Hakeem Jeffries Defends ‘Maximum Warfare’ Promise Before Assassination Attempt of Trump

DonGlock26

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2024
Messages
17,958
Reaction score
26,451
Points
2,288
"Hakeem Jeffries Attacks Karoline Leavitt, Defends ‘Maximum Warfare’ Promise Before Assassination Attempt of Trump
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) attacked White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt for criticizing Democrats for their violent rhetoric after a shooting took place in the vicinity of the White House Correspondents’ Dinner at the Washington Hilton Hotel.

During a press conference on Monday, Jeffries labeled Leavitt a “stone-cold liar,” and accused her of reading “talking points” and being critical of words Democrats had said.

“I know you said you stand by your comment, but at the same time you have been a subject of threats as well, so, with respect to this comment about maximum warfare, even if it’s about redistricting, why not tone down the language here, in this moment?” a reporter asked.

“I think that what’s interesting to me, as you’ve pointed out, is that the so-called White House press secretary, who’s a disgrace, she’s a stone-cold liar, had the nerve to stand up there and read talking points, being critical of statements — all taken out of context, that Democrats have made,” Jeffries said. Jeffries added that Leavitt made no mention of comments from “MAGA extremists.”



Just another example of Democrats using violent rhetoric in hopes that one of their followers will assassinate Republicans.
Meanwhile, Obama pretends that the assassin wasn't sprouting mainstream Democrat talking points in his manifesto.
 
Democrat logic is as dumb as it gets, and Hakeem is the perfect person to deliver their message. It's hard to imagine that this guy is one of the top Democrat leaders.
 

Right, there's an "Authority" for you.

A guy who got off on a mental illness defense after he nearly killed the president.
 
Democrat logic is as dumb as it gets, and Hakeem is the perfect person to deliver their message. It's hard to imagine that this guy is one of the top Democrat leaders.
The right should do maximum warfare against Jeffries and Schumer.
 
"Hakeem Jeffries Attacks Karoline Leavitt, Defends ‘Maximum Warfare’ Promise Before Assassination Attempt of Trump
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) attacked White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt for criticizing Democrats for their violent rhetoric after a shooting took place in the vicinity of the White House Correspondents’ Dinner at the Washington Hilton Hotel.

During a press conference on Monday, Jeffries labeled Leavitt a “stone-cold liar,” and accused her of reading “talking points” and being critical of words Democrats had said.

“I know you said you stand by your comment, but at the same time you have been a subject of threats as well, so, with respect to this comment about maximum warfare, even if it’s about redistricting, why not tone down the language here, in this moment?” a reporter asked.

“I think that what’s interesting to me, as you’ve pointed out, is that the so-called White House press secretary, who’s a disgrace, she’s a stone-cold liar, had the nerve to stand up there and read talking points, being critical of statements — all taken out of context, that Democrats have made,” Jeffries said. Jeffries added that Leavitt made no mention of comments from “MAGA extremists.”



Just another example of Democrats using violent rhetoric in hopes that one of their followers will assassinate Republicans.
Meanwhile, Obama pretends that the assassin wasn't sprouting mainstream Democrat talking points in his manifesto.
what the hell does he think ‘Maximum Warfare’ is?

A slap fight?

yo momma insults?

you may believe your constituents are stupid, and rightfully so, but the entire country isn't, Jeffries.
 
Yes, Hakeem said 'maximum warfare' Karoline said 'shots will be fired' and politicians nearly all promise to 'fight' for their consituents.

We need to tone down the rhetoric about the rhetoric. U.S. Politicians have said things like that for at least as long as I have been alive. Yet, it did not cause people to commit real acts of violence until 2020? We don't need to police speech, we need more competent people in charge of security. It should not have been hard to guess that the WHCD might be targeted.

We also need to investigate who is funding these riots. These people aren't doing this stuff for free.
 
Yes, Hakeem said 'maximum warfare' Karoline said 'shots will be fired' and politicians nearly all promise to 'fight' for their consituents.

We need to tone down the rhetoric about the rhetoric. U.S. Politicians have said things like that for at least as long as I have been alive. Yet, it did not cause people to commit real acts of violence until 2020? We don't need to police speech, we need more competent people in charge of security. It should not have been hard to guess that the WHCD might be targeted.

We also need to investigate who is funding these riots. These people aren't doing this stuff for free.

The people of 1/6 were paid?
 
1777376884656.webp
 
15th post
The people of 1/6 were paid?
Is that a serious question?

The FBI agents and FBI "sources" were definitely paid. Did you think they were inciting riots in their spare time?

Were any of the real Trumpers paid? I wouldn't be surprised at all. But do you want to stray from your party's (or "not your party's") line that it was caused by Trump making a speech?

As I said, the funding for the riots should be investigated, and I didn't make any exceptions.
 
Is that a serious question?

The FBI agents and FBI "sources" were definitely paid. Did you think they were inciting riots in their spare time?

Were any of the real Trumpers paid? I wouldn't be surprised at all. But do you want to stray from your party's (or "not your party's") line that it was caused by Trump making a speech?

As I said, the funding for the riots should be investigated, and I didn't make any exceptions.

Yeah well, I was hoping to be able to take you seriously. I guess not.
 
Yes, Hakeem said 'maximum warfare' Karoline said 'shots will be fired' and politicians nearly all promise to 'fight' for their consituents.

Um, yeah, some of the metaphors are a little silly, but this guy didn't take pot shots at Trump because of something anyone said.

He took pot shots because of Trump's policies, which are horrific.

We need to tone down the rhetoric about the rhetoric. U.S. Politicians have said things like that for at least as long as I have been alive. Yet, it did not cause people to commit real acts of violence until 2020? We don't need to police speech, we need more competent people in charge of security. It should not have been hard to guess that the WHCD might be targeted.

I agree. It almost seems like it was staged.

We also need to investigate who is funding these riots. These people aren't doing this stuff for free.
you mean like January 6th?

People are rioting because they are seeing things that they find truly offensive.

And because the normal processes for correcting these things aren't working.
 
All the communists are doubling down on their violent rhetoric when asked about it after the attack at the WHCD.
 
Back
Top Bottom