Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

[Dale Smith]

Wrong.

Crenshaw was an emergency room INTERN and was not a relevant witness.

His claims which arose years after the fact are based on a few minutes of casual observation with no expertise or experience to make any sort of informed determination of any facts. He challenges the expert autopsy but was not qualified to do so.


There were never any witnesses who saw any shooters on the south side of Elm street.

You lose again and have no idea what the Warren Commission wrote or said because you never read it. It is you and conspiracy theorists guilty of ignoring evidence which proves you wrong.

Your claim about large numbers dying who could refute the fact is a false one and google will not show any such thing.

The fact is people die and the event happened decades ago. No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact.

No, he and others saw the throat wound, dumb ass. And "yes" there were multiple witnesses that saw gunmen with rifles and they thought they were secret service agents until JFK was murdered. If you haven't watched the documentary "JFK To 9/11...Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" then you don't have shit to say that has any relevance. It's the Rosetta Stone of information with a compilation of eye witness accounts that counter the single gunman theory and knocks it on it's ass.

"No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact".

Here is where you get taken to the woodshed yet again.....in the three year span after the murder of JFK, 18 material witnesses died.

Six by gunfire, three in car wrecks, two "suicides", one that was cut from ear to ear by a knife, one by a broken neck, three heart attacks, two natural causes and a partridge in a pear tree...the odds of that happening to that many people in a three year span? Over a TRILLION to one.

Stop while you are behind..... because you just keep getting buried under an avalanche of irrefutable facts that totally destroys the bullshit you have been spewing as a you cling to the (snicker) "Warren Commission Report". If this was a boxing match? They would have stopped it a long time ago. You rise off of the canvas on wobbly knees and offer forth your chin for yet another uppercut...at this point in the fight? A light breeze could put you back on your ass.

Let us go over the facts.....

#1 Kennedy had a throat wound.
#2 Kennedy had a back wound.
#3 Kennedy had a head wound that blew his head up and to the left which by the laws of physics explains that the kill shot came from a position that was lower than Kennedy's head. which means that the "umbrella man" signaled to the driver to stop so the assassin in the storm drain had an unobscured shot which is what drove JFK's head up and to the left. Simple physics, my misguided friend.

The premise of the Warren Report is that only three shots were fired and one of those hit the concrete and caused a bystander to be injured by a concrete shard. There goes one one shot......then there is the shot that hits Kennedy in the throat......shot #2 according to the Warren Commission....and it also hit Connolly blowing out his ribs, and into his wrist...and then the laughable head shot that they claim is from the back that hits JFK knocking his head up and to the left and THEN at Parkland hospital, that insidious bullet was found on the gurney in almost pristine condition. If you REALLY believe this bullshit? You still believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

Walk away, little troll.......walk away.

LMAO! Yes, Kennedy had a throat wound...an EXIT wound.

Yes Kennedy had a back wound...an ENTRANCE wound.

Yes, Kennedy had a head wound. At that point, you leave facts and rush into fantasy land. When Kennedy's scalp was folded back into position, the entrance wound was found on the back of his head. If a shot had come from the front, blood, fluid bone and matter would have flown toward the back, but that's not happened. All of that stuff flew forward and then as the car rolled forward, it fell down on to the trunk lid.

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

Did you notice the Chemtrails in Dallas that day?

Coincidence?

The Solar Radiation Management program aka "Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Program" of spraying heavy metal nano-particulates was in it's testing phase in 1963 and did not become a fully implemented program for all NATO countries until 1997.

Hope this helps......

 

[rightwinger]

No, he and others saw the throat wound, dumb ass. And "yes" there were multiple witnesses that saw gunmen with rifles and they thought they were secret service agents until JFK was murdered. If you haven't watched the documentary "JFK To 9/11...Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" then you don't have shit to say that has any relevance. It's the Rosetta Stone of information with a compilation of eye witness accounts that counter the single gunman theory and knocks it on it's ass.

"No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact".

Here is where you get taken to the woodshed yet again.....in the three year span after the murder of JFK, 18 material witnesses died.

Six by gunfire, three in car wrecks, two "suicides", one that was cut from ear to ear by a knife, one by a broken neck, three heart attacks, two natural causes and a partridge in a pear tree...the odds of that happening to that many people in a three year span? Over a TRILLION to one.

Stop while you are behind..... because you just keep getting buried under an avalanche of irrefutable facts that totally destroys the bullshit you have been spewing as a you cling to the (snicker) "Warren Commission Report". If this was a boxing match? They would have stopped it a long time ago. You rise off of the canvas on wobbly knees and offer forth your chin for yet another uppercut...at this point in the fight? A light breeze could put you back on your ass.

Let us go over the facts.....

#1 Kennedy had a throat wound.
#2 Kennedy had a back wound.
#3 Kennedy had a head wound that blew his head up and to the left which by the laws of physics explains that the kill shot came from a position that was lower than Kennedy's head. which means that the "umbrella man" signaled to the driver to stop so the assassin in the storm drain had an unobscured shot which is what drove JFK's head up and to the left. Simple physics, my misguided friend.

The premise of the Warren Report is that only three shots were fired and one of those hit the concrete and caused a bystander to be injured by a concrete shard. There goes one one shot......then there is the shot that hits Kennedy in the throat......shot #2 according to the Warren Commission....and it also hit Connolly blowing out his ribs, and into his wrist...and then the laughable head shot that they claim is from the back that hits JFK knocking his head up and to the left and THEN at Parkland hospital, that insidious bullet was found on the gurney in almost pristine condition. If you REALLY believe this bullshit? You still believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

Walk away, little troll.......walk away.

LMAO! Yes, Kennedy had a throat wound...an EXIT wound.

Yes Kennedy had a back wound...an ENTRANCE wound.

Yes, Kennedy had a head wound. At that point, you leave facts and rush into fantasy land. When Kennedy's scalp was folded back into position, the entrance wound was found on the back of his head. If a shot had come from the front, blood, fluid bone and matter would have flown toward the back, but that's not happened. All of that stuff flew forward and then as the car rolled forward, it fell down on to the trunk lid.

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

Did you notice the Chemtrails in Dallas that day?

Coincidence?

The Solar Radiation Management program aka "Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Program" of spraying heavy metal nano-particulates was in it's testing phase in 1963 and did not become a fully implemented program for all NATO countries until 1997.

Hope this helps......

Winner, winner....Chicken Dinner

Crazy Dale comes through again

 

[Dale Smith]

LMAO! Yes, Kennedy had a throat wound...an EXIT wound.

Yes Kennedy had a back wound...an ENTRANCE wound.

Yes, Kennedy had a head wound. At that point, you leave facts and rush into fantasy land. When Kennedy's scalp was folded back into position, the entrance wound was found on the back of his head. If a shot had come from the front, blood, fluid bone and matter would have flown toward the back, but that's not happened. All of that stuff flew forward and then as the car rolled forward, it fell down on to the trunk lid.

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

Did you notice the Chemtrails in Dallas that day?

Coincidence?

The Solar Radiation Management program aka "Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Program" of spraying heavy metal nano-particulates was in it's testing phase in 1963 and did not become a fully implemented program for all NATO countries until 1997.

Hope this helps......

Winner, winner....Chicken Dinner

Crazy Dale comes through again

It's not about winning, it's about revealing the truth. You have taken a massive ass kicking of monumental proportions which is why you went "off topic". You should have left well enough alone.

My suggestion to you is to stick to whiny leftard talking points and waving the rainbow colored leftard flag......that is where you excel. Just tryin' to help.


(snicker)

 

[rightwinger]

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

Did you notice the Chemtrails in Dallas that day?

Coincidence?

The Solar Radiation Management program aka "Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Program" of spraying heavy metal nano-particulates was in it's testing phase in 1963 and did not become a fully implemented program for all NATO countries until 1997.

Hope this helps......

Winner, winner....Chicken Dinner

Crazy Dale comes through again

It's not about winning, it's about revealing the truth. You have taken a massive ass kicking of monumental proportions which is why you went "off topic". You should have left well enough alone.

My suggestion to you is to stick to whiny leftard talking points and waving the rainbow colored leftard flag......that is where you excel. Just tryin' to help.


(snicker)

Why conspiracy theorists can’t be taken seriously

Off the deep end

 

[Soupnazi630]

I already havew and I have defeated him.

Now stop trying to distract from your cowardice and dishonesty.

You made an assertion you cannot support and it is based on total ignorance.

Cite a passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Do not make demands when you run like a dog from every and all challenges. You do not get to set the terms and you are no authority.

Back up your claim BOY

You haven't defeated anything or anyone here as it pertains to the murder of JFK by deep state actors. All you have done is spew the official bullshit of the Warren Commission. The reason as to why so many citizen journalists and researchers had to seek the truth was because of so many ludicrous claims like a bullet that can "zig zag" and then pop out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. It takes a real idiot to avoid the hundred or so anomalies and then claim with a straight face "Yep, Oswald did it and acted alone.....nothing to see here, folks....move along".

The fact of the matter is that the Warren Commission and some of it's dubious members tailored the report to fit the lone gunman narrative and ignored anything else that could call it into question. Witnesses that could refute the official fairy tale were never called and many of them ended up "toe-tagged" because those loose ends had to be tied up as much as possible. Then the CIA comes out with an inner agency memo in 1967 ( CIA Document 1035-960 ) to weaponize the term "conspiracy theorist" to discourage and derail honest debate and further scrutiny of the bogus Warren Commission report.

What it boils down to is that you are the worst kind of coward and I throw rightwinger and candycorn in there as well. You are too gutless to come to grips that things are not what you believe them to be....it's too painful and it would upset your entire world view. I can understand that to a point, but what causes me to hold you in total disdain is the intellectual laziness and then lamely attempt to flame others that know more than you...but what the hell, it's your cyber dime.

You are simply wrong and ignorant and yes you know I have defeated debunked and pwnd your sorry little self

These people you refer to are frauds. Like you they have not read the warren commission report and have no idea what it claims.

First of all the WC report tailored nothing they searched for every possible witness and interviewed them. They actively pursued conspiracy but found no evidence. The witnesses you say they were not NEVER existed.You cannot name one of them. No witness died in any way that was suspicious or out of the ordinary.

The Warren Commission report represents a comprehensive and exhaustive investigation which none of your cherry picked videos have done. It is the conspiracy theorists fixating on evidence which lacks credibility in order to prop up a narrative.

You have it quite backwards. Listen little boy you have no idea what the WC report says and you NEVER read it.

They never claimed a bullet zig zagged or popped out in pristine condition.

Intellectual laziness is when a fool **** YOU ignores evidence and listens only to ONE side of the story. You are the intellectual fraud and lazy fool who never bothered to fact check anything.

You are a naive and foolish little gullible chump who got sold a bridge in Brooklyn and you know nothing about the JFK assassination

The Warren Commission refused to allow anyone to testify before the committee that could refute it. They never called Dr. Charles Crenshaw to testify....they never called any witnesses that saw multiple shooters in buildings on the south side of Elm street. They never did anything that resembled due diligence at all. A simple "Google" search will show you how those that could refute the official story died in droves and the odds of that many dying that shared the same experience in that short amount of time is in the billions to one. Refute this..........

Wrong.

Crenshaw was an emergency room INTERN and was not a relevant witness.

His claims which arose years after the fact are based on a few minutes of casual observation with no expertise or experience to make any sort of informed determination of any facts. He challenges the expert autopsy but was not qualified to do so.


There were never any witnesses who saw any shooters on the south side of Elm street.

You lose again and have no idea what the Warren Commission wrote or said because you never read it. It is you and conspiracy theorists guilty of ignoring evidence which proves you wrong.

Your claim about large numbers dying who could refute the fact is a false one and google will not show any such thing.

The fact is people die and the event happened decades ago. No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact.

No, he and others saw the throat wound, dumb ass. And "yes" there were multiple witnesses that saw gunmen with rifles and they thought they were secret service agents until JFK was murdered. If you haven't watched the documentary "JFK To 9/11...Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" then you don't have shit to say that has any relevance. It's the Rosetta Stone of information with a compilation of eye witness accounts that counter the single gunman theory and knocks it on it's ass.

"No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact".

Here is where you get taken to the woodshed yet again.....in the three year span after the murder of JFK, 18 material witnesses died.

Six by gunfire, three in car wrecks, two "suicides", one that was cut from ear to ear by a knife, one by a broken neck, three heart attacks, two natural causes and a partridge in a pear tree...the odds of that happening to that many people in a three year span? Over a TRILLION to one.

Stop while you are behind..... because you just keep getting buried under an avalanche of irrefutable facts that totally destroys the bullshit you have been spewing as a you cling to the (snicker) "Warren Commission Report". If this was a boxing match? They would have stopped it a long time ago. You rise off of the canvas on wobbly knees and offer forth your chin for yet another uppercut...at this point in the fight? A light breeze could put you back on your ass.

Let us go over the facts.....

#1 Kennedy had a throat wound.
#2 Kennedy had a back wound.
#3 Kennedy had a head wound that blew his head up and to the left which by the laws of physics explains that the kill shot came from a position that was lower than Kennedy's head. which means that the "umbrella man" signaled to the driver to stop so the assassin in the storm drain had an unobscured shot which is what drove JFK's head up and to the left. Simple physics, my misguided friend.

The premise of the Warren Report is that only three shots were fired and one of those hit the concrete and caused a bystander to be injured by a concrete shard. There goes one one shot......then there is the shot that hits Kennedy in the throat......shot #2 according to the Warren Commission....and it also hit Connolly blowing out his ribs, and into his wrist...and then the laughable head shot that they claim is from the back that hits JFK knocking his head up and to the left and THEN at Parkland hospital, that insidious bullet was found on the gurney in almost pristine condition. If you REALLY believe this bullshit? You still believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

Walk away, little troll.......walk away.

Sorry boy but no one is walking away especially when it is too damn easy to humiliate you.

Crenshaw and others only took a CASUAL and BRIEF glance at Kennedy's body he had no expertise to judge the nature of the wounds other than a generality. He did not dissect or closely examine the wounds and yet he tries to contradict expert autopsy findings.He has no credibility and is a fraud. Sorry but you are wrong he did nothing to challenge the evidence that Oswald acted alone

That is one fact.

No sir you are full of crap no one saw any shooter in Dealey plaza. No one saw anyone shooting on the south side of the plaza period the witnesses you describe BUT NEVER CITE A NAME are fictitious.

That is another fact.

No one died in unusual numbers.

You keep repeating this assertion but it is a false one. The proof is that you will not define what constitutes a material witness or give any names because your claim is a fictitious claim. Your conclusion that the odds are a trillion to one is a made up lie you pulled pout of your ass.

Show your work and demonstrate the calculations for arriving at those odds. Calculating odds is a straight forward mathematical exercise which anyone can understand. But you will not do so because you cite probability odds which you dreamed up.

That is another fact.

I am burying YOU in facts and destroying your false claim and you have yet to post a fact.

So let's review the facts.

Kennedy had a wound which entered his back and exited his throat fired from above and behind.

Kennedy had a head wound and he moved back and to the left as a result of other forces not from the push of the bullet thus demonstrating your ignorance about physics.

The bullet found on the gurney which was NEVER in pristine condition came from Cnnaly's leg not from Kennedy's head head.

No one saw a shooter. All evidence proves Oswald was the only shooter. You have no witnesses or physical evidence to to support any of your claims/

Run away and weep like the fool I just made you into boy you are cooked and beaten

Too easy

 

[Soupnazi630]

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

Did you notice the Chemtrails in Dallas that day?

Coincidence?

The Solar Radiation Management program aka "Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Program" of spraying heavy metal nano-particulates was in it's testing phase in 1963 and did not become a fully implemented program for all NATO countries until 1997.

Hope this helps......

Winner, winner....Chicken Dinner

Crazy Dale comes through again

It's not about winning, it's about revealing the truth. You have taken a massive ass kicking of monumental proportions which is why you went "off topic". You should have left well enough alone.

My suggestion to you is to stick to whiny leftard talking points and waving the rainbow colored leftard flag......that is where you excel. Just tryin' to help.


(snicker)

You are the only one here taking a massive ass kicking and hyou have told no truth of any kind the evidence has destroyed you.

 

[Soupnazi630]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

No, you are confused. The story has never been debunked. The only "proof" to it being debunked is the claim that there exist a film that shows the SS Agent without an AR-15 in his hand. However, the film is very fuzzy and not what it is claimed to be upon viewing.

I don't know if the story is true or not. None of us do. However, there is credible evidence that it might be true. It is certainly consistent with the fact that Kennedy suffered a massive shot to the back of the head that doesn't line up with the line of shot from the window where Oswald fired the other shots. The size of the wound and all the fragmentation pieces of bullet in his head is consistent with .223 fragmentation.

If it was then I think we all know that the SS would never admit that they were the ones that killed Kennedy, even if it was an accident.

The only real value to this theory is that it ruins all the silly speculation that Kennedy was assassinated by somebody other than Oswald.

Oswald tried to kill Kennedy and fired three shots. The first shot missed him because the rifle had not been zeroed with the scope. Bullet fragments hit Kennedy but not a serious wound. The second shot using iron sights hit Kennedy in the shoulder. Not a fatal shot.

Either one of two things happened on the third shot. Either Oswald hit his target or he missed and the negligent discharge from the Secret Service Agent hit Kennedy. Does it really make much of a difference? The action by Oswald was either the direct or indirect cause of the death of Kennedy.

I am not confused and it has been massively and absolutely debunked.

There is zero evidence of any kind that any SS agents fired a weapon and if they had witnesses would have seen and heard it. In addition there is no physical evidence to support it and such evidence would have been found such as a bullet the ONLY bullet and bullet fragments recovered came from Oswalds gun and that is proven fact.

The entire theory is based on one expert opinion which has been soundly refuted by endless real experts in ballistic.

The wound to Kennedy;s head DID line up[ with the snoopers nest in the TSBD . On the other hand even with a negligent discharge the SS agent would have had to stand up to shoot Kennedy or he would have fired through the windshield.

He was crouched the entire time.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Debate Dale or STFU!

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

are you going to debate Dale? If not, STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I already havew and I have defeated him.

Now stop trying to distract from your cowardice and dishonesty.

You made an assertion you cannot support and it is based on total ignorance.

Cite a passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Do not make demands when you run like a dog from every and all challenges. You do not get to set the terms and you are no authority.

Back up your claim BOY

You haven't defeated anything or anyone here as it pertains to the murder of JFK by deep state actors. All you have done is spew the official bullshit of the Warren Commission. The reason as to why so many citizen journalists and researchers had to seek the truth was because of so many ludicrous claims like a bullet that can "zig zag" and then pop out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. It takes a real idiot to avoid the hundred or so anomalies and then claim with a straight face "Yep, Oswald did it and acted alone.....nothing to see here, folks....move along".

The fact of the matter is that the Warren Commission and some of it's dubious members tailored the report to fit the lone gunman narrative and ignored anything else that could call it into question. Witnesses that could refute the official fairy tale were never called and many of them ended up "toe-tagged" because those loose ends had to be tied up as much as possible. Then the CIA comes out with an inner agency memo in 1967 ( CIA Document 1035-960 ) to weaponize the term "conspiracy theorist" to discourage and derail honest debate and further scrutiny of the bogus Warren CoSACmission report.

What it boils down to is that you are the worst kind of coward and I throw rightwinger and candycorn in there as well. You are too gutless to come to grips that things are not what you believe them to be....it's too painful and it would upset your entire world view. I can understand that to a point, but what causes me to hold you in total disdain is the intellectual laziness and then lamely attempt to flame others that know more than you...but what the hell, it's your cyber dime.

Well stated Dale.

It is amazing to me that anyone TODAY believes the Warren report. After all the evidence that has come forth, yet these people cling to their hopes. The HSCA concluded in 1979 that a conspiracy occurred. Stating there was a second shooter with four shots fired. These deluded Americans don't want to believe their own government would conspire to murder their president, lie about it, and cover it up for over five decades.

Not only is the physical evidence overwhelming, but so is the circumstantial evidence. The fact that the CIA committed many high level assassinations, it was essentially a rogue agency in 1963, it knew JFK intended to terminate them and their war in Vietnam, they hated his covert peace efforts with the USSR, fired their psychopathic leader (who magically is placed on the Warren Commission), all this is ignored by the statist believers in fairy tales. The CIA despised JFK for his refusal to commit troops to the Bay of Pigs fiasco and his concerted attacks on their buddies in the Mob...and on and on it goes.

Combine the means, motive, and opportunity with the physical evidence, and this case is overwhelming that a conspiracy at the highest levels of our government occurred.

There is no physical evidence at all supporting your claim.


And dale had been spanked and taken to school you just as you have,

Cite a passage from the WC report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

 

[Soupnazi630]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

No, you are confused. The story has never been debunked. The only "proof" to it being debunked is the claim that there exist a film that shows the SS Agent without an AR-15 in his hand. However, the film is very fuzzy and not what it is claimed to be upon viewing.

I don't know if the story is true or not. None of us do. However, there is credible evidence that it might be true. It is certainly consistent with the fact that Kennedy suffered a massive shot to the back of the head that doesn't line up with the line of shot from the window where Oswald fired the other shots. The size of the wound and all the fragmentation pieces of bullet in his head is consistent with .223 fragmentation.

If it was then I think we all know that the SS would never admit that they were the ones that killed Kennedy, even if it was an accident.

The only real value to this theory is that it ruins all the silly speculation that Kennedy was assassinated by somebody other than Oswald.

Oswald tried to kill Kennedy and fired three shots. The first shot missed him because the rifle had not been zeroed with the scope. Bullet fragments hit Kennedy but not a serious wound. The second shot using iron sights hit Kennedy in the shoulder. Not a fatal shot.

Either one of two things happened on the third shot. Either Oswald hit his target or he missed and the negligent discharge from the Secret Service Agent hit Kennedy. Does it really make much of a difference? The action by Oswald was either the direct or indirect cause of the death of Kennedy.

If you watch the Zapruter film, you can see that Kennedy was slumped forward, his hands on his throat. A shot from behind on the same level as he was would not have hit near the crown of his skull. The shot came from above.

Ludicrous

Not ludicrous. Your claims are ludicrous.

Cite a specific passage from the WC report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

No, you are confused. The story has never been debunked. The only "proof" to it being debunked is the claim that there exist a film that shows the SS Agent without an AR-15 in his hand. However, the film is very fuzzy and not what it is claimed to be upon viewing.

I don't know if the story is true or not. None of us do. However, there is credible evidence that it might be true. It is certainly consistent with the fact that Kennedy suffered a massive shot to the back of the head that doesn't line up with the line of shot from the window where Oswald fired the other shots. The size of the wound and all the fragmentation pieces of bullet in his head is consistent with .223 fragmentation.

If it was then I think we all know that the SS would never admit that they were the ones that killed Kennedy, even if it was an accident.

The only real value to this theory is that it ruins all the silly speculation that Kennedy was assassinated by somebody other than Oswald.

Oswald tried to kill Kennedy and fired three shots. The first shot missed him because the rifle had not been zeroed with the scope. Bullet fragments hit Kennedy but not a serious wound. The second shot using iron sights hit Kennedy in the shoulder. Not a fatal shot.

Either one of two things happened on the third shot. Either Oswald hit his target or he missed and the negligent discharge from the Secret Service Agent hit Kennedy. Does it really make much of a difference? The action by Oswald was either the direct or indirect cause of the death of Kennedy.

If you watch the Zapruter film, you can see that Kennedy was slumped forward, his hands on his throat. A shot from behind on the same level as he was would not have hit near the crown of his skull. The shot came from above.

Whatever you say Sport.

You should watch the Zapruter film and look at the autopsy photos, rather than wallow in ignorance.

The Zapruder film was doctored and doesn't reflect the fact that Greer stopped at the mark on the curb where the "Umbrella man" was to signal the need to stop for an easy shot at Kennedy's head from the storm drain. There is a photo of a policeman dropping his motorcycle and looking right at the storm drain.

Needless to say, the all-star team of assassins provided by the mafia and CIA assets failed miserably and had to rely on a young man Jack Allen Lawrence, a CIA asset that was willing to navigate a fetid sewer the length of two football fields. No mafia assassin would stoop to walking through other people's shit to do a hit.

Frank Sturgis, E.Howard Hunt, G.Gordon Liddy that later played a huge role in Watergate as Nixon's "plumbers" were in Dallas that day. So were those like J Edgar Hoover, George H W Bush, Colonel Ed Lansdale, Nixon, LBJ, mafia heads of cities that were in their territory. Lots of things that you do not know but I do.

There is no evidence that it was doctored. You simply lie and claim it was because it refutes you. Greer slowed the limo down but he did NOT stop it.

You know nothing at all of this issue and have no evidence that anyone but Oswald was involved.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The Warren Commission refused to allow anyone to testify before the committee that could refute it. They never called Dr. Charles Crenshaw to testify....they never called any witnesses that saw multiple shooters in buildings on the south side of Elm street. They never did anything that resembled due diligence at all. A simple "Google" search will show you how those that could refute the official story died in droves and the odds of that many dying that shared the same experience in that short amount of time is in the billions to one. Refute this..........

Wrong.

Crenshaw was an emergency room INTERN and was not a relevant witness.

His claims which arose years after the fact are based on a few minutes of casual observation with no expertise or experience to make any sort of informed determination of any facts. He challenges the expert autopsy but was not qualified to do so.


There were never any witnesses who saw any shooters on the south side of Elm street.

You lose again and have no idea what the Warren Commission wrote or said because you never read it. It is you and conspiracy theorists guilty of ignoring evidence which proves you wrong.

Your claim about large numbers dying who could refute the fact is a false one and google will not show any such thing.

The fact is people die and the event happened decades ago. No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact.

No, he and others saw the throat wound, dumb ass. And "yes" there were multiple witnesses that saw gunmen with rifles and they thought they were secret service agents until JFK was murdered. If you haven't watched the documentary "JFK To 9/11...Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" then you don't have shit to say that has any relevance. It's the Rosetta Stone of information with a compilation of eye witness accounts that counter the single gunman theory and knocks it on it's ass.

"No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact".

Here is where you get taken to the woodshed yet again.....in the three year span after the murder of JFK, 18 material witnesses died.

Six by gunfire, three in car wrecks, two "suicides", one that was cut from ear to ear by a knife, one by a broken neck, three heart attacks, two natural causes and a partridge in a pear tree...the odds of that happening to that many people in a three year span? Over a TRILLION to one.

Stop while you are behind..... because you just keep getting buried under an avalanche of irrefutable facts that totally destroys the bullshit you have been spewing as a you cling to the (snicker) "Warren Commission Report". If this was a boxing match? They would have stopped it a long time ago. You rise off of the canvas on wobbly knees and offer forth your chin for yet another uppercut...at this point in the fight? A light breeze could put you back on your ass.

Let us go over the facts.....

#1 Kennedy had a throat wound.
#2 Kennedy had a back wound.
#3 Kennedy had a head wound that blew his head up and to the left which by the laws of physics explains that the kill shot came from a position that was lower than Kennedy's head. which means that the "umbrella man" signaled to the driver to stop so the assassin in the storm drain had an unobscured shot which is what drove JFK's head up and to the left. Simple physics, my misguided friend.

The premise of the Warren Report is that only three shots were fired and one of those hit the concrete and caused a bystander to be injured by a concrete shard. There goes one one shot......then there is the shot that hits Kennedy in the throat......shot #2 according to the Warren Commission....and it also hit Connolly blowing out his ribs, and into his wrist...and then the laughable head shot that they claim is from the back that hits JFK knocking his head up and to the left and THEN at Parkland hospital, that insidious bullet was found on the gurney in almost pristine condition. If you REALLY believe this bullshit? You still believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

Walk away, little troll.......walk away.

LMAO! Yes, Kennedy had a throat wound...an EXIT wound.

Yes Kennedy had a back wound...an ENTRANCE wound.

Yes, Kennedy had a head wound. At that point, you leave facts and rush into fantasy land. When Kennedy's scalp was folded back into position, the entrance wound was found on the back of his head. If a shot had come from the front, blood, fluid bone and matter would have flown toward the back, but that's not happened. All of that stuff flew forward and then as the car rolled forward, it fell down on to the trunk lid.

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

No you have not you have been crushed folded spindled and mutilated.

You have no facts evidence or witnesses supporting you and you know it.

 

[MaryL]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

 

[Dale Smith]

You haven't defeated anything or anyone here as it pertains to the murder of JFK by deep state actors. All you have done is spew the official bullshit of the Warren Commission. The reason as to why so many citizen journalists and researchers had to seek the truth was because of so many ludicrous claims like a bullet that can "zig zag" and then pop out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. It takes a real idiot to avoid the hundred or so anomalies and then claim with a straight face "Yep, Oswald did it and acted alone.....nothing to see here, folks....move along".

The fact of the matter is that the Warren Commission and some of it's dubious members tailored the report to fit the lone gunman narrative and ignored anything else that could call it into question. Witnesses that could refute the official fairy tale were never called and many of them ended up "toe-tagged" because those loose ends had to be tied up as much as possible. Then the CIA comes out with an inner agency memo in 1967 ( CIA Document 1035-960 ) to weaponize the term "conspiracy theorist" to discourage and derail honest debate and further scrutiny of the bogus Warren Commission report.

What it boils down to is that you are the worst kind of coward and I throw rightwinger and candycorn in there as well. You are too gutless to come to grips that things are not what you believe them to be....it's too painful and it would upset your entire world view. I can understand that to a point, but what causes me to hold you in total disdain is the intellectual laziness and then lamely attempt to flame others that know more than you...but what the hell, it's your cyber dime.

You are simply wrong and ignorant and yes you know I have defeated debunked and pwnd your sorry little self

These people you refer to are frauds. Like you they have not read the warren commission report and have no idea what it claims.

First of all the WC report tailored nothing they searched for every possible witness and interviewed them. They actively pursued conspiracy but found no evidence. The witnesses you say they were not NEVER existed.You cannot name one of them. No witness died in any way that was suspicious or out of the ordinary.

The Warren Commission report represents a comprehensive and exhaustive investigation which none of your cherry picked videos have done. It is the conspiracy theorists fixating on evidence which lacks credibility in order to prop up a narrative.

You have it quite backwards. Listen little boy you have no idea what the WC report says and you NEVER read it.

They never claimed a bullet zig zagged or popped out in pristine condition.

Intellectual laziness is when a fool **** YOU ignores evidence and listens only to ONE side of the story. You are the intellectual fraud and lazy fool who never bothered to fact check anything.

You are a naive and foolish little gullible chump who got sold a bridge in Brooklyn and you know nothing about the JFK assassination

The Warren Commission refused to allow anyone to testify before the committee that could refute it. They never called Dr. Charles Crenshaw to testify....they never called any witnesses that saw multiple shooters in buildings on the south side of Elm street. They never did anything that resembled due diligence at all. A simple "Google" search will show you how those that could refute the official story died in droves and the odds of that many dying that shared the same experience in that short amount of time is in the billions to one. Refute this..........

Wrong.

Crenshaw was an emergency room INTERN and was not a relevant witness.

His claims which arose years after the fact are based on a few minutes of casual observation with no expertise or experience to make any sort of informed determination of any facts. He challenges the expert autopsy but was not qualified to do so.


There were never any witnesses who saw any shooters on the south side of Elm street.

You lose again and have no idea what the Warren Commission wrote or said because you never read it. It is you and conspiracy theorists guilty of ignoring evidence which proves you wrong.

Your claim about large numbers dying who could refute the fact is a false one and google will not show any such thing.

The fact is people die and the event happened decades ago. No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact.

No, he and others saw the throat wound, dumb ass. And "yes" there were multiple witnesses that saw gunmen with rifles and they thought they were secret service agents until JFK was murdered. If you haven't watched the documentary "JFK To 9/11...Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" then you don't have shit to say that has any relevance. It's the Rosetta Stone of information with a compilation of eye witness accounts that counter the single gunman theory and knocks it on it's ass.

"No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact".

Here is where you get taken to the woodshed yet again.....in the three year span after the murder of JFK, 18 material witnesses died.

Six by gunfire, three in car wrecks, two "suicides", one that was cut from ear to ear by a knife, one by a broken neck, three heart attacks, two natural causes and a partridge in a pear tree...the odds of that happening to that many people in a three year span? Over a TRILLION to one.

Stop while you are behind..... because you just keep getting buried under an avalanche of irrefutable facts that totally destroys the bullshit you have been spewing as a you cling to the (snicker) "Warren Commission Report". If this was a boxing match? They would have stopped it a long time ago. You rise off of the canvas on wobbly knees and offer forth your chin for yet another uppercut...at this point in the fight? A light breeze could put you back on your ass.

Let us go over the facts.....

#1 Kennedy had a throat wound.
#2 Kennedy had a back wound.
#3 Kennedy had a head wound that blew his head up and to the left which by the laws of physics explains that the kill shot came from a position that was lower than Kennedy's head. which means that the "umbrella man" signaled to the driver to stop so the assassin in the storm drain had an unobscured shot which is what drove JFK's head up and to the left. Simple physics, my misguided friend.

The premise of the Warren Report is that only three shots were fired and one of those hit the concrete and caused a bystander to be injured by a concrete shard. There goes one one shot......then there is the shot that hits Kennedy in the throat......shot #2 according to the Warren Commission....and it also hit Connolly blowing out his ribs, and into his wrist...and then the laughable head shot that they claim is from the back that hits JFK knocking his head up and to the left and THEN at Parkland hospital, that insidious bullet was found on the gurney in almost pristine condition. If you REALLY believe this bullshit? You still believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

Walk away, little troll.......walk away.

Sorry boy but no one is walking away especially when it is too damn easy to humiliate you.

Crenshaw and others only took a CASUAL and BRIEF glance at Kennedy's body he had no expertise to judge the nature of the wounds other than a generality. He did not dissect or closely examine the wounds and yet he tries to contradict expert autopsy findings.He has no credibility and is a fraud. Sorry but you are wrong he did nothing to challenge the evidence that Oswald acted alone

That is one fact.

No sir you are full of crap no one saw any shooter in Dealey plaza. No one saw anyone shooting on the south side of the plaza period the witnesses you describe BUT NEVER CITE A NAME are fictitious.

That is another fact.

No one died in unusual numbers.

You keep repeating this assertion but it is a false one. The proof is that you will not define what constitutes a material witness or give any names because your claim is a fictitious claim. Your conclusion that the odds are a trillion to one is a made up lie you pulled pout of your ass.

Show your work and demonstrate the calculations for arriving at those odds. Calculating odds is a straight forward mathematical exercise which anyone can understand. But you will not do so because you cite probability odds which you dreamed up.

That is another fact.

I am burying YOU in facts and destroying your false claim and you have yet to post a fact.

So let's review the facts.

Kennedy had a wound which entered his back and exited his throat fired from above and behind.

Kennedy had a head wound and he moved back and to the left as a result of other forces not from the push of the bullet thus demonstrating your ignorance about physics.

The bullet found on the gurney which was NEVER in pristine condition came from Cnnaly's leg not from Kennedy's head head.

No one saw a shooter. All evidence proves Oswald was the only shooter. You have no witnesses or physical evidence to to support any of your claims/

Run away and weep like the fool I just made you into boy you are cooked and beaten

Too easy

As I write this reply, I have but one favor to request......can you PLEASE use a comma in strategic points of your sentences? Your "run on" sentences make your replies maddening to dissect. How can anyone take your attempts to refute my claims when your postings are riddled with grammatical errors that would make a third grader blush with shame? But I digress.... let us continue......


"Kennedy had a wound which entered his back and exited his throat fired from above and behind"

So, Oswald fired a "wound" and THAT "wound" entered his back and exited from his throat.......Ooooookay (slowly backs away)

So, what you are claiming is that this shot entered the back of JFK and wormed it's way out of the throat? HOLY shit.......I am
absolutely stunned that you would believe that load of bullshit.....

"Crenshaw and others only took a CASUAL and BRIEF glance at Kennedy's body he had no expertise to judge the nature of the wounds other than a generality. He did not dissect or closely examine the wounds and yet he tries to contradict expert autopsy findings"

The alleged expert that did the autopsy of JFK had never done an autopsy on someone that died of a gunshot wound . Don't you find it rather suspicious that the "doctor" picked to do the most important autopsy in history had never done one where a gunshot was the cause of death??? The one performing the autopsy was no "expert" and he was constantly hounded by military officers to steer him away from the throat and back wounds. He also never found the bullet in the brain that killed JFK.

HOLY shit, the ass kicking you are taking just keeps getting worse! I gotta admire how you rise off of the cyber canvas for another uppercut........your glass jaw has been shattered.

"Kennedy had a head wound and he moved back and to the left as a result of other forces not from the push of the bullet thus demonstrating your ignorance about physics"

ROTFLMAO! What forces were those, Soupy? This is beyond hilarious and you keep digging that hole for yourself!


"The bullet found on the gurney which was NEVER in pristine condition came from Cnnaly's leg not from Kennedy's head head"

Of course it didn't come from JFK's head because that bullet was never extracted by the amateur doctor at Bethesda, the "magic bullet" that zig-zagged all over the ******* place found it's final resting place on a gurney found by a deep state operative in nearly pristine condition even in spite of so many collisions with bones.......HOLY shit.....I just have to shake my head.

"No one saw a shooter. All evidence proves Oswald was the only shooter. You have no witnesses or physical evidence to to support any of your claims"

Multiple witnesses saw men with rifles in various positions along buildings on Elm Street and gave very detailed descriptions of them and were never allowed to testify before the Warren Commission.

Have you ever seen the movie "Cool Hand Luke"? If so, then you know what I mean when I say "Stay down, Luke....he's too big and strong".......but I have no problem with you rising off of the cyber canvas with wobbly legs and an upturned chin just begging for another uppercut that will send you sprawling to the canvas.

Your turn.......(snicker)

 

[gipper]

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

No, you are confused. The story has never been debunked. The only "proof" to it being debunked is the claim that there exist a film that shows the SS Agent without an AR-15 in his hand. However, the film is very fuzzy and not what it is claimed to be upon viewing.

I don't know if the story is true or not. None of us do. However, there is credible evidence that it might be true. It is certainly consistent with the fact that Kennedy suffered a massive shot to the back of the head that doesn't line up with the line of shot from the window where Oswald fired the other shots. The size of the wound and all the fragmentation pieces of bullet in his head is consistent with .223 fragmentation.

If it was then I think we all know that the SS would never admit that they were the ones that killed Kennedy, even if it was an accident.

The only real value to this theory is that it ruins all the silly speculation that Kennedy was assassinated by somebody other than Oswald.

Oswald tried to kill Kennedy and fired three shots. The first shot missed him because the rifle had not been zeroed with the scope. Bullet fragments hit Kennedy but not a serious wound. The second shot using iron sights hit Kennedy in the shoulder. Not a fatal shot.

Either one of two things happened on the third shot. Either Oswald hit his target or he missed and the negligent discharge from the Secret Service Agent hit Kennedy. Does it really make much of a difference? The action by Oswald was either the direct or indirect cause of the death of Kennedy.

If you watch the Zapruter film, you can see that Kennedy was slumped forward, his hands on his throat. A shot from behind on the same level as he was would noat have hit near the crown of his skull. The shot came from above.

Ludicrous

Not ludicrous. Your claims are ludicrous.

Cite a specific passage from the WC report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Cite a passage that is true.

LMFAO!!!

 

[gipper]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

 

[rightwinger]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Which means what?

That there is no evidence of mob involvement. If they were, Oswalds body would have never been found after the assassination

He would not have been wandering the streets of Dallas

 

[rightwinger]

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

No, you are confused. The story has never been debunked. The only "proof" to it being debunked is the claim that there exist a film that shows the SS Agent without an AR-15 in his hand. However, the film is very fuzzy and not what it is claimed to be upon viewing.

I don't know if the story is true or not. None of us do. However, there is credible evidence that it might be true. It is certainly consistent with the fact that Kennedy suffered a massive shot to the back of the head that doesn't line up with the line of shot from the window where Oswald fired the other shots. The size of the wound and all the fragmentation pieces of bullet in his head is consistent with .223 fragmentation.

If it was then I think we all know that the SS would never admit that they were the ones that killed Kennedy, even if it was an accident.

The only real value to this theory is that it ruins all the silly speculation that Kennedy was assassinated by somebody other than Oswald.

Oswald tried to kill Kennedy and fired three shots. The first shot missed him because the rifle had not been zeroed with the scope. Bullet fragments hit Kennedy but not a serious wound. The second shot using iron sights hit Kennedy in the shoulder. Not a fatal shot.

Either one of two things happened on the third shot. Either Oswald hit his target or he missed and the negligent discharge from the Secret Service Agent hit Kennedy. Does it really make much of a difference? The action by Oswald was either the direct or indirect cause of the death of Kennedy.

If you watch the Zapruter film, you can see that Kennedy was slumped forward, his hands on his throat. A shot from behind on the same level as he was would noat have hit near the crown of his skull. The shot came from above.

Ludicrous

Not ludicrous. Your claims are ludicrous.

Cite a specific passage from the WC report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Cite a passage that is true.

LMFAO!!!

Oswald acted alone

 

[Flash]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

 

[rightwinger]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

Ruby was at the Western Union office FOUR MINUTES before he shot Oswald

Not the act of someone stalking Oswald and waiting to shoot him

 

[candycorn]

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

Did you notice the Chemtrails in Dallas that day?

Coincidence?

The Solar Radiation Management program aka "Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Program" of spraying heavy metal nano-particulates was in it's testing phase in 1963 and did not become a fully implemented program for all NATO countries until 1997.

Hope this helps......

Winner, winner....Chicken Dinner

Crazy Dale comes through again

It's not about winning, it's about revealing the truth. You have taken a massive ass kicking of monumental proportions which is why you went "off topic". You should have left well enough alone.

My suggestion to you is to stick to whiny leftard talking points and waving the rainbow colored leftard flag......that is where you excel. Just tryin' to help.


(snicker)

Why conspiracy theorists can’t be taken seriously

Off the deep end

Correct.
They are their own worst enemies. Folks like myself who think there may have been something more than meets the eye there are done a great dis-service by these idiots.