Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

[gipper]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

Inconceivable. Oswald was not a nutcase or a loony. This is a fabrication of our lying government.

He was very intelligent and well liked by his buddies in the CIA and FBI.

 

[rightwinger]

Did you notice the Chemtrails in Dallas that day?

Coincidence?

The Solar Radiation Management program aka "Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Program" of spraying heavy metal nano-particulates was in it's testing phase in 1963 and did not become a fully implemented program for all NATO countries until 1997.

Hope this helps......

Winner, winner....Chicken Dinner

Crazy Dale comes through again

It's not about winning, it's about revealing the truth. You have taken a massive ass kicking of monumental proportions which is why you went "off topic". You should have left well enough alone.

My suggestion to you is to stick to whiny leftard talking points and waving the rainbow colored leftard flag......that is where you excel. Just tryin' to help.


(snicker)

Why conspiracy theorists can’t be taken seriously

Off the deep end

Correct.
They are their own worst enemies. Folks like myself who think there may have been something more than meets the eye there are done a great dis-service by these idiots.

While I don’t agree with some of your theories, at least they are rational

The whacky conspiracy theorists are so bizarre in what they claim that you can’t give anything they say credibility

 

[rightwinger]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

Inconceivable. Oswald was not a nutcase or a loony. This is a fabrication of our lying government.

He was very intelligent and well liked by his buddies in the CIA and FBI.

Oswald was a loser who was picked on his whole life. At his numerous schools, in the marines, at work

 

[rightwinger]

Oswald attended 7th grade in the Bronx, New York, but was often truant, which led to a psychiatric assessment at a juvenile reformatory.[15] The reformatory psychiatrist, Dr. Renatus Hartogs, described Oswald as immersed in a "vivid fantasy life, turning around the topics of omnipotence and power, through which [Oswald] tries to compensate for his present shortcomings and frustrations." Dr. Hartogs detected a "personality pattern disturbance with schizoid features and passive-aggressive tendencies" and recommended continued treatment.[16]

 

[candycorn]

The Solar Radiation Management program aka "Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Program" of spraying heavy metal nano-particulates was in it's testing phase in 1963 and did not become a fully implemented program for all NATO countries until 1997.

Hope this helps......

Winner, winner....Chicken Dinner

Crazy Dale comes through again

It's not about winning, it's about revealing the truth. You have taken a massive ass kicking of monumental proportions which is why you went "off topic". You should have left well enough alone.

My suggestion to you is to stick to whiny leftard talking points and waving the rainbow colored leftard flag......that is where you excel. Just tryin' to help.


(snicker)

Why conspiracy theorists can’t be taken seriously

Off the deep end

Correct.
They are their own worst enemies. Folks like myself who think there may have been something more than meets the eye there are done a great dis-service by these idiots.

While I don’t agree with some of your theories, at least they are rational

The whacky conspiracy theorists are so bizarre in what they claim that you can’t give anything they say credibility

Fair enough. I don’t ask you to “open your mind” to what I’m saying…it’s obvious that a proper key would do that as it would with most people on most topics.

I do think that the dismissiveness is enhanced by so many whacko conspiracy theories that gain traction and, most damaging, that remarkably, bewilderingly, and frankly most repugnant is the fact that most conspiracy theorist will buy any theory other than the one reached by the commissioned bodies. Their only requirement is that they disagree with the “official” story; regardless if the theories disagree with one another.

It does bring up an interesting scenario though now that we’re in the throes of the Trump campaign and our President is a conspiracy theorist….What if a 9/11 type event were to happen today? The findings of the commission that would be empaneled would be contested but today it may have a separate commission, two findings, unending speculation that both have an “official seal” of sorts.

 

[rightwinger]

Winner, winner....Chicken Dinner

Crazy Dale comes through again

It's not about winning, it's about revealing the truth. You have taken a massive ass kicking of monumental proportions which is why you went "off topic". You should have left well enough alone.

My suggestion to you is to stick to whiny leftard talking points and waving the rainbow colored leftard flag......that is where you excel. Just tryin' to help.


(snicker)

Why conspiracy theorists can’t be taken seriously

Off the deep end

Correct.
They are their own worst enemies. Folks like myself who think there may have been something more than meets the eye there are done a great dis-service by these idiots.

While I don’t agree with some of your theories, at least they are rational

The whacky conspiracy theorists are so bizarre in what they claim that you can’t give anything they say credibility

Fair enough. I don’t ask you to “open your mind” to what I’m saying…it’s obvious that a proper key would do that as it would with most people on most topics.

I do think that the dismissiveness is enhanced by so many whacko conspiracy theories that gain traction and, most damaging, that remarkably, bewilderingly, and frankly most repugnant is the fact that most conspiracy theorist will buy any theory other than the one reached by the commissioned bodies. Their only requirement is that they disagree with the “official” story; regardless if the theories disagree with one another.

It does bring up an interesting scenario though now that we’re in the throes of the Trump campaign and our President is a conspiracy theorist….What if a 9/11 type event were to happen today? The findings of the commission that would be empaneled would be contested but today it may have a separate commission, two findings, unending speculation that both have an “official seal” of sorts.

It would have been interesting if 9-11 happened with Obama as President and Republicans controlled Congress

Given the hysteria over Benghazi, I imagine an impeachment would have been forthcoming

With Bush, Democrats just held two weeks of testimony

 

[candycorn]

It's not about winning, it's about revealing the truth. You have taken a massive ass kicking of monumental proportions which is why you went "off topic". You should have left well enough alone.

My suggestion to you is to stick to whiny leftard talking points and waving the rainbow colored leftard flag......that is where you excel. Just tryin' to help.


(snicker)

Why conspiracy theorists can’t be taken seriously

Off the deep end

Correct.
They are their own worst enemies. Folks like myself who think there may have been something more than meets the eye there are done a great dis-service by these idiots.

While I don’t agree with some of your theories, at least they are rational

The whacky conspiracy theorists are so bizarre in what they claim that you can’t give anything they say credibility

Fair enough. I don’t ask you to “open your mind” to what I’m saying…it’s obvious that a proper key would do that as it would with most people on most topics.

I do think that the dismissiveness is enhanced by so many whacko conspiracy theories that gain traction and, most damaging, that remarkably, bewilderingly, and frankly most repugnant is the fact that most conspiracy theorist will buy any theory other than the one reached by the commissioned bodies. Their only requirement is that they disagree with the “official” story; regardless if the theories disagree with one another.

It does bring up an interesting scenario though now that we’re in the throes of the Trump campaign and our President is a conspiracy theorist….What if a 9/11 type event were to happen today? The findings of the commission that would be empaneled would be contested but today it may have a separate commission, two findings, unending speculation that both have an “official seal” of sorts.

It would have been interesting if 9-11 happened with Obama as President and Republicans controlled Congress

Given the hysteria over Benghazi, I imagine an impeachment would have been forthcoming

With Bush, Democrats just held two weeks of testimony

Correct.

However, in a post-Trump world…I wonder how docile the Dems would be with a GOP President.

 

[rightwinger]

Why conspiracy theorists can’t be taken seriously

Off the deep end

Correct.
They are their own worst enemies. Folks like myself who think there may have been something more than meets the eye there are done a great dis-service by these idiots.

While I don’t agree with some of your theories, at least they are rational

The whacky conspiracy theorists are so bizarre in what they claim that you can’t give anything they say credibility

Fair enough. I don’t ask you to “open your mind” to what I’m saying…it’s obvious that a proper key would do that as it would with most people on most topics.

I do think that the dismissiveness is enhanced by so many whacko conspiracy theories that gain traction and, most damaging, that remarkably, bewilderingly, and frankly most repugnant is the fact that most conspiracy theorist will buy any theory other than the one reached by the commissioned bodies. Their only requirement is that they disagree with the “official” story; regardless if the theories disagree with one another.

It does bring up an interesting scenario though now that we’re in the throes of the Trump campaign and our President is a conspiracy theorist….What if a 9/11 type event were to happen today? The findings of the commission that would be empaneled would be contested but today it may have a separate commission, two findings, unending speculation that both have an “official seal” of sorts.

It would have been interesting if 9-11 happened with Obama as President and Republicans controlled Congress

Given the hysteria over Benghazi, I imagine an impeachment would have been forthcoming

With Bush, Democrats just held two weeks of testimony

Correct.

However, in a post-Trump world…I wonder how docile the Dems would be with a GOP President.

I’m afraid the days of congressional courtesies are over

 

[LA RAM FAN]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

You are correct that the fatal head shot was not fired by oswald.however you are grasping at straws saying there is no doubt oswald shot JFK.Read the posts of myself,Gipper and dale from previous posts,you will see there was never any evidence he had anything to do with it.

saying the SS agent discharged by an AR-15 is being just as much irresponsible as saying oswald was the lone assassin since the fatal head shot came from the front.

I don't know what happen any more than you do.

It is not a fact that the fatal shot came from the front. In fact there is much more evidence that it came from the rear. There is tremendous evidence that Oswald shot the rifle and hit Kennedy.

I don't know if any of this is true but there is also credible evidence that there could have been a negligent discharge from the Secret Service agent.

Hidden in Plain Sight – Bonar Menninger – Medium

Hidden in Plain Sight
Did a Secret Service Agent Accidentally Shoot JFK?

But after a decade of work, Donahue reluctantly arrived at a very different conclusion. Based on his assessment of all available evidence, the gunsmith believed the fatal head shot was actually an accident, inadvertently fired by one of the Secret Service agents from the open security car just behind the presidential limousine in the chaotic, final moments of Oswald’s ambush.

According to Donahue’s analysis, the shooting unfolded like this: Oswald fired his first shot from a sixth-floor window of the Texas School Book Depository soon after the motorcade made the turn onto Elm Street. But his scope was not adjusted properly, according to the Warren Commission, and the bullet missed, hitting the pavement behind and to the right of Kennedy’s limousine. Fragments ricocheted up and struck the inside windshield trim. At least two caught the president in the scalp and caused him to cry out, “My God! I’m hit!”

Oswald chambered a second round. This time, he skipped the rifle’s offset-mounted scope and instead drew a bead along the iron sights on top of the barrel. He fired again and the bullet ripped into Kennedy’s upper back, exited his neck and pierced Gov. Connally’s right side.

At this moment, photos from Dealey Plaza show Secret Service Special Agent George W. Hickey Jr. — riding in the left-rear seat of the follow-up car and sitting up high near the trunk deck — already had turned completely around and was looking back toward the book depository. He may well have spotted the barrel of Oswald’s rifle protruding from the sixth-floor window.

So Hickey reached down and grabbed the Colt AR15 select-fire, semi-automatic rifle from the floor of the car and flipped the safety lever off. He started to stand and turn to acquire Oswald’s position and return fire. But the follow-up car braked suddenly to avoid a collision with the presidential limousine and Hickey lost his balance. His finger slipped off the trigger guard and the weapon discharged. The bullet was flying at 3,300 feet-per-second when it slammed into the back of Kennedy’s head, 21 feet away, and disintegrated.

That book Hidden In Plain sight has been debunked and you have obviously done ZERO research into this whatsoever other than reading the propaganda book.Please, watch the documentary THE MEN WHO KILLED KENNEDY.It is 100 times more accurate than that propaganda book you mentioned. so far your posts are lunatic ramblings same as langley resident trolls soupnazi,wrongwinger,and candyass.

To say there that oswald fired the rifle is doing the same thing those trolls i mentioned always do while making fools out of themselves ignoring what witnesses said they saw and what the doctors said.ALL which agreed the fatal head shot came from the front,so no more BS oswald fired the head shot crap anymore or that references to that stupid book anymore. Its old and tiresome.

The Warren Commission refused to allow anyone to testify before the committee that could refute it. They never called Dr. Charles Crenshaw to testify....they never called any witnesses that saw multiple shooters in buildings on the south side of Elm street. They never did anything that resembled due diligence at all. A simple "Google" search will show you how those that could refute the official story died in droves and the odds of that many dying that shared the same experience in that short amount of time is in the billions to one. Refute this....



...

 

[LA RAM FAN]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

Actually, photographs and 8mm film from the opposite side of where Zapruter was filming shows the SS didn't deploy the rifle until after the Presidential limousine was traveling under the railroad bridge.

which is WHY we can forget that BS that that secret service agent accidently shot him with that rifle.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

View attachment 203544 View attachment 203544

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

I need to be specific. The whole thing is fiction.

OK then you ******* retard tell me the date that JFK was shot? The Warren Commission states he was shot on November 22 1963.

If the whole thing is fiction then they got the date wrong.

Give us the date you sniveling chicken hawk.

Yes you need to be specific you lying piece of trash you never read the report and your assertions are the lies.

Now cite a specific passage from the WC which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

ROTFLMAO! Dude!!!! Learn to use a friggin' comma every once and awhile!

Learn to do research and since you are throwing in you cite any lie from the Warren commission report.

DO not try and distract and evade and run away and you have been.

Stop being a coward and cite some evidence BOY.!!!!!!

LMAO! That is hilarious coming from someone that only recites from the joke of a report done by the (snicker) "Warren Commission"......

Indeed,could not have said ti better myself.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The Warren Commission refused to allow anyone to testify before the committee that could refute it. They never called Dr. Charles Crenshaw to testify....they never called any witnesses that saw multiple shooters in buildings on the south side of Elm street. They never did anything that resembled due diligence at all. A simple "Google" search will show you how those that could refute the official story died in droves and the odds of that many dying that shared the same experience in that short amount of time is in the billions to one. Refute this..........

Wrong.

Crenshaw was an emergency room INTERN and was not a relevant witness.

His claims which arose years after the fact are based on a few minutes of casual observation with no expertise or experience to make any sort of informed determination of any facts. He challenges the expert autopsy but was not qualified to do so.


There were never any witnesses who saw any shooters on the south side of Elm street.

You lose again and have no idea what the Warren Commission wrote or said because you never read it. It is you and conspiracy theorists guilty of ignoring evidence which proves you wrong.

Your claim about large numbers dying who could refute the fact is a false one and google will not show any such thing.

The fact is people die and the event happened decades ago. No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact.

No, he and others saw the throat wound, dumb ass. And "yes" there were multiple witnesses that saw gunmen with rifles and they thought they were secret service agents until JFK was murdered. If you haven't watched the documentary "JFK To 9/11...Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" then you don't have shit to say that has any relevance. It's the Rosetta Stone of information with a compilation of eye witness accounts that counter the single gunman theory and knocks it on it's ass.

"No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact".

Here is where you get taken to the woodshed yet again.....in the three year span after the murder of JFK, 18 material witnesses died.

Six by gunfire, three in car wrecks, two "suicides", one that was cut from ear to ear by a knife, one by a broken neck, three heart attacks, two natural causes and a partridge in a pear tree...the odds of that happening to that many people in a three year span? Over a TRILLION to one.

Stop while you are behind..... because you just keep getting buried under an avalanche of irrefutable facts that totally destroys the bullshit you have been spewing as a you cling to the (snicker) "Warren Commission Report". If this was a boxing match? They would have stopped it a long time ago. You rise off of the canvas on wobbly knees and offer forth your chin for yet another uppercut...at this point in the fight? A light breeze could put you back on your ass.

Let us go over the facts.....

#1 Kennedy had a throat wound.
#2 Kennedy had a back wound.
#3 Kennedy had a head wound that blew his head up and to the left which by the laws of physics explains that the kill shot came from a position that was lower than Kennedy's head. which means that the "umbrella man" signaled to the driver to stop so the assassin in the storm drain had an unobscured shot which is what drove JFK's head up and to the left. Simple physics, my misguided friend.

The premise of the Warren Report is that only three shots were fired and one of those hit the concrete and caused a bystander to be injured by a concrete shard. There goes one one shot......then there is the shot that hits Kennedy in the throat......shot #2 according to the Warren Commission....and it also hit Connolly blowing out his ribs, and into his wrist...and then the laughable head shot that they claim is from the back that hits JFK knocking his head up and to the left and THEN at Parkland hospital, that insidious bullet was found on the gurney in almost pristine condition. If you REALLY believe this bullshit? You still believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

Walk away, little troll.......walk away.

LMAO! Yes, Kennedy had a throat wound...an EXIT wound.

Yes Kennedy had a back wound...an ENTRANCE wound.

Yes, Kennedy had a head wound. At that point, you leave facts and rush into fantasy land. When Kennedy's scalp was folded back into position, the entrance wound was found on the back of his head. If a shot had come from the front, blood, fluid bone and matter would have flown toward the back, but that's not happened. All of that stuff flew forward and then as the car rolled forward, it fell down on to the trunk lid.

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

You had credibility until you destroyed it with your babble that oswald was a nutcase that acted alone and all the other rambles after that. I just destroyed this ramble of yours in post# 669 here http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...correct-oswald-acted-alone.692966/page-67here and so did dale in post# 653 Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone you have been checkmated by us both.here is the crying towel.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

Did you notice the Chemtrails in Dallas that day?

Coincidence?

The Solar Radiation Management program aka "Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Program" of spraying heavy metal nano-particulates was in it's testing phase in 1963 and did not become a fully implemented program for all NATO countries until 1997.

Hope this helps......

Winner, winner....Chicken Dinner

Crazy Dale comes through again

It's not about winning, it's about revealing the truth. You have taken a massive ass kicking of monumental proportions which is why you went "off topic". You should have left well enough alone.

My suggestion to you is to stick to whiny leftard talking points and waving the rainbow colored leftard flag......that is where you excel. Just tryin' to help.


(snicker)

which tells me the coward said NO to you on the challenge you gave him to debate him in a podcast since his boss at Langley KNOWS you would destroy him.He is a coward same as fellow disinfo agent Gerald Posner. Posner was invited by a group to come to one of the meetings in dallas one time to discuss his book and to try and back it up against excellent researchers such as Jim Marrs and others but to no surprise,the coward turned tail and ran cause he knew they would destroy and pick apart his lies and his sorry ass.

.that is the same thing he did with your challenge,he did THIS-ran off from the challenge since knows he cant cowardly hide behind the computer in a podcast and knows he cant stand toe to toe with you in a debate.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

No, you are confused. The story has never been debunked. The only "proof" to it being debunked is the claim that there exist a film that shows the SS Agent without an AR-15 in his hand. However, the film is very fuzzy and not what it is claimed to be upon viewing.

I don't know if the story is true or not. None of us do. However, there is credible evidence that it might be true. It is certainly consistent with the fact that Kennedy suffered a massive shot to the back of the head that doesn't line up with the line of shot from the window where Oswald fired the other shots. The size of the wound and all the fragmentation pieces of bullet in his head is consistent with .223 fragmentation.

If it was then I think we all know that the SS would never admit that they were the ones that killed Kennedy, even if it was an accident.

The only real value to this theory is that it ruins all the silly speculation that Kennedy was assassinated by somebody other than Oswald.

Oswald tried to kill Kennedy and fired three shots. The first shot missed him because the rifle had not been zeroed with the scope. Bullet fragments hit Kennedy but not a serious wound. The second shot using iron sights hit Kennedy in the shoulder. Not a fatal shot.

Either one of two things happened on the third shot. Either Oswald hit his target or he missed and the negligent discharge from the Secret Service Agent hit Kennedy. Does it really make much of a difference? The action by Oswald was either the direct or indirect cause of the death of Kennedy.

If you watch the Zapruter film, you can see that Kennedy was slumped forward, his hands on his throat. A shot from behind on the same level as he was would noat have hit near the crown of his skull. The shot came from above.

Ludicrous

Not ludicrous. Your claims are ludicrous.

Cite a specific passage from the WC report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Cite a passage that is true.

LMFAO!!!

I did, now you cite a passage which is a lie

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Now you are just making shit up as usual.

We lie about what happened if Oswald was really the lone gunman?

That s why dead people are taken to hospitals

Why is it so strange to you?

Yes they took him to one hospital and pronounced him dead. Then amazing they went to the trouble of moving his dead body from one hospital to another. Just so happened that the second hospital held JFKs dead body, which looked a lot like Tippit’s dead body.

Nothing Strange about that...

Exactly. He was taken to the closest hospital for treatment and pronounced dead. Then, he was sent to the County Hospital (Parkland) for the autopsy. I did get a good laugh at the idea that Tippit and Kennedy looked alike. Thanks for that.

You clearly aren’t informed. Tippit had a strong resemblance to JFK. What else do you need to know?

Yep, both of them had a nose, an eye on each side of the nose and a mouth underneath the nose. NO ONE who looks at a picture of Tippit would believe it was a picture of JFK.

Dallas police officer JD Tippit was JFK's 'real' assassin | Daily Mail Online

You are a gullible idiot.

Debate Dale or STFU!

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

are you going to debate Dale? If not, STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I already havew and I have defeated him.

Now stop trying to distract from your cowardice and dishonesty.

You made an assertion you cannot support and it is based on total ignorance.

Cite a passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Do not make demands when you run like a dog from every and all challenges. You do not get to set the terms and you are no authority.

Back up your claim BOY

You haven't defeated anything or anyone here as it pertains to the murder of JFK by deep state actors. All you have done is spew the official bullshit of the Warren Commission. The reason as to why so many citizen journalists and researchers had to seek the truth was because of so many ludicrous claims like a bullet that can "zig zag" and then pop out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. It takes a real idiot to avoid the hundred or so anomalies and then claim with a straight face "Yep, Oswald did it and acted alone.....nothing to see here, folks....move along".

The fact of the matter is that the Warren Commission and some of it's dubious members tailored the report to fit the lone gunman narrative and ignored anything else that could call it into question. Witnesses that could refute the official fairy tale were never called and many of them ended up "toe-tagged" because those loose ends had to be tied up as much as possible. Then the CIA comes out with an inner agency memo in 1967 ( CIA Document 1035-960 ) to weaponize the term "conspiracy theorist" to discourage and derail honest debate and further scrutiny of the bogus Warren Commission report.

What it boils down to is that you are the worst kind of coward and I throw rightwinger and candycorn in there as well. You are too gutless to come to grips that things are not what you believe them to be....it's too painful and it would upset your entire world view. I can understand that to a point, but what causes me to hold you in total disdain is the intellectual laziness and then lamely attempt to flame others that know more than you...but what the hell, it's your cyber dime.

NO ONE claims a bullet can "zig zag" nor that it popped out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. Only a very stupid person would put that stupid sentence in a post. And, it's based on the most dishonest interpretation that the President and Governor were sitting in a straight line and on the same level and that's just not the case. The Governor was sitting on a jump seat that folded out of the side of the passenger compartment. The Governor was lower and sitting more toward the center of the vehicle. The bullet traveled in a straight line, was deformed across its base, but not vertically and wasn't "magic" at all.

I'm sure that no one was hurt by your claim that people who disagree with you are "the worst kind of coward" The honest truth is that you DON'T know the facts, you are just vomiting out the most inane conspiracy theory crap and are not someone who can be taken seriously. The fact you accuse anyone else of intellectual laziness and flaming others who know is ludicrous. That's all you did in that post.

Hey troll need to look in the mirror when sprouting off conspiracy crap that oswald was the lone assassin and speaking of someone who doesnt know the facts and can be taken seriously who has intellectual laziness and flames others when we dont fall for your ludicrous conspiracy crap oswald shot kennedy. Debunk this excellent post of Gippers, post# 661 of his http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...-correct-oswald-acted-alone.692966/page-67you cant,nobody ever has.


or debunk this excellent informative post of dales here in post# 653,

Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone
you cant,.nobody ever has

or post# 638 here,you cant,nobody ever has.
Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone


you cant,nobody ever has.

 

[Soupnazi630]

You are simply wrong and ignorant and yes you know I have defeated debunked and pwnd your sorry little self

These people you refer to are frauds. Like you they have not read the warren commission report and have no idea what it claims.

First of all the WC report tailored nothing they searched for every possible witness and interviewed them. They actively pursued conspiracy but found no evidence. The witnesses you say they were not NEVER existed.You cannot name one of them. No witness died in any way that was suspicious or out of the ordinary.

The Warren Commission report represents a comprehensive and exhaustive investigation which none of your cherry picked videos have done. It is the conspiracy theorists fixating on evidence which lacks credibility in order to prop up a narrative.

You have it quite backwards. Listen little boy you have no idea what the WC report says and you NEVER read it.

They never claimed a bullet zig zagged or popped out in pristine condition.

Intellectual laziness is when a fool **** YOU ignores evidence and listens only to ONE side of the story. You are the intellectual fraud and lazy fool who never bothered to fact check anything.

You are a naive and foolish little gullible chump who got sold a bridge in Brooklyn and you know nothing about the JFK assassination

The Warren Commission refused to allow anyone to testify before the committee that could refute it. They never called Dr. Charles Crenshaw to testify....they never called any witnesses that saw multiple shooters in buildings on the south side of Elm street. They never did anything that resembled due diligence at all. A simple "Google" search will show you how those that could refute the official story died in droves and the odds of that many dying that shared the same experience in that short amount of time is in the billions to one. Refute this..........

Wrong.

Crenshaw was an emergency room INTERN and was not a relevant witness.

His claims which arose years after the fact are based on a few minutes of casual observation with no expertise or experience to make any sort of informed determination of any facts. He challenges the expert autopsy but was not qualified to do so.


There were never any witnesses who saw any shooters on the south side of Elm street.

You lose again and have no idea what the Warren Commission wrote or said because you never read it. It is you and conspiracy theorists guilty of ignoring evidence which proves you wrong.

Your claim about large numbers dying who could refute the fact is a false one and google will not show any such thing.

The fact is people die and the event happened decades ago. No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact.

No, he and others saw the throat wound, dumb ass. And "yes" there were multiple witnesses that saw gunmen with rifles and they thought they were secret service agents until JFK was murdered. If you haven't watched the documentary "JFK To 9/11...Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" then you don't have shit to say that has any relevance. It's the Rosetta Stone of information with a compilation of eye witness accounts that counter the single gunman theory and knocks it on it's ass.

"No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact".

Here is where you get taken to the woodshed yet again.....in the three year span after the murder of JFK, 18 material witnesses died.

Six by gunfire, three in car wrecks, two "suicides", one that was cut from ear to ear by a knife, one by a broken neck, three heart attacks, two natural causes and a partridge in a pear tree...the odds of that happening to that many people in a three year span? Over a TRILLION to one.

Stop while you are behind..... because you just keep getting buried under an avalanche of irrefutable facts that totally destroys the bullshit you have been spewing as a you cling to the (snicker) "Warren Commission Report". If this was a boxing match? They would have stopped it a long time ago. You rise off of the canvas on wobbly knees and offer forth your chin for yet another uppercut...at this point in the fight? A light breeze could put you back on your ass.

Let us go over the facts.....

#1 Kennedy had a throat wound.
#2 Kennedy had a back wound.
#3 Kennedy had a head wound that blew his head up and to the left which by the laws of physics explains that the kill shot came from a position that was lower than Kennedy's head. which means that the "umbrella man" signaled to the driver to stop so the assassin in the storm drain had an unobscured shot which is what drove JFK's head up and to the left. Simple physics, my misguided friend.

The premise of the Warren Report is that only three shots were fired and one of those hit the concrete and caused a bystander to be injured by a concrete shard. There goes one one shot......then there is the shot that hits Kennedy in the throat......shot #2 according to the Warren Commission....and it also hit Connolly blowing out his ribs, and into his wrist...and then the laughable head shot that they claim is from the back that hits JFK knocking his head up and to the left and THEN at Parkland hospital, that insidious bullet was found on the gurney in almost pristine condition. If you REALLY believe this bullshit? You still believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

Walk away, little troll.......walk away.

Sorry boy but no one is walking away especially when it is too damn easy to humiliate you.

Crenshaw and others only took a CASUAL and BRIEF glance at Kennedy's body he had no expertise to judge the nature of the wounds other than a generality. He did not dissect or closely examine the wounds and yet he tries to contradict expert autopsy findings.He has no credibility and is a fraud. Sorry but you are wrong he did nothing to challenge the evidence that Oswald acted alone

That is one fact.

No sir you are full of crap no one saw any shooter in Dealey plaza. No one saw anyone shooting on the south side of the plaza period the witnesses you describe BUT NEVER CITE A NAME are fictitious.

That is another fact.

No one died in unusual numbers.

You keep repeating this assertion but it is a false one. The proof is that you will not define what constitutes a material witness or give any names because your claim is a fictitious claim. Your conclusion that the odds are a trillion to one is a made up lie you pulled pout of your ass.

Show your work and demonstrate the calculations for arriving at those odds. Calculating odds is a straight forward mathematical exercise which anyone can understand. But you will not do so because you cite probability odds which you dreamed up.

That is another fact.

I am burying YOU in facts and destroying your false claim and you have yet to post a fact.

So let's review the facts.

Kennedy had a wound which entered his back and exited his throat fired from above and behind.

Kennedy had a head wound and he moved back and to the left as a result of other forces not from the push of the bullet thus demonstrating your ignorance about physics.

The bullet found on the gurney which was NEVER in pristine condition came from Cnnaly's leg not from Kennedy's head head.

No one saw a shooter. All evidence proves Oswald was the only shooter. You have no witnesses or physical evidence to to support any of your claims/

Run away and weep like the fool I just made you into boy you are cooked and beaten

Too easy

As I write this reply, I have but one favor to request......can you PLEASE use a comma in strategic points of your sentences? Your "run on" sentences make your replies maddening to dissect. How can anyone take your attempts to refute my claims when your postings are riddled with grammatical errors that would make a third grader blush with shame? But I digress.... let us continue......


"Kennedy had a wound which entered his back and exited his throat fired from above and behind"

So, Oswald fired a "wound" and THAT "wound" entered his back and exited from his throat.......Ooooookay (slowly backs away)

So, what you are claiming is that this shot entered the back of JFK and wormed it's way out of the throat? HOLY shit.......I am
absolutely stunned that you would believe that load of bullshit.....

"Crenshaw and others only took a CASUAL and BRIEF glance at Kennedy's body he had no expertise to judge the nature of the wounds other than a generality. He did not dissect or closely examine the wounds and yet he tries to contradict expert autopsy findings"

The alleged expert that did the autopsy of JFK had never done an autopsy on someone that died of a gunshot wound . Don't you find it rather suspicious that the "doctor" picked to do the most important autopsy in history had never done one where a gunshot was the cause of death??? The one performing the autopsy was no "expert" and he was constantly hounded by military officers to steer him away from the throat and back wounds. He also never found the bullet in the brain that killed JFK.

HOLY shit, the ass kicking you are taking just keeps getting worse! I gotta admire how you rise off of the cyber canvas for another uppercut........your glass jaw has been shattered.

"Kennedy had a head wound and he moved back and to the left as a result of other forces not from the push of the bullet thus demonstrating your ignorance about physics"

ROTFLMAO! What forces were those, Soupy? This is beyond hilarious and you keep digging that hole for yourself!


"The bullet found on the gurney which was NEVER in pristine condition came from Cnnaly's leg not from Kennedy's head head"

Of course it didn't come from JFK's head because that bullet was never extracted by the amateur doctor at Bethesda, the "magic bullet" that zig-zagged all over the ******* place found it's final resting place on a gurney found by a deep state operative in nearly pristine condition even in spite of so many collisions with bones.......HOLY shit.....I just have to shake my head.

"No one saw a shooter. All evidence proves Oswald was the only shooter. You have no witnesses or physical evidence to to support any of your claims"

Multiple witnesses saw men with rifles in various positions along buildings on Elm Street and gave very detailed descriptions of them and were never allowed to testify before the Warren Commission.

Have you ever seen the movie "Cool Hand Luke"? If so, then you know what I mean when I say "Stay down, Luke....he's too big and strong".......but I have no problem with you rising off of the cyber canvas with wobbly legs and an upturned chin just begging for another uppercut that will send you sprawling to the canvas.

Your turn.......(snicker)

Yes silly boy.

The bullet entered the upper back and exited the throat which is no mystery or anything out of the ordinary.

Yes the doctors who did the autopsy had years of experience performing autopsy's on gun shot wound victims your claim to the contrary is simply FALSE. He was in fact an expert and there were no other officers on the scene hounding him as you claim. That myth is from the movie JFK which is fictional.

They did indeed find bullet fragments in JFK's brain. N one steered them away from any part of the autopsy or the wounds.

Sorry but the bullet which was never in pristine condition fell out of Connally's leg onto HIS gurney. Even your conspiracy theorists do not claim it fell out of JFK's head.

No one ever claimed that a bullet zig zagged or changed direction

You are the one losing this argument as you cannot even keep your theories straight.

You cannot name any witnesses who gave detailed descriptions of other shooters because they never existed.

All facts proving you wrong.

 

[Soupnazi630]

That s why dead people are taken to hospitals

Why is it so strange to you?

Yes they took him to one hospital and pronounced him dead. Then amazing they went to the trouble of moving his dead body from one hospital to another. Just so happened that the second hospital held JFKs dead body, which looked a lot like Tippit’s dead body.

Nothing Strange about that...

Exactly. He was taken to the closest hospital for treatment and pronounced dead. Then, he was sent to the County Hospital (Parkland) for the autopsy. I did get a good laugh at the idea that Tippit and Kennedy looked alike. Thanks for that.

You clearly aren’t informed. Tippit had a strong resemblance to JFK. What else do you need to know?

Yep, both of them had a nose, an eye on each side of the nose and a mouth underneath the nose. NO ONE who looks at a picture of Tippit would believe it was a picture of JFK.

Dallas police officer JD Tippit was JFK's 'real' assassin | Daily Mail Online

You are a gullible idiot.

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

are you going to debate Dale? If not, STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I already havew and I have defeated him.

Now stop trying to distract from your cowardice and dishonesty.

You made an assertion you cannot support and it is based on total ignorance.

Cite a passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Do not make demands when you run like a dog from every and all challenges. You do not get to set the terms and you are no authority.

Back up your claim BOY

You haven't defeated anything or anyone here as it pertains to the murder of JFK by deep state actors. All you have done is spew the official bullshit of the Warren Commission. The reason as to why so many citizen journalists and researchers had to seek the truth was because of so many ludicrous claims like a bullet that can "zig zag" and then pop out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. It takes a real idiot to avoid the hundred or so anomalies and then claim with a straight face "Yep, Oswald did it and acted alone.....nothing to see here, folks....move along".

The fact of the matter is that the Warren Commission and some of it's dubious members tailored the report to fit the lone gunman narrative and ignored anything else that could call it into question. Witnesses that could refute the official fairy tale were never called and many of them ended up "toe-tagged" because those loose ends had to be tied up as much as possible. Then the CIA comes out with an inner agency memo in 1967 ( CIA Document 1035-960 ) to weaponize the term "conspiracy theorist" to discourage and derail honest debate and further scrutiny of the bogus Warren Commission report.

What it boils down to is that you are the worst kind of coward and I throw rightwinger and candycorn in there as well. You are too gutless to come to grips that things are not what you believe them to be....it's too painful and it would upset your entire world view. I can understand that to a point, but what causes me to hold you in total disdain is the intellectual laziness and then lamely attempt to flame others that know more than you...but what the hell, it's your cyber dime.

NO ONE claims a bullet can "zig zag" nor that it popped out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. Only a very stupid person would put that stupid sentence in a post. And, it's based on the most dishonest interpretation that the President and Governor were sitting in a straight line and on the same level and that's just not the case. The Governor was sitting on a jump seat that folded out of the side of the passenger compartment. The Governor was lower and sitting more toward the center of the vehicle. The bullet traveled in a straight line, was deformed across its base, but not vertically and wasn't "magic" at all.

I'm sure that no one was hurt by your claim that people who disagree with you are "the worst kind of coward" The honest truth is that you DON'T know the facts, you are just vomiting out the most inane conspiracy theory crap and are not someone who can be taken seriously. The fact you accuse anyone else of intellectual laziness and flaming others who know is ludicrous. That's all you did in that post.

Hey troll need to look in the mirror when sprouting off conspiracy crap that oswald was the lone assassin and speaking of someone who doesnt know the facts and can be taken seriously who has intellectual laziness and flames others when we dont fall for your ludicrous conspiracy crap oswald shot kennedy. Debunk this excellent post of Gippers, post# you cant,nobody ever has.

So this retard says that a lone shooter is a conspiracy.

Apparently he is too stupid to realize that a conspiracy by definition requires more than one person.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

No, you are confused. The story has never been debunked. The only "proof" to it being debunked is the claim that there exist a film that shows the SS Agent without an AR-15 in his hand. However, the film is very fuzzy and not what it is claimed to be upon viewing.

I don't know if the story is true or not. None of us do. However, there is credible evidence that it might be true. It is certainly consistent with the fact that Kennedy suffered a massive shot to the back of the head that doesn't line up with the line of shot from the window where Oswald fired the other shots. The size of the wound and all the fragmentation pieces of bullet in his head is consistent with .223 fragmentation.

If it was then I think we all know that the SS would never admit that they were the ones that killed Kennedy, even if it was an accident.

The only real value to this theory is that it ruins all the silly speculation that Kennedy was assassinated by somebody other than Oswald.

Oswald tried to kill Kennedy and fired three shots. The first shot missed him because the rifle had not been zeroed with the scope. Bullet fragments hit Kennedy but not a serious wound. The second shot using iron sights hit Kennedy in the shoulder. Not a fatal shot.

Either one of two things happened on the third shot. Either Oswald hit his target or he missed and the negligent discharge from the Secret Service Agent hit Kennedy. Does it really make much of a difference? The action by Oswald was either the direct or indirect cause of the death of Kennedy.

If you watch the Zapruter film, you can see that Kennedy was slumped forward, his hands on his throat. A shot from behind on the same level as he was would not have hit near the crown of his skull. The shot came from above.

Ludicrous

You are correct, your whole argument, as well as your world view, is ludicrious.

You are describing YOURSELF to a tee there,great job. Ludicrious would be all your sad pathetic debunked posts you have posted here.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

No, you are confused. The story has never been debunked. The only "proof" to it being debunked is the claim that there exist a film that shows the SS Agent without an AR-15 in his hand. However, the film is very fuzzy and not what it is claimed to be upon viewing.

I don't know if the story is true or not. None of us do. However, there is credible evidence that it might be true. It is certainly consistent with the fact that Kennedy suffered a massive shot to the back of the head that doesn't line up with the line of shot from the window where Oswald fired the other shots. The size of the wound and all the fragmentation pieces of bullet in his head is consistent with .223 fragmentation.

If it was then I think we all know that the SS would never admit that they were the ones that killed Kennedy, even if it was an accident.

The only real value to this theory is that it ruins all the silly speculation that Kennedy was assassinated by somebody other than Oswald.

Oswald tried to kill Kennedy and fired three shots. The first shot missed him because the rifle had not been zeroed with the scope. Bullet fragments hit Kennedy but not a serious wound. The second shot using iron sights hit Kennedy in the shoulder. Not a fatal shot.

Either one of two things happened on the third shot. Either Oswald hit his target or he missed and the negligent discharge from the Secret Service Agent hit Kennedy. Does it really make much of a difference? The action by Oswald was either the direct or indirect cause of the death of Kennedy.

If you watch the Zapruter film, you can see that Kennedy was slumped forward, his hands on his throat. A shot from behind on the same level as he was would not have hit near the crown of his skull. The shot came from above.

Ludicrous

You are correct, your whole argument, as well as your world view, is ludicrious.

You are describing YOURSELF to a tee there,great job. Ludicrious would be all your sad pathetic debunked posts you have posted here.

Wrong boy.

Your entire argument is one big emoji and meme.

You are the one here who has consistently been debunked.

 

[Soupnazi630]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

Inconceivable. Oswald was not a nutcase or a loony. This is a fabrication of our lying government.

He was very intelligent and well liked by his buddies in the CIA and FBI.

Wrong.

he was a nut and a marxist which you have never cited evidence to dispute.