US lawmakers see no Trump plan for Iran following strikes

‘The United States has yet to spell out a "day-after" strategy for Iran following joint U.S.-Israeli strikes that killed much of the country's leadership, lawmakers from both major political parties said on Sunday.
[...]
The strategy Trump has publicly outlined so far hinges largely on the hope that the Iranian people will rise up and determine their own future after decades of repression.’


Trump is an ignoramus and a fool – the Iranian people aren’t going to ‘rise up.’

Here’s why:

“The Real Reason Relates to the Largely Unknown Security Measures That the Regime Preemptively Activated the Moment That Israel’s Operations Started.
[…]
As Israel took control of Iranian airspace, the Iranian Interior Ministry’s National Security Council gave orders to the IRGC operational-security military headquarters to neutralize any gathering that could lead to protests.”


You think the US should never meddle in the affairs of another country unless it’s a direct threat to the US? I’m fine if that’s what you believe, I just want to make sure I understand that we should never war with another country that isn’t actively attacking us..?
 
‘The United States has yet to spell out a "day-after" strategy for Iran following joint U.S.-Israeli strikes that killed much of the country's leadership, lawmakers from both major political parties said on Sunday.
[...]
The strategy Trump has publicly outlined so far hinges largely on the hope that the Iranian people will rise up and determine their own future after decades of repression.’


Trump is an ignoramus and a fool – the Iranian people aren’t going to ‘rise up.’

Here’s why:

“The Real Reason Relates to the Largely Unknown Security Measures That the Regime Preemptively Activated the Moment That Israel’s Operations Started.
[…]
As Israel took control of Iranian airspace, the Iranian Interior Ministry’s National Security Council gave orders to the IRGC operational-security military headquarters to neutralize any gathering that could lead to protests.”

Its irrelevant. If there's a plan, no plan, a goal, no goal etc.. it's Trump, so the Left will always argue the opposite.
 

US lawmakers see no Trump plan for Iran following strikes​



1773940035476.webp
 
Many in the congress can’t be trusted to not leak sensitive information.
 
Look back at your own post idiot. You refer, by meme, to the difference in two situations as "had a plan to get out of" one, but not the other. To get out you must be in. Perhaps when you get to 3rd grade you will understand.
Oh, you don't think Trump is "in" Iran? What's his exit strategy? Just stop all hostilities, unilaterally? And how will he spin that as a win? Or, rather, how will YOU spin that as a win?
4i6Ckte.gif
 
The nitwits you refer to are incapable of seeing the obvious. The "plan" is to drastically weaken the terrorist and authoritarian evil government in Iran so the people will have a chance to overthrow that government and establish a government of the people.


we are so desensitized these days, that 30,000 + people gunned down or tortured to death by the Goon squads doesnt really mean anything anymore and how it showed the true danger of that regeime for much of the world. It's probably what pushed us over the edge despite everything else, but Democrats could never give Trump credit for that.
 
Oh, you don't think Trump is "in" Iran? What's his exit strategy? Just stop all hostilities, unilaterally? And how will he spin that as a win? Or, rather, how will YOU spin that as a win?
4i6Ckte.gif
Do you have any idea what you are taking about or do you just mimic liberal tdd as lying points?

Can you research things on your own, then form your own ideas?
 
15th post
Oh, you don't think Trump is "in" Iran? What's his exit strategy? Just stop all hostilities, unilaterally? And how will he spin that as a win? Or, rather, how will YOU spin that as a win?
4i6Ckte.gif
Once again you prove yourself a fool. Flying over Iran is not "in" Iran. Thank you for proving my point.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom