Trump’s Pushing Us Closer to WW3 Than Biden Ever Did

[shockedcanadian]

Then why is he taking credit?

For what? WWIII?

 

[Synthaholic]

And nobody in the "intel community" would lie to her, in order to make her look bad and to try and foment division between two people they hate, right?

Then why hasn't he replaced her? Because he's weak.

 

[mudwhistle]

The Breeze The Duke Meister mudwhistle toobfreak

Fake News rating on one of your own kind (Conservative from Georgia) goes to show just how much you guys are into Trump's ass, refusing to even see what Trump is showing you! Everything in the OP is news (not opinion) and yet it is Fake News to you?

Hahahaha

Here you are, blind as a bat for obvious reasons:

View attachment 1126911

If we not go to war because Trump backs off (he is all huff and puff), we will be destroyed by MAGA anyway.

Incompetent leadership always ends with the troops getting harmed or killed. Fact of life.

 

[konradv]

And if Iran got nukes, you’d all blame President Trump.

No one gives a shit what you anti-Trumpers think.

Iran has been on the verge of nukes for 30 years! Trump is just “wagging the dog” to distract from his disastrous domestic policies.

 

[Synthaholic]

Yet another reason to shitcan Ratcliffe post haste.

Then we hasn't he replaced him? Because he's weak.

 

[Rigby5]

Appease Porridge Left on the Stove Too Long

The Israelis know that Americans let threats develop until it's too late, as our moronic intelligence agencies did with 9/11. The only thing that wakes up Americans is the threat of being nuked. So Mossad was forced to go with that.

Case in point. Why didn't we knock out these psychos after they seized our embassy? Some superpower. Our failure to respond to that humiliation encouraged terrorism by both Islamic sects.

Wrong.
Iran is not the bad guy, we are.
We over turned their democracy in 1953, with Operation Ajax, murdering tens of thousands, and installing the Shah as dictator.
The US embassy is where the coup was coordinated from.
We were illegally conducting insurrection out of our embassy in Tehran.

Even now, we illegally impose economic sanctions on Iran that are in total violation of the 1906 Geneva Conventions the US ratified into US law.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Iran has been on the verge of nukes for 30 years! Trump is just “wagging the dog” to distract from his disastrous domestic policies.

Oh they have not. Stop your bs

 

[Synthaholic]

Iran has been working on a nuclear bomb since the 1980’s

MAGA-level of dumbassery in this post.

Working on it since the 1980s?

 

[Rigby5]

No one including me thinks Iran has the bomb yet

Nor do I think they will use it till they have a stockpile

But sooner or later…

No one can "use" nukes.
They are only good for deterrent purposes.
If you actually "use" them for anything else, you would get obliterated by retaliation.
Which is why Iran should have nukes, and the illegal US invasion of Iraq proves that they need nuke deterrents.

 

[theHawk]

Iran has been on the verge of nukes for 30 years! Trump is just “wagging the dog” to distract from his disastrous domestic policies.

Uh huh, he’s just making up the fact that Iran is actively launching rockets into Israel and is preparing to attack US bases in the region.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
Iran is not the bad guy, we are.
We over turned their democracy in 1953, with Operation Ajax, murdering tens of thousands, and installing the Shah as dictator.
The US embassy is where the coup was coordinated from.
We were illegally conducting insurrection out of our embassy in Tehran.

Even now, we illegally impose economic sanctions on Iran that are in total violation of the 1906 Geneva Conventions the US ratified into US law.

There was no insurrection when they stormed the embassy and siezed hostages you dumb ****

The sanctions ARE LEGAL

 

[SassyIrishLass]

No one can "use" nukes.
They are only good for deterrent purposes.
If you actually "use" them for anything else, you would get obliterated by retaliation.
Which is why Iran should have nukes, and the illegal US invasion of Iraq proves that they need nuke deterrents.

Uhm the US used nukes and it wasn't a deterrent

Cripes you're fckn stupid

 

[Soupnazi630]

No one can "use" nukes.
They are only good for deterrent purposes.
If you actually "use" them for anything else, you would get obliterated by retaliation.
Which is why Iran should have nukes, and the illegal US invasion of Iraq proves that they need nuke deterrents.

The invasion was legal

They cannot have nukes they are an evil and unstable muslim theocracy

 

[Rigby5]

Oh they have not. Stop your bs

Wrong.
Iran installed and practiced with the centrifuges in the 1990s.
It only takes a few years for anyone to make nukes, like Pakistan, India, North Korea, etc., did in the 1990s.
Iran is much more capable of making nukes than any of these other nuclear powers, and likely would be more trustworthy as well.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
The cash Obama returned was Iranian money, prepaid for ships we failed to deliver.
The World Court was insisting we repay.
Obama had no choice in the matter.
It was theft to even delay that long, since the money had been paid for the ships in 1979.
Keeping the money was criminal.

Nor is Iran guilty of terrorism.
The US is the one attacking everyone, so retaliation is not terrorism, but justice.

Iran is guilty of terrorism we have attacked no one you are an idiot making shit up

 

[Luckyone]

We are not in a war against Iran. I am still all in for our country and still support Trump. The media is causing your worry.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
Iran installed and practiced with the centrifuges in the 1990s.
It only takes a few years for anyone to make nukes, like Pakistan, India, North Korea, etc., did in the 1990s.
Iran is much more capable of making nukes than any of these other nuclear powers, and likely would be more trustworthy as well.

They did not start in the 90s and create the nukes in the 90s you moron they began trying to devop nukes DECADES before they built one

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Wrong.
Iran installed and practiced with the centrifuges in the 1990s.
It only takes a few years for anyone to make nukes, like Pakistan, India, North Korea, etc., did in the 1990s.
Iran is much more capable of making nukes than any of these other nuclear powers, and likely would be more trustworthy as well.

I don't believe a single thing you post. I haven't since you exposed yourself as an antisemiteic jackass so stop

 

[Rigby5]

Uhm the US used nukes and it wasn't a deterrent

Cripes you're fckn stupid

It was criminal for the US to use nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the only excuse we used was that we did not know of the civilian harm it was going to have.
But now that everyone knows how nukes cannot be limited to military application, they are hundreds of times more illegal than poison gas or biological weapons.
So anyone using them would be quickly destroyed by retaliation.
And that means Iran would never use them first.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It was criminal for the US to use nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the only excuse we used was that we did not know of the civilian harm it was going to have.
But now that everyone knows how nukes cannot be limited to military application, they are hundreds of times more illegal than poison gas or biological weapons.
So anyone using them would be quickly destroyed by retaliation.
And that means Iran would never use them first.

I don't care. Spew your bs to someone you think does