By who?It has been reported Trump complied with the subpoena. Deal with it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
By who?It has been reported Trump complied with the subpoena. Deal with it.
No he can't. He's been on this forum for a while now. He's just a silly clown who takes up space. Which is really the point.You bet.
Good advice.
But, truth be told, I already do that when I make a claim.
And therein lies the rub, good poster Dude -- "make a claim".
If one makes a claim it is up to the claimant to bring some game -- to the game..
I am mildly sure you already know that. But, in this case, you possibly have no credible source to back yourself up.
C'mon man!
You can be better than that.
I actually like the 4 Tops…you don’t? why?LOl! You lose.
By who?
The Justice Department subpoenaed former President Trump months before federal law enforcement executed a search warrant of his Mar-a-Lago estate this week, The New York Times reported Thursday.
According to the Times, investigators had been concerned about classified national security information that might have remained at Trump’s Florida property, even in the months after the National Archives recovered 15 boxes of White House materials from there in January.
The subpoena reportedly preceded a June meeting at Mar-a-Lago between attorneys representing Trump and Justice Department investigators, who later asked that a basement room containing White House records be better secured.
The Times noted that the subpoena was first reported by the conservative journalist John Solomon, who wrote this week that Trump’s lawyers had been making efforts to comply.
On June 3, the FBI visited Mar-a-Lago to retrieve the requested documents in the subpoena, which Trump complied with, the source told Fox News.
Those investigators toured the area of the Florida resort where some documents were stored, then briefly viewed and took custody of a small amount of potentially sensitive material. Separate sources told Fox News that federal investigators had spoken with at least one person who relayed the possibility of more sensitive national security material in that storage room and other areas of the property.
FBI officials, that day, asked to see a storage facility where the records were located. The FBI asked that staff put a lock on the storage room, which they later did.
This source said Trump and his staff were, and are, committed to being in compliance with the Presidential Records Act, which requires presidential administrations to preserve certain documents.
How are you so sure the contents listing as being retrieved didn't include what was turned over in June?Look you idiot, Christina Bobb signed papers saying that was all of them. And Trump knew it after the fact. He had some stored in his closet. I'm just wondering if they were stored with the sex toys?
And?They got him.
Unsealed Trump Search Warrant - Trump had classified Documents
It's now semi-fascist.we saw this fascist regime do that before
nahIt's now semi-fascist.
This is content. Can you debunk this information; Opinion | Trump's Mar-a-Lago lawyers have some real explaining to do
That's the new term the communists just started using.
The president can declassify all the documents he took with him when he left office. But that would mean all copies of the 184 classified documents would be declassified. If he did that he should be charged with treason or committed to an asylum.Sure, the first word in the title covers it.
AGAIN, I've asked at least a half dozen Democrats this and none of you even try to answer it. I wonder why? LOL.
Trump took the documents when he was still President and had the literal power to instantly declassify documents.
But you say it's a crime and he didn't.
WHAT exactly did Trump NOT do to declassify them exactly? Did he need to rub his stomach three times? Did he need to repeat a voodoo chant? What did he need to do to make it all legal but he didn't do exactly?
I say it's absurd that the guy who can declassify them can possibly not do that and hang himself. He's not stupid, you are. And you're a massive hypocrite because if it were a Democrat being attacked for the exact same thing, you'd be losing your mind
The president can declassify all the documents he took with him when he left office. But that would mean all copies of the 184 classified documents would be declassified. If he did that he should be charged with treason or committed to an asylum.
I'm just asking you to use common sense.When you read the Constitution, you actually read the first amendment as "The Democrat Party gets to do whatever the fuck it wants," don't you? Be honest.
So you're a Constitutional lawyer or you made that up? We both know it's the latter. Link, jackass. If you suspect I don't trust your legal opinion, you're right. What you just described sounds like a very solvable problem and you jumped it all the way to treason, but then, first amendment, huh?
From a Democrat, that's classic.I'm just asking you to use common sense
Two things...You're a fool and an idiot;
He far exceeded my expectations, thanks. Here is my own list - enjoy!...How did he meet your expectations?
Two years of taking credit for Obama's successes that he inherited and then two years of a botched covid pandemic response.
And now Biden in his first two years has had to clean up the messes that he inherited from Trump.