Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

[rightwinger]

In March 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald, using the alias "A. Hidell," purchased by mail order a 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle for $19.99

The Italian made rifle was not respected as a military weapon, but thousands were dumped on the market as cheap military surplus

It was a bolt action, single shot rifle in which you had to manually chamber each round.


Now, if the Soviets, Cubans, Mafia or CIA were involved in a conspiracy with Oswald.....don’t you think they could have sprung for a decent sniper rifle?

Or not.

Affording Oswald a proper rifle would expose the conspiracy.

A $200 rifle vs a $20 rifle?
Not necessarily

Buying Oswald a
$250 car to drive around in would not arise suspicion

 

[gipper]

In March 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald, using the alias "A. Hidell," purchased by mail order a 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle for $19.99

The Italian made rifle was not respected as a military weapon, but thousands were dumped on the market as cheap military surplus

It was a bolt action, single shot rifle in which you had to manually chamber each round.


Now, if the Soviets, Cubans, Mafia or CIA were involved in a conspiracy with Oswald.....don’t you think they could have sprung for a decent sniper rifle?

Or not.

Affording Oswald a proper rifle would expose the conspiracy.

A $200 rifle vs a $20 rifle?
Not necessarily

Buying Oswald a
$250 car to drive around in would not arise suspicion

Oswald couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn and with that rifle he bought, which wasn’t sighted in, it was impossible. As a true patsy, he never fired a shot that day, but I suspect the CIA’s hired killers did.

 

[Soupnazi630]

In March 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald, using the alias "A. Hidell," purchased by mail order a 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle for $19.99

The Italian made rifle was not respected as a military weapon, but thousands were dumped on the market as cheap military surplus

It was a bolt action, single shot rifle in which you had to manually chamber each round.


Now, if the Soviets, Cubans, Mafia or CIA were involved in a conspiracy with Oswald.....don’t you think they could have sprung for a decent sniper rifle?

Or not.

Affording Oswald a proper rifle would expose the conspiracy.

A $200 rifle vs a $20 rifle?
Not necessarily

Buying Oswald a
$250 car to drive around in would not arise suspicion

Oswald couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn and with that rifle he bought, which wasn’t sighted in, it was impossible. As a true patsy, he never fired a shot that day, but I suspect the CIA’s hired killers did.

And there you go in circles.

Yes Oswald could shoot and shoot well as his marine corps records proved.

His rifle had fixed iron sights which did not need to be zeroed.

The absolute proven fact is you are wrong. He had the skill, the rifle was accurate enough to hit where it did and the evidence proves he fired three shots.


No evidence exists that anyone else did.

Of course you will continue to repeat debunkedies even though you never produce evidence.

 

[Soupnazi630]

In March 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald, using the alias "A. Hidell," purchased by mail order a 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle for $19.99

The Italian made rifle was not respected as a military weapon, but thousands were dumped on the market as cheap military surplus

It was a bolt action, single shot rifle in which you had to manually chamber each round.


Now, if the Soviets, Cubans, Mafia or CIA were involved in a conspiracy with Oswald.....don’t you think they could have sprung for a decent sniper rifle?

Or not.

Affording Oswald a proper rifle would expose the conspiracy.

That makes no sense.

If a conspiracy oa going to go to the trouble of setting up a Patsy for a crime of this magnitude they would do so carefully.

He would not have been left to host own devices he would have been driven by or with others.

His rifle would not have been state of the art but neither would it have been an obscure cheap rifle such as a carcano.

The mountain of evidence proves a clumsy not too bright guy ( Oswald ) pulled off the crime but did so with little or no for thought.

 

[gipper]

In March 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald, using the alias "A. Hidell," purchased by mail order a 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle for $19.99

The Italian made rifle was not respected as a military weapon, but thousands were dumped on the market as cheap military surplus

It was a bolt action, single shot rifle in which you had to manually chamber each round.


Now, if the Soviets, Cubans, Mafia or CIA were involved in a conspiracy with Oswald.....don’t you think they could have sprung for a decent sniper rifle?

Or not.

Affording Oswald a proper rifle would expose the conspiracy.

A $200 rifle vs a $20 rifle?
Not necessarily

Buying Oswald a
$250 car to drive around in would not arise suspicion

Oswald couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn and with that rifle he bought, which wasn’t sighted in, it was impossible. As a true patsy, he never fired a shot that day, but I suspect the CIA’s hired killers did.

And there you go in circles.

Yes Oswald could shoot and shoot well as his marine corps records proved.

His rifle had fixed iron sights which did not need to be zeroed.

The absolute proven fact is you are wrong. He had the skill, the rifle was accurate enough to hit where it did and the evidence proves he fired three shots.


No evidence exists that anyone else did.

Of course you will continue to repeat debunkedies even though you never produce evidence.

More lies. Hadn’t shot a rifle since basic and while in basic, couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn with a quality rifle. So, no chance he fired a gun that day that hit anything.

 

[Soupnazi630]

In March 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald, using the alias "A. Hidell," purchased by mail order a 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle for $19.99

The Italian made rifle was not respected as a military weapon, but thousands were dumped on the market as cheap military surplus

It was a bolt action, single shot rifle in which you had to manually chamber each round.


Now, if the Soviets, Cubans, Mafia or CIA were involved in a conspiracy with Oswald.....don’t you think they could have sprung for a decent sniper rifle?

Or not.

Affording Oswald a proper rifle would expose the conspiracy.

A $200 rifle vs a $20 rifle?
Not necessarily

Buying Oswald a
$250 car to drive around in would not arise suspicion

Oswald couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn and with that rifle he bought, which wasn’t sighted in, it was impossible. As a true patsy, he never fired a shot that day, but I suspect the CIA’s hired killers did.

And there you go in circles.

Yes Oswald could shoot and shoot well as his marine corps records proved.

His rifle had fixed iron sights which did not need to be zeroed.

The absolute proven fact is you are wrong. He had the skill, the rifle was accurate enough to hit where it did and the evidence proves he fired three shots.


No evidence exists that anyone else did.

Of course you will continue to repeat debunkedies even though you never produce evidence.

More lies. Hadn’t shot a rifle since basic and while in basic, couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn with a quality rifle. So, no chance he fired a gun that day that hit anything.

In March 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald, using the alias "A. Hidell," purchased by mail order a 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle for $19.99

The Italian made rifle was not respected as a military weapon, but thousands were dumped on the market as cheap military surplus

It was a bolt action, single shot rifle in which you had to manually chamber each round.


Now, if the Soviets, Cubans, Mafia or CIA were involved in a conspiracy with Oswald.....don’t you think they could have sprung for a decent sniper rifle?

Or not.

Affording Oswald a proper rifle would expose the conspiracy.

A $200 rifle vs a $20 rifle?
Not necessarily

Buying Oswald a
$250 car to drive around in would not arise suspicion

Oswald couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn and with that rifle he bought, which wasn’t sighted in, it was impossible. As a true patsy, he never fired a shot that day, but I suspect the CIA’s hired killers did.

And there you go in circles.

Yes Oswald could shoot and shoot well as his marine corps records proved.

His rifle had fixed iron sights which did not need to be zeroed.

The absolute proven fact is you are wrong. He had the skill, the rifle was accurate enough to hit where it did and the evidence proves he fired three shots.


No evidence exists that anyone else did.

Of course you will continue to repeat debunkedies even though you never produce evidence.

More lies. Hadn’t shot a rifle since basic and while in basic, couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn with a quality rifle. So, no chance he fired a gun that day that hit anything.

You are the one lying.

His record shows in the Marines he was in fact a sharpshooter.

There is no such thing as a marine who cannot shoot. Even then worst marine marine marksman is a decent shot.

He had in fact shot his rifle since basic and what he did in dealey was easy and within the skill set of any novice Hunter.

Those are facts which have been prove .You have only repeated empty claims with no evidence.

The evidence proves you wrong and the real liar.

 

[rightwinger]

In March 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald, using the alias "A. Hidell," purchased by mail order a 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle for $19.99

The Italian made rifle was not respected as a military weapon, but thousands were dumped on the market as cheap military surplus

It was a bolt action, single shot rifle in which you had to manually chamber each round.


Now, if the Soviets, Cubans, Mafia or CIA were involved in a conspiracy with Oswald.....don’t you think they could have sprung for a decent sniper rifle?

Or not.

Affording Oswald a proper rifle would expose the conspiracy.

A $200 rifle vs a $20 rifle?
Not necessarily

Buying Oswald a
$250 car to drive around in would not arise suspicion

Oswald couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn and with that rifle he bought, which wasn’t sighted in, it was impossible. As a true patsy, he never fired a shot that day, but I suspect the CIA’s hired killers did.

Alternative facts

Oswald was a marksman with a clear shot

He hit two out of three

 

[rightwinger]

In March 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald, using the alias "A. Hidell," purchased by mail order a 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle for $19.99

The Italian made rifle was not respected as a military weapon, but thousands were dumped on the market as cheap military surplus

It was a bolt action, single shot rifle in which you had to manually chamber each round.


Now, if the Soviets, Cubans, Mafia or CIA were involved in a conspiracy with Oswald.....don’t you think they could have sprung for a decent sniper rifle?

Or not.

Affording Oswald a proper rifle would expose the conspiracy.

A $200 rifle vs a $20 rifle?
Not necessarily

Buying Oswald a
$250 car to drive around in would not arise suspicion

Oswald couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn and with that rifle he bought, which wasn’t sighted in, it was impossible. As a true patsy, he never fired a shot that day, but I suspect the CIA’s hired killers did.

And there you go in circles.

Yes Oswald could shoot and shoot well as his marine corps records proved.

His rifle had fixed iron sights which did not need to be zeroed.

The absolute proven fact is you are wrong. He had the skill, the rifle was accurate enough to hit where it did and the evidence proves he fired three shots.


No evidence exists that anyone else did.

Of course you will continue to repeat debunkedies even though you never produce evidence.

More lies. Hadn’t shot a rifle since basic and while in basic, couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn with a quality rifle. So, no chance he fired a gun that day that hit anything.

Oswald often shot his rifle and used it to try to kill Gen Walker

 

[Dale Smith]

In March 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald, using the alias "A. Hidell," purchased by mail order a 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle for $19.99

The Italian made rifle was not respected as a military weapon, but thousands were dumped on the market as cheap military surplus

It was a bolt action, single shot rifle in which you had to manually chamber each round.


Now, if the Soviets, Cubans, Mafia or CIA were involved in a conspiracy with Oswald.....don’t you think they could have sprung for a decent sniper rifle?

Or not.

Affording Oswald a proper rifle would expose the conspiracy.

A $200 rifle vs a $20 rifle?
Not necessarily

Buying Oswald a
$250 car to drive around in would not arise suspicion

Oswald couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn and with that rifle he bought, which wasn’t sighted in, it was impossible. As a true patsy, he never fired a shot that day, but I suspect the CIA’s hired killers did.

Alternative facts

Oswald was a marksman with a clear shot

He hit two out of three

At least 16 shots were fired by eight different snipers. Watch this and educate yourself or remain ignorant.

 

[Soupnazi630]

In March 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald, using the alias "A. Hidell," purchased by mail order a 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle for $19.99

The Italian made rifle was not respected as a military weapon, but thousands were dumped on the market as cheap military surplus

It was a bolt action, single shot rifle in which you had to manually chamber each round.


Now, if the Soviets, Cubans, Mafia or CIA were involved in a conspiracy with Oswald.....don’t you think they could have sprung for a decent sniper rifle?

Or not.

Affording Oswald a proper rifle would expose the conspiracy.

A $200 rifle vs a $20 rifle?
Not necessarily

Buying Oswald a
$250 car to drive around in would not arise suspicion

Oswald couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn and with that rifle he bought, which wasn’t sighted in, it was impossible. As a true patsy, he never fired a shot that day, but I suspect the CIA’s hired killers did.

Alternative facts

Oswald was a marksman with a clear shot

He hit two out of three

At least 16 shots were fired by eight different snipers. Watch this and educate yourself or remain ignorant.

That's quite a feat since the only evidence found proves three shots from one man which is what the vast majority of witnesses heard.

But anyone can make a video

 

[gipper]

Or not.

Affording Oswald a proper rifle would expose the conspiracy.

A $200 rifle vs a $20 rifle?
Not necessarily

Buying Oswald a
$250 car to drive around in would not arise suspicion

Oswald couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn and with that rifle he bought, which wasn’t sighted in, it was impossible. As a true patsy, he never fired a shot that day, but I suspect the CIA’s hired killers did.

Alternative facts

Oswald was a marksman with a clear shot

He hit two out of three

At least 16 shots were fired by eight different snipers. Watch this and educate yourself or remain ignorant.

That's quite a feat since the only evidence found proves three shots from one man which is what the vast majority of witnesses heard.

But anyone can make a video

That’s so funny I can’t stop laughing.

Thanks so much for making me laugh my ass off this morning.

 

[sparky]

Methinks people just can't grasp such a formidable man could be taken so easily, in the blink of an eye......~S~

What was formidable about JFK as a man?

Since when has any man be so formidable that rifle fire cannot bring him down?

Simply because he was a young handsome war hero the nation adored

His assasination left us in shock , i remember that day

It spawned the begining of what we now call the deep state .....

shirts available in X, XX, and XXX

 

[Soupnazi630]

Methinks people just can't grasp such a formidable man could be taken so easily, in the blink of an eye......~S~

What was formidable about JFK as a man?

Since when has any man be so formidable that rifle fire cannot bring him down?

Simply because he was a young handsome war hero the nation adored

His assasination left us in shock , i remember that day

It spawned the begining of what we now call the deep state .....

shirts available in X, XX, and XXX

Young and handsome is not the same as formidable

He was still just a man vulnerable to bullets.

He was not beloved by everyone. In fact he was not popular with the majority. He was viewed by many as an illegitimate president who had to cheat to get elected.

The main reason for his visit to Texas was to resolve serious rifts with the Democratic party in Texas. The conflicts in the Democratic party in Texas were serious enough to threaten his ability to win the state in the 64 election. And he had to have Texas to win re-election.

 

[Soupnazi630]

A $200 rifle vs a $20 rifle?
Not necessarily

Buying Oswald a
$250 car to drive around in would not arise suspicion

Oswald couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn and with that rifle he bought, which wasn’t sighted in, it was impossible. As a true patsy, he never fired a shot that day, but I suspect the CIA’s hired killers did.

Alternative facts

Oswald was a marksman with a clear shot

He hit two out of three

At least 16 shots were fired by eight different snipers. Watch this and educate yourself or remain ignorant.

That's quite a feat since the only evidence found proves three shots from one man which is what the vast majority of witnesses heard.

But anyone can make a video

That’s so funny I can’t stop laughing.

Thanks so much for making me laugh my ass off this morning.

Laugh all you like it is true and proven facts which you can not refute.

You have never offered evidence and have repeatedly been crushed and humiliated.

 

[sparky]

JFK Anniversary Recalls the Age of America's Camelot

 

[Soupnazi630]

JFK Anniversary Recalls the Age of America's Camelot

Yes the legend of Camelot and JFK as a beloved popular president started after he was killed by Oswald. Being murdered often does make people more popular than they were in life.

Before his death he was highly controversial and not so universally respected or liked.

 

[rightwinger]

In March 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald, using the alias "A. Hidell," purchased by mail order a 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle for $19.99

The Italian made rifle was not respected as a military weapon, but thousands were dumped on the market as cheap military surplus

It was a bolt action, single shot rifle in which you had to manually chamber each round.


Now, if the Soviets, Cubans, Mafia or CIA were involved in a conspiracy with Oswald.....don’t you think they could have sprung for a decent sniper rifle?

Or not.

Affording Oswald a proper rifle would expose the conspiracy.

A $200 rifle vs a $20 rifle?
Not necessarily

Buying Oswald a
$250 car to drive around in would not arise suspicion

Oswald couldn’t hit the broadside of a barn and with that rifle he bought, which wasn’t sighted in, it was impossible. As a true patsy, he never fired a shot that day, but I suspect the CIA’s hired killers did.

Alternative facts

Oswald was a marksman with a clear shot

He hit two out of three

At least 16 shots were fired by eight different snipers. Watch this and educate yourself or remain ignorant.

Damn
You goofy

 

[rightwinger]

JFK Anniversary Recalls the Age of America's Camelot

Yes the legend of Camelot and JFK as a beloved popular president started after he was killed by Oswald. Being murdered often does make people more popular than they were in life.

Before his death he was highly controversial and not so universally respected or liked.

Conservatives called him a commie

 

[sparky]

Being murdered often does make people more popular than they were in life.

true....
Every Single Member Of The Notorious 27 Club
~S~

 

[sparky]

JFK Anniversary Recalls the Age of America's Camelot

Yes the legend of Camelot and JFK as a beloved popular president started after he was killed by Oswald. Being murdered often does make people more popular than they were in life.

Before his death he was highly controversial and not so universally respected or liked.

Conservatives called him a commie

then.......where as they laud him now as one of their own
~S~