JoeB131
Diamond Member
well, it is their sense of entitlement that wears thin on people.Yes, you ARE talking about Jews every time you use the term Zionist, subhuman.
Not all Jews are Zionists though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well, it is their sense of entitlement that wears thin on people.Yes, you ARE talking about Jews every time you use the term Zionist, subhuman.
Thank you for revealing why you truly have a problem with the event, you don't have a problem with communication errors, you have a problem seeing Jews have equal rights of protection. YOU want to have power over them, you are a racist.Oh, I see, the Jews now own international waters?
According to crew members, the planes flew close enough to where they could see the pilots.
But, shit, let's leave the planes aside for the moment. The third attack was by boats on the water.
They knew what they were doing, and it was murder. If our government hadn't sold out to the Zionist Lobby, we'd see justice.
Thank you for revealing why you truly have a problem with the event, you don't have a problem with communication errors, you have a problem seeing Jews have equal rights of protection. YOU want to have power over them, you are a racist.
Israel was the invaded Sherlock racist.Um, how is invading someone else land, and then bombing an allied ship because they might have picked up signals of your sneak attack, "a right to protection"?
I have a problem with the Zionists/Jews because these events seem to be par for the course. "Whoops, we blew up your ship." "Whoops, we paid Jonathan Pollard to steal your secrets." "Whoops, we ran over Rachel Corry with a bulldozer", "Whoops, we blew up a hospital full of injured kids"
Israel was the invaded Sherlock racist.
LABANON was the invaded by Syrian terrorists, Gaza today is invaded by Egyptian terrorists, Iran subversion, Syria, and Isis and other radical factions.
WHOOPS, Another car caught fire by Dems passing by the car and it spontaneous combusting.
WHOOPS, black smoke is billowing up to the sky polluting the air so cows can be lead to slaughter for their farts.
Whoops, everything you argued about was always wrong.
And the Jews they block from school class rooms and attack are born and raised in the U.S., the Kids they kidnaped were from Italy, US, Asia, and other countries therefore you and they don't have a beef about land rights you and they have a beef about race and religion.You're babbling, buddie.
The Arabs are the natives of the Levant.
The Jews of Europe are the invaders.
And the Jews they block from school class rooms and attack are born and raised in the U.S., the Kids they kidnaped were from Italy, US, Asia, and other countries therefore you and they don't have a beef about land rights you and they have a beef about race and religion.
You are just replying nonsense just to top post your antisemitic propaganda.
Now that "you brought up a different subject" I get the right to reply on that topic.
Many Jews were living in Palestine before the immigrations and settlements and were concentrated in four cities with religious significance: Jerusalem, Hebron, Safad and Tiberias. Most of Israel was described by Mark Twain as barren and the Arab influx trying to match the Jewish imigration is what unsuspected gullible people consider indegenous people is a big farce especially since they never controled the territory. You can't be occupied if you don't own what you claim someone's occupying it's like saying you a renter or squater had your house taken away when you don't own your house your landlord does.
The Arab population from 1920-1930 generally reaped the benefits of Jewish immigration, and did not oppose the establishment Jewish National Home. It wasn’t until a minority group of trouble makers started the beginning of this propaganda machine and incitement by chance Arafat's hero and possibly as some claim his uncle: Haj Amin Al-Husseini.
**(Note Arafats real full name is=Mohammed Yasser Abdul-Ra'ouf Qudwa Al-Husseini & his true birthplace I researched is in Cairo, Egypt the place this reported uncle of same last name returned to after his stay in Berlin.)
Facts: In 1921, the British divided this region in two: east of the Jordan River became the Emirate of Transjordan, to be ruled by Faysal's brother 'Abdullah, and west of the Jordan River became the Palestine Mandate.
Throughout the region, Arabs were angered by Britain, the owner controller who gave them their pie=biting the hand that feed them, but also making propaganda about
stealing land rediculous since they never owned/controlled the land.
Claims of occupation are also ludicrous since Iran, Syria and outside Radical Islamist are the occupiers of Palestine keeping them from peace, prosperity, and full autonomy.
During the rising tide of European Jewish immigration, land purchases (as opposed to the propaganda claiming theft of land) and settlement in Palestine generated increasing resistance by Palestinian Arab peasants, journalists and political figures. example letter of their concern which I found in their archives:
*1 ( Abdullah bin al-Hussein Amman on: 11 Thul Hijja 1364 Corresponding to: 16 November 1945 Presidency of the Arab League - Cairo"The Arab nation is wailing the urgent magnanimity of the Arab States and there is no time to waste, otherwise the Jews will be able to *buy new lands*and push new immigrants to Palestine.")
Secondly he mentions how they wanted to bring in Arab immigrants into Palestine on a monthly basis and in numbers equal to the Jewish immigrants.
Palestinian Arabs opposed the British Mandate because it thwarted their aspirations for self-rule, and opposed massive Jewish immigration because it threatened their position in the country and control of the region.
The Jewish National Fund purchased large tracts of land
from absentee Arab landowners, the Arabs living in these areas were evicted
by Britts in formation of the Jewish portion of Palestine, but also because of the Wars the Arabs were starting and had started. These displacements led to increasing tensions and violent confrontations between Jewish settlers and Arab peasant tenants.
European Jewish immigration to Palestine increased dramatically after Hitler's rise to power in 1933, leading to new land purchases and Jewish settlements. Palestinian resistance to British control and Zionist settlement climaxed with the Arab revolt of 1936-39, which Britain suppressed with the help of Zionist militias and the complicity of neighboring Arab regimes.
Because of the uprising by the Arabs many of the leaders became exhiled and they became seriously disorganized
during the crucial decade in which the future of Palestine was decided. If they hadn’t wanted the whole pie they would have been enjoying the half they were gonna get at the time and are still trying to be given but the brat won’t take it because it’s not the whole thing and they keep poking their forks into the pie handlers (Britts)hand as he feeds it to him.
(**Note Jews purchasing houses and land in arab neighborhoods that were being mandated or allotted as Jewish territory, was seen as wrong by the propaganda influenced & more predjudiced Arabs, but where they get theft from being allotted or purchasing of land is part of the ploy to distort history.
Their reactions and violence can be liken to the predjudiced reactions and violence against Black people when black people moved into white areas and bought homes in their neighborhoods they too where charged with all kinds of hate, violence and propaganda regarding their right to live and purchase where they chose to live.
The Jews in the midst of a huge Arabic Middle East were turly the despised minority who were not allowed to have a place to live if it meant changing the makeup of the middle eastern neighborhood.)***
What part of you bringing it up do you not grasp? THEREFORE You just blasted yourself "what does (what you brought up)- have to do with the topic"I could probably refute every paragraph of this, but what does this have to do with why the Zionists bombed a US ship in international waters when they were supposedly our allies?

What part of you bringing it up do you not grasp? THEREFORE You just blasted yourself "what does (what you brought up)- have to do with the topic"
You just revealed you brought it up over prejudice.
NOW BACK TO TOPIC: your standard and logic means we can blame liberals for this destruction of a ship.
Yes attacked by liberals according to you and your standard of logic and we had car camera and street surveillance pics of liberals burning and attacking EVs on land.Was that ship attacked, or did i wear my underware on backwards today while eating a chocolate pudding pop?
I mean, you can't seem to grasp that the Zionist Entity attacked the liberty, so you went on a long rant about how it was okay for them to steal land from the Arabs because the Germans were mean to them.
Yes attacked by liberals according to you and your standard of logic and we had car camera and street surveillance pics of liberals burning and attacking EVs on land.
Once again your topic not mine:That is bizarre.
Now, if it turns out this ship was the victim of sabotage, that would be a different issue. (I don't think they were carrying Teslas, so there would be no reason for liberals to burn her.)


Once again your topic not mine:
The PURPOSEFUL ATTACK ON INNOCENT VEHICLES IN LA BY LIBERALS and foreign invaders, done over arresting sex offenders drug dealers and violent gang members.
The topic you changed or is it really much different?Try to stay on topic. The Topic is the dishonorable Zionist attack on USS Liberty.
Not some photoshop garbage you found on Faux News about the protests in LA.
If you're speaking of the INS Dakar in 1968 Report reveals story of Israeli sub sunk in 1968 and if the rumors are true that the US Navy sunk that boat, it would not be friendly fire, it would be revenge by US Navy patriots for the attack on the Liberty.Not true, I couldn't find my uncle's friendly fire sunk Sub attack that killed the entire crew either. Another of those lack of communication incidents.
Thanks, this was a US sub and the friendly fire accident was by a Brit Ship who thought it was a German sub, because nobody responded =communications error.If you're speaking of the INS Dakar in 1968 Report reveals story of Israeli sub sunk in 1968 and if the rumors are true that the US Navy sunk that boat, it would not be friendly fire, it would be revenge by US Navy patriots for the attack on the Liberty.
The topic you changed or is it really much different?
So you're saying attacking visually marked police and ice cars is not the same as you are accussing, because Liberals are not a race you are prejudiced against?
BUSTED AGAIN!
We told you, lack of communications like what happened to my uncle and that Chinese plane. The U S. Admited their equipment failed and their being there was wrong once warned not to be for this very reason, DOH!Naw, attacking ICE cars is fine as long as they act like Jackboots.
What was Israel's excuse for bombing the Liberty?
We told you, lack of communications like what happened to my uncle and that Chinese plane. The U S. Admited their equipment failed and their being there was wrong once warned not to be for this very reason, DOH!