluded that "scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy."
https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10264/report-of-the-committee-on-ballistic-acoustics

No one said it was a fabrication.

It simply picked up no discerneble gun shots..

And yes wiki is a credible source which specifically lists other credible sources debunking the HSCA findings

 

[westwall]

The House Select Committee on Assassinations did. They ruled the Kennedy assassination a conspiracy. I thought you supported everything that government does. What gives?

They did not actually. They ruled on nothing, they concluded a probable conspiracy based on ONE and ONLY ONE piece of evidence which has long since been debunked.

And why the hell would you think any such thing?

Here is a link to the actual document.


The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy.

1. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Soviet Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.
2. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Cuban Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.
3. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that anti-Castro Cuban groups, as groups, were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
4. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the national syndicate of organized crime, as a group, was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
5. The Secret Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.

Summary of Findings

Yes exactly. As i said the House Select Committee on assassination found evidence of a probable conspiracy.

If you click the link you will find that this conclusion is based on one piece of evidence only which is an acoustical recording.

Unfortunately later analysis shows that the interpretation of that acoustical evidence was wrong.

John F. Kennedy assassination Dictabelt recording - Wikipedia

In the end due to the fact that the HSCA had only this piece of evidence for their conclusion and it has been debunked the fact remains no credible evidence exists of a conspiracy.

Wiki is not a credible source. Please find a more credible link that shows the audio recording is a fabrication.

I did find this source which refutes what you claim

Contributors
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications
Description
At the time of the assassination of President Kennedy, the Dallas police recorded sounds from an open microphone; these sounds have been previously analyzed by two research groups at the request of the House Select Committee on Assassinations. Both groups concluded with 95% probability that the recordings contained acoustic impulses which provide evidence for the existence of a shot from the grassy knoll area of Dealey Plaza. On the basis of these results and since shots definitely were fired from the Texas School Book Depository, the House Committee concluded that "scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy."
https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10264/report-of-the-committee-on-ballistic-acoustics

No one said it was a fabrication.

It simply picked up no discerneble gun shots..

And yes wiki is a credible source which specifically lists other credible sources debunking the HSCA findings

The report I linked to doesn't say that. Please provide a link to a study that does.

 

[Soupnazi630]

They did not actually. They ruled on nothing, they concluded a probable conspiracy based on ONE and ONLY ONE piece of evidence which has long since been debunked.

And why the hell would you think any such thing?

Here is a link to the actual document.


The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy.

1. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Soviet Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.
2. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Cuban Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.
3. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that anti-Castro Cuban groups, as groups, were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
4. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the national syndicate of organized crime, as a group, was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
5. The Secret Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.

Summary of Findings

Yes exactly. As i said the House Select Committee on assassination found evidence of a probable conspiracy.

If you click the link you will find that this conclusion is based on one piece of evidence only which is an acoustical recording.

Unfortunately later analysis shows that the interpretation of that acoustical evidence was wrong.

John F. Kennedy assassination Dictabelt recording - Wikipedia

In the end due to the fact that the HSCA had only this piece of evidence for their conclusion and it has been debunked the fact remains no credible evidence exists of a conspiracy.

Wiki is not a credible source. Please find a more credible link that shows the audio recording is a fabrication.

I did find this source which refutes what you claim

Contributors
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications
Description
At the time of the assassination of President Kennedy, the Dallas police recorded sounds from an open microphone; these sounds have been previously analyzed by two research groups at the request of the House Select Committee on Assassinations. Both groups concluded with 95% probability that the recordings contained acoustic impulses which provide evidence for the existence of a shot from the grassy knoll area of Dealey Plaza. On the basis of these results and since shots definitely were fired from the Texas School Book Depository, the House Committee concluded that "scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy."
https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10264/report-of-the-committee-on-ballistic-acoustics

No one said it was a fabrication.

It simply picked up no discerneble gun shots..

And yes wiki is a credible source which specifically lists other credible sources debunking the HSCA findings

The report I linked to doesn't say that. Please provide a link to a study that does.

The link I posted to cited several such studies.

 

[westwall]

Here is a link to the actual document.


The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy.

1. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Soviet Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.
2. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the Cuban Government was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.
3. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that anti-Castro Cuban groups, as groups, were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
4. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that the national syndicate of organized crime, as a group, was not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy, but that the available evidence does not preclude the possibility that individual members may have been involved.
5. The Secret Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Central Intelligence Agency were not involved in the assassination of President Kennedy.

Summary of Findings

Yes exactly. As i said the House Select Committee on assassination found evidence of a probable conspiracy.

If you click the link you will find that this conclusion is based on one piece of evidence only which is an acoustical recording.

Unfortunately later analysis shows that the interpretation of that acoustical evidence was wrong.

John F. Kennedy assassination Dictabelt recording - Wikipedia

In the end due to the fact that the HSCA had only this piece of evidence for their conclusion and it has been debunked the fact remains no credible evidence exists of a conspiracy.

Wiki is not a credible source. Please find a more credible link that shows the audio recording is a fabrication.

I did find this source which refutes what you claim

Contributors
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications
Description
At the time of the assassination of President Kennedy, the Dallas police recorded sounds from an open microphone; these sounds have been previously analyzed by two research groups at the request of the House Select Committee on Assassinations. Both groups concluded with 95% probability that the recordings contained acoustic impulses which provide evidence for the existence of a shot from the grassy knoll area of Dealey Plaza. On the basis of these results and since shots definitely were fired from the Texas School Book Depository, the House Committee concluded that "scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy."
https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10264/report-of-the-committee-on-ballistic-acoustics

No one said it was a fabrication.

It simply picked up no discerneble gun shots..

And yes wiki is a credible source which specifically lists other credible sources debunking the HSCA findings

The report I linked to doesn't say that. Please provide a link to a study that does.

The link I posted to cited several such studies.

Link to ONE of them please.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes exactly. As i said the House Select Committee on assassination found evidence of a probable conspiracy.

If you click the link you will find that this conclusion is based on one piece of evidence only which is an acoustical recording.

Unfortunately later analysis shows that the interpretation of that acoustical evidence was wrong.

John F. Kennedy assassination Dictabelt recording - Wikipedia

In the end due to the fact that the HSCA had only this piece of evidence for their conclusion and it has been debunked the fact remains no credible evidence exists of a conspiracy.

Wiki is not a credible source. Please find a more credible link that shows the audio recording is a fabrication.

I did find this source which refutes what you claim

Contributors
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications
Description
At the time of the assassination of President Kennedy, the Dallas police recorded sounds from an open microphone; these sounds have been previously analyzed by two research groups at the request of the House Select Committee on Assassinations. Both groups concluded with 95% probability that the recordings contained acoustic impulses which provide evidence for the existence of a shot from the grassy knoll area of Dealey Plaza. On the basis of these results and since shots definitely were fired from the Texas School Book Depository, the House Committee concluded that "scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy."
https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10264/report-of-the-committee-on-ballistic-acoustics

No one said it was a fabrication.

It simply picked up no discerneble gun shots..

And yes wiki is a credible source which specifically lists other credible sources debunking the HSCA findings

The report I linked to doesn't say that. Please provide a link to a study that does.

The link I posted to cited several such studies.

Link to ONE of them please.

I gave you a link with several.


http://www.thekennedyhalfcentury.com/pdf/Kennedy-Half-Century-Audio-Research.pdf

The acoustic evidence in the Kennedy assassination

 

[westwall]

Wiki is not a credible source. Please find a more credible link that shows the audio recording is a fabrication.

I did find this source which refutes what you claim

Contributors
Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences; Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications
Description
At the time of the assassination of President Kennedy, the Dallas police recorded sounds from an open microphone; these sounds have been previously analyzed by two research groups at the request of the House Select Committee on Assassinations. Both groups concluded with 95% probability that the recordings contained acoustic impulses which provide evidence for the existence of a shot from the grassy knoll area of Dealey Plaza. On the basis of these results and since shots definitely were fired from the Texas School Book Depository, the House Committee concluded that "scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy."
https://www.nap.edu/catalog/10264/report-of-the-committee-on-ballistic-acoustics

No one said it was a fabrication.

It simply picked up no discerneble gun shots..

And yes wiki is a credible source which specifically lists other credible sources debunking the HSCA findings

The report I linked to doesn't say that. Please provide a link to a study that does.

The link I posted to cited several such studies.

Link to ONE of them please.

I gave you a link with several.


http://www.thekennedyhalfcentury.com/pdf/Kennedy-Half-Century-Audio-Research.pdf

The acoustic evidence in the Kennedy assassination

I need to read these. Give me a day or two.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

SoupNazi and Rightwinger are two Mossad liars here who knew that JFK was offed for not sending arms to Israel.

They were very happy about LBJ and this...

After the start of the 67 war, LBJ came out and told the American people that Israel was attacked and was just defending itself. He lied...


CIA Analysis of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War — Central Intelligence Agency


"Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move"


There is no point in discussing truth with these two traitors, as they have no interest in truth. They care about Israel and helping Israel get away with everything from 911 to JFK...

you mean THREE traIters.


you forgot to mention their fellow Langley resident troll Hunarcy as well.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

SoupNazi and Rightwinger are two Mossad liars here who knew that JFK was offed for not sending arms to Israel.

They were very happy about LBJ and this...

After the start of the 67 war, LBJ came out and told the American people that Israel was attacked and was just defending itself. He lied...


CIA Analysis of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War — Central Intelligence Agency


"Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move"


There is no point in discussing truth with these two traitors, as they have no interest in truth. They care about Israel and helping Israel get away with everything from 911 to JFK...

None of which you have ever presented evidence for.

Tell it to Jackie and Tippets widow

Jackie knew Oswald was a patsy. Fool.

Citation needed.

Oh sorry I forgot you only make crap up and never offer any evidence to support it,

She never made any such claim fool.

The evidence shows he was not a patsy.

Of course she never made that claim. She knew what your buddies at Langley would do to her...just what they did to her husband, brother in-law, and likely her son.

Can you blame her?

So she never made such a claim.

Therefore you do not know any such thing and are merely speaking out of your consistent ignorance and stupidity.

Bur I will give you credit that for once at least you admit to being a liar since you have no idea what she thought and have fessed up to it.

Jackie Kennedy knew that the altered corpse of J.D Tippit wasn't that of JFK and said that it resembled something straight out of Madame Toussad's wax museum. You see, JFK had gross skeletal abnormalities all along the spine of his body as several of his vertebrae had fractures and metal pins inserted into the cartilage and bones. These conditions were due to JFK having osteoporosis as a child and injuries caused by his time in the military during his military. Now, here is the tale of the tape that more than proves that the autopsy was done on Tippit instead of JFK..... the section titled "Skeletal Structure" in the "autopsy report declares that there were "no gross skeletal abnormalities"...hmmmmm????

You lose yet again, Soup, dupe.....kicking your ass is too ******* easy.

btw, you can spew as much you desire and equally drooling dredges of this forum will applaud you....but I simply laugh at you as you attempt to wave the Warren Commission flag as the bastion of truth. You are dismissed and exposed for the fraud that you are.

To those that know the REAL truth? There is nothing more that needs to be said...morons are gonna be morons. You can lead a mule to water but there are some that are so stubborn that they would rather die of thirst than to admit that they were lead to the oasis.

well even children laugh at this troll soup dupe.,the biggest stupid **** to ever penetrate this forum.LOL

 

[LA RAM FAN]

None of which you have ever presented evidence for.

So she never made such a claim.

Therefore you do not know any such thing and are merely speaking out of your consistent ignorance and stupidity.

Bur I will give you credit that for once at least you admit to being a liar since you have no idea what she thought and have fessed up to it.

Jackie Kennedy knew that the altered corpse of J.D Tippit wasn't that of JFK and said that it resembled something straight out of Madame Toussad's wax museum. You see, JFK had gross skeletal abnormalities all along the spine of his body as several of his vertebrae had fractures and metal pins inserted into the cartilage and bones. These conditions were due to JFK having osteoporosis as a child and injuries caused by his time in the military during his military. Now, here is the tale of the tape that more than proves that the autopsy was done on Tippit instead of JFK..... the section titled "Skeletal Structure" in the "autopsy report declares that there were "no gross skeletal abnormalities"...hmmmmm????

You lose yet again, Soup, dupe.....kicking your ass is too ******* easy.

btw, you can spew as much you desire and equally drooling dredges of this forum will applaud you....but I simply laugh at you as you attempt to wave the Warren Commission flag as the bastion of truth. You are dismissed and exposed for the fraud that you are.

To those that know the REAL truth? There is nothing more that needs to be said...morons are gonna be morons. You can lead a mule to water but there are some that are so stubborn that they would rather die of thirst than to admit that they were lead to the oasis.

You have kicked no one's ass little boy you have only lost every argument.

You have failed to cite any evidence or even a witness to challenge the Warren Commission report or to refute it;s findings.

Jackie Kennedy never saw Tippet's body.

Commas, Soupy........they mean so much. Allow me to school you on the importance so STFU, turn around and face the blackboard.

Here is why a strategically placed comma can change the entire meaning of a sentence. Please not the example.

"Let's eat mom".......

Now, this sentence implies cannibalism, no?

BUT? Let's place a "comma" in that sentence and all of the sudden it becomes an invite to dine.

"Let's eat, mom".

That concludes this particular lesson as it pertains to strategically placed punctuation.

As far as you claiming the Warren Report was pure gospel? That claim is even more pathetic than your piss poor attempts at punctuation. The "hit" was nothing to write home about. This all-star team of CIA and mafia hitmen fucked up royally and I blame it on the fact that they had to try and coordinate with the other shooters because it had to look like one bullet took him out. 16 plus shots and only four verifiable hits and none of them a "kill shot" so they had to use the ace in the hole which was Greer stopping in front of the storm drain (pert the umbrella man) so Jack Allen Lawrence had a clear shot from twenty or so feet away that blew off part of Kennedy's skull which landed on the trunk of the limo BEHIND him which makes the ludicrous claim that JFK was hit from the school book depository abso-*******-lutely HILARIOUS to even state. I knocked you on your ass, if it was a fight, they would have stopped it because the beating that you received would be making everyone sick.

Jackie Kennedy saw Tippit's body and wasn't fooled by the deception.

JAckie Kennedy did not see Tippet's body period.

You have no evidence that she did.

You have no evidence of any kind of 16 shots. You have no evidence of multiple shooters.

You keep repeating yours self with idiotic claims but you have zero evidence for any of them.

You have no witnesses and you failed miserably when asked to cite any. Greer did not stop the limo as the zapruder film proves and your idiotic claim that the film was doctored is false with no supporting evidence.

Oswald acted alone. The evidence proves this fact and you look like a fool when you criticize the Warren Commission when you are not even intelligent enough to have read the report.

Learn how to read before trying to correct others and you will not be owned like a ***** as you have been by me.

EVIDENCE boy It MATTERS and you have NOTHING.

I have proven you wrong WITH EVIDENCE.

Suck on it

LOL! Rodney King took less of an ass kicking than you have received.You "sag" with your britches "a hangin low" spewing lies from the Warren Commission report that tailored it around the "lone gun man" theory while totally ignoring the tsunami of evidence that counters the (snicker) "official story". I have engaged in some debates as it pertains to whether there is a "shadow government" or not... or that the Federal Reserve is a parasitic entity that is not part of "da gubermint" whose shareholders are part of the global elite.....but NO one has made a more pathetic attempt to defend the blatantly obvious "hit" on JFK than you. No one has clung and defended the "Oswald was a lone assassin" bullshit while coming across as an illiterate, raving moron than you. You have hit the trifecta of stupidity, so wallow in it and wear the "I'm An Idiot" badge proudly.


You are the quintessential "Elmer Fudd" in cyber boxing trunks taking on Mike Tyson in his prime. ANYONE with the slightest iota of common sense has witnessed you being beaten like a rented mule....not just by me, but others here as well. Rise off the cyber canvas for another uppercut if you wish, but your defeat and continual desire for another trip to the canvas doesn't interest me. Happy trails, Soupy........


(snicker)

Indeed NOBODY has ever even come close to the constant ass beatings and humilation he has suffered from over the years while desperatly trying to cling on and defend the debunked lone gunman theory.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Good point

If Oswald is part of a high level conspiracy, where is his plan?
After Oswald killed JFK, he ended up taking a bus

The CIA couldn’t come up with a better escape plan than that?

The CIA needed a patsy to cover up their killing JFK. Oswald was the...too perfect patsy.

Just ask Soupy. He will confirm it.

They had no operation.

You have yet to offer any evidence that they did.

Oswald would have been a shitty patsy especially since he survived to talk

Your CIA buddies expected him to die in a shoot out, at the movie theater. When that didn't happen, your buddies at the CIA strong armed their good buddies in the Mafia (who assisted in the JFK hit), who in turn forced Ruby to hit Oswald.

Had Oswald song like a little birdie, your boys at Langley would have ended up in the electric chair, where they most definitely belong.

Cite some evidence.

I wish you would, but you can’t.

Lies, lies, and more lies is all you have, but are too dumb to know it.

 

[rightwinger]

Again, if there was a conspiracy....

Show where Oswald received any help from the conspirators

The guy didn't even have a car. He had to take the bus after the shooting
Did the conspirators give him twenty cents so he could take the bus?

 

[gipper]

Again, if there was a conspiracy....

Show where Oswald received any help from the conspirators

The guy didn't even have a car. He had to take the bus after the shooting
Did the conspirators give him twenty cents so he could take the bus?

You don’t understand the meaning of a patsy.

 

[Soupnazi630]

SoupNazi and Rightwinger are two Mossad liars here who knew that JFK was offed for not sending arms to Israel.

They were very happy about LBJ and this...

After the start of the 67 war, LBJ came out and told the American people that Israel was attacked and was just defending itself. He lied...


CIA Analysis of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War — Central Intelligence Agency


"Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move"


There is no point in discussing truth with these two traitors, as they have no interest in truth. They care about Israel and helping Israel get away with everything from 911 to JFK...

you mean THREE traIters.


you forgot to mention their fellow Langley resident troll Hunarcy as well.

So after years of having no evidence and being made into a total ***** on every thread you decided to c all people tralters.

Typical of you

 

[Soupnazi630]

SoupNazi and Rightwinger are two Mossad liars here who knew that JFK was offed for not sending arms to Israel.

They were very happy about LBJ and this...

After the start of the 67 war, LBJ came out and told the American people that Israel was attacked and was just defending itself. He lied...


CIA Analysis of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War — Central Intelligence Agency


"Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move"


There is no point in discussing truth with these two traitors, as they have no interest in truth. They care about Israel and helping Israel get away with everything from 911 to JFK...

None of which you have ever presented evidence for.

Jackie knew Oswald was a patsy. Fool.

Citation needed.

Oh sorry I forgot you only make crap up and never offer any evidence to support it,

She never made any such claim fool.

The evidence shows he was not a patsy.

Of course she never made that claim. She knew what your buddies at Langley would do to her...just what they did to her husband, brother in-law, and likely her son.

Can you blame her?

So she never made such a claim.

Therefore you do not know any such thing and are merely speaking out of your consistent ignorance and stupidity.

Bur I will give you credit that for once at least you admit to being a liar since you have no idea what she thought and have fessed up to it.

Jackie Kennedy knew that the altered corpse of J.D Tippit wasn't that of JFK and said that it resembled something straight out of Madame Toussad's wax museum. You see, JFK had gross skeletal abnormalities all along the spine of his body as several of his vertebrae had fractures and metal pins inserted into the cartilage and bones. These conditions were due to JFK having osteoporosis as a child and injuries caused by his time in the military during his military. Now, here is the tale of the tape that more than proves that the autopsy was done on Tippit instead of JFK..... the section titled "Skeletal Structure" in the "autopsy report declares that there were "no gross skeletal abnormalities"...hmmmmm????

You lose yet again, Soup, dupe.....kicking your ass is too ******* easy.

btw, you can spew as much you desire and equally drooling dredges of this forum will applaud you....but I simply laugh at you as you attempt to wave the Warren Commission flag as the bastion of truth. You are dismissed and exposed for the fraud that you are.

To those that know the REAL truth? There is nothing more that needs to be said...morons are gonna be morons. You can lead a mule to water but there are some that are so stubborn that they would rather die of thirst than to admit that they were lead to the oasis.

well even children laugh at this troll soup dupe.,the biggest stupid **** to ever penetrate this forum.LOL

Yes you do laugh a lot at people smarter than you. You are childish like that.

And of course calling someone a stupid **** from you means they humiliated and crushed you repeatedly

So explain how someone " penetrates " an obscure but public forum,

 

[Soupnazi630]

Jackie Kennedy knew that the altered corpse of J.D Tippit wasn't that of JFK and said that it resembled something straight out of Madame Toussad's wax museum. You see, JFK had gross skeletal abnormalities all along the spine of his body as several of his vertebrae had fractures and metal pins inserted into the cartilage and bones. These conditions were due to JFK having osteoporosis as a child and injuries caused by his time in the military during his military. Now, here is the tale of the tape that more than proves that the autopsy was done on Tippit instead of JFK..... the section titled "Skeletal Structure" in the "autopsy report declares that there were "no gross skeletal abnormalities"...hmmmmm????

You lose yet again, Soup, dupe.....kicking your ass is too ******* easy.

btw, you can spew as much you desire and equally drooling dredges of this forum will applaud you....but I simply laugh at you as you attempt to wave the Warren Commission flag as the bastion of truth. You are dismissed and exposed for the fraud that you are.

To those that know the REAL truth? There is nothing more that needs to be said...morons are gonna be morons. You can lead a mule to water but there are some that are so stubborn that they would rather die of thirst than to admit that they were lead to the oasis.

You have kicked no one's ass little boy you have only lost every argument.

You have failed to cite any evidence or even a witness to challenge the Warren Commission report or to refute it;s findings.

Jackie Kennedy never saw Tippet's body.

Commas, Soupy........they mean so much. Allow me to school you on the importance so STFU, turn around and face the blackboard.

Here is why a strategically placed comma can change the entire meaning of a sentence. Please not the example.

"Let's eat mom".......

Now, this sentence implies cannibalism, no?

BUT? Let's place a "comma" in that sentence and all of the sudden it becomes an invite to dine.

"Let's eat, mom".

That concludes this particular lesson as it pertains to strategically placed punctuation.

As far as you claiming the Warren Report was pure gospel? That claim is even more pathetic than your piss poor attempts at punctuation. The "hit" was nothing to write home about. This all-star team of CIA and mafia hitmen fucked up royally and I blame it on the fact that they had to try and coordinate with the other shooters because it had to look like one bullet took him out. 16 plus shots and only four verifiable hits and none of them a "kill shot" so they had to use the ace in the hole which was Greer stopping in front of the storm drain (pert the umbrella man) so Jack Allen Lawrence had a clear shot from twenty or so feet away that blew off part of Kennedy's skull which landed on the trunk of the limo BEHIND him which makes the ludicrous claim that JFK was hit from the school book depository abso-*******-lutely HILARIOUS to even state. I knocked you on your ass, if it was a fight, they would have stopped it because the beating that you received would be making everyone sick.

Jackie Kennedy saw Tippit's body and wasn't fooled by the deception.

JAckie Kennedy did not see Tippet's body period.

You have no evidence that she did.

You have no evidence of any kind of 16 shots. You have no evidence of multiple shooters.

You keep repeating yours self with idiotic claims but you have zero evidence for any of them.

You have no witnesses and you failed miserably when asked to cite any. Greer did not stop the limo as the zapruder film proves and your idiotic claim that the film was doctored is false with no supporting evidence.

Oswald acted alone. The evidence proves this fact and you look like a fool when you criticize the Warren Commission when you are not even intelligent enough to have read the report.

Learn how to read before trying to correct others and you will not be owned like a ***** as you have been by me.

EVIDENCE boy It MATTERS and you have NOTHING.

I have proven you wrong WITH EVIDENCE.

Suck on it

LOL! Rodney King took less of an ass kicking than you have received.You "sag" with your britches "a hangin low" spewing lies from the Warren Commission report that tailored it around the "lone gun man" theory while totally ignoring the tsunami of evidence that counters the (snicker) "official story". I have engaged in some debates as it pertains to whether there is a "shadow government" or not... or that the Federal Reserve is a parasitic entity that is not part of "da gubermint" whose shareholders are part of the global elite.....but NO one has made a more pathetic attempt to defend the blatantly obvious "hit" on JFK than you. No one has clung and defended the "Oswald was a lone assassin" bullshit while coming across as an illiterate, raving moron than you. You have hit the trifecta of stupidity, so wallow in it and wear the "I'm An Idiot" badge proudly.


You are the quintessential "Elmer Fudd" in cyber boxing trunks taking on Mike Tyson in his prime. ANYONE with the slightest iota of common sense has witnessed you being beaten like a rented mule....not just by me, but others here as well. Rise off the cyber canvas for another uppercut if you wish, but your defeat and continual desire for another trip to the canvas doesn't interest me. Happy trails, Soupy........


(snicker)

Indeed NOBODY has ever even come close to the constant ass beatings and humilation he has suffered from over the years while desperatly trying to cling on and defend the debunked lone gunman theory.

You have it backwards as I have crushed and humiliated you every time and beaten your ass every time.

You have neve debunked it boy

 

[Soupnazi630]

Again, if there was a conspiracy....

Show where Oswald received any help from the conspirators

The guy didn't even have a car. He had to take the bus after the shooting
Did the conspirators give him twenty cents so he could take the bus?

You don’t understand the meaning of a patsy.

You do not understand the meaning of evidence as you have none and have never offered any.

On the other hand evidence has been put in your face many times proven you wrong.

Answer his question and do not dodge