Oddball
Unobtanium Member
Meanwhile you phukwits piss and moan about MUH MOCRACYYYYY! left and right.It's hilarious to see the outrage from rightists when Democrats use their tactics.
GFY, crackpot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Meanwhile you phukwits piss and moan about MUH MOCRACYYYYY! left and right.It's hilarious to see the outrage from rightists when Democrats use their tactics.
Once they are a Virginia resident and register to vote then yes....Sadly.Does Virginia's constitution permit them to take part in referendums?
Be that as it may, I just point my finger and laugh at rightard fauxtrage.Meanwhile you phukwits piss and moan about MUH MOCRACYYYYY! left and right.
GFY, crackpot.
Once they are a Virginia resident and register to vote then yes....Sadly.
It's not lost upon me that Spanberger won by almost the exact number of votes as the NY transplants who have moved to Virginia since 2022.
The Democrats have no 'subjects'...and given the Republican history of Gerrymandering...the Republicans really have no room to talk!
ORLY?Be that as it may, I just point my finger and laugh at rightard fauxtrage.
It's not lost upon me that Spanberger won by almost the exact number of votes as the NY transplants who have moved to Virginia since 2022.
Now Spanberger won the election with 527,271 votes over Earle-Sears.
Not even close.
WW
ORLY?
How many (R) seats are there in the entirety of New England, jackass?
Those states are still 40% (R)...Outside of GA, he deep south isn't anywhere near that.Google AI
New England today is one of the most Democratic regions in the U.S., with four of the six states considered among the most solidly Democratic in the country.
Is that your point?
Now do the deep south.
Its not done yet. While I agree the courts would usually leave this alone, they trashed their own state constitution to do it. The vote went against referendum rules. I imagine they will have to re-do the vote.Is this the final word..or must we go through yet some more hoops to resolve this issue.
Well...The Virginia Supreme court needs to weigh in--but it does appear that the redistricting will stand.
Like it or not, Gerrymandering is a part of American politics..and the courts will not step in.
A Virginia court ruled in favor of Democrats in a case concerning the Old Dominion’s congressional lines on Sunday, denying a last-minute Republican effort challenging Democrats’ redistricting referendum and the composition of the new House map passed by voters.
Richmond Circuit Court Judge Tracy Thorne-Begland denied a request by the Republican National Committee (RNC), Virginia GOP and others to block the results of a redistricting referendum held last week, when voters narrowly passed a set of congressional lines that gives Democrats four additional pickup opportunities in November.
The Virginia congressional delegation currently has a 6-5 Democratic edge, but the new map would give the party a 10-1 edge in November.
“This Court knows its role is clear. It is not to assess the wisdom of public policy nor to engage in policy making from the bench,” Thorne-Begland wrote. “Instead, it is to decide if those with whom we have entrusted power have exercised that power in conformance with their constitutional mandate. On this question, the Court’s answer is in the affirmative.”
Is this the final word..or must we go through yet some more hoops to resolve this issue.
Well...The Virginia Supreme court needs to weigh in--but it does appear that the redistricting will stand.
Like it or not, Gerrymandering is a part of American politics..and the courts will not step in.
A Virginia court ruled in favor of Democrats in a case concerning the Old Dominion’s congressional lines on Sunday, denying a last-minute Republican effort challenging Democrats’ redistricting referendum and the composition of the new House map passed by voters.
Richmond Circuit Court Judge Tracy Thorne-Begland denied a request by the Republican National Committee (RNC), Virginia GOP and others to block the results of a redistricting referendum held last week, when voters narrowly passed a set of congressional lines that gives Democrats four additional pickup opportunities in November.
The Virginia congressional delegation currently has a 6-5 Democratic edge, but the new map would give the party a 10-1 edge in November.
“This Court knows its role is clear. It is not to assess the wisdom of public policy nor to engage in policy making from the bench,” Thorne-Begland wrote. “Instead, it is to decide if those with whom we have entrusted power have exercised that power in conformance with their constitutional mandate. On this question, the Court’s answer is in the affirmative.”
As I pointed out , New England with 21 seats vs Deep South with 45 seats.Those states are still 40% (R)...Outside of GA, he deep south isn't anywhere near that.
Aside from that, Dixie is deep RINO country anyway.
Exhibit A why we're a Republic and not a "democracy"Is this the final word..or must we go through yet some more hoops to resolve this issue.
Well...The Virginia Supreme court needs to weigh in--but it does appear that the redistricting will stand.
Like it or not, Gerrymandering is a part of American politics..and the courts will not step in.
A Virginia court ruled in favor of Democrats in a case concerning the Old Dominion’s congressional lines on Sunday, denying a last-minute Republican effort challenging Democrats’ redistricting referendum and the composition of the new House map passed by voters.
Richmond Circuit Court Judge Tracy Thorne-Begland denied a request by the Republican National Committee (RNC), Virginia GOP and others to block the results of a redistricting referendum held last week, when voters narrowly passed a set of congressional lines that gives Democrats four additional pickup opportunities in November.
The Virginia congressional delegation currently has a 6-5 Democratic edge, but the new map would give the party a 10-1 edge in November.
“This Court knows its role is clear. It is not to assess the wisdom of public policy nor to engage in policy making from the bench,” Thorne-Begland wrote. “Instead, it is to decide if those with whom we have entrusted power have exercised that power in conformance with their constitutional mandate. On this question, the Court’s answer is in the affirmative.”
Doesn't change the demographics, cheater.As I pointed out , New England with 21 seats vs Deep South with 45 seats.
As the number of seats per state goes down, it leads to the consolidation of statewide votes, approaching the at-large result.
There are only so many ways to slide and dice small potatoes.
Texas could have taken ten, but they didn't.Good for Virginia.
Florida’s turn at the plate.
Reminds me of the fascists in Colorado who got bitchslapped for trying to ban Trump from the ballot.It is fun watching the dems expose themselves as the true authoritarians, trampling on the voting rights of their subjects.
Doesn't change the demographics, cheater.