Trump’s Pushing Us Closer to WW3 Than Biden Ever Did

[Soupnazi630]

It was criminal for the US to use nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the only excuse we used was that we did not know of the civilian harm it was going to have.
But now that everyone knows how nukes cannot be limited to military application, they are hundreds of times more illegal than poison gas or biological weapons.
So anyone using them would be quickly destroyed by retaliation.
And that means Iran would never use them first.

It was not criminal it was perfectly legal to drops those bombs

They are not mroe illegal

Iran has an insane and unstable government so yes they would use them before us

 

[mudwhistle]

The Breeze The Duke Meister mudwhistle toobfreak

Fake News rating on one of your own kind (Conservative from Georgia) goes to show just how much you guys are into Trump's ass, refusing to even see what Trump is showing you! Everything in the OP is news (not opinion) and yet it is Fake News to you?

Hahahaha

Here you are, blind as a bat for obvious reasons:

View attachment 1126911

If we do not go to war because Trump backs off (he is all huff and puff and no balls, and no brains), we will be destroyed by MAGA anyway.

Incompetent leadership always ends with the troops getting harmed or killed. Fact of life.

Yep....I discovered that in Mogadishu in 93'.

 

[Rigby5]

The invasion was legal

They cannot have nukes they are an evil and unstable muslim theocracy

Wrong.
The US invasion of Iraq was totally in violation of the UN charter that we ratified into US law in 1945.
The excuse we tried to use was that Iraqi WMD made the attack "defensive".
But that clearly was a lie, because Iraq never had any real or significant WMD.
In fact, the only WMD they ever had were the ones we gave to them, during their fight with Iran in the 1980s.

Iran is not "evil" since they never tried to commit crimes, like invading or stealing, like the US always is doing.

There are dozens of Moslem theocracies, and none of them are problem in any way.
They are more strict and moral than we are.

Islam is actually a very minor reformation of Judaism.
They even have almost identical food and family rules.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
The US invasion of Iraq was totally in violation of the UN charter that we ratified into US law in 1945.
The excuse we tried to use was that Iraqi WMD made the attack "defensive".
But that clearly was a lie, because Iraq never had any real or significant WMD.
In fact, the only WMD they ever had were the ones we gave to them, during their fight with Iran in the 1980s.

Iran is not "evil" since they never tried to commit crimes, like invading or stealing, like the US always is doing.

There are dozens of Moslem theocracies, and none of them are problem in any way.
They are more strict and moral than we are.

Islam is actually a very minor reformation of Judaism.
They even have almost identical food and family rules.

WRONG
The Un charter is not law superceeding congress which authorized the invasion and therefore made it LEGAL

Yes they did commit said crimes ************

They are evil because they have an unstable and abominable muslim dictatorship

Yes they all are problems

Islam is not a reformation of judaism it is a radically different and extremist religion

 

[Rigby5]

They did not start in the 90s and create the nukes in the 90s you moron they began trying to devop nukes DECADES before they built one

Wrong.
It only takes a couple years for anyone to make nukes.
There is no research necessary.
It is actually very trivial.
Just a little time consuming to use the techniques to enrich, like centrifuges.
The US took less than 2 years to make not just nukes, but thermonuclear weapons.
Same with Russia.

 

[westwall]

I was all-in for Trump, thinking he’d keep us out of wars, unlike Biden and the DC crowd. But this Iran mess is freaking me out. Back under Biden, everyone screamed we were on the edge of WW3 over Ukraine, but it was just talk…sanctions, some weapons, no real escalation. Now? Trump’s letting Israel bomb Iran’s nuclear sites and take out their big-shot commanders, and he’s even thinking about jumping in with US forces.

Trump’s not pushing for a cease-fire and might green-light a US attack on Iran in a couple weeks. This ain’t the “America First” guy I voted for. Feels like he’s itching for a fight way more than Biden ever did.


Then there’s Russia, and they’re not playing around. They said they’d be pissed if Israel, with our help, tries to take out Iran’s top leader, calling it “unimaginable.” That’s a red flag, folks. Russia’s tight with Iran, and they’re already on edge from Ukraine. Biden kept things at arm’s length…proxy wars didn’t turn into world wars. But Trump’s all-in with Israel’s attacks and talking about US strikes, which could drag Russia or even China into this. I feel like we got duped. The guy we trusted to keep the peace is risking a real WW3, not the overhyped stuff we rolled our eyes at under Biden.


We gotta call BS on this as Trump supporters. Israel’s hitting Iran’s nuclear plants, and Trump’s not just cheering—he’s sending B-2 bombers and Navy ships to the region, according to the WSJ. Defensive? Yeah, right, that’s war prep. Biden got crap for being weak, but he didn’t have us facing off against a nuclear Iran with Russia threatening to step in. Trump’s supposed to be the deal guy, so where’s the deal to cool this down? I backed him to fix the system, not to drag us into a global disaster. Honestly, I’m starting to think we got the wrong warmonger pegged.

Liar

 

[Rigby5]

I don't believe a single thing you post. I haven't since you exposed yourself as an antisemiteic jackass so stop

Wrong.
It should be obvious I am Jewish, so impossible to be anti-Semitic.
But you need to work on your punctuation.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
It only takes a couple years for anyone to make nukes.
There is no research necessary.
It is actually very trivial.
Just a little time consuming to use the techniques to enrich, like centrifuges.
The US took less than 2 years to make not just nukes, but thermonuclear weapons.
Same with Russia.

WRONG

It takes decades

There is massive research and work necessary

Bullshit it took two years to make atom bombs but much longer to make hysrogen bombs and these other natrions did not have the same resources

Russia stole them from us DUMBASS

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
It should be obvious I am Jewish, so impossible to be anti-Semitic.
But you need to work on your punctuation.

You are a liar and fraud and are not a jew nor jewish

You are an anti semetic jew hating pig

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Wrong.
It should be obvious I am Jewish, so impossible to be anti-Semitic.
But you need to work on your punctuation.

Roflmao.. no just no you fckn fraud

 

[0311]

It was 47 that said Biden was dragging our county into World War II

 

[Rigby5]

It was not criminal it was perfectly legal to drops those bombs

They are not mroe illegal

Iran has an insane and unstable government so yes they would use them before us

Wrong.
Nuclear weapons clearly are banned as illegal chemical weapons and biological weapons.
They can't be directed onto just military targets, but instead always also impact civilians.
And in discriminant, wide spread weapons that do things like cause radiation sickness, cancers, etc., clearly are illegal and have been since WWI.

Iran has done nothing "insane" or "unstable", and have a justifiable right to be angry with the US illegal involvement in the 1979 takeover by the Shah.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
Nuclear weapons clearly are banned as illegal chemical weapons and biological weapons.
They can't be directed onto just military targets, but instead always also impact civilians.
And in discriminant, wide spread weapons that do things like cause radiation sickness, cancers, etc., clearly are illegal and have been since WWI.

Iran has done nothing "insane" or "unstable", and have a justifiable right to be angry with the US illegal involvement in the 1979 takeover by the Shah.

Wrong

Nuclear weapons are not banned

The US reserves the right to use them

Yes Iran is an insane and unstable islamic nation

The shah did not take over in 1979 you idiot. 79 was when they threw him out

 

[Rigby5]

WRONG
The Un charter is not law superceeding congress which authorized the invasion and therefore made it LEGAL

Yes they did commit said crimes ************

They are evil because they have an unstable and abominable muslim dictatorship

Yes they all are problems

Islam is not a reformation of judaism it is a radically different and extremist religion

Wrong.
How it works is that when the UN passes a convention, then Congress has to either ratify it, or can decide to leave the UN.
When chemical and biological weapons were made illegal by the UN, Congress ratified that ban in to US law.

When the US joined the UN, it ratified the UN charter prohibiting aggressive war, in 1945.
So Congress voluntarily made all war illegal except defensive war when the US is attacked.
But Iraq never attacked the US, so the US attack on Iraq was not defensive, and therefore illegal.

Go read the 2003 Joint Resolution for the Use of Force in Iraq, by Congress.
It did NOT authorize the attack.
What Congress did instead, was to allow the president to decide if the US was threatened or not.

Iraq committed no crimes, so the US was the criminal in violation of US law, for illegally invading Iraq.

Ask any clergy about the 3 Abrahamic religions, Islam, Judaism, and Christianity.
They all use the exact same Old Testament.
They are identical except for a few reformations.

The similarities are far greater than their differences.
For example, the Christian habits nuns wear, are actually the Moslem hajib, and what Jewish women are also supposed to wear.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
How it works is that when the UN passes a convention, then Congress has to either ratify it, or can decide to leave the UN.
When chemical and biological weapons were made illegal by the UN, Congress ratified that ban in to US law.

When the US joined the UN, it ratified the UN charter prohibiting aggressive war, in 1945.
So Congress voluntarily made all war illegal except defensive war when the US is attacked.
But Iraq never attacked the US, so the US attack on Iraq was not defensive, and therefore illegal.

Go read the 2003 Joint Resolution for the Use of Force in Iraq, by Congress.
It did NOT authorize the attack.
What Congress did instead, was to allow the president to decide if the US was threatened or not.

Iraq committed no crimes, so the US was the criminal in violation of US law, for illegally invading Iraq.

Ask any clergy about the 3 Abrahamic religions, Islam, Judaism, and Christianity.
They all use the exact same Old Testament.
They are identical except for a few reformations.

The similarities are far greater than their differences.
For example, the Christian habits nuns wear, are actually the Moslem hajib, and what Jewish women are also supposed to wear.

Wrong moron

The UN is not a legal authority over the US

COngress authorized the attack the UN is irrelevant'

The US violated no law in invading

Wrong they are radically different as any clergy knows

 

[Rigby5]

Wrong

Nuclear weapons are not banned

The US reserves the right to use them

Yes Iran is an insane and unstable islamic nation

The shah did not take over in 1979 you idiot. 79 was when they threw him out

Nuclear weapons obvious cause medical diseases, so are biological weapons.
They also produce toxic gases and toxic radiation, so are chemical weapons.
Both biological and chemical weapons that will be impossible to prevent from killing civilians are illegal.
So then nukes also have to be illegal.

All countries reserve the right to use nuclear weapons, but they are only legal in retaliation to a nuclear attack.

Iran has never done anything "insane" and have never attacked innocent countries like we have.

Yes, the Shah took over in 1953, and was kicked out in 1979.
I know the history of that era very well.

 

[Rigby5]

Wrong moron

The UN is not a legal authority over the US

COngress authorized the attack the UN is irrelevant'

The US violated no law in invading

Wrong they are radically different as any clergy knows

Wrong.
Congress ratified the UN charter and all passed UN resolutions, making them into US law.

Congress did NOT "authorize the attack" on Iraq.
The Joint Resolution for the Use of Force in Iraq copped out and just allowed the president to decide on his own.
So Bush was the criminal who lied and claimed that Iraq was about to attack the US with nuclear and biological weapons that they actually never had tried to make at all.
So yes, the US violated US law by invading Iraq on deliberate WMD lies.
The inspectors all agreed Iraq has no WMD or even any programs to make WMD.

 

[AZrailwhale]

It was criminal for the US to use nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the only excuse we used was that we did not know of the civilian harm it was going to have.
But now that everyone knows how nukes cannot be limited to military application, they are hundreds of times more illegal than poison gas or biological weapons.
So anyone using them would be quickly destroyed by retaliation.
And that means Iran would never use them first.

It wasn't criminal. In WW 2 bombing cities filled with civilians was that standard. The Germans did it, the Japanese did it, the Italians did it, the Soviets did it, all explicitly intending to kill or "dehouse" civilians. Of all the combatants, only the USA even tried to limit the damage to miliary targets. The Germans and Japanese even bombed cities that had been declared "open" meaning that they wouldn't be defended against attack.

 

[AZrailwhale]

WRONG

It takes decades

There is massive research and work necessary

Bullshit it took two years to make atom bombs but much longer to make hysrogen bombs and these other natrions did not have the same resources

Russia stole them from us DUMBASS

There is no research necessary to make either enriched uranium or plutonium for nuclear bombs. Neither is research necessary to build the bombs themselves, the process is now well known, it's just a minor engineering problem to create the critical mass needed for the detonation.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Nuclear weapons obvious cause medical diseases, so are biological weapons.
They also produce toxic gases and toxic radiation, so are chemical weapons.
Both biological and chemical weapons that will be impossible to prevent from killing civilians are illegal.
So then nukes also have to be illegal.

All countries reserve the right to use nuclear weapons, but they are only legal in retaliation to a nuclear attack.

Iran has never done anything "insane" and have never attacked innocent countries like we have.

Yes, the Shah took over in 1953, and was kicked out in 1979.
I know the history of that era very well.

Nuclear weapons are not illegal. Your mental gymnastics are bullshit

Iran is led by an insane and evil government
The US reserves the right to use them at will

yet you stated the shah took over in 1979. You know nothing of this era of history of any other you are ignorant and stupid