Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

[LA RAM FAN]

J/.D. tippet had no resemblance to JFK I proved that with photographs of the two and the matter is settled proving you wrong

Debate Dale or STFU!

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

are you going to debate Dale? If not, STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I already havew and I have defeated him.

Now stop trying to distract from your cowardice and dishonesty.

You made an assertion you cannot support and it is based on total ignorance.

Cite a passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Do not make demands when you run like a dog from every and all challenges. You do not get to set the terms and you are no authority.

Back up your claim BOY

You haven't defeated anything or anyone here as it pertains to the murder of JFK by deep state actors. All you have done is spew the official bullshit of the Warren Commission. The reason as to why so many citizen journalists and researchers had to seek the truth was because of so many ludicrous claims like a bullet that can "zig zag" and then pop out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. It takes a real idiot to avoid the hundred or so anomalies and then claim with a straight face "Yep, Oswald did it and acted alone.....nothing to see here, folks....move along".

The fact of the matter is that the Warren Commission and some of it's dubious members tailored the report to fit the lone gunman narrative and ignored anything else that could call it into question. Witnesses that could refute the official fairy tale were never called and many of them ended up "toe-tagged" because those loose ends had to be tied up as much as possible. Then the CIA comes out with an inner agency memo in 1967 ( CIA Document 1035-960 ) to weaponize the term "conspiracy theorist" to discourage and derail honest debate and further scrutiny of the bogus Warren Commission report.

What it boils down to is that you are the worst kind of coward and I throw rightwinger and candycorn in there as well. You are too gutless to come to grips that things are not what you believe them to be....it's too painful and it would upset your entire world view. I can understand that to a point, but what causes me to hold you in total disdain is the intellectual laziness and then lamely attempt to flame others that know more than you...but what the hell, it's your cyber dime.

yeah those three cowards hide behind the computer and they wont take you up on your challenge to debate them in a podcast because they know you will destroy their asses so badly.they would never recover if they had to debate you in publicj. so they cowardly hide behind the computer.

as i said earlier,these coward trolls remind me of that fellow disin agent troll they worship gerald posner who was invited by reseacher jim marrs and others to debate him in public in of the dallas meetings there and sure enough,the coward turned them down knowing his sorry ass would get owned by them and thats the same they do in their coward evasive actions not debating you in public since they know you will checkmate and own their sorry asses.


did you REALLY expect anything differently from these Langley employees?

you and Gipper are hopeless.I have said this to you both at LEAST a hundred times before in the past-

But i might as well just be talking to a brick wall.It drives me crazy how you guys ignore that advise .

I am just going to have to leave this thread before i explode on you two for foolishly feeding them as you have done despite my multiple shout outs on this.

 

[rightwinger]

Wrong.

Crenshaw was an emergency room INTERN and was not a relevant witness.

His claims which arose years after the fact are based on a few minutes of casual observation with no expertise or experience to make any sort of informed determination of any facts. He challenges the expert autopsy but was not qualified to do so.


There were never any witnesses who saw any shooters on the south side of Elm street.

You lose again and have no idea what the Warren Commission wrote or said because you never read it. It is you and conspiracy theorists guilty of ignoring evidence which proves you wrong.

Your claim about large numbers dying who could refute the fact is a false one and google will not show any such thing.

The fact is people die and the event happened decades ago. No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact.

No, he and others saw the throat wound, dumb ass. And "yes" there were multiple witnesses that saw gunmen with rifles and they thought they were secret service agents until JFK was murdered. If you haven't watched the documentary "JFK To 9/11...Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" then you don't have shit to say that has any relevance. It's the Rosetta Stone of information with a compilation of eye witness accounts that counter the single gunman theory and knocks it on it's ass.

"No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact".

Here is where you get taken to the woodshed yet again.....in the three year span after the murder of JFK, 18 material witnesses died.

Six by gunfire, three in car wrecks, two "suicides", one that was cut from ear to ear by a knife, one by a broken neck, three heart attacks, two natural causes and a partridge in a pear tree...the odds of that happening to that many people in a three year span? Over a TRILLION to one.

Stop while you are behind..... because you just keep getting buried under an avalanche of irrefutable facts that totally destroys the bullshit you have been spewing as a you cling to the (snicker) "Warren Commission Report". If this was a boxing match? They would have stopped it a long time ago. You rise off of the canvas on wobbly knees and offer forth your chin for yet another uppercut...at this point in the fight? A light breeze could put you back on your ass.

Let us go over the facts.....

#1 Kennedy had a throat wound.
#2 Kennedy had a back wound.
#3 Kennedy had a head wound that blew his head up and to the left which by the laws of physics explains that the kill shot came from a position that was lower than Kennedy's head. which means that the "umbrella man" signaled to the driver to stop so the assassin in the storm drain had an unobscured shot which is what drove JFK's head up and to the left. Simple physics, my misguided friend.

The premise of the Warren Report is that only three shots were fired and one of those hit the concrete and caused a bystander to be injured by a concrete shard. There goes one one shot......then there is the shot that hits Kennedy in the throat......shot #2 according to the Warren Commission....and it also hit Connolly blowing out his ribs, and into his wrist...and then the laughable head shot that they claim is from the back that hits JFK knocking his head up and to the left and THEN at Parkland hospital, that insidious bullet was found on the gurney in almost pristine condition. If you REALLY believe this bullshit? You still believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

Walk away, little troll.......walk away.

LMAO! Yes, Kennedy had a throat wound...an EXIT wound.

Yes Kennedy had a back wound...an ENTRANCE wound.

Yes, Kennedy had a head wound. At that point, you leave facts and rush into fantasy land. When Kennedy's scalp was folded back into position, the entrance wound was found on the back of his head. If a shot had come from the front, blood, fluid bone and matter would have flown toward the back, but that's not happened. All of that stuff flew forward and then as the car rolled forward, it fell down on to the trunk lid.

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

You had credibility until you destroyed it with your babble that oswald was a nutcase that acted alone and all the other rambles after that. I just destroyed this ramble of yours in post# 669 here http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...correct-oswald-acted-alone.692966/page-67here and so did dale in post# 653 Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone you have been checkmated by us both.here is the crying towel.

Nobody has yet to provide any evidence that Oswald received assistance

What assistance?

A. $19.95 rifle and no car

 

[hunarcy]

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

No, you are confused. The story has never been debunked. The only "proof" to it being debunked is the claim that there exist a film that shows the SS Agent without an AR-15 in his hand. However, the film is very fuzzy and not what it is claimed to be upon viewing.

I don't know if the story is true or not. None of us do. However, there is credible evidence that it might be true. It is certainly consistent with the fact that Kennedy suffered a massive shot to the back of the head that doesn't line up with the line of shot from the window where Oswald fired the other shots. The size of the wound and all the fragmentation pieces of bullet in his head is consistent with .223 fragmentation.

If it was then I think we all know that the SS would never admit that they were the ones that killed Kennedy, even if it was an accident.

The only real value to this theory is that it ruins all the silly speculation that Kennedy was assassinated by somebody other than Oswald.

Oswald tried to kill Kennedy and fired three shots. The first shot missed him because the rifle had not been zeroed with the scope. Bullet fragments hit Kennedy but not a serious wound. The second shot using iron sights hit Kennedy in the shoulder. Not a fatal shot.

Either one of two things happened on the third shot. Either Oswald hit his target or he missed and the negligent discharge from the Secret Service Agent hit Kennedy. Does it really make much of a difference? The action by Oswald was either the direct or indirect cause of the death of Kennedy.

If you watch the Zapruter film, you can see that Kennedy was slumped forward, his hands on his throat. A shot from behind on the same level as he was would not have hit near the crown of his skull. The shot came from above.

Whatever you say Sport.

You should watch the Zapruter film and look at the autopsy photos, rather than wallow in ignorance.

The Zapruder film was doctored and doesn't reflect the fact that Greer stopped at the mark on the curb where the "Umbrella man" was to signal the need to stop for an easy shot at Kennedy's head from the storm drain. There is a photo of a policeman dropping his motorcycle and looking right at the storm drain.

Needless to say, the all-star team of assassins provided by the mafia and CIA assets failed miserably and had to rely on a young man Jack Allen Lawrence, a CIA asset that was willing to navigate a fetid sewer the length of two football fields. No mafia assassin would stoop to walking through other people's shit to do a hit.

Frank Sturgis, E.Howard Hunt, G.Gordon Liddy that later played a huge role in Watergate as Nixon's "plumbers" were in Dallas that day. So were those like J Edgar Hoover, George H W Bush, Colonel Ed Lansdale, Nixon, LBJ, mafia heads of cities that were in their territory. Lots of things that you do not know but I do.

You are stupid. rightwinger is correct, you're not worth trying to reason with.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No, he and others saw the throat wound, dumb ass. And "yes" there were multiple witnesses that saw gunmen with rifles and they thought they were secret service agents until JFK was murdered. If you haven't watched the documentary "JFK To 9/11...Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" then you don't have shit to say that has any relevance. It's the Rosetta Stone of information with a compilation of eye witness accounts that counter the single gunman theory and knocks it on it's ass.

"No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact".

Here is where you get taken to the woodshed yet again.....in the three year span after the murder of JFK, 18 material witnesses died.

Six by gunfire, three in car wrecks, two "suicides", one that was cut from ear to ear by a knife, one by a broken neck, three heart attacks, two natural causes and a partridge in a pear tree...the odds of that happening to that many people in a three year span? Over a TRILLION to one.

Stop while you are behind..... because you just keep getting buried under an avalanche of irrefutable facts that totally destroys the bullshit you have been spewing as a you cling to the (snicker) "Warren Commission Report". If this was a boxing match? They would have stopped it a long time ago. You rise off of the canvas on wobbly knees and offer forth your chin for yet another uppercut...at this point in the fight? A light breeze could put you back on your ass.

Let us go over the facts.....

#1 Kennedy had a throat wound.
#2 Kennedy had a back wound.
#3 Kennedy had a head wound that blew his head up and to the left which by the laws of physics explains that the kill shot came from a position that was lower than Kennedy's head. which means that the "umbrella man" signaled to the driver to stop so the assassin in the storm drain had an unobscured shot which is what drove JFK's head up and to the left. Simple physics, my misguided friend.

The premise of the Warren Report is that only three shots were fired and one of those hit the concrete and caused a bystander to be injured by a concrete shard. There goes one one shot......then there is the shot that hits Kennedy in the throat......shot #2 according to the Warren Commission....and it also hit Connolly blowing out his ribs, and into his wrist...and then the laughable head shot that they claim is from the back that hits JFK knocking his head up and to the left and THEN at Parkland hospital, that insidious bullet was found on the gurney in almost pristine condition. If you REALLY believe this bullshit? You still believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

Walk away, little troll.......walk away.

LMAO! Yes, Kennedy had a throat wound...an EXIT wound.

Yes Kennedy had a back wound...an ENTRANCE wound.

Yes, Kennedy had a head wound. At that point, you leave facts and rush into fantasy land. When Kennedy's scalp was folded back into position, the entrance wound was found on the back of his head. If a shot had come from the front, blood, fluid bone and matter would have flown toward the back, but that's not happened. All of that stuff flew forward and then as the car rolled forward, it fell down on to the trunk lid.

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

You had credibility until you destroyed it with your babble that oswald was a nutcase that acted alone and all the other rambles after that. I just destroyed this ramble of yours in post# 669 here http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...correct-oswald-acted-alone.692966/page-67here and so did dale in post# 653 Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone you have been checkmated by us both.here is the crying towel.

Nobody has yet to provide any evidence that Oswald received assistance

What assistance?

A. $19.95 rifle and no car

They seem to be claiming that someone URGED him to do it.

This would be predicated on the notion that he would not have tried on his own. OF course he tried with Walker. He also once told his wife he was going to shoot Nixon when Nixon visited New Orleans. She pushed him into a closet and kept him locked in said closet until Nixon left town. Which means she took his threat serious.

 

[hunarcy]

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

Did you notice the Chemtrails in Dallas that day?

Coincidence?

The Solar Radiation Management program aka "Stratospheric Aerosol Injection Program" of spraying heavy metal nano-particulates was in it's testing phase in 1963 and did not become a fully implemented program for all NATO countries until 1997.

Hope this helps......

Winner, winner....Chicken Dinner

Crazy Dale comes through again

It's not about winning, it's about revealing the truth. You have taken a massive ass kicking of monumental proportions which is why you went "off topic". You should have left well enough alone.

My suggestion to you is to stick to whiny leftard talking points and waving the rainbow colored leftard flag......that is where you excel. Just tryin' to help.


(snicker)

You should RUN to the closest mental health facility

 

[rightwinger]

LMAO! Yes, Kennedy had a throat wound...an EXIT wound.

Yes Kennedy had a back wound...an ENTRANCE wound.

Yes, Kennedy had a head wound. At that point, you leave facts and rush into fantasy land. When Kennedy's scalp was folded back into position, the entrance wound was found on the back of his head. If a shot had come from the front, blood, fluid bone and matter would have flown toward the back, but that's not happened. All of that stuff flew forward and then as the car rolled forward, it fell down on to the trunk lid.

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

You had credibility until you destroyed it with your babble that oswald was a nutcase that acted alone and all the other rambles after that. I just destroyed this ramble of yours in post# 669 here http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...correct-oswald-acted-alone.692966/page-67here and so did dale in post# 653 Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone you have been checkmated by us both.here is the crying towel.

Nobody has yet to provide any evidence that Oswald received assistance

What assistance?

A. $19.95 rifle and no car

They seem to be claiming that someone URGED him to do it.

This would be predicated on the notion that he would not have tried on his own. OF course he tried with Walker. He also once told his wife he was going to shoot Nixon when Nixon visited New Orleans. She pushed him into a closet and kept him locked in said closet until Nixon left town. Which means she took his threat serious.

Sure they did

The CIA and Mafia are good at urging

 

[gipper]

No, he and others saw the throat wound, dumb ass. And "yes" there were multiple witnesses that saw gunmen with rifles and they thought they were secret service agents until JFK was murdered. If you haven't watched the documentary "JFK To 9/11...Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick" then you don't have shit to say that has any relevance. It's the Rosetta Stone of information with a compilation of eye witness accounts that counter the single gunman theory and knocks it on it's ass.

"No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact".

Here is where you get taken to the woodshed yet again.....in the three year span after the murder of JFK, 18 material witnesses died.

Six by gunfire, three in car wrecks, two "suicides", one that was cut from ear to ear by a knife, one by a broken neck, three heart attacks, two natural causes and a partridge in a pear tree...the odds of that happening to that many people in a three year span? Over a TRILLION to one.

Stop while you are behind..... because you just keep getting buried under an avalanche of irrefutable facts that totally destroys the bullshit you have been spewing as a you cling to the (snicker) "Warren Commission Report". If this was a boxing match? They would have stopped it a long time ago. You rise off of the canvas on wobbly knees and offer forth your chin for yet another uppercut...at this point in the fight? A light breeze could put you back on your ass.

Let us go over the facts.....

#1 Kennedy had a throat wound.
#2 Kennedy had a back wound.
#3 Kennedy had a head wound that blew his head up and to the left which by the laws of physics explains that the kill shot came from a position that was lower than Kennedy's head. which means that the "umbrella man" signaled to the driver to stop so the assassin in the storm drain had an unobscured shot which is what drove JFK's head up and to the left. Simple physics, my misguided friend.

The premise of the Warren Report is that only three shots were fired and one of those hit the concrete and caused a bystander to be injured by a concrete shard. There goes one one shot......then there is the shot that hits Kennedy in the throat......shot #2 according to the Warren Commission....and it also hit Connolly blowing out his ribs, and into his wrist...and then the laughable head shot that they claim is from the back that hits JFK knocking his head up and to the left and THEN at Parkland hospital, that insidious bullet was found on the gurney in almost pristine condition. If you REALLY believe this bullshit? You still believe in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

Walk away, little troll.......walk away.

LMAO! Yes, Kennedy had a throat wound...an EXIT wound.

Yes Kennedy had a back wound...an ENTRANCE wound.

Yes, Kennedy had a head wound. At that point, you leave facts and rush into fantasy land. When Kennedy's scalp was folded back into position, the entrance wound was found on the back of his head. If a shot had come from the front, blood, fluid bone and matter would have flown toward the back, but that's not happened. All of that stuff flew forward and then as the car rolled forward, it fell down on to the trunk lid.

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

You had credibility until you destroyed it with your babble that oswald was a nutcase that acted alone and all the other rambles after that. I just destroyed this ramble of yours in post# 669 here http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...correct-oswald-acted-alone.692966/page-67here and so did dale in post# 653 Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone you have been checkmated by us both.here is the crying towel.

Nobody has yet to provide any evidence that Oswald received assistance

What assistance?

A. $19.95 rifle and no car

Why would he need assistance? He did nothing.

 

[Soupnazi630]

LMAO! Yes, Kennedy had a throat wound...an EXIT wound.

Yes Kennedy had a back wound...an ENTRANCE wound.

Yes, Kennedy had a head wound. At that point, you leave facts and rush into fantasy land. When Kennedy's scalp was folded back into position, the entrance wound was found on the back of his head. If a shot had come from the front, blood, fluid bone and matter would have flown toward the back, but that's not happened. All of that stuff flew forward and then as the car rolled forward, it fell down on to the trunk lid.

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

You had credibility until you destroyed it with your babble that oswald was a nutcase that acted alone and all the other rambles after that. I just destroyed this ramble of yours in post# 669 here http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...correct-oswald-acted-alone.692966/page-67here and so did dale in post# 653 Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone you have been checkmated by us both.here is the crying towel.

Nobody has yet to provide any evidence that Oswald received assistance

What assistance?

A. $19.95 rifle and no car

Why would he need assistance? He did nothing.

The evidence proves he shot kennedy

 

[gipper]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

Inconceivable. Oswald was not a nutcase or a loony. This is a fabrication of our lying government.

He was very intelligent and well liked by his buddies in the CIA and FBI.

Wrong.

he was a nut and a marxist which you have never cited evidence to dispute.

Wrong. Oswald was a right wing anti-commie like all your buddies at the CIA,

Now cite one thing from the WC that is true.

 

[gipper]

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

You had credibility until you destroyed it with your babble that oswald was a nutcase that acted alone and all the other rambles after that. I just destroyed this ramble of yours in post# 669 here http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...correct-oswald-acted-alone.692966/page-67here and so did dale in post# 653 Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone you have been checkmated by us both.here is the crying towel.

Nobody has yet to provide any evidence that Oswald received assistance

What assistance?

A. $19.95 rifle and no car

Why would he need assistance? He did nothing.

The evidence proves he shot kennedy

No. The evidence proves he never fired a shot.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

Inconceivable. Oswald was not a nutcase or a loony. This is a fabrication of our lying government.

He was very intelligent and well liked by his buddies in the CIA and FBI.

Wrong.

he was a nut and a marxist which you have never cited evidence to dispute.

Wrong. Oswald was a right wing anti-commie like all your buddies at the CIA,

Now cite one thing from the WC that is true.

I have already offerred such a citation now it is your turn.

you have never offered any evidence of any kind that Oswald was a right winger.

Show some evidence or it proves you are merely a foolish liar.

He was a marxist by his own account and you have nothing to refute that fact.

Now since I offered the citation you asked for cite a specific passage from the WC which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

You had credibility until you destroyed it with your babble that oswald was a nutcase that acted alone and all the other rambles after that. I just destroyed this ramble of yours in post# 669 here http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...correct-oswald-acted-alone.692966/page-67here and so did dale in post# 653 Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone you have been checkmated by us both.here is the crying towel.

Nobody has yet to provide any evidence that Oswald received assistance

What assistance?

A. $19.95 rifle and no car

Why would he need assistance? He did nothing.

The evidence proves he shot kennedy

No. The evidence proves he never fired a shot.

Wrong you fool the evidence proves he was the only shooter and fired three shots.

I fisted you with the evidence and you are just too much of a botch to admit but you know it is true

 

[rightwinger]

LMAO! Yes, Kennedy had a throat wound...an EXIT wound.

Yes Kennedy had a back wound...an ENTRANCE wound.

Yes, Kennedy had a head wound. At that point, you leave facts and rush into fantasy land. When Kennedy's scalp was folded back into position, the entrance wound was found on the back of his head. If a shot had come from the front, blood, fluid bone and matter would have flown toward the back, but that's not happened. All of that stuff flew forward and then as the car rolled forward, it fell down on to the trunk lid.

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

You had credibility until you destroyed it with your babble that oswald was a nutcase that acted alone and all the other rambles after that. I just destroyed this ramble of yours in post# 669 here http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...correct-oswald-acted-alone.692966/page-67here and so did dale in post# 653 Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone you have been checkmated by us both.here is the crying towel.

Nobody has yet to provide any evidence that Oswald received assistance

What assistance?

A. $19.95 rifle and no car

Why would he need assistance? He did nothing.

Tell it to Jackie and Tippets widow

 

[hunarcy]

LMAO! Yes, Kennedy had a throat wound...an EXIT wound.

Yes Kennedy had a back wound...an ENTRANCE wound.

Yes, Kennedy had a head wound. At that point, you leave facts and rush into fantasy land. When Kennedy's scalp was folded back into position, the entrance wound was found on the back of his head. If a shot had come from the front, blood, fluid bone and matter would have flown toward the back, but that's not happened. All of that stuff flew forward and then as the car rolled forward, it fell down on to the trunk lid.

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

Reminds me of a Peggy Lee song.. is that all there is?
Oswald was the fulcrum of history here. But the fact Joe Kennedy SR. was so closely aligned with the mob and made his money running rum , and the provocative 1960 presidential election was questionable at best. And bring in brother Bob teasing the mob and the racketeering stuff. And daddy Joe being in bed with the mob participating in racketeering 25 years back, well that clouds stuff.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

You had credibility until you destroyed it with your babble that oswald was a nutcase that acted alone and all the other rambles after that. I just destroyed this ramble of yours in post# 669 here http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...correct-oswald-acted-alone.692966/page-67here and so did dale in post# 653 Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone you have been checkmated by us both.here is the crying towel.

Nobody has yet to provide any evidence that Oswald received assistance

What assistance?

A. $19.95 rifle and no car

Why would he need assistance? He did nothing.

You are being consistently stupid in this thread.

 

[candycorn]

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

You had credibility until you destroyed it with your babble that oswald was a nutcase that acted alone and all the other rambles after that. I just destroyed this ramble of yours in post# 669 here http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...correct-oswald-acted-alone.692966/page-67here and so did dale in post# 653 Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone you have been checkmated by us both.here is the crying towel.

Nobody has yet to provide any evidence that Oswald received assistance

What assistance?

A. $19.95 rifle and no car

They seem to be claiming that someone URGED him to do it.

This would be predicated on the notion that he would not have tried on his own. OF course he tried with Walker. He also once told his wife he was going to shoot Nixon when Nixon visited New Orleans. She pushed him into a closet and kept him locked in said closet until Nixon left town. Which means she took his threat serious.

Sure they did

The CIA and Mafia are good at urging

Nice.

 

[Dale Smith]

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

Inconceivable. Oswald was not a nutcase or a loony. This is a fabrication of our lying government.

He was very intelligent and well liked by his buddies in the CIA and FBI.

Wrong.

he was a nut and a marxist which you have never cited evidence to dispute.

Wrong. Oswald was a right wing anti-commie like all your buddies at the CIA,

Now cite one thing from the WC that is true.

I have already offerred such a citation now it is your turn.

you have never offered any evidence of any kind that Oswald was a right winger.

Show some evidence or it proves you are merely a foolish liar.

He was a marxist by his own account and you have nothing to refute that fact.

Now since I offered the citation you asked for cite a specific passage from the WC which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Magic bullets! A bolt action rifle that could have never of caused the kind of damage with simply two shots and especially by a patsy that never fired a shot.

You believe in leprechauns, trolls, unicorns and other legends of lore since you buy the Warren Commission loaded full of fetid shit.....and you put a bib around your neck, pull out a spoon and fork so you can dine.....bon appetit.

 

[gipper]

Trying to engage in a logical discussions with Dale is a waste of bandwidth

Rightwinger, I have utterly destroyed your lame argument......it was too easy. A logical discussion requires two parties willing to discuss an issue in a rational manner, which you have never been willing to do.

Yes...this is often overlooked or out right ignored by many, but certainly the WC fools.

Joe Sr was a criminal with long ties to the Mob. He assured the Mob that Jack would protect them, if he were POTUS. The Mob made sure Jack won Illinois by stuffing the ballot boxes. Then Bobby starts kicking the Mob's ass. BETRAYAL...and Mob took their vengeance with the help of SloppyNazis' CIA buddies. A much more valid explanation than the fictional WC report.

Who had the means, motive, and opportunity? Who had the ability to cover-up the crime for over 50 years? Who had the ability to murder and silence multiple witnesses, and get away with it? There is only one answer.

It is all spelled out right here:

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

You had credibility until you destroyed it with your babble that oswald was a nutcase that acted alone and all the other rambles after that. I just destroyed this ramble of yours in post# 669 here http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...correct-oswald-acted-alone.692966/page-67here and so did dale in post# 653 Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone you have been checkmated by us both.here is the crying towel.

Nobody has yet to provide any evidence that Oswald received assistance

What assistance?

A. $19.95 rifle and no car

Why would he need assistance? He did nothing.

Tell it to Jackie and Tippets widow

Jackie knew Oswald was a patsy. Fool.

 

[francoHFW]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Unfortunately for the GOP there are no conspiracies...

 

[francoHFW]

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

Inconceivable. Oswald was not a nutcase or a loony. This is a fabrication of our lying government.

He was very intelligent and well liked by his buddies in the CIA and FBI.

Wrong.

he was a nut and a marxist which you have never cited evidence to dispute.

Wrong. Oswald was a right wing anti-commie like all your buddies at the CIA,

Now cite one thing from the WC that is true.

I have already offerred such a citation now it is your turn.

you have never offered any evidence of any kind that Oswald was a right winger.

Show some evidence or it proves you are merely a foolish liar.

He was a marxist by his own account and you have nothing to refute that fact.

Now since I offered the citation you asked for cite a specific passage from the WC which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Magic bullets! A bolt action rifle that could have never of caused the kind of damage with simply two shots and especially by a patsy that never fired a shot.

You believe in leprechauns, trolls, unicorns and other legends of lore since you buy the Warren Commission loaded full of fetid shit.....and you put a bib around your neck, pull out a spoon and fork so you can dine.....bon appetit.

Conspiracy Nut Job typical Republican...

 

[hunarcy]

With the possible theory of the negligent discharge by the Secret Service agent there is no credible evidence that anybody other than Oswald shot Kennedy.

That means the Mob got to Oswald long before Kennedy announced he was going to Dallas and set him to be a "patsy" shooter. Somebody that had no previsions ties to the Mafia or was even a professional hitman. Then they arranged for Ruby to whack him and for Ruby to die later. Years afterwards then they whacked Bobby by using a Palestinian kid who said he did he for political reasons and who is still alive today..

While certainly they had a motive for getting rid of the Kennedy boys it simply doesn't seem feasible.

Given Oswald's background it is actually more feasible that the CIA set up Oswald and Ruby. I suspect there were CIA agents very pissed about Kennedy's betrayal at the Bay of Pigs. They were just as capable of doing it as the Mafia.

However, the most logical explanation is that Oswald was a nutcase that acted alone. He certainly was a loony tune.

Maybe the reason that 55 years later the reason why no credibly evidence exist for it being somebody other than Oswald acting alone is because there is no other evidence. Only speculation about motives but no facts.

The Kennedy family was a collection of corrupt and arrogant assholes. I am sure there was a lot of people that would have liked to have seen them whacked. However, it looks like Joe died of old age, Johnny Boy was killed by a commie nutcase and Bobby was shot by a pissed off Palestinian. Teddy lived and was a murderous asshole Senator.

Inconceivable. Oswald was not a nutcase or a loony. This is a fabrication of our lying government.

He was very intelligent and well liked by his buddies in the CIA and FBI.

Wrong.

he was a nut and a marxist which you have never cited evidence to dispute.

Wrong. Oswald was a right wing anti-commie like all your buddies at the CIA,

Now cite one thing from the WC that is true.

I have already offerred such a citation now it is your turn.

you have never offered any evidence of any kind that Oswald was a right winger.

Show some evidence or it proves you are merely a foolish liar.

He was a marxist by his own account and you have nothing to refute that fact.

Now since I offered the citation you asked for cite a specific passage from the WC which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Magic bullets! A bolt action rifle that could have never of caused the kind of damage with simply two shots and especially by a patsy that never fired a shot.

You believe in leprechauns, trolls, unicorns and other legends of lore since you buy the Warren Commission loaded full of fetid shit.....and you put a bib around your neck, pull out a spoon and fork so you can dine.....bon appetit.

LOL! NO one speaks of magic bullets except weak minded buffoons who ignore the science and want to wallow in conspiracy.

Here, in case you'd like to stop appearing so stupid. Using Modern Ballistics to Crack 'Cold Case JFK'