Slowly but surely the medical establishment is being forced to accept the effectiveness of vitamin c.
This doctor in Scottsdale AZ says IV full of C is a game changer.
TOO FUNNY. A Naturopathic doctor. And he agrees with me and refutes all your previous claims! He's prescribing reasonable doses of a few grams of C a day, NOT 100, 200 or 300 grams a day!

You crack me up.
I don't bother with Vitamin C supplements, since I get plenty of it in the food, I do take a full Multiple Mineral pills everyday, since American foods tends to be low in Minerals.
Can’t get enough from food. Read above post.
Now you are just babbling, since the IV of Vitamin C are from a single doctor, who may or may not have a valid reason to do it, but not as a standard treatment protocol in medical care, since it lacks scientific research behind it.
You are grasping for straws here, pushing an idea that has so little support behind it, it seems that you are a fanatic over it. Nature doesn't provide ultra high Vitamin C for a good reason, no living creature can use it at high levels, that many animals make their own Vitamin C, but NEVER at ultra high levels.
I have done very well getting Vitamin C from the diet, only had the Flu twice in my 60 years, never required hospitalization for it, Strep throat twice, last one was 11 years ago, and never got sick from Sars, Mers and so far Covid-19. Have been in Malarial land repeatedly, Tropical regions never got sick at all.
I have NONE of the signs of insufficient Vitamin C, from
WIKIPEDIA
Vitamin C deficiency
Lack of ascorbic acid in the daily diet leads to a disease called
scurvy, a form of
a vitaminosis that is characterized by:
You are full of baloney on this, you have been shown that ultra high Vitamin C is NOT vital therapy for Cancer, not a single paper supports it outside of Linus Pauling. The body simply dumps the excess amount, since it is water soluble, the liver can't keep any of it.
Where in this thread have I stated vitamin C cures cancer? Please stop being a dumb fuck.
You forgot post 44 I wrote and YOUR reply to it?
Post 44:
The same "great" Linus Pauling claimed it prevented cancer ALONE, he ingested massive doses for many years,
he died of....... cancer...… ha ha.
It is well known the body doesn't use all that Vitamin C, since it excretes a lot of it away through the urine.
Linus Paulings claims have not gained traction with research since he died of cancer.
When it comes to mega doses of Vitamin C claims, Pauling was a confirmed crackpot.
YOUR reply:
He was 93 when he died dumbass. Do you know what life expectancy was when he was born in 1901? Dumbass.
You’re an idiot. Go ahead believe the establishment. You will die young. We need to remove dumbasses from the gene pool.
C has been shownby numerous doctors and scientists to be very effective. Assholes like you think Pauling was the only one espousing C.
Post 51, where I again exposed Paulins anto cancer claims as being full of baloney:
"Yes and he died of CANCER, which he is on record saying Mega Doses of Vitamin C would ALONE Could prevent Cancer. It is clear you didn't read the links I posted:..."
Post 54, where you admit that Pauling MIGHT be wrong about Cancer cure claims
"LOL. You know very little about the topic.
C has been proven to be very beneficial. Will it cure cancer? Probably not, but that in no way means C isn’t effective on all sorts of diseases.
Your small mind is stuck on Pauling’s cancer cure, while ignoring the mountain of evidence showing C’s effectiveness on all sorts of ailments."
It is clear you are trying to avoid his Vitamin C claim FAILURES. I posted evidence that his mega dose claims are not supported by science research, not even today. Your favorite doctors claims are NOT being supported by the medical field, he makes claims on his own, not a valid way to promote standard medical care practice.
I have never said Vitamin C is bad for you or ineffective, I have been against grandiose megadose claims from the start, Pauling made a bunch of unverified mega dose claims that TO THIS DAY are not getting science research support. He was essentially quack on Vitamin C, the man DIED of cancer despite his claims to the contrary.
Your reply to Pauling's death to cancer, which greatly contradicted his anti- cancer claims, by saying he lived to age 93. A feeble attempt to avoid his absurd anti-cancer claims. You don't want to face it, which is why you threw up the old age response instead of the stark reality that his mega doses of Vitamin C use, FAILED to prevent his cancer.
YOU are a quack student.