Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

[Dale Smith]

are you going to debate Dale? If not, STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I already havew and I have defeated him.

Now stop trying to distract from your cowardice and dishonesty.

You made an assertion you cannot support and it is based on total ignorance.

Cite a passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Do not make demands when you run like a dog from every and all challenges. You do not get to set the terms and you are no authority.

Back up your claim BOY

You haven't defeated anything or anyone here as it pertains to the murder of JFK by deep state actors. All you have done is spew the official bullshit of the Warren Commission. The reason as to why so many citizen journalists and researchers had to seek the truth was because of so many ludicrous claims like a bullet that can "zig zag" and then pop out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. It takes a real idiot to avoid the hundred or so anomalies and then claim with a straight face "Yep, Oswald did it and acted alone.....nothing to see here, folks....move along".

The fact of the matter is that the Warren Commission and some of it's dubious members tailored the report to fit the lone gunman narrative and ignored anything else that could call it into question. Witnesses that could refute the official fairy tale were never called and many of them ended up "toe-tagged" because those loose ends had to be tied up as much as possible. Then the CIA comes out with an inner agency memo in 1967 ( CIA Document 1035-960 ) to weaponize the term "conspiracy theorist" to discourage and derail honest debate and further scrutiny of the bogus Warren Commission report.

What it boils down to is that you are the worst kind of coward and I throw rightwinger and candycorn in there as well. You are too gutless to come to grips that things are not what you believe them to be....it's too painful and it would upset your entire world view. I can understand that to a point, but what causes me to hold you in total disdain is the intellectual laziness and then lamely attempt to flame others that know more than you...but what the hell, it's your cyber dime.

You are simply wrong and ignorant and yes you know I have defeated debunked and pwnd your sorry little self

These people you refer to are frauds. Like you they have not read the warren commission report and have no idea what it claims.

First of all the WC report tailored nothing they searched for every possible witness and interviewed them. They actively pursued conspiracy but found no evidence. The witnesses you say they were not NEVER existed.You cannot name one of them. No witness died in any way that was suspicious or out of the ordinary.

The Warren Commission report represents a comprehensive and exhaustive investigation which none of your cherry picked videos have done. It is the conspiracy theorists fixating on evidence which lacks credibility in order to prop up a narrative.

You have it quite backwards. Listen little boy you have no idea what the WC report says and you NEVER read it.

They never claimed a bullet zig zagged or popped out in pristine condition.

Intellectual laziness is when a fool **** YOU ignores evidence and listens only to ONE side of the story. You are the intellectual fraud and lazy fool who never bothered to fact check anything.

You are a naive and foolish little gullible chump who got sold a bridge in Brooklyn and you know nothing about the JFK assassination

The Warren Commission refused to allow anyone to testify before the committee that could refute it. They never called Dr. Charles Crenshaw to testify....they never called any witnesses that saw multiple shooters in buildings on the south side of Elm street. They never did anything that resembled due diligence at all. A simple "Google" search will show you how those that could refute the official story died in droves and the odds of that many dying that shared the same experience in that short amount of time is in the billions to one. Refute this..........

Wrong.

Crenshaw was an emergency room INTERN and was not a relevant witness.

His claims which arose years after the fact are based on a few minutes of casual observation with no expertise or experience to make any sort of informed determination of any facts. He challenges the expert autopsy but was not qualified to do so.


There were never any witnesses who saw any shooters on the south side of Elm street.

You lose again and have no idea what the Warren Commission wrote or said because you never read it. It is you and conspiracy theorists guilty of ignoring evidence which proves you wrong.

Your claim about large numbers dying who could refute the fact is a false one and google will not show any such thing.

The fact is people die and the event happened decades ago. No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact.

No, he and others saw the throat wound, dumb ass. And "yes" there were multiple witnesses that saw gunmen with rifles and they thought they were secret service agents until JFK was murdered. If you haven't watched the documentary "JFK To 9/11...Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" then you don't have shit to say that has any relevance. It's the Rosetta Stone of information with a compilation of eye witness accounts that counter the single gunman theory and knocks it on it's ass.

"No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact".

Here is where you get taken to the woodshed yet again.....in the three year span after the murder of JFK, 18 material witnesses died.

Six by gunfire, three in car wrecks, two "suicides", one that was cut from ear to ear by a knife, one by a broken neck, three heart attacks, two natural causes and a partridge in a pear tree...the odds of that happening to that many people in a three year span? Over a TRILLION to one.

Stop while you are behind..... because you just keep getting buried under an avalanche of irrefutable facts that totally destroys the bullshit you have been spewing as a you cling to the (snicker) "Warren Commission Report". If this was a boxing match? They would have stopped it a long time ago. You rise off of the canvas on wobbly knees and offer forth your chin for yet another uppercut...at this point in the fight? A light breeze could put you back on your ass.

Let us go over the facts.....

#1 Kennedy had a throat wound.
#2 Kennedy had a back wound.
#3 Kennedy had a head wound that blew his head up and to the left which by the laws of physics explains that the kill shot came from a position that was lower than Kennedy's head. which means that the "umbrella man" signaled to the driver to stop so the assassin in the storm drain had an unobscured shot which is what drove JFK's head up and to the left. Simple physics, my misguided friend.

The premise of the Warren Report is that only three shots were fired and one of those hit the concrete and caused a bystander to be injured by a concrete shard. There goes one one shot......then there is the shot that hits Kennedy in the throat......shot #2 according to the Warren Commission....and it also hit Connolly blowing out his ribs, and into his wrist...and then the laughable head shot that they claim is from the back that hits JFK knocking his head up and to the left and THEN at Parkland hospital, that insidious bullet was found on the gurney in almost pristine condition. If you REALLY believe this bullshit? You still believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

Walk away, little troll.......walk away.

 

[gipper]

J/.D. tippet had no resemblance to JFK I proved that with photographs of the two and the matter is settled proving you wrong

Debate Dale or STFU!

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

are you going to debate Dale? If not, STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I already havew and I have defeated him.

Now stop trying to distract from your cowardice and dishonesty.

You made an assertion you cannot support and it is based on total ignorance.

Cite a passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Do not make demands when you run like a dog from every and all challenges. You do not get to set the terms and you are no authority.

Back up your claim BOY

You haven't defeated anything or anyone here as it pertains to the murder of JFK by deep state actors. All you have done is spew the official bullshit of the Warren Commission. The reason as to why so many citizen journalists and researchers had to seek the truth was because of so many ludicrous claims like a bullet that can "zig zag" and then pop out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. It takes a real idiot to avoid the hundred or so anomalies and then claim with a straight face "Yep, Oswald did it and acted alone.....nothing to see here, folks....move along".

The fact of the matter is that the Warren Commission and some of it's dubious members tailored the report to fit the lone gunman narrative and ignored anything else that could call it into question. Witnesses that could refute the official fairy tale were never called and many of them ended up "toe-tagged" because those loose ends had to be tied up as much as possible. Then the CIA comes out with an inner agency memo in 1967 ( CIA Document 1035-960 ) to weaponize the term "conspiracy theorist" to discourage and derail honest debate and further scrutiny of the bogus Warren CoSACmission report.

What it boils down to is that you are the worst kind of coward and I throw rightwinger and candycorn in there as well. You are too gutless to come to grips that things are not what you believe them to be....it's too painful and it would upset your entire world view. I can understand that to a point, but what causes me to hold you in total disdain is the intellectual laziness and then lamely attempt to flame others that know more than you...but what the hell, it's your cyber dime.

Well stated Dale.

It is amazing to me that anyone TODAY believes the Warren report. After all the evidence that has come forth, yet these people cling to their hopes. The HSCA concluded in 1979 that a conspiracy occurred. Stating there was a second shooter with four shots fired. These deluded Americans don't want to believe their own government would conspire to murder their president, lie about it, and cover it up for over five decades.

Not only is the physical evidence overwhelming, but so is the circumstantial evidence. The fact that the CIA committed many high level assassinations, it was essentially a rogue agency in 1963, it knew JFK intended to terminate them and their war in Vietnam, they hated his covert peace efforts with the USSR, fired their psychopathic leader (who magically is placed on the Warren Commission), all this is ignored by the statist believers in fairy tales. The CIA despised JFK for his refusal to commit troops to the Bay of Pigs fiasco and his concerted attacks on their buddies in the Mob...and on and on it goes.

Combine the means, motive, and opportunity with the physical evidence, and this case is overwhelming that a conspiracy at the highest levels of our government occurred.

 

[rightwinger]

Let’s see...

What do we have so far to refute overwhelming evidence that Oswald acted alone

The CIA did it
A secret service agent shot him
Tippet was a JFK look alike
It was the Jews!
Whatever Crazy Dale comes up with

All with zero credible evidence

 

[Flash]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

No, you are confused. The story has never been debunked. The only "proof" to it being debunked is the claim that there exist a film that shows the SS Agent without an AR-15 in his hand. However, the film is very fuzzy and not what it is claimed to be upon viewing.

I don't know if the story is true or not. None of us do. However, there is credible evidence that it might be true. It is certainly consistent with the fact that Kennedy suffered a massive shot to the back of the head that doesn't line up with the line of shot from the window where Oswald fired the other shots. The size of the wound and all the fragmentation pieces of bullet in his head is consistent with .223 fragmentation.

If it was then I think we all know that the SS would never admit that they were the ones that killed Kennedy, even if it was an accident.

The only real value to this theory is that it ruins all the silly speculation that Kennedy was assassinated by somebody other than Oswald.

Oswald tried to kill Kennedy and fired three shots. The first shot missed him because the rifle had not been zeroed with the scope. Bullet fragments hit Kennedy but not a serious wound. The second shot using iron sights hit Kennedy in the shoulder. Not a fatal shot.

Either one of two things happened on the third shot. Either Oswald hit his target or he missed and the negligent discharge from the Secret Service Agent hit Kennedy. Does it really make much of a difference? The action by Oswald was either the direct or indirect cause of the death of Kennedy.

 

[candycorn]

Because Parkland has a morgue

Now you are just making shit up as usual.

We lie about what happened if Oswald was really the lone gunman?

That s why dead people are taken to hospitals

Why is it so strange to you?

Yes they took him to one hospital and pronounced him dead. Then amazing they went to the trouble of moving his dead body from one hospital to another. Just so happened that the second hospital held JFKs dead body, which looked a lot like Tippit’s dead body.

Nothing Strange about that...

Exactly. He was taken to the closest hospital for treatment and pronounced dead. Then, he was sent to the County Hospital (Parkland) for the autopsy. I did get a good laugh at the idea that Tippit and Kennedy looked alike. Thanks for that.

It was an understandable mistake...

Oswald was walking down the street and saw Tippet. Mistaking him for JFK, he shot him again

I thought I killed that guy already

 

[candycorn]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Lol, did you get tired of the usual arguments and decided to stir up the crazies?

The simplest explanation is the most likely

After 50 years you still can’t refute it

The “simplest” solution being the most likely is correct, of course. But it has to fit in to the framework of the known facts. On one hand, there is the argument that he desired a place in history which is a valid argument. But it is not exactly congruent with “I’m just a patsy” which we know Oswald said. If you’re doing something and your lone desire is to get the perverted credit for killing the President…one of the first words out of your mouth to the media wouldn’t be to “share” the credit with someone else which is what the word “patsy” could be taken to imply.

It could also be that Oswald was referring to the DPD making him a patsy. That is true but it was sort of early in the process to be using that term, I believe.

 

[hunarcy]

J/.D. tippet had no resemblance to JFK I proved that with photographs of the two and the matter is settled proving you wrong

Debate Dale or STFU!

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

are you going to debate Dale? If not, STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I already havew and I have defeated him.

Now stop trying to distract from your cowardice and dishonesty.

You made an assertion you cannot support and it is based on total ignorance.

Cite a passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Do not make demands when you run like a dog from every and all challenges. You do not get to set the terms and you are no authority.

Back up your claim BOY

You haven't defeated anything or anyone here as it pertains to the murder of JFK by deep state actors. All you have done is spew the official bullshit of the Warren Commission. The reason as to why so many citizen journalists and researchers had to seek the truth was because of so many ludicrous claims like a bullet that can "zig zag" and then pop out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. It takes a real idiot to avoid the hundred or so anomalies and then claim with a straight face "Yep, Oswald did it and acted alone.....nothing to see here, folks....move along".

The fact of the matter is that the Warren Commission and some of it's dubious members tailored the report to fit the lone gunman narrative and ignored anything else that could call it into question. Witnesses that could refute the official fairy tale were never called and many of them ended up "toe-tagged" because those loose ends had to be tied up as much as possible. Then the CIA comes out with an inner agency memo in 1967 ( CIA Document 1035-960 ) to weaponize the term "conspiracy theorist" to discourage and derail honest debate and further scrutiny of the bogus Warren Commission report.

What it boils down to is that you are the worst kind of coward and I throw rightwinger and candycorn in there as well. You are too gutless to come to grips that things are not what you believe them to be....it's too painful and it would upset your entire world view. I can understand that to a point, but what causes me to hold you in total disdain is the intellectual laziness and then lamely attempt to flame others that know more than you...but what the hell, it's your cyber dime.

NO ONE claims a bullet can "zig zag" nor that it popped out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. Only a very stupid person would put that stupid sentence in a post. And, it's based on the most dishonest interpretation that the President and Governor were sitting in a straight line and on the same level and that's just not the case. The Governor was sitting on a jump seat that folded out of the side of the passenger compartment. The Governor was lower and sitting more toward the center of the vehicle. The bullet traveled in a straight line, was deformed across its base, but not vertically and wasn't "magic" at all.

I'm sure that no one was hurt by your claim that people who disagree with you are "the worst kind of coward" The honest truth is that you DON'T know the facts, you are just vomiting out the most inane conspiracy theory crap and are not someone who can be taken seriously. The fact you accuse anyone else of intellectual laziness and flaming others who know is ludicrous. That's all you did in that post.

 

[hunarcy]

I already havew and I have defeated him.

Now stop trying to distract from your cowardice and dishonesty.

You made an assertion you cannot support and it is based on total ignorance.

Cite a passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Do not make demands when you run like a dog from every and all challenges. You do not get to set the terms and you are no authority.

Back up your claim BOY

You haven't defeated anything or anyone here as it pertains to the murder of JFK by deep state actors. All you have done is spew the official bullshit of the Warren Commission. The reason as to why so many citizen journalists and researchers had to seek the truth was because of so many ludicrous claims like a bullet that can "zig zag" and then pop out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. It takes a real idiot to avoid the hundred or so anomalies and then claim with a straight face "Yep, Oswald did it and acted alone.....nothing to see here, folks....move along".

The fact of the matter is that the Warren Commission and some of it's dubious members tailored the report to fit the lone gunman narrative and ignored anything else that could call it into question. Witnesses that could refute the official fairy tale were never called and many of them ended up "toe-tagged" because those loose ends had to be tied up as much as possible. Then the CIA comes out with an inner agency memo in 1967 ( CIA Document 1035-960 ) to weaponize the term "conspiracy theorist" to discourage and derail honest debate and further scrutiny of the bogus Warren Commission report.

What it boils down to is that you are the worst kind of coward and I throw rightwinger and candycorn in there as well. You are too gutless to come to grips that things are not what you believe them to be....it's too painful and it would upset your entire world view. I can understand that to a point, but what causes me to hold you in total disdain is the intellectual laziness and then lamely attempt to flame others that know more than you...but what the hell, it's your cyber dime.

You are simply wrong and ignorant and yes you know I have defeated debunked and pwnd your sorry little self

These people you refer to are frauds. Like you they have not read the warren commission report and have no idea what it claims.

First of all the WC report tailored nothing they searched for every possible witness and interviewed them. They actively pursued conspiracy but found no evidence. The witnesses you say they were not NEVER existed.You cannot name one of them. No witness died in any way that was suspicious or out of the ordinary.

The Warren Commission report represents a comprehensive and exhaustive investigation which none of your cherry picked videos have done. It is the conspiracy theorists fixating on evidence which lacks credibility in order to prop up a narrative.

You have it quite backwards. Listen little boy you have no idea what the WC report says and you NEVER read it.

They never claimed a bullet zig zagged or popped out in pristine condition.

Intellectual laziness is when a fool **** YOU ignores evidence and listens only to ONE side of the story. You are the intellectual fraud and lazy fool who never bothered to fact check anything.

You are a naive and foolish little gullible chump who got sold a bridge in Brooklyn and you know nothing about the JFK assassination

The Warren Commission refused to allow anyone to testify before the committee that could refute it. They never called Dr. Charles Crenshaw to testify....they never called any witnesses that saw multiple shooters in buildings on the south side of Elm street. They never did anything that resembled due diligence at all. A simple "Google" search will show you how those that could refute the official story died in droves and the odds of that many dying that shared the same experience in that short amount of time is in the billions to one. Refute this..........

Wrong.

Crenshaw was an emergency room INTERN and was not a relevant witness.

His claims which arose years after the fact are based on a few minutes of casual observation with no expertise or experience to make any sort of informed determination of any facts. He challenges the expert autopsy but was not qualified to do so.


There were never any witnesses who saw any shooters on the south side of Elm street.

You lose again and have no idea what the Warren Commission wrote or said because you never read it. It is you and conspiracy theorists guilty of ignoring evidence which proves you wrong.

Your claim about large numbers dying who could refute the fact is a false one and google will not show any such thing.

The fact is people die and the event happened decades ago. No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact.

No, he and others saw the throat wound, dumb ass. And "yes" there were multiple witnesses that saw gunmen with rifles and they thought they were secret service agents until JFK was murdered. If you haven't watched the documentary "JFK To 9/11...Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" then you don't have shit to say that has any relevance. It's the Rosetta Stone of information with a compilation of eye witness accounts that counter the single gunman theory and knocks it on it's ass.

"No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact".

Here is where you get taken to the woodshed yet again.....in the three year span after the murder of JFK, 18 material witnesses died.

Six by gunfire, three in car wrecks, two "suicides", one that was cut from ear to ear by a knife, one by a broken neck, three heart attacks, two natural causes and a partridge in a pear tree...the odds of that happening to that many people in a three year span? Over a TRILLION to one.

Stop while you are behind..... because you just keep getting buried under an avalanche of irrefutable facts that totally destroys the bullshit you have been spewing as a you cling to the (snicker) "Warren Commission Report". If this was a boxing match? They would have stopped it a long time ago. You rise off of the canvas on wobbly knees and offer forth your chin for yet another uppercut...at this point in the fight? A light breeze could put you back on your ass.

Let us go over the facts.....

#1 Kennedy had a throat wound.
#2 Kennedy had a back wound.
#3 Kennedy had a head wound that blew his head up and to the left which by the laws of physics explains that the kill shot came from a position that was lower than Kennedy's head. which means that the "umbrella man" signaled to the driver to stop so the assassin in the storm drain had an unobscured shot which is what drove JFK's head up and to the left. Simple physics, my misguided friend.

The premise of the Warren Report is that only three shots were fired and one of those hit the concrete and caused a bystander to be injured by a concrete shard. There goes one one shot......then there is the shot that hits Kennedy in the throat......shot #2 according to the Warren Commission....and it also hit Connolly blowing out his ribs, and into his wrist...and then the laughable head shot that they claim is from the back that hits JFK knocking his head up and to the left and THEN at Parkland hospital, that insidious bullet was found on the gurney in almost pristine condition. If you REALLY believe this bullshit? You still believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

Walk away, little troll.......walk away.

LMAO! Yes, Kennedy had a throat wound...an EXIT wound.

Yes Kennedy had a back wound...an ENTRANCE wound.

Yes, Kennedy had a head wound. At that point, you leave facts and rush into fantasy land. When Kennedy's scalp was folded back into position, the entrance wound was found on the back of his head. If a shot had come from the front, blood, fluid bone and matter would have flown toward the back, but that's not happened. All of that stuff flew forward and then as the car rolled forward, it fell down on to the trunk lid.

 

[hunarcy]

Debate Dale or STFU!

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

are you going to debate Dale? If not, STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I already havew and I have defeated him.

Now stop trying to distract from your cowardice and dishonesty.

You made an assertion you cannot support and it is based on total ignorance.

Cite a passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Do not make demands when you run like a dog from every and all challenges. You do not get to set the terms and you are no authority.

Back up your claim BOY

You haven't defeated anything or anyone here as it pertains to the murder of JFK by deep state actors. All you have done is spew the official bullshit of the Warren Commission. The reason as to why so many citizen journalists and researchers had to seek the truth was because of so many ludicrous claims like a bullet that can "zig zag" and then pop out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. It takes a real idiot to avoid the hundred or so anomalies and then claim with a straight face "Yep, Oswald did it and acted alone.....nothing to see here, folks....move along".

The fact of the matter is that the Warren Commission and some of it's dubious members tailored the report to fit the lone gunman narrative and ignored anything else that could call it into question. Witnesses that could refute the official fairy tale were never called and many of them ended up "toe-tagged" because those loose ends had to be tied up as much as possible. Then the CIA comes out with an inner agency memo in 1967 ( CIA Document 1035-960 ) to weaponize the term "conspiracy theorist" to discourage and derail honest debate and further scrutiny of the bogus Warren CoSACmission report.

What it boils down to is that you are the worst kind of coward and I throw rightwinger and candycorn in there as well. You are too gutless to come to grips that things are not what you believe them to be....it's too painful and it would upset your entire world view. I can understand that to a point, but what causes me to hold you in total disdain is the intellectual laziness and then lamely attempt to flame others that know more than you...but what the hell, it's your cyber dime.

Well stated Dale.

It is amazing to me that anyone TODAY believes the Warren report. After all the evidence that has come forth, yet these people cling to their hopes. The HSCA concluded in 1979 that a conspiracy occurred. Stating there was a second shooter with four shots fired. These deluded Americans don't want to believe their own government would conspire to murder their president, lie about it, and cover it up for over five decades.

Not only is the physical evidence overwhelming, but so is the circumstantial evidence. The fact that the CIA committed many high level assassinations, it was essentially a rogue agency in 1963, it knew JFK intended to terminate them and their war in Vietnam, they hated his covert peace efforts with the USSR, fired their psychopathic leader (who magically is placed on the Warren Commission), all this is ignored by the statist believers in fairy tales. The CIA despised JFK for his refusal to commit troops to the Bay of Pigs fiasco and his concerted attacks on their buddies in the Mob...and on and on it goes.

Combine the means, motive, and opportunity with the physical evidence, and this case is overwhelming that a conspiracy at the highest levels of our government occurred.

It is not surprising you have embraced the most ridiculous explanations, but it makes me sad. The HSCA based their finding on an audio recording that was refuted after their report came out, but it fits your hopes, so you embrace it. That's sad.
showDoc.html

 

[hunarcy]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

No, you are confused. The story has never been debunked. The only "proof" to it being debunked is the claim that there exist a film that shows the SS Agent without an AR-15 in his hand. However, the film is very fuzzy and not what it is claimed to be upon viewing.

I don't know if the story is true or not. None of us do. However, there is credible evidence that it might be true. It is certainly consistent with the fact that Kennedy suffered a massive shot to the back of the head that doesn't line up with the line of shot from the window where Oswald fired the other shots. The size of the wound and all the fragmentation pieces of bullet in his head is consistent with .223 fragmentation.

If it was then I think we all know that the SS would never admit that they were the ones that killed Kennedy, even if it was an accident.

The only real value to this theory is that it ruins all the silly speculation that Kennedy was assassinated by somebody other than Oswald.

Oswald tried to kill Kennedy and fired three shots. The first shot missed him because the rifle had not been zeroed with the scope. Bullet fragments hit Kennedy but not a serious wound. The second shot using iron sights hit Kennedy in the shoulder. Not a fatal shot.

Either one of two things happened on the third shot. Either Oswald hit his target or he missed and the negligent discharge from the Secret Service Agent hit Kennedy. Does it really make much of a difference? The action by Oswald was either the direct or indirect cause of the death of Kennedy.

If you watch the Zapruter film, you can see that Kennedy was slumped forward, his hands on his throat. A shot from behind on the same level as he was would not have hit near the crown of his skull. The shot came from above.

 

[rightwinger]

You haven't defeated anything or anyone here as it pertains to the murder of JFK by deep state actors. All you have done is spew the official bullshit of the Warren Commission. The reason as to why so many citizen journalists and researchers had to seek the truth was because of so many ludicrous claims like a bullet that can "zig zag" and then pop out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. It takes a real idiot to avoid the hundred or so anomalies and then claim with a straight face "Yep, Oswald did it and acted alone.....nothing to see here, folks....move along".

The fact of the matter is that the Warren Commission and some of it's dubious members tailored the report to fit the lone gunman narrative and ignored anything else that could call it into question. Witnesses that could refute the official fairy tale were never called and many of them ended up "toe-tagged" because those loose ends had to be tied up as much as possible. Then the CIA comes out with an inner agency memo in 1967 ( CIA Document 1035-960 ) to weaponize the term "conspiracy theorist" to discourage and derail honest debate and further scrutiny of the bogus Warren Commission report.

What it boils down to is that you are the worst kind of coward and I throw rightwinger and candycorn in there as well. You are too gutless to come to grips that things are not what you believe them to be....it's too painful and it would upset your entire world view. I can understand that to a point, but what causes me to hold you in total disdain is the intellectual laziness and then lamely attempt to flame others that know more than you...but what the hell, it's your cyber dime.

You are simply wrong and ignorant and yes you know I have defeated debunked and pwnd your sorry little self

These people you refer to are frauds. Like you they have not read the warren commission report and have no idea what it claims.

First of all the WC report tailored nothing they searched for every possible witness and interviewed them. They actively pursued conspiracy but found no evidence. The witnesses you say they were not NEVER existed.You cannot name one of them. No witness died in any way that was suspicious or out of the ordinary.

The Warren Commission report represents a comprehensive and exhaustive investigation which none of your cherry picked videos have done. It is the conspiracy theorists fixating on evidence which lacks credibility in order to prop up a narrative.

You have it quite backwards. Listen little boy you have no idea what the WC report says and you NEVER read it.

They never claimed a bullet zig zagged or popped out in pristine condition.

Intellectual laziness is when a fool **** YOU ignores evidence and listens only to ONE side of the story. You are the intellectual fraud and lazy fool who never bothered to fact check anything.

You are a naive and foolish little gullible chump who got sold a bridge in Brooklyn and you know nothing about the JFK assassination

The Warren Commission refused to allow anyone to testify before the committee that could refute it. They never called Dr. Charles Crenshaw to testify....they never called any witnesses that saw multiple shooters in buildings on the south side of Elm street. They never did anything that resembled due diligence at all. A simple "Google" search will show you how those that could refute the official story died in droves and the odds of that many dying that shared the same experience in that short amount of time is in the billions to one. Refute this..........

Wrong.

Crenshaw was an emergency room INTERN and was not a relevant witness.

His claims which arose years after the fact are based on a few minutes of casual observation with no expertise or experience to make any sort of informed determination of any facts. He challenges the expert autopsy but was not qualified to do so.


There were never any witnesses who saw any shooters on the south side of Elm street.

You lose again and have no idea what the Warren Commission wrote or said because you never read it. It is you and conspiracy theorists guilty of ignoring evidence which proves you wrong.

Your claim about large numbers dying who could refute the fact is a false one and google will not show any such thing.

The fact is people die and the event happened decades ago. No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact.

No, he and others saw the throat wound, dumb ass. And "yes" there were multiple witnesses that saw gunmen with rifles and they thought they were secret service agents until JFK was murdered. If you haven't watched the documentary "JFK To 9/11...Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" then you don't have shit to say that has any relevance. It's the Rosetta Stone of information with a compilation of eye witness accounts that counter the single gunman theory and knocks it on it's ass.

"No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact".

Here is where you get taken to the woodshed yet again.....in the three year span after the murder of JFK, 18 material witnesses died.

Six by gunfire, three in car wrecks, two "suicides", one that was cut from ear to ear by a knife, one by a broken neck, three heart attacks, two natural causes and a partridge in a pear tree...the odds of that happening to that many people in a three year span? Over a TRILLION to one.

Stop while you are behind..... because you just keep getting buried under an avalanche of irrefutable facts that totally destroys the bullshit you have been spewing as a you cling to the (snicker) "Warren Commission Report". If this was a boxing match? They would have stopped it a long time ago. You rise off of the canvas on wobbly knees and offer forth your chin for yet another uppercut...at this point in the fight? A light breeze could put you back on your ass.

Let us go over the facts.....

#1 Kennedy had a throat wound.
#2 Kennedy had a back wound.
#3 Kennedy had a head wound that blew his head up and to the left which by the laws of physics explains that the kill shot came from a position that was lower than Kennedy's head. which means that the "umbrella man" signaled to the driver to stop so the assassin in the storm drain had an unobscured shot which is what drove JFK's head up and to the left. Simple physics, my misguided friend.

The premise of the Warren Report is that only three shots were fired and one of those hit the concrete and caused a bystander to be injured by a concrete shard. There goes one one shot......then there is the shot that hits Kennedy in the throat......shot #2 according to the Warren Commission....and it also hit Connolly blowing out his ribs, and into his wrist...and then the laughable head shot that they claim is from the back that hits JFK knocking his head up and to the left and THEN at Parkland hospital, that insidious bullet was found on the gurney in almost pristine condition. If you REALLY believe this bullshit? You still believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

Walk away, little troll.......walk away.

LMAO! Yes, Kennedy had a throat wound...an EXIT wound.

Yes Kennedy had a back wound...an ENTRANCE wound.

Yes, Kennedy had a head wound. At that point, you leave facts and rush into fantasy land. When Kennedy's scalp was folded back into position, the entrance wound was found on the back of his head. If a shot had come from the front, blood, fluid bone and matter would have flown toward the back, but that's not happened. All of that stuff flew forward and then as the car rolled forward, it fell down on to the trunk lid.

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

 

[gipper]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

No, you are confused. The story has never been debunked. The only "proof" to it being debunked is the claim that there exist a film that shows the SS Agent without an AR-15 in his hand. However, the film is very fuzzy and not what it is claimed to be upon viewing.

I don't know if the story is true or not. None of us do. However, there is credible evidence that it might be true. It is certainly consistent with the fact that Kennedy suffered a massive shot to the back of the head that doesn't line up with the line of shot from the window where Oswald fired the other shots. The size of the wound and all the fragmentation pieces of bullet in his head is consistent with .223 fragmentation.

If it was then I think we all know that the SS would never admit that they were the ones that killed Kennedy, even if it was an accident.

The only real value to this theory is that it ruins all the silly speculation that Kennedy was assassinated by somebody other than Oswald.

Oswald tried to kill Kennedy and fired three shots. The first shot missed him because the rifle had not been zeroed with the scope. Bullet fragments hit Kennedy but not a serious wound. The second shot using iron sights hit Kennedy in the shoulder. Not a fatal shot.

Either one of two things happened on the third shot. Either Oswald hit his target or he missed and the negligent discharge from the Secret Service Agent hit Kennedy. Does it really make much of a difference? The action by Oswald was either the direct or indirect cause of the death of Kennedy.

If you watch the Zapruter film, you can see that Kennedy was slumped forward, his hands on his throat. A shot from behind on the same level as he was would not have hit near the crown of his skull. The shot came from above.

Ludicrous

 

[Flash]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

No, you are confused. The story has never been debunked. The only "proof" to it being debunked is the claim that there exist a film that shows the SS Agent without an AR-15 in his hand. However, the film is very fuzzy and not what it is claimed to be upon viewing.

I don't know if the story is true or not. None of us do. However, there is credible evidence that it might be true. It is certainly consistent with the fact that Kennedy suffered a massive shot to the back of the head that doesn't line up with the line of shot from the window where Oswald fired the other shots. The size of the wound and all the fragmentation pieces of bullet in his head is consistent with .223 fragmentation.

If it was then I think we all know that the SS would never admit that they were the ones that killed Kennedy, even if it was an accident.

The only real value to this theory is that it ruins all the silly speculation that Kennedy was assassinated by somebody other than Oswald.

Oswald tried to kill Kennedy and fired three shots. The first shot missed him because the rifle had not been zeroed with the scope. Bullet fragments hit Kennedy but not a serious wound. The second shot using iron sights hit Kennedy in the shoulder. Not a fatal shot.

Either one of two things happened on the third shot. Either Oswald hit his target or he missed and the negligent discharge from the Secret Service Agent hit Kennedy. Does it really make much of a difference? The action by Oswald was either the direct or indirect cause of the death of Kennedy.

If you watch the Zapruter film, you can see that Kennedy was slumped forward, his hands on his throat. A shot from behind on the same level as he was would not have hit near the crown of his skull. The shot came from above.

Whatever you say Sport.

 

[hunarcy]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

No, you are confused. The story has never been debunked. The only "proof" to it being debunked is the claim that there exist a film that shows the SS Agent without an AR-15 in his hand. However, the film is very fuzzy and not what it is claimed to be upon viewing.

I don't know if the story is true or not. None of us do. However, there is credible evidence that it might be true. It is certainly consistent with the fact that Kennedy suffered a massive shot to the back of the head that doesn't line up with the line of shot from the window where Oswald fired the other shots. The size of the wound and all the fragmentation pieces of bullet in his head is consistent with .223 fragmentation.

If it was then I think we all know that the SS would never admit that they were the ones that killed Kennedy, even if it was an accident.

The only real value to this theory is that it ruins all the silly speculation that Kennedy was assassinated by somebody other than Oswald.

Oswald tried to kill Kennedy and fired three shots. The first shot missed him because the rifle had not been zeroed with the scope. Bullet fragments hit Kennedy but not a serious wound. The second shot using iron sights hit Kennedy in the shoulder. Not a fatal shot.

Either one of two things happened on the third shot. Either Oswald hit his target or he missed and the negligent discharge from the Secret Service Agent hit Kennedy. Does it really make much of a difference? The action by Oswald was either the direct or indirect cause of the death of Kennedy.

If you watch the Zapruter film, you can see that Kennedy was slumped forward, his hands on his throat. A shot from behind on the same level as he was would not have hit near the crown of his skull. The shot came from above.

Ludicrous

You are correct, your whole argument, as well as your world view, is ludicrious.

 

[hunarcy]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

No, you are confused. The story has never been debunked. The only "proof" to it being debunked is the claim that there exist a film that shows the SS Agent without an AR-15 in his hand. However, the film is very fuzzy and not what it is claimed to be upon viewing.

I don't know if the story is true or not. None of us do. However, there is credible evidence that it might be true. It is certainly consistent with the fact that Kennedy suffered a massive shot to the back of the head that doesn't line up with the line of shot from the window where Oswald fired the other shots. The size of the wound and all the fragmentation pieces of bullet in his head is consistent with .223 fragmentation.

If it was then I think we all know that the SS would never admit that they were the ones that killed Kennedy, even if it was an accident.

The only real value to this theory is that it ruins all the silly speculation that Kennedy was assassinated by somebody other than Oswald.

Oswald tried to kill Kennedy and fired three shots. The first shot missed him because the rifle had not been zeroed with the scope. Bullet fragments hit Kennedy but not a serious wound. The second shot using iron sights hit Kennedy in the shoulder. Not a fatal shot.

Either one of two things happened on the third shot. Either Oswald hit his target or he missed and the negligent discharge from the Secret Service Agent hit Kennedy. Does it really make much of a difference? The action by Oswald was either the direct or indirect cause of the death of Kennedy.

If you watch the Zapruter film, you can see that Kennedy was slumped forward, his hands on his throat. A shot from behind on the same level as he was would not have hit near the crown of his skull. The shot came from above.

Whatever you say Sport.

You should watch the Zapruter film and look at the autopsy photos, rather than wallow in ignorance.

 

[LaDexter]

The Mossad here who are pushing the "Oswald and just him, nobody else" BS are the same who shout down the 911 truth as well. That's their job. When they aren't plotting and executing false flag terror attacks against the US, they are here shouting down those noticing too much truth....

 

[rightwinger]

The Mossad here who are pushing the "Oswald and just him, nobody else" BS are the same who shout down the 911 truth as well. That's their job. When they aren't plotting and executing false flag terror attacks against the US, they are here shouting down those noticing too much truth....

It’s da Joose!

 

[Dale Smith]

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

No, you are confused. The story has never been debunked. The only "proof" to it being debunked is the claim that there exist a film that shows the SS Agent without an AR-15 in his hand. However, the film is very fuzzy and not what it is claimed to be upon viewing.

I don't know if the story is true or not. None of us do. However, there is credible evidence that it might be true. It is certainly consistent with the fact that Kennedy suffered a massive shot to the back of the head that doesn't line up with the line of shot from the window where Oswald fired the other shots. The size of the wound and all the fragmentation pieces of bullet in his head is consistent with .223 fragmentation.

If it was then I think we all know that the SS would never admit that they were the ones that killed Kennedy, even if it was an accident.

The only real value to this theory is that it ruins all the silly speculation that Kennedy was assassinated by somebody other than Oswald.

Oswald tried to kill Kennedy and fired three shots. The first shot missed him because the rifle had not been zeroed with the scope. Bullet fragments hit Kennedy but not a serious wound. The second shot using iron sights hit Kennedy in the shoulder. Not a fatal shot.

Either one of two things happened on the third shot. Either Oswald hit his target or he missed and the negligent discharge from the Secret Service Agent hit Kennedy. Does it really make much of a difference? The action by Oswald was either the direct or indirect cause of the death of Kennedy.

If you watch the Zapruter film, you can see that Kennedy was slumped forward, his hands on his throat. A shot from behind on the same level as he was would not have hit near the crown of his skull. The shot came from above.

Whatever you say Sport.

You should watch the Zapruter film and look at the autopsy photos, rather than wallow in ignorance.

The Zapruder film was doctored and doesn't reflect the fact that Greer stopped at the mark on the curb where the "Umbrella man" was to signal the need to stop for an easy shot at Kennedy's head from the storm drain. There is a photo of a policeman dropping his motorcycle and looking right at the storm drain.

Needless to say, the all-star team of assassins provided by the mafia and CIA assets failed miserably and had to rely on a young man Jack Allen Lawrence, a CIA asset that was willing to navigate a fetid sewer the length of two football fields. No mafia assassin would stoop to walking through other people's shit to do a hit.

Frank Sturgis, E.Howard Hunt, G.Gordon Liddy that later played a huge role in Watergate as Nixon's "plumbers" were in Dallas that day. So were those like J Edgar Hoover, George H W Bush, Colonel Ed Lansdale, Nixon, LBJ, mafia heads of cities that were in their territory. Lots of things that you do not know but I do.

 

[Dale Smith]

You are simply wrong and ignorant and yes you know I have defeated debunked and pwnd your sorry little self

These people you refer to are frauds. Like you they have not read the warren commission report and have no idea what it claims.

First of all the WC report tailored nothing they searched for every possible witness and interviewed them. They actively pursued conspiracy but found no evidence. The witnesses you say they were not NEVER existed.You cannot name one of them. No witness died in any way that was suspicious or out of the ordinary.

The Warren Commission report represents a comprehensive and exhaustive investigation which none of your cherry picked videos have done. It is the conspiracy theorists fixating on evidence which lacks credibility in order to prop up a narrative.

You have it quite backwards. Listen little boy you have no idea what the WC report says and you NEVER read it.

They never claimed a bullet zig zagged or popped out in pristine condition.

Intellectual laziness is when a fool **** YOU ignores evidence and listens only to ONE side of the story. You are the intellectual fraud and lazy fool who never bothered to fact check anything.

You are a naive and foolish little gullible chump who got sold a bridge in Brooklyn and you know nothing about the JFK assassination

The Warren Commission refused to allow anyone to testify before the committee that could refute it. They never called Dr. Charles Crenshaw to testify....they never called any witnesses that saw multiple shooters in buildings on the south side of Elm street. They never did anything that resembled due diligence at all. A simple "Google" search will show you how those that could refute the official story died in droves and the odds of that many dying that shared the same experience in that short amount of time is in the billions to one. Refute this..........

Wrong.

Crenshaw was an emergency room INTERN and was not a relevant witness.

His claims which arose years after the fact are based on a few minutes of casual observation with no expertise or experience to make any sort of informed determination of any facts. He challenges the expert autopsy but was not qualified to do so.


There were never any witnesses who saw any shooters on the south side of Elm street.

You lose again and have no idea what the Warren Commission wrote or said because you never read it. It is you and conspiracy theorists guilty of ignoring evidence which proves you wrong.

Your claim about large numbers dying who could refute the fact is a false one and google will not show any such thing.

The fact is people die and the event happened decades ago. No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact.

No, he and others saw the throat wound, dumb ass. And "yes" there were multiple witnesses that saw gunmen with rifles and they thought they were secret service agents until JFK was murdered. If you haven't watched the documentary "JFK To 9/11...Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" then you don't have shit to say that has any relevance. It's the Rosetta Stone of information with a compilation of eye witness accounts that counter the single gunman theory and knocks it on it's ass.

"No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact".

Here is where you get taken to the woodshed yet again.....in the three year span after the murder of JFK, 18 material witnesses died.

Six by gunfire, three in car wrecks, two "suicides", one that was cut from ear to ear by a knife, one by a broken neck, three heart attacks, two natural causes and a partridge in a pear tree...the odds of that happening to that many people in a three year span? Over a TRILLION to one.

Stop while you are behind..... because you just keep getting buried under an avalanche of irrefutable facts that totally destroys the bullshit you have been spewing as a you cling to the (snicker) "Warren Commission Report". If this was a boxing match? They would have stopped it a long time ago. You rise off of the canvas on wobbly knees and offer forth your chin for yet another uppercut...at this point in the fight? A light breeze could put you back on your ass.

Let us go over the facts.....

#1 Kennedy had a throat wound.
#2 Kennedy had a back wound.
#3 Kennedy had a head wound that blew his head up and to the left which by the laws of physics explains that the kill shot came from a position that was lower than Kennedy's head. which means that the "umbrella man" signaled to the driver to stop so the assassin in the storm drain had an unobscured shot which is what drove JFK's head up and to the left. Simple physics, my misguided friend.

The premise of the Warren Report is that only three shots were fired and one of those hit the concrete and caused a bystander to be injured by a concrete shard. There goes one one shot......then there is the shot that hits Kennedy in the throat......shot #2 according to the Warren Commission....and it also hit Connolly blowing out his ribs, and into his wrist...and then the laughable head shot that they claim is from the back that hits JFK knocking his head up and to the left and THEN at Parkland hospital, that insidious bullet was found on the gurney in almost pristine condition. If you REALLY believe this bullshit? You still believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

Walk away, little troll.......walk away.

LMAO! Yes, Kennedy had a throat wound...an EXIT wound.

Yes Kennedy had a back wound...an ENTRANCE wound.

Yes, Kennedy had a head wound. At that point, you leave facts and rush into fantasy land. When Kennedy's scalp was folded back into position, the entrance wound was found on the back of his head. If a shot had come from the front, blood, fluid bone and matter would have flown toward the back, but that's not happened. All of that stuff flew forward and then as the car rolled forward, it fell down on to the trunk lid.

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

 

[rightwinger]

The Warren Commission refused to allow anyone to testify before the committee that could refute it. They never called Dr. Charles Crenshaw to testify....they never called any witnesses that saw multiple shooters in buildings on the south side of Elm street. They never did anything that resembled due diligence at all. A simple "Google" search will show you how those that could refute the official story died in droves and the odds of that many dying that shared the same experience in that short amount of time is in the billions to one. Refute this..........

Wrong.

Crenshaw was an emergency room INTERN and was not a relevant witness.

His claims which arose years after the fact are based on a few minutes of casual observation with no expertise or experience to make any sort of informed determination of any facts. He challenges the expert autopsy but was not qualified to do so.


There were never any witnesses who saw any shooters on the south side of Elm street.

You lose again and have no idea what the Warren Commission wrote or said because you never read it. It is you and conspiracy theorists guilty of ignoring evidence which proves you wrong.

Your claim about large numbers dying who could refute the fact is a false one and google will not show any such thing.

The fact is people die and the event happened decades ago. No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact.

No, he and others saw the throat wound, dumb ass. And "yes" there were multiple witnesses that saw gunmen with rifles and they thought they were secret service agents until JFK was murdered. If you haven't watched the documentary "JFK To 9/11...Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" then you don't have shit to say that has any relevance. It's the Rosetta Stone of information with a compilation of eye witness accounts that counter the single gunman theory and knocks it on it's ass.

"No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact".

Here is where you get taken to the woodshed yet again.....in the three year span after the murder of JFK, 18 material witnesses died.

Six by gunfire, three in car wrecks, two "suicides", one that was cut from ear to ear by a knife, one by a broken neck, three heart attacks, two natural causes and a partridge in a pear tree...the odds of that happening to that many people in a three year span? Over a TRILLION to one.

Stop while you are behind..... because you just keep getting buried under an avalanche of irrefutable facts that totally destroys the bullshit you have been spewing as a you cling to the (snicker) "Warren Commission Report". If this was a boxing match? They would have stopped it a long time ago. You rise off of the canvas on wobbly knees and offer forth your chin for yet another uppercut...at this point in the fight? A light breeze could put you back on your ass.

Let us go over the facts.....

#1 Kennedy had a throat wound.
#2 Kennedy had a back wound.
#3 Kennedy had a head wound that blew his head up and to the left which by the laws of physics explains that the kill shot came from a position that was lower than Kennedy's head. which means that the "umbrella man" signaled to the driver to stop so the assassin in the storm drain had an unobscured shot which is what drove JFK's head up and to the left. Simple physics, my misguided friend.

The premise of the Warren Report is that only three shots were fired and one of those hit the concrete and caused a bystander to be injured by a concrete shard. There goes one one shot......then there is the shot that hits Kennedy in the throat......shot #2 according to the Warren Commission....and it also hit Connolly blowing out his ribs, and into his wrist...and then the laughable head shot that they claim is from the back that hits JFK knocking his head up and to the left and THEN at Parkland hospital, that insidious bullet was found on the gurney in almost pristine condition. If you REALLY believe this bullshit? You still believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

Walk away, little troll.......walk away.

LMAO! Yes, Kennedy had a throat wound...an EXIT wound.

Yes Kennedy had a back wound...an ENTRANCE wound.

Yes, Kennedy had a head wound. At that point, you leave facts and rush into fantasy land. When Kennedy's scalp was folded back into position, the entrance wound was found on the back of his head. If a shot had come from the front, blood, fluid bone and matter would have flown toward the back, but that's not happened. All of that stuff flew forward and then as the car rolled forward, it fell down on to the trunk lid.

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

Did you notice the Chemtrails in Dallas that day?

Coincidence?