Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

[mudwhistle]

I also see no LBJ in it either.

Can you see him in this one?

View attachment 201831

Yeah, limo looks white......not black.

It was grey.

In the first one I posted you can clearly see lady bird and she was next to him.

Different driver though.
Must have beamed up the other one.

Take a break from the dooby.

it is clearly the same guy driving.

Bullshit. The first picture shows a fairly heavy set guy, roughly 40 years old with no hat, the second was a slender guy probably in his 60s with a white LBJ type hat.

 

[westwall]

It is BARELY Sharpshooter. Under exceptionally controlled conditions and with a SGT at your elbow helping you do your best. The 1959 score is far more indicative of his actual ability. Your argument is specious at best.

Still sharpshooter and still USMC standards which are higher. Than any other,

My argument is sound. He had the skill to do it which is plain and simple he was no poor shot.

The standards are the same as for any branch of service. He lacked the skill, the target was moving away and lower than the shooter, which makes the shot far more difficult. Add to that the oak tree that obscured the target for a significant period of time, and the fact that he had to make all three shots that we know for certain were fired within a very short span of time and yet again, you help the CT people and not you.

No they are not the same,

They vary from branch to branch and the USMC training program is the best out of all of them.

He had more than enough skill.

The target was moving very slowly and yes away from him which only limited the amount of time he had. Limited but not unreasonably so. The target was very close which eliminates the downward problem,

The Oak tree did not obscure the target during the actual shooting which is all that matters,

I debunk the CT people you help them.

HE had the skill that is proven fact you had to backpedal on it and try to marginalize the facts proving he did in fact have the skill.

The Corps definitely has the best training, but the scores needed to qualify are the same from service to service. You're simply wrong. Hell ROTC has the same qualifications. I shoot with a man who won the Walsh Trophy (USMC Individual Pistol) TWICE in a row which no one has done before or since, so actively know real USMC Presidents 100 shooters, you don't. I actively shoot every week to maintain my skills, oswald didn't. He was a marginal shot, and his ability to manipulate the bolt on the Carcano in a timely fashion is questionable.

The target was 90 yards away, in a poor quality scope, with crap mounts, that is a hard shot. You see, the closer you are, the HARDER it becomes to hit when you are using a scope. Especially a scope that hinders the ability to manipulate the bolt of the rifle you're firing.

And no, you are not debunking them. You are tossing out long tired tropes that confuse people who don't know anything, but your rifle knowledge is a joke. The Carcano isn't a bad rifle as the CT people claim, but nor is it a great rifle as you would have everyone believe. Shooting a moving target that is below you, and that you are trying to pick up in a poorly mounted scope is not anywhere near as easy as you would like to make it out to be.

In fact the target was less than 90 yards for all three shots.

He di not need to use the scope and used the iron sites especially for the second and third shots.

The scope did not hinder the action it was mounted on the leftside while the bolt was on the right side.

It is you tossing out tropes and backpedaling when faced with facts you do not like. You hated being wrong about his score of sharpshooter which you had to admit was true so you tried to strawman it and failed,

The facts do not support any of your claims or any CT claim.

I did not make it out that he tried to shoot through the scope all three times it is in fact very easy to pick out a target at less than 100 yards over open sites.

He probably tried the scope on the first shot which is why he missed the first shot. After that he would almost certainly have fallen back on his training and used the mounted sites.

I said that from the beginning. The failed premise is that he had a scope and therefore HAD to use scope which would have made it impossible

That would be possible, but very difficult. Here is a reconstruction of the scope and mount as used on the rifle. It is offset so interferes with the sights. Yes, they can still be used, but with difficulty. And thanks to the scope the field of view is drastically reduced which against a moving target is very bad.

 

[mudwhistle]

I also see no LBJ in it either.

Can you see him in this one?

View attachment 201831

Yeah, limo looks white......not black.

It was grey.

In the first one I posted you can clearly see lady bird and she was next to him.

Different driver though.
Must have beamed up the other one.

Take a break from the dooby.

it is clearly the same guy driving.

Clearly not.
Your credibility is really going to shit now.

 

[BlindBoo]

Gee, if only we had the Presidents brain we'd know the trajectory of the shots that killed him. How is is they lost that vital piece evidence?

Evidence is also still in Gov. Connolly. Bullet fragments in his body could be compared with the magic bullet found in Parkland.

 

[gipper]

Can you see him in this one?

View attachment 201831

Yeah, limo looks white......not black.

It was grey.

In the first one I posted you can clearly see lady bird and she was next to him.

Different driver though.
Must have beamed up the other one.

Take a break from the dooby.

it is clearly the same guy driving.

Clearly not.
Your credibility is really going to shit now.

He never had any credibility.

 

[gipper]

..

Which is idiotic. If he hatched the plan that day he brings his pistol in with the rifle. Like I said, all you are doing is helping the CT people.

I suspect his CIA training is failing him.

The only thing failing is your brain after having been debunked and proven a liar so many times.

Cite any passage in the WC which is a lie or fabrication with evidence

Cite a passage that is truthful.

DO not dodge I asked you first.

You made a claim which you cannot support and are lying about having evidence.

You never even read the damn thing. You are an ignorant fool who knows nothing about it except what a few cartoons told you.

But here you go.
Page 1.

"The Assassination of John F. Kennedy on November 22 1963 was a cruel and shocking act of violence directed against a man, a family, a nation and against all mankind."

Now prove it happened on a different day or that it was not a cruel and shocking act of violence.

Cite a passage which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

I remember hearing about it when I was in 2nd grade lunch period.
My teacher came running in screaming about it.

What was really cruel was we had to watch the Black & White coverage of it all weekend. They canceled Bugs Bunny because of it on Saturday morning.

....and yet Poppy Bush (well know CIA **********) couldn't remember where he was, when he was asked.

I was in first grade, and remember it clearly. That whole holiday weekend I remember. We watched on the b&w TV when the CIA, FBI, Dallas PD, Texas SP, all allowed Ruby to waltz right up to the patsy Oswald and murder him.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Can you see him in this one?

View attachment 201831

Yeah, limo looks white......not black.

It was grey.

In the first one I posted you can clearly see lady bird and she was next to him.

Different driver though.
Must have beamed up the other one.

Take a break from the dooby.

it is clearly the same guy driving.

Bullshit. The first picture shows a fairly heavy set guy, roughly 40 years old with no hat, the second was a slender guy probably in his 60s with a white LBJ type hat.

Wrong.

The face of the driver is the same. In the first one his hat is obscured by the windshield frame. But it is clearly the same man

Stop with the childish lies.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Still sharpshooter and still USMC standards which are higher. Than any other,

My argument is sound. He had the skill to do it which is plain and simple he was no poor shot.

The standards are the same as for any branch of service. He lacked the skill, the target was moving away and lower than the shooter, which makes the shot far more difficult. Add to that the oak tree that obscured the target for a significant period of time, and the fact that he had to make all three shots that we know for certain were fired within a very short span of time and yet again, you help the CT people and not you.

No they are not the same,

They vary from branch to branch and the USMC training program is the best out of all of them.

He had more than enough skill.

The target was moving very slowly and yes away from him which only limited the amount of time he had. Limited but not unreasonably so. The target was very close which eliminates the downward problem,

The Oak tree did not obscure the target during the actual shooting which is all that matters,

I debunk the CT people you help them.

HE had the skill that is proven fact you had to backpedal on it and try to marginalize the facts proving he did in fact have the skill.

The Corps definitely has the best training, but the scores needed to qualify are the same from service to service. You're simply wrong. Hell ROTC has the same qualifications. I shoot with a man who won the Walsh Trophy (USMC Individual Pistol) TWICE in a row which no one has done before or since, so actively know real USMC Presidents 100 shooters, you don't. I actively shoot every week to maintain my skills, oswald didn't. He was a marginal shot, and his ability to manipulate the bolt on the Carcano in a timely fashion is questionable.

The target was 90 yards away, in a poor quality scope, with crap mounts, that is a hard shot. You see, the closer you are, the HARDER it becomes to hit when you are using a scope. Especially a scope that hinders the ability to manipulate the bolt of the rifle you're firing.

And no, you are not debunking them. You are tossing out long tired tropes that confuse people who don't know anything, but your rifle knowledge is a joke. The Carcano isn't a bad rifle as the CT people claim, but nor is it a great rifle as you would have everyone believe. Shooting a moving target that is below you, and that you are trying to pick up in a poorly mounted scope is not anywhere near as easy as you would like to make it out to be.

In fact the target was less than 90 yards for all three shots.

He di not need to use the scope and used the iron sites especially for the second and third shots.

The scope did not hinder the action it was mounted on the leftside while the bolt was on the right side.

It is you tossing out tropes and backpedaling when faced with facts you do not like. You hated being wrong about his score of sharpshooter which you had to admit was true so you tried to strawman it and failed,

The facts do not support any of your claims or any CT claim.

I did not make it out that he tried to shoot through the scope all three times it is in fact very easy to pick out a target at less than 100 yards over open sites.

He probably tried the scope on the first shot which is why he missed the first shot. After that he would almost certainly have fallen back on his training and used the mounted sites.

I said that from the beginning. The failed premise is that he had a scope and therefore HAD to use scope which would have made it impossible

That would be possible, but very difficult. Here is a reconstruction of the scope and mount as used on the rifle. It is offset so interferes with the sights. Yes, they can still be used, but with difficulty. And thanks to the scope the field of view is drastically reduced which against a moving target is very bad.

Wrong the scope is canted to the left leaving the sites unobscured making it not difficult at all to see them

 

[Soupnazi630]

Gee, if only we had the Presidents brain we'd know the trajectory of the shots that killed him. How is is they lost that vital piece evidence?

Evidence is also still in Gov. Connolly. Bullet fragments in his body could be compared with the magic bullet found in Parkland.

Who is they that you claim lost it?

You should probably research before stating such things. They did establish the trajectory with and without the brain.

There was no magic bullet.

 

[Soupnazi630]

..

I suspect his CIA training is failing him.

The only thing failing is your brain after having been debunked and proven a liar so many times.

Cite any passage in the WC which is a lie or fabrication with evidence

Cite a passage that is truthful.

DO not dodge I asked you first.

You made a claim which you cannot support and are lying about having evidence.

You never even read the damn thing. You are an ignorant fool who knows nothing about it except what a few cartoons told you.

But here you go.
Page 1.

"The Assassination of John F. Kennedy on November 22 1963 was a cruel and shocking act of violence directed against a man, a family, a nation and against all mankind."

Now prove it happened on a different day or that it was not a cruel and shocking act of violence.

Cite a passage which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

I remember hearing about it when I was in 2nd grade lunch period.
My teacher came running in screaming about it.

What was really cruel was we had to watch the Black & White coverage of it all weekend. They canceled Bugs Bunny because of it on Saturday morning.

....and yet Poppy Bush (well know CIA **********) couldn't remember where he was, when he was asked.

I was in first grade, and remember it clearly. That whole holiday weekend I remember. We watched on the b&w TV when the CIA, FBI, Dallas PD, Texas SP, all allowed Ruby to waltz right up to the patsy Oswald and murder him.

You did not see it because the CIA and FBI were not there dumbass.

 

[jillian]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Yes. But it is interesting to see which wack job freaks think that reality is funny

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yeah, limo looks white......not black.

It was grey.

In the first one I posted you can clearly see lady bird and she was next to him.

Different driver though.
Must have beamed up the other one.

Take a break from the dooby.

it is clearly the same guy driving.

Clearly not.
Your credibility is really going to shit now.

He never had any credibility.

I have more than you. Anyone who claims CIA agents are hanging out in chat rooms as you do ruins any credibility they may have had,

It proves you are a mindless brat and chump to even believe such nonsense. Your whole ego is wrapped up in this and you cannot stand the fact that your beliefs are proven false,



I have evidence you do not.

Cite some evidence.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Can you see him in this one?

View attachment 201831

Yeah, limo looks white......not black.

It was grey.

In the first one I posted you can clearly see lady bird and she was next to him.

Different driver though.
Must have beamed up the other one.

Take a break from the dooby.

it is clearly the same guy driving.

Clearly not.
Your credibility is really going to shit now.

you clearly have never talked with this poster from Langley before i see,same as the OP,his credibility went to shit YEARS ago.He is just seeking attention,best to put him on ignore and let him make a fool out of himself as he does with me all the time always talking to himself all the time addressing me in the first person, desperate to try and get you to read his lies.at LEAST Over a 100 other posters have told him the exact same thing you just did over the year.same with the OP. You obviously dont get it that they are are employees of Langley. they reveal that very quickly when they start evading the evidence and start posting lies in their desperate attempts to try and get you to believe them.

 

[gipper]

It was grey.

In the first one I posted you can clearly see lady bird and she was next to him.

Different driver though.
Must have beamed up the other one.

Take a break from the dooby.

it is clearly the same guy driving.

Clearly not.
Your credibility is really going to shit now.

He never had any credibility.

I have more than you. Anyone who claims CIA agents are hanging out in chat rooms as you do ruins any credibility they may have had,

It proves you are a mindless brat and chump to even believe such nonsense. Your whole ego is wrapped up in this and you cannot stand the fact that your beliefs are proven false,



I have evidence you do not.

Cite some evidence.

Go away you rat.

 

[gipper]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Yes. But it is interesting to see which wack job freaks think that reality is funny

You just outed yourself again Silly Jilly.

 

[gipper]

..

The only thing failing is your brain after having been debunked and proven a liar so many times.

Cite any passage in the WC which is a lie or fabrication with evidence

Cite a passage that is truthful.

DO not dodge I asked you first.

You made a claim which you cannot support and are lying about having evidence.

You never even read the damn thing. You are an ignorant fool who knows nothing about it except what a few cartoons told you.

But here you go.
Page 1.

"The Assassination of John F. Kennedy on November 22 1963 was a cruel and shocking act of violence directed against a man, a family, a nation and against all mankind."

Now prove it happened on a different day or that it was not a cruel and shocking act of violence.

Cite a passage which is a lie or fabrication and provide evidence.

I remember hearing about it when I was in 2nd grade lunch period.
My teacher came running in screaming about it.

What was really cruel was we had to watch the Black & White coverage of it all weekend. They canceled Bugs Bunny because of it on Saturday morning.

....and yet Poppy Bush (well know CIA **********) couldn't remember where he was, when he was asked.

I was in first grade, and remember it clearly. That whole holiday weekend I remember. We watched on the b&w TV when the CIA, FBI, Dallas PD, Texas SP, all allowed Ruby to waltz right up to the patsy Oswald and murder him.

You did not see it because the CIA and FBI were not there dumbass.

See what?

Were you on the grassy knoll?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Gee, if only we had the Presidents brain we'd know the trajectory of the shots that killed him. How is is they lost that vital piece evidence?

Evidence is also still in Gov. Connolly. Bullet fragments in his body could be compared with the magic bullet found in Parkland.

One example of the coverup that took place of destroying evidence.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is

Yes. But it is interesting to see which wack job freaks think that reality is funny

You just outed yourself again Silly Jilly.

Shillian and the other Langley employees like nazi agent and WRONGwinger are getting desperate as always.