On the first day of boot camp in the US military, you sign away several Constitutional rights, including your rights to free speech.
Of course, this, to you, is a very good thing.
Not surprised at all. Not at all.
You cant have soldiers who are required to obey the orders of "the Commander in Chief" (aka, the President of the United States) also shit talking the Commander in Chief and undermining his official US positions.
There is a difference between "shit-talking" about the CiC, and whistle-blowing on being given extremely morally repugnant orders.
Question for you, you little lover of circumcised dicks: If your army superior asked you to rape a 12-year-old girl, would you do it?
That kind of individuality doesnt create a world class cohesive military.
First of all, you call having a conscience "individuality". LMAO.
Secondly, what's the point of having a world-class military, if you are just gonna go around doing extremely immoral things?
Every member has to be on the same program, otherwise it just becomes a chaotic monkey shit fight in the zoo.
I know that. And I am not saying that there should be the same level of freedom in the armed forces as in civilian life. However, I am talking about something different. I am talking about whether soldiers should be able to exercise their conscience, when they are given an extremely immoral order. This has nothing to do with allowing individuality. It has to do with freedom of conscience, and whether it has a place in the armed forces, which, I agree, involves obedience and order and such, as it is a very different kind of environment.
Its immoral to kill a man, yet you might be ordered to do so if youre in the military. Morals are not a consideration for anything in the military. All that matters is the law.
So, if your army sergeant asked you to put dynamite up the vagina of a 13-year-old and then detonate it, and as soon as he assures you that it's legal, you would do it?
You are REQUIRED to disobey unlawful orders in the military.
If soldiers are required to disobey unlawful orders, I don't see why they can't also disobey immoral orders.
If a superior orders you to break the law, you refuse, and you might even get arrested for refusing his order, then you let the military courts decide if you were right to disobey the order. Thats how it works in the US military.
That sounds fair to me. So, if my army superior asked me to do something immoral, I want to be able to refuse it, and then let the military courts decide, too. But according to you, this shouldn't happen.
No, he should not be able to refuse it. Dont join the military if your conscience is going to get in the way of the job. Refusing will result in an immediate court martial and you WILL go to military prison for it.
Then this sounds like your system is fucked up. Why should people go to prison for refusing to do something that offends their conscience to an extreme degree? Now, I am not talking about things like, say, animal welfare. For example, if they ask you to blow up a cow and you refuse because it goes against your personal codes, then I can see being sent to jail. But what if it was something that is universally regarded as being extremely offensive to human conscience? Think stuff like gang-raping young girls to death, or shoving a bayonet into the vagina of a pregnant woman. Honestly, you really think soldiers should be punished for refusing to do things like these?
I am not unsympathetic to the suffering of others, past and present, but am repulsed at the crass and fraudulent machinations of the Holocaust Industry (1), (2) and the equally repulsive exploitation of the Holocaust(3) to commit a more egregious genocide.
I agree that American taxpayers should not be saddled with the marketing of Holocaustian pity mongering as the main US Holocaust theme park sits on $ Trillion dollar real estate and costs Americans $ 100 Million per year.
I can think of no other similar tragedy that has been so obscenely used to extract countless $ Billions not only from innocent Germans but from any and every country, industry or entity targeted by Holocaustian extortionists.
Finally, if its not about the money, why, then, is no amount of money enough?
I agree mostly, however, I just want to emphasize that it has nothing to do with holocaust (I am refusing to capitalize this filthy word, just to piss Jews off) museums being located on prime lands. Rather, it's a matter of principle. What are holocaust museums doing in the States? holocaust, as it were, happened in Germany. And the US is not Germany. So why should there be any holocaust museums here? Even one is too ******* many.
Palestinians are the biggest snowflakes. They started another war with Israel and now they are complaining about how bad they are getting their asses kicked.
They are getting their asses kicked, because Israel receives money and military tech from the States. I mean, from you chumps.
All while continuing to support terrorism against Israel.
I wonder if they have a good reason for that?
www.progressiveisrael.org
