Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

[LA RAM FAN]

Exactly. He was taken to the closest hospital for treatment and pronounced dead. Then, he was sent to the County Hospital (Parkland) for the autopsy. I did get a good laugh at the idea that Tippit and Kennedy looked alike. Thanks for that.

I clearly aren’t informed. Tippit had a strong resemblance to JFK. What else do you need to know?

J/.D. tippet had no resemblance to JFK I proved that with photographs of the two and the matter is settled proving you wrong

Debate Dale or STFU!

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

are you going to debate Dale? If not, STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Notice he cant give an answer? as always,plays dodgeball.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

You are correct that the fatal head shot was not fired by oswald.however you are grasping at straws saying there is no doubt oswald shot JFK.Read the posts of myself,Gipper and dale from previous posts,you will see there was never any evidence he had anything to do with it.

saying the SS agent discharged by an AR-15 is being just as much irresponsible as saying oswald was the lone assassin since the fatal head shot came from the front.

 

[rightwinger]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

JFK was whacked because an unstable loser seeking fame brought his gun to work one day

 

[Flash]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

You are correct that the fatal head shot was not fired by oswald.however you are grasping at straws saying there is no doubt oswald shot JFK.Read the posts of myself,Gipper and dale from previous posts,you will see there was never any evidence he had anything to do with it.

saying the SS agent discharged by an AR-15 is being just as much irresponsible as saying oswald was the lone assassin since the fatal head shot came from the front.

I don't know what happen any more than you do.

It is not a fact that the fatal shot came from the front. In fact there is much more evidence that it came from the rear. There is tremendous evidence that Oswald shot the rifle and hit Kennedy.

I don't know if any of this is true but there is also credible evidence that there could have been a negligent discharge from the Secret Service agent.

Hidden in Plain Sight – Bonar Menninger – Medium

Hidden in Plain Sight
Did a Secret Service Agent Accidentally Shoot JFK?

But after a decade of work, Donahue reluctantly arrived at a very different conclusion. Based on his assessment of all available evidence, the gunsmith believed the fatal head shot was actually an accident, inadvertently fired by one of the Secret Service agents from the open security car just behind the presidential limousine in the chaotic, final moments of Oswald’s ambush.

According to Donahue’s analysis, the shooting unfolded like this: Oswald fired his first shot from a sixth-floor window of the Texas School Book Depository soon after the motorcade made the turn onto Elm Street. But his scope was not adjusted properly, according to the Warren Commission, and the bullet missed, hitting the pavement behind and to the right of Kennedy’s limousine. Fragments ricocheted up and struck the inside windshield trim. At least two caught the president in the scalp and caused him to cry out, “My God! I’m hit!”

Oswald chambered a second round. This time, he skipped the rifle’s offset-mounted scope and instead drew a bead along the iron sights on top of the barrel. He fired again and the bullet ripped into Kennedy’s upper back, exited his neck and pierced Gov. Connally’s right side.

At this moment, photos from Dealey Plaza show Secret Service Special Agent George W. Hickey Jr. — riding in the left-rear seat of the follow-up car and sitting up high near the trunk deck — already had turned completely around and was looking back toward the book depository. He may well have spotted the barrel of Oswald’s rifle protruding from the sixth-floor window.

So Hickey reached down and grabbed the Colt AR15 select-fire, semi-automatic rifle from the floor of the car and flipped the safety lever off. He started to stand and turn to acquire Oswald’s position and return fire. But the follow-up car braked suddenly to avoid a collision with the presidential limousine and Hickey lost his balance. His finger slipped off the trigger guard and the weapon discharged. The bullet was flying at 3,300 feet-per-second when it slammed into the back of Kennedy’s head, 21 feet away, and disintegrated.

 

[rightwinger]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

You are correct that the fatal head shot was not fired by oswald.however you are grasping at straws saying there is no doubt oswald shot JFK.Read the posts of myself,Gipper and dale from previous posts,you will see there was never any evidence he had anything to do with it.

saying the SS agent discharged by an AR-15 is being just as much irresponsible as saying oswald was the lone assassin since the fatal head shot came from the front.

I don't know what happen any more than you do.

It is not a fact that the fatal shot came from the front. In fact there is much more evidence that it came from the rear. There is tremendous evidence that Oswald shot the rifle and hit Kennedy.

I don't know if any of this is true but there is also credible evidence that there could have been a negligent discharge from the Secret Service agent.

Hidden in Plain Sight – Bonar Menninger – Medium

Hidden in Plain Sight
Did a Secret Service Agent Accidentally Shoot JFK?

But after a decade of work, Donahue reluctantly arrived at a very different conclusion. Based on his assessment of all available evidence, the gunsmith believed the fatal head shot was actually an accident, inadvertently fired by one of the Secret Service agents from the open security car just behind the presidential limousine in the chaotic, final moments of Oswald’s ambush.

According to Donahue’s analysis, the shooting unfolded like this: Oswald fired his first shot from a sixth-floor window of the Texas School Book Depository soon after the motorcade made the turn onto Elm Street. But his scope was not adjusted properly, according to the Warren Commission, and the bullet missed, hitting the pavement behind and to the right of Kennedy’s limousine. Fragments ricocheted up and struck the inside windshield trim. At least two caught the president in the scalp and caused him to cry out, “My God! I’m hit!”

Oswald chambered a second round. This time, he skipped the rifle’s offset-mounted scope and instead drew a bead along the iron sights on top of the barrel. He fired again and the bullet ripped into Kennedy’s upper back, exited his neck and pierced Gov. Connally’s right side.

At this moment, photos from Dealey Plaza show Secret Service Special Agent George W. Hickey Jr. — riding in the left-rear seat of the follow-up car and sitting up high near the trunk deck — already had turned completely around and was looking back toward the book depository. He may well have spotted the barrel of Oswald’s rifle protruding from the sixth-floor window.

So Hickey reached down and grabbed the Colt AR15 select-fire, semi-automatic rifle from the floor of the car and flipped the safety lever off. He started to stand and turn to acquire Oswald’s position and return fire. But the follow-up car braked suddenly to avoid a collision with the presidential limousine and Hickey lost his balance. His finger slipped off the trigger guard and the weapon discharged. The bullet was flying at 3,300 feet-per-second when it slammed into the back of Kennedy’s head, 21 feet away, and disintegrated.

The Barney Fife theory

 

[hunarcy]

Because Parkland has a morgue

Now you are just making shit up as usual.

We lie about what happened if Oswald was really the lone gunman?

That s why dead people are taken to hospitals

Why is it so strange to you?

Yes they took him to one hospital and pronounced him dead. Then amazing they went to the trouble of moving his dead body from one hospital to another. Just so happened that the second hospital held JFKs dead body, which looked a lot like Tippit’s dead body.

Nothing Strange about that...

Exactly. He was taken to the closest hospital for treatment and pronounced dead. Then, he was sent to the County Hospital (Parkland) for the autopsy. I did get a good laugh at the idea that Tippit and Kennedy looked alike. Thanks for that.

You clearly aren’t informed. Tippit had a strong resemblance to JFK. What else do you need to know?

Yep, both of them had a nose, an eye on each side of the nose and a mouth underneath the nose. NO ONE who looks at a picture of Tippit would believe it was a picture of JFK.

Dallas police officer JD Tippit was JFK's 'real' assassin | Daily Mail Online

You are a gullible idiot.

 

[hunarcy]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

Actually, photographs and 8mm film from the opposite side of where Zapruter was filming shows the SS didn't deploy the rifle until after the Presidential limousine was traveling under the railroad bridge.

 

[rightwinger]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

Actually, photographs and 8mm film from the opposite side of where Zapruter was filming shows the SS didn't deploy the rifle until after the Presidential limousine was traveling under the railroad bridge.

Shhhhhh...

Don’t upset his dilusion

 

[Flash]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

Actually, photographs and 8mm film from the opposite side of where Zapruter was filming shows the SS didn't deploy the rifle until after the Presidential limousine was traveling under the railroad bridge.

If you read the article that I posted you will see that was the claim but did not really show that. The film was inconclusive.

Anyway, we will never know.

The Kennedy shooting will always be a source of speculation.

I personally think Oswald shot but not kill and there was a negligent discharge that was the fatal blow.

Of course I don't know more than any body else, just what I read from time to time.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Exactly. He was taken to the closest hospital for treatment and pronounced dead. Then, he was sent to the County Hospital (Parkland) for the autopsy. I did get a good laugh at the idea that Tippit and Kennedy looked alike. Thanks for that.

I clearly aren’t informed. Tippit had a strong resemblance to JFK. What else do you need to know?

J/.D. tippet had no resemblance to JFK I proved that with photographs of the two and the matter is settled proving you wrong

Debate Dale or STFU!

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

are you going to debate Dale? If not, STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I already havew and I have defeated him.

Now stop trying to distract from your cowardice and dishonesty.

You made an assertion you cannot support and it is based on total ignorance.

Cite a passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Do not make demands when you run like a dog from every and all challenges. You do not get to set the terms and you are no authority.

Back up your claim BOY

 

[Soupnazi630]

Exactly. He was taken to the closest hospital for treatment and pronounced dead. Then, he was sent to the County Hospital (Parkland) for the autopsy. I did get a good laugh at the idea that Tippit and Kennedy looked alike. Thanks for that.

I clearly aren’t informed. Tippit had a strong resemblance to JFK. What else do you need to know?

J/.D. tippet had no resemblance to JFK I proved that with photographs of the two and the matter is settled proving you wrong

Debate Dale or STFU!

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

I need to be specific. The whole thing is fiction.

OK then you ******* retard tell me the date that JFK was shot? The Warren Commission states he was shot on November 22 1963.

If the whole thing is fiction then they got the date wrong.

Give us the date you sniveling chicken hawk.

Yes you need to be specific you lying piece of trash you never read the report and your assertions are the lies.

Now cite a specific passage from the WC which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

 

[Soupnazi630]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

I will agree but I think there is a little more to the story.

No doubt Oswald shot Kennedy.

However, there is some credible evidence that the bullet that blew his head off and killed him was not fired by Oswald but was a negligent AR-15 discharge by a Secret Service agent in the chase car.

I don't know if any of us that was alive when it happen will ever know the complete truth.

I never liked Kennedy and neither did very many people in my family.

Although there is no evidence to say it happen because of this reason if there is any real justice in the world then he was whacked because of his betrayal of the Cuban Freedom Fighters at the Bay of Pigs.

Wrong that story has long since been debunked and there is no evidence credible or otherwise that the SS fired a shot negligent or in any other fashion.

 

[Dale Smith]

I clearly aren’t informed. Tippit had a strong resemblance to JFK. What else do you need to know?

J/.D. tippet had no resemblance to JFK I proved that with photographs of the two and the matter is settled proving you wrong

Debate Dale or STFU!

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

are you going to debate Dale? If not, STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I already havew and I have defeated him.

Now stop trying to distract from your cowardice and dishonesty.

You made an assertion you cannot support and it is based on total ignorance.

Cite a passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Do not make demands when you run like a dog from every and all challenges. You do not get to set the terms and you are no authority.

Back up your claim BOY

You haven't defeated anything or anyone here as it pertains to the murder of JFK by deep state actors. All you have done is spew the official bullshit of the Warren Commission. The reason as to why so many citizen journalists and researchers had to seek the truth was because of so many ludicrous claims like a bullet that can "zig zag" and then pop out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. It takes a real idiot to avoid the hundred or so anomalies and then claim with a straight face "Yep, Oswald did it and acted alone.....nothing to see here, folks....move along".

The fact of the matter is that the Warren Commission and some of it's dubious members tailored the report to fit the lone gunman narrative and ignored anything else that could call it into question. Witnesses that could refute the official fairy tale were never called and many of them ended up "toe-tagged" because those loose ends had to be tied up as much as possible. Then the CIA comes out with an inner agency memo in 1967 ( CIA Document 1035-960 ) to weaponize the term "conspiracy theorist" to discourage and derail honest debate and further scrutiny of the bogus Warren Commission report.

What it boils down to is that you are the worst kind of coward and I throw rightwinger and candycorn in there as well. You are too gutless to come to grips that things are not what you believe them to be....it's too painful and it would upset your entire world view. I can understand that to a point, but what causes me to hold you in total disdain is the intellectual laziness and then lamely attempt to flame others that know more than you...but what the hell, it's your cyber dime.

 

[Dale Smith]

I clearly aren’t informed. Tippit had a strong resemblance to JFK. What else do you need to know?

J/.D. tippet had no resemblance to JFK I proved that with photographs of the two and the matter is settled proving you wrong

Debate Dale or STFU!

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

I need to be specific. The whole thing is fiction.

OK then you ******* retard tell me the date that JFK was shot? The Warren Commission states he was shot on November 22 1963.

If the whole thing is fiction then they got the date wrong.

Give us the date you sniveling chicken hawk.

Yes you need to be specific you lying piece of trash you never read the report and your assertions are the lies.

Now cite a specific passage from the WC which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

ROTFLMAO! Dude!!!! Learn to use a friggin' comma every once and awhile!

 

[Soupnazi630]

J/.D. tippet had no resemblance to JFK I proved that with photographs of the two and the matter is settled proving you wrong

Debate Dale or STFU!

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

are you going to debate Dale? If not, STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I already havew and I have defeated him.

Now stop trying to distract from your cowardice and dishonesty.

You made an assertion you cannot support and it is based on total ignorance.

Cite a passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Do not make demands when you run like a dog from every and all challenges. You do not get to set the terms and you are no authority.

Back up your claim BOY

You haven't defeated anything or anyone here as it pertains to the murder of JFK by deep state actors. All you have done is spew the official bullshit of the Warren Commission. The reason as to why so many citizen journalists and researchers had to seek the truth was because of so many ludicrous claims like a bullet that can "zig zag" and then pop out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. It takes a real idiot to avoid the hundred or so anomalies and then claim with a straight face "Yep, Oswald did it and acted alone.....nothing to see here, folks....move along".

The fact of the matter is that the Warren Commission and some of it's dubious members tailored the report to fit the lone gunman narrative and ignored anything else that could call it into question. Witnesses that could refute the official fairy tale were never called and many of them ended up "toe-tagged" because those loose ends had to be tied up as much as possible. Then the CIA comes out with an inner agency memo in 1967 ( CIA Document 1035-960 ) to weaponize the term "conspiracy theorist" to discourage and derail honest debate and further scrutiny of the bogus Warren Commission report.

What it boils down to is that you are the worst kind of coward and I throw rightwinger and candycorn in there as well. You are too gutless to come to grips that things are not what you believe them to be....it's too painful and it would upset your entire world view. I can understand that to a point, but what causes me to hold you in total disdain is the intellectual laziness and then lamely attempt to flame others that know more than you...but what the hell, it's your cyber dime.

You are simply wrong and ignorant and yes you know I have defeated debunked and pwnd your sorry little self

These people you refer to are frauds. Like you they have not read the warren commission report and have no idea what it claims.

First of all the WC report tailored nothing they searched for every possible witness and interviewed them. They actively pursued conspiracy but found no evidence. The witnesses you say they were not NEVER existed.You cannot name one of them. No witness died in any way that was suspicious or out of the ordinary.

The Warren Commission report represents a comprehensive and exhaustive investigation which none of your cherry picked videos have done. It is the conspiracy theorists fixating on evidence which lacks credibility in order to prop up a narrative.

You have it quite backwards. Listen little boy you have no idea what the WC report says and you NEVER read it.

They never claimed a bullet zig zagged or popped out in pristine condition.

Intellectual laziness is when a fool **** YOU ignores evidence and listens only to ONE side of the story. You are the intellectual fraud and lazy fool who never bothered to fact check anything.

You are a naive and foolish little gullible chump who got sold a bridge in Brooklyn and you know nothing about the JFK assassination

 

[Soupnazi630]

View attachment 203544 View attachment 203544

J/.D. tippet had no resemblance to JFK I proved that with photographs of the two and the matter is settled proving you wrong

Debate Dale or STFU!

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

I need to be specific. The whole thing is fiction.

OK then you ******* retard tell me the date that JFK was shot? The Warren Commission states he was shot on November 22 1963.

If the whole thing is fiction then they got the date wrong.

Give us the date you sniveling chicken hawk.

Yes you need to be specific you lying piece of trash you never read the report and your assertions are the lies.

Now cite a specific passage from the WC which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

ROTFLMAO! Dude!!!! Learn to use a friggin' comma every once and awhile!

Learn to do research and since you are throwing in you cite any lie from the Warren commission report.

DO not try and distract and evade and run away and you have been.

Stop being a coward and cite some evidence BOY.!!!!!!

 

[Dale Smith]

Debate Dale or STFU!

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

are you going to debate Dale? If not, STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I already havew and I have defeated him.

Now stop trying to distract from your cowardice and dishonesty.

You made an assertion you cannot support and it is based on total ignorance.

Cite a passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Do not make demands when you run like a dog from every and all challenges. You do not get to set the terms and you are no authority.

Back up your claim BOY

You haven't defeated anything or anyone here as it pertains to the murder of JFK by deep state actors. All you have done is spew the official bullshit of the Warren Commission. The reason as to why so many citizen journalists and researchers had to seek the truth was because of so many ludicrous claims like a bullet that can "zig zag" and then pop out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. It takes a real idiot to avoid the hundred or so anomalies and then claim with a straight face "Yep, Oswald did it and acted alone.....nothing to see here, folks....move along".

The fact of the matter is that the Warren Commission and some of it's dubious members tailored the report to fit the lone gunman narrative and ignored anything else that could call it into question. Witnesses that could refute the official fairy tale were never called and many of them ended up "toe-tagged" because those loose ends had to be tied up as much as possible. Then the CIA comes out with an inner agency memo in 1967 ( CIA Document 1035-960 ) to weaponize the term "conspiracy theorist" to discourage and derail honest debate and further scrutiny of the bogus Warren Commission report.

What it boils down to is that you are the worst kind of coward and I throw rightwinger and candycorn in there as well. You are too gutless to come to grips that things are not what you believe them to be....it's too painful and it would upset your entire world view. I can understand that to a point, but what causes me to hold you in total disdain is the intellectual laziness and then lamely attempt to flame others that know more than you...but what the hell, it's your cyber dime.

You are simply wrong and ignorant and yes you know I have defeated debunked and pwnd your sorry little self

These people you refer to are frauds. Like you they have not read the warren commission report and have no idea what it claims.

First of all the WC report tailored nothing they searched for every possible witness and interviewed them. They actively pursued conspiracy but found no evidence. The witnesses you say they were not NEVER existed.You cannot name one of them. No witness died in any way that was suspicious or out of the ordinary.

The Warren Commission report represents a comprehensive and exhaustive investigation which none of your cherry picked videos have done. It is the conspiracy theorists fixating on evidence which lacks credibility in order to prop up a narrative.

You have it quite backwards. Listen little boy you have no idea what the WC report says and you NEVER read it.

They never claimed a bullet zig zagged or popped out in pristine condition.

Intellectual laziness is when a fool **** YOU ignores evidence and listens only to ONE side of the story. You are the intellectual fraud and lazy fool who never bothered to fact check anything.

You are a naive and foolish little gullible chump who got sold a bridge in Brooklyn and you know nothing about the JFK assassination

The Warren Commission refused to allow anyone to testify before the committee that could refute it. They never called Dr. Charles Crenshaw to testify....they never called any witnesses that saw multiple shooters in buildings on the south side of Elm street. They never did anything that resembled due diligence at all. A simple "Google" search will show you how those that could refute the official story died in droves and the odds of that many dying that shared the same experience in that short amount of time is in the billions to one. Refute this..........

 

[Dale Smith]

View attachment 203544 View attachment 203544

Debate Dale or STFU!

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

I need to be specific. The whole thing is fiction.

OK then you ******* retard tell me the date that JFK was shot? The Warren Commission states he was shot on November 22 1963.

If the whole thing is fiction then they got the date wrong.

Give us the date you sniveling chicken hawk.

Yes you need to be specific you lying piece of trash you never read the report and your assertions are the lies.

Now cite a specific passage from the WC which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

ROTFLMAO! Dude!!!! Learn to use a friggin' comma every once and awhile!

Learn to do research and since you are throwing in you cite any lie from the Warren commission report.

DO not try and distract and evade and run away and you have been.

Stop being a coward and cite some evidence BOY.!!!!!!

LMAO! That is hilarious coming from someone that only recites from the joke of a report done by the (snicker) "Warren Commission"......

 

[Soupnazi630]

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

are you going to debate Dale? If not, STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I already havew and I have defeated him.

Now stop trying to distract from your cowardice and dishonesty.

You made an assertion you cannot support and it is based on total ignorance.

Cite a passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

Do not make demands when you run like a dog from every and all challenges. You do not get to set the terms and you are no authority.

Back up your claim BOY

You haven't defeated anything or anyone here as it pertains to the murder of JFK by deep state actors. All you have done is spew the official bullshit of the Warren Commission. The reason as to why so many citizen journalists and researchers had to seek the truth was because of so many ludicrous claims like a bullet that can "zig zag" and then pop out on the gurney in nearly pristine condition. It takes a real idiot to avoid the hundred or so anomalies and then claim with a straight face "Yep, Oswald did it and acted alone.....nothing to see here, folks....move along".

The fact of the matter is that the Warren Commission and some of it's dubious members tailored the report to fit the lone gunman narrative and ignored anything else that could call it into question. Witnesses that could refute the official fairy tale were never called and many of them ended up "toe-tagged" because those loose ends had to be tied up as much as possible. Then the CIA comes out with an inner agency memo in 1967 ( CIA Document 1035-960 ) to weaponize the term "conspiracy theorist" to discourage and derail honest debate and further scrutiny of the bogus Warren Commission report.

What it boils down to is that you are the worst kind of coward and I throw rightwinger and candycorn in there as well. You are too gutless to come to grips that things are not what you believe them to be....it's too painful and it would upset your entire world view. I can understand that to a point, but what causes me to hold you in total disdain is the intellectual laziness and then lamely attempt to flame others that know more than you...but what the hell, it's your cyber dime.

You are simply wrong and ignorant and yes you know I have defeated debunked and pwnd your sorry little self

These people you refer to are frauds. Like you they have not read the warren commission report and have no idea what it claims.

First of all the WC report tailored nothing they searched for every possible witness and interviewed them. They actively pursued conspiracy but found no evidence. The witnesses you say they were not NEVER existed.You cannot name one of them. No witness died in any way that was suspicious or out of the ordinary.

The Warren Commission report represents a comprehensive and exhaustive investigation which none of your cherry picked videos have done. It is the conspiracy theorists fixating on evidence which lacks credibility in order to prop up a narrative.

You have it quite backwards. Listen little boy you have no idea what the WC report says and you NEVER read it.

They never claimed a bullet zig zagged or popped out in pristine condition.

Intellectual laziness is when a fool **** YOU ignores evidence and listens only to ONE side of the story. You are the intellectual fraud and lazy fool who never bothered to fact check anything.

You are a naive and foolish little gullible chump who got sold a bridge in Brooklyn and you know nothing about the JFK assassination

The Warren Commission refused to allow anyone to testify before the committee that could refute it. They never called Dr. Charles Crenshaw to testify....they never called any witnesses that saw multiple shooters in buildings on the south side of Elm street. They never did anything that resembled due diligence at all. A simple "Google" search will show you how those that could refute the official story died in droves and the odds of that many dying that shared the same experience in that short amount of time is in the billions to one. Refute this..........

Wrong.

Crenshaw was an emergency room INTERN and was not a relevant witness.

His claims which arose years after the fact are based on a few minutes of casual observation with no expertise or experience to make any sort of informed determination of any facts. He challenges the expert autopsy but was not qualified to do so.


There were never any witnesses who saw any shooters on the south side of Elm street.

You lose again and have no idea what the Warren Commission wrote or said because you never read it. It is you and conspiracy theorists guilty of ignoring evidence which proves you wrong.

Your claim about large numbers dying who could refute the fact is a false one and google will not show any such thing.

The fact is people die and the event happened decades ago. No one has died in an unusual manner or in unusual numbers and that is fact.

 

[Soupnazi630]

View attachment 203544 View attachment 203544

Cite a specific passage from the Warren Commission report which is a lie or fabrication as you claimed and provide evidence.

DO not make demands when you run from any request to cite evidence.

I need to be specific. The whole thing is fiction.

OK then you ******* retard tell me the date that JFK was shot? The Warren Commission states he was shot on November 22 1963.

If the whole thing is fiction then they got the date wrong.

Give us the date you sniveling chicken hawk.

Yes you need to be specific you lying piece of trash you never read the report and your assertions are the lies.

Now cite a specific passage from the WC which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

ROTFLMAO! Dude!!!! Learn to use a friggin' comma every once and awhile!

Learn to do research and since you are throwing in you cite any lie from the Warren commission report.

DO not try and distract and evade and run away and you have been.

Stop being a coward and cite some evidence BOY.!!!!!!

LMAO! That is hilarious coming from someone that only recites from the joke of a report done by the (snicker) "Warren Commission"......

Which means I read both sides of the issue. I read all the leading conspiracy theory books by Jim Marrs, Mark Lane, Jim Garrison, Fletcher Prouty, David Lifton and many others. I read " JFK and the Unspeakable " , " Assassination Science" and " The triangle of death " and many others.

And then I read the other side of the story.

You have not done due diligence. You have not looked at both sides. You have never read the Warren Commission report. You have no clue what it contains and are ignorant as hell about it and JFK.

You are gullible and naive and believe many things about the Warren Commission report because you believe whatever someone tells you like a chump would. THAT is intellectual weakness.

You have stated several proven lies about it already such as zig zagging bullets and pristine bullets and omitted witnesses.

You are foolishly ignorant because your ignorance is WILLFUL. You cannot cite any lie, fabrication, error, falsehood or omitted witness because you simply do not know what the **** you are talking about