Unless you're gay, on the dole, or a commie why would you vote Democrat ?

[bripat9643]

And this is where the Federal government gets involved. To end disputes between states. If one state recognizes a gay couple's marriage then every state must recognize that gay couples marriage. That is how it works for heterosexuals, so equality under the law states that this is how it must be for homosexual and lesbian couples, too. A heterosexual couple who gets drunk in Las Vegas and get married as a joke are legally married in every state. This same right is equally available to everyone, or it is not available to anyone.

The US Federal government cannot pass a Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage or defining "traditional" marriage as between a man and a woman because that is unconstitutional. It infringes on the rights of the homosexual and lesbian citizens, and the First Amendment forbids religious dogma from becoming US law.

Your religion does not have any power over American law. That is your religious fantasy.

Do you want to abolish the First Amendment in order to protect "traditional" marriage?

The 1A has nothing to do with this, low information one.
And nothing in the Constitution makes one state subservient to another state. The opposite in fact.

So a drive-through marriage in Las Vegas isn't recognized by other states? And gay people have that same freedom, right? So the Federal government has to get involved.

The First Amendment has everything to do with this because you religious talking monkeys can only cite the Bible as your reason for opposing gay and lesbian rights, and the First Amendment prohibits religious bullshit from taking over the US legal system. So the question stands: Are you willing to abolish the First Amendment in order to inject your narrow-minded religious view of marriage into US law?

I am an atheist, and I have never cited the Bible has a reason for opposing gay marriage. That's one more claim we can add to the pile of your discredited arguments.

 

[KNB]

The 1A has nothing to do with this, low information one.
And nothing in the Constitution makes one state subservient to another state. The opposite in fact.

So a drive-through marriage in Las Vegas isn't recognized by other states? And gay people have that same freedom, right? So the Federal government has to get involved.

The First Amendment has everything to do with this because you religious talking monkeys can only cite the Bible as your reason for opposing gay and lesbian rights, and the First Amendment prohibits religious bullshit from taking over the US legal system. So the question stands: Are you willing to abolish the First Amendment in order to inject your narrow-minded religious view of marriage into US law?

I am an atheist, and I have never cited the Bible has a reason for opposing gay marriage. That's one more claim we can add to the pile of your discredited arguments.

No, you said that heterosexuals' chances of getting AIDS is virtually zero, which is even dumber than anything that I've read in the Bible.

 

[bripat9643]

Race has what to do with anything? You said that heterosexuals' chances of getting AIDS is "virtually zero". You are wrong. Irresponsibly and tremendously wrong.

I just explained it for those who capable of committing logic. It has to do with Haitians, moron. The fact that they are black is purely incidental. The CDC's numbers are propaganda. The proof is in the article I posted. They put all Haitians with HIV into the "heterosexual" category. That is a huge lie.

So the CDC is lying and Michael Fumento is telling the truth? Again, who the fuck is Michael Fumento? And where does he get his information from if not the CDC? From his asshole?

Post one REAL link to anyone with a PhD in medicine who will say that heterosexuals have virtually no chance of contracting HIV/AIDS.

I just did, dumbfuck. The article quoted Dr. Harold Jaffe, Chief epidemiologist for the CDC.

It doesn't matter who Michael Fumento is. It's simply an historical fact that the CDC lumped in all Haitian immigrants with HIV into the "heterosexual' category. That makes the CDC statistics nothing but pure bullshit propaganda.

 

[bripat9643]

So a drive-through marriage in Las Vegas isn't recognized by other states? And gay people have that same freedom, right? So the Federal government has to get involved.

The First Amendment has everything to do with this because you religious talking monkeys can only cite the Bible as your reason for opposing gay and lesbian rights, and the First Amendment prohibits religious bullshit from taking over the US legal system. So the question stands: Are you willing to abolish the First Amendment in order to inject your narrow-minded religious view of marriage into US law?

I am an atheist, and I have never cited the Bible has a reason for opposing gay marriage. That's one more claim we can add to the pile of your discredited arguments.

No, you said that heterosexuals' chances of getting AIDS is virtually zero, which is even dumber than anything that I've read in the Bible.

Wrong, I said the chances of a male contracting HIV by having sex with a HIV positive femail is virtually zero.

Apparently you think facts are dumb.

I've debated this subject many times with libturd drones, and it never fails to make their heads explode. They simply will not admit the truth, no matter how thoroughly you rub their faces into it.

 

[KNB]

The article quoted Dr. Jaffe asking why the rate of heterosexual infections hasn't exploded since the 1980s. That doesn't "prove" that heterosexuals' chances of getting AIDS is virtually zero. All it proves is that fewer heterosexuals are contracting the disease compared to homosexuals, but the human chance of getting the disease does not have to do with race or gender. If anything, I could point to the higher rate of infections in the gay and black community as further evidence that the US doesn't give a fuck about gay or black people and just want to leave the problem alone to punish them for a perceived "sin".

Heterosexual chances of getting AIDS from unprotected sex or a dirty needle is just the same as that of a gay person. The disease doesn't care what color you are, who you have sex with, or how you have sex. If you come into contact with the disease, your chance of getting it is the same as anyone else.

Learn, or kill yourself.

 

[KNB]

I am an atheist, and I have never cited the Bible has a reason for opposing gay marriage. That's one more claim we can add to the pile of your discredited arguments.

No, you said that heterosexuals' chances of getting AIDS is virtually zero, which is even dumber than anything that I've read in the Bible.

Wrong, I said the chances of a male contracting HIV by having sex with a HIV positive femail is virtually zero.

And that's fucking retarded.

 

[natstew]

It's amazing how so many Democrap lemmings changed their opinion about Queer marriage when their Messiah changed his.

A CEO gets fired for his belief about Queer marriage ten years ago, how about firing Obama for his belief of just five years ago.

The hypocrisy of the Left is unending!!

 

[KNB]

It's amazing how so many Democrap lemmings changed their opinion about Queer marriage when their Messiah changed his.

A CEO gets fired for his belief about Queer marriage ten years ago, how about firing Obama for his belief of just five years ago.

The hypocrisy of the Left is unending!!

2008 wasn't ten years ago and Obama isn't Progressive.

 

[GreenBean]

exactly, one of the goals of progressives is to destroy marriage, when two people marry and form a family that family unit takes precedence over all else to those people, the progressives want people's first loyalty to be to the federal govt.

thats the same reason why progressives fight against states rights. We all must kowtow to the feds, we cannot think for ourselves, we cannot put anything or anyone above the government masters.

these silly assholes on the left have no idea what they are asking for.

The entire argument is "Framed" to highlight Gay Rights but most Liberal Progressive SocioFacists fail to understand the difeference between Gay Rights and The Gay Agenda .

They fail to understand the difference between Sex and Sodomy . Gay Sex is not true Sex, it is simply Sodomy . They fail to comprehend the difference between being Gay and being Happy. Homosexual is a Sad and sorry way to lead your life, it's not refelctive of the true meaning of Gay at all- it's an Oxymoron perpetuated by Morons.

IN effect Gay Sex = Sad Sodomy

Type "porn" into your search engine and see what comes up. Click on the first site. There are millions of heterosexuals in every country all over the world having anal sex, like they have since the ancient eras, same as gay people.

Did you know that there are prehistoric dildos that have been found? Some carved from bone, rock and even wood.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/2010/05/18/world-oldest-sex-toy-uncovered-in-german-cave/
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Ancient phallus unearthed in cave
The Christian Bedroom: The History of Sex Toys: who made the first dildo?

Etymologically speaking it's Sodomy whetehre practiced by heteros or homos - So far as the history of Sex Toys, so what ? Who cares ? And not that it matters but there is not proof positive that they were sex toys , ... doesn't matter barely relevant.

 

[KNB]

The entire argument is "Framed" to highlight Gay Rights but most Liberal Progressive SocioFacists fail to understand the difeference between Gay Rights and The Gay Agenda .

They fail to understand the difference between Sex and Sodomy . Gay Sex is not true Sex, it is simply Sodomy . They fail to comprehend the difference between being Gay and being Happy. Homosexual is a Sad and sorry way to lead your life, it's not refelctive of the true meaning of Gay at all- it's an Oxymoron perpetuated by Morons.

IN effect Gay Sex = Sad Sodomy

Type "porn" into your search engine and see what comes up. Click on the first site. There are millions of heterosexuals in every country all over the world having anal sex, like they have since the ancient eras, same as gay people.

Did you know that there are prehistoric dildos that have been found? Some carved from bone, rock and even wood.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/2010/05/18/world-oldest-sex-toy-uncovered-in-german-cave/
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Ancient phallus unearthed in cave
The Christian Bedroom: The History of Sex Toys: who made the first dildo?

Etymologically speaking it's Sodomy whetehre practiced by heteros or homos - So far as the history of Sex Toys, so what ? Who cares ? And not that it matters but there is not proof positive that they were sex toys , ... doesn't matter barely relevant.

Actually it is very relevant because those sex toys (click on that link for "The Christian Bedroom.com". Tell us what that item on the right was used for if not a cock) were used in anal intercourse. This means that heterosexuals have been engaging in sodomy for just as long as gay people, and the world hasn't been destroyed by an invisible man in the sky. "Gay sex is not true sex". Jesus monkey-fucking Christ. How do you people even get dressed, let alone log in to an internet messageboard?

Your religious opposition to gay marriage has no strength under the US Constitution.

 

[bripat9643]

The article quoted Dr. Jaffe asking why the rate of heterosexual infections hasn't exploded since the 1980s. That doesn't "prove" that heterosexuals' chances of getting AIDS is virtually zero. All it proves is that fewer heterosexuals are contracting the disease compared to homosexuals, but the human chance of getting the disease does not have to do with race or gender. If anything, I could point to the higher rate of infections in the gay and black community as further evidence that the US doesn't give a fuck about gay or black people and just want to leave the problem alone to punish them for a perceived "sin".

Heterosexual chances of getting AIDS from unprotected sex or a dirty needle is just the same as that of a gay person. The disease doesn't care what color you are, who you have sex with, or how you have sex. If you come into contact with the disease, your chance of getting it is the same as anyone else.

Learn, or kill yourself.

That's obviously pure PC bullshit. Whether you get HIV depends entirely on two activities: IV drug use or having anal receptive sex or having vaginal sex with an infected male. It's virtually impossible for a male to contract the disease by having intercourse of any kind with a female.

You're spouting gay propaganda, not facts.

 

[bripat9643]

Type "porn" into your search engine and see what comes up. Click on the first site. There are millions of heterosexuals in every country all over the world having anal sex, like they have since the ancient eras, same as gay people.

Did you know that there are prehistoric dildos that have been found? Some carved from bone, rock and even wood.
World's Oldest Sex Toy Uncovered in German Cave | Fox News
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Ancient phallus unearthed in cave
The Christian Bedroom: The History of Sex Toys: who made the first dildo?

Etymologically speaking it's Sodomy whetehre practiced by heteros or homos - So far as the history of Sex Toys, so what ? Who cares ? And not that it matters but there is not proof positive that they were sex toys , ... doesn't matter barely relevant.

Actually it is very relevant because those sex toys (click on that link for "The Christian Bedroom.com". Tell us what that item on the right was used for if not a cock) were used in anal intercourse. This means that heterosexuals have been engaging in sodomy for just as long as gay people, and the world hasn't been destroyed by an invisible man in the sky. "Gay sex is not true sex". Jesus monkey-fucking Christ. How do you people even get dressed, let alone log in to an internet messageboard?

Your religious opposition to gay marriage has no strength under the US Constitution.

It really doesn't matter whether you are gay or straight, the only way to get HIV is to have a penis jammed up your ass.

 

[bripat9643]

No, you said that heterosexuals' chances of getting AIDS is virtually zero, which is even dumber than anything that I've read in the Bible.

Wrong, I said the chances of a male contracting HIV by having sex with a HIV positive femail is virtually zero.

And that's fucking retarded.

You obviously believe facts are retarded.

 

[KNB]

The article quoted Dr. Jaffe asking why the rate of heterosexual infections hasn't exploded since the 1980s. That doesn't "prove" that heterosexuals' chances of getting AIDS is virtually zero. All it proves is that fewer heterosexuals are contracting the disease compared to homosexuals, but the human chance of getting the disease does not have to do with race or gender. If anything, I could point to the higher rate of infections in the gay and black community as further evidence that the US doesn't give a fuck about gay or black people and just want to leave the problem alone to punish them for a perceived "sin".

Heterosexual chances of getting AIDS from unprotected sex or a dirty needle is just the same as that of a gay person. The disease doesn't care what color you are, who you have sex with, or how you have sex. If you come into contact with the disease, your chance of getting it is the same as anyone else.

Learn, or kill yourself.

That's obviously pure PC bullshit. Whether you get HIV depends entirely on two activities: IV drug use or having anal receptive sex or having vaginal sex with an infected male. It's virtually impossible for a male to contract the disease by having intercourse of any kind with a female.

You're spouting gay propaganda, not facts.

It depends on coming into contact with the disease. Your chance of getting infected if you come into contact with the disease is the same as that of a gay person. Or do you think that heterosexual women have some special protective barrier in their vaginas that wards off AIDS?

 

[KNB]

Wrong, I said the chances of a male contracting HIV by having sex with a HIV positive femail is virtually zero.

And that's fucking retarded.

You obviously believe facts are retarded.

You quoted an opinion piece from an unknown shill. "It doesn't matter who the author is because it's all totally for reals!" Yeah, good job, dingleberry.

Learn, or kill yourself.

How Do You Get HIV or AIDS?

 

[The Rabbi]

And this is where the Federal government gets involved. To end disputes between states. If one state recognizes a gay couple's marriage then every state must recognize that gay couples marriage. That is how it works for heterosexuals, so equality under the law states that this is how it must be for homosexual and lesbian couples, too. A heterosexual couple who gets drunk in Las Vegas and get married as a joke are legally married in every state. This same right is equally available to everyone, or it is not available to anyone.

The US Federal government cannot pass a Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage or defining "traditional" marriage as between a man and a woman because that is unconstitutional. It infringes on the rights of the homosexual and lesbian citizens, and the First Amendment forbids religious dogma from becoming US law.

Your religion does not have any power over American law. That is your religious fantasy.

Do you want to abolish the First Amendment in order to protect "traditional" marriage?

The 1A has nothing to do with this, low information one.
And nothing in the Constitution makes one state subservient to another state. The opposite in fact.

So a drive-through marriage in Las Vegas isn't recognized by other states? And gay people have that same freedom, right? So the Federal government has to get involved.

The First Amendment has everything to do with this because you religious talking monkeys can only cite the Bible as your reason for opposing gay and lesbian rights, and the First Amendment prohibits religious bullshit from taking over the US legal system. So the question stands: Are you willing to abolish the First Amendment in order to inject your narrow-minded religious view of marriage into US law?

You're literally insane. No one has cited the Bible in this discussion. Not in over 30 pages.
Marriage in Las Vegas is recognized because it is. Not because it has to be.
I have a handgun carry permit from TN. It is recognized in about 40 states. But it isn't recognized in NY or MA, among others. SO much for your argument.

 

[bripat9643]

The article quoted Dr. Jaffe asking why the rate of heterosexual infections hasn't exploded since the 1980s. That doesn't "prove" that heterosexuals' chances of getting AIDS is virtually zero. All it proves is that fewer heterosexuals are contracting the disease compared to homosexuals, but the human chance of getting the disease does not have to do with race or gender. If anything, I could point to the higher rate of infections in the gay and black community as further evidence that the US doesn't give a fuck about gay or black people and just want to leave the problem alone to punish them for a perceived "sin".

Heterosexual chances of getting AIDS from unprotected sex or a dirty needle is just the same as that of a gay person. The disease doesn't care what color you are, who you have sex with, or how you have sex. If you come into contact with the disease, your chance of getting it is the same as anyone else.

Learn, or kill yourself.

That's obviously pure PC bullshit. Whether you get HIV depends entirely on two activities: IV drug use or having anal receptive sex or having vaginal sex with an infected male. It's virtually impossible for a male to contract the disease by having intercourse of any kind with a female.

You're spouting gay propaganda, not facts.

It depends on coming into contact with the disease. Your chance of getting infected if you come into contact with the disease is the same as that of a gay person. Or do you think that heterosexual women have some special protective barrier in their vaginas that wards off AIDS?

It depends on whether a person who is HIV positive rams his penis up your ass. Women can get it through vaginal sex, but it's much more difficult. The vagina is a tough muscular wall. The membrane in your rectum, on the other hand, is thin and it tears easily. To get HIV you have to have blood to blood contact. That rarely happens unless you're getting a penis rammed up your ass.

 

[The Rabbi]

The article quoted Dr. Jaffe asking why the rate of heterosexual infections hasn't exploded since the 1980s. That doesn't "prove" that heterosexuals' chances of getting AIDS is virtually zero. All it proves is that fewer heterosexuals are contracting the disease compared to homosexuals, but the human chance of getting the disease does not have to do with race or gender. If anything, I could point to the higher rate of infections in the gay and black community as further evidence that the US doesn't give a fuck about gay or black people and just want to leave the problem alone to punish them for a perceived "sin".

Heterosexual chances of getting AIDS from unprotected sex or a dirty needle is just the same as that of a gay person. The disease doesn't care what color you are, who you have sex with, or how you have sex. If you come into contact with the disease, your chance of getting it is the same as anyone else.

Learn, or kill yourself.

That's obviously pure PC bullshit. Whether you get HIV depends entirely on two activities: IV drug use or having anal receptive sex or having vaginal sex with an infected male. It's virtually impossible for a male to contract the disease by having intercourse of any kind with a female.

You're spouting gay propaganda, not facts.

It depends on coming into contact with the disease. Your chance of getting infected if you come into contact with the disease is the same as that of a gay person. Or do you think that heterosexual women have some special protective barrier in their vaginas that wards off AIDS?

And you come into contact with the disease by getting a dick stuck up your ass. How many straight men have that happen vs gay men?
I rest my case. AIDS is predominantly a disease of the gay community.

 

[KNB]

That's obviously pure PC bullshit. Whether you get HIV depends entirely on two activities: IV drug use or having anal receptive sex or having vaginal sex with an infected male. It's virtually impossible for a male to contract the disease by having intercourse of any kind with a female.

You're spouting gay propaganda, not facts.

It depends on coming into contact with the disease. Your chance of getting infected if you come into contact with the disease is the same as that of a gay person. Or do you think that heterosexual women have some special protective barrier in their vaginas that wards off AIDS?

It depends on whether a person who is HIV positive rams his penis up your ass. Women can get it through vaginal sex, but it's much more difficult. The vagina is a tough muscular wall. The membrane in your rectum, on the other hand, is thin and it tears easily. To get HIV you have to have blood to blood contact. That rarely happens unless you're getting a penis rammed up your ass.

You're fucking retarded.

 

[bripat9643]

And that's fucking retarded.

You obviously believe facts are retarded.

You quoted an opinion piece from an unknown shill. "It doesn't matter who the author is because it's all totally for reals!" Yeah, good job, dingleberry.

Learn, or kill yourself.

How Do You Get HIV or AIDS?

Your quoting a government website. The government is the primary source of disinformation about HIV.

You have no credibility. You're just another shill for the gay lobby. You're probably gay yourself. It's been my experience that all the fanatics who argue for gay marriage are homosexuals.