Trump’s Pushing Us Closer to WW3 Than Biden Ever Did

[Mac-7]

Pascal's wager isn't an argument.

So if you are wrong and the Irans build a bomb you are ok with that?

 

[Contumacious]

It takes two to twngo

If we act now Iran will not have nukes to respond with

If an existential threat is created Iran may use a dirty bomb or Russia, China or North Korea will provide 1 or 2.

 

[Contumacious]

So if you are wrong and the Irans build a bomb you are ok with that?

According to the ASS-k-NAZI entity Iran has been ready to build a bomb for the past 30 years !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Oddball]

So if you are wrong and the Irans build a bomb you are ok with that?

Still Pascal's wager, still not an argument.

 

[Oddball]

Under normal circumstances it stops there , but NOT when there is a power struggle

Well, you're either part of the solution or part of the problem.

What evidence can you show that would lead me to believe that Rat is part of the solution?

 

[Crepitus]

I was all-in for Trump, thinking he’d keep us out of wars, unlike Biden and the DC crowd. But this Iran mess is freaking me out. Back under Biden, everyone screamed we were on the edge of WW3 over Ukraine, but it was just talk…sanctions, some weapons, no real escalation. Now? Trump’s letting Israel bomb Iran’s nuclear sites and take out their big-shot commanders, and he’s even thinking about jumping in with US forces.

Trump’s not pushing for a cease-fire and might green-light a US attack on Iran in a couple weeks. This ain’t the “America First” guy I voted for. Feels like he’s itching for a fight way more than Biden ever did.


Then there’s Russia, and they’re not playing around. They said they’d be pissed if Israel, with our help, tries to take out Iran’s top leader, calling it “unimaginable.” That’s a red flag, folks. Russia’s tight with Iran, and they’re already on edge from Ukraine. Biden kept things at arm’s length…proxy wars didn’t turn into world wars. But Trump’s all-in with Israel’s attacks and talking about US strikes, which could drag Russia or even China into this. I feel like we got duped. The guy we trusted to keep the peace is risking a real WW3, not the overhyped stuff we rolled our eyes at under Biden.


We gotta call BS on this as Trump supporters. Israel’s hitting Iran’s nuclear plants, and Trump’s not just cheering—he’s sending B-2 bombers and Navy ships to the region, according to the WSJ. Defensive? Yeah, right, that’s war prep. Biden got crap for being weak, but he didn’t have us facing off against a nuclear Iran with Russia threatening to step in. Trump’s supposed to be the deal guy, so where’s the deal to cool this down? I backed him to fix the system, not to drag us into a global disaster. Honestly, I’m starting to think we got the wrong warmonger pegged.

 

[Mac-7]

If an existential threat is created Iran may use a dirty bomb or Russia, China or North Korea will provide 1 or 2.

You cant defeat a bully by sticking your head in the sand

The consequences of allowing Itan to go nuclear are incalcuable

But thats less likely if we continue to take out their nuclear infastructure

Not to mention all the other damage being done to the cleric’s and their power structure

 

[BackAgain]

I was all-in for Trump, thinking he’d keep us out of wars, unlike Biden and the DC crowd. But this Iran mess is freaking me out. Back under Biden, everyone screamed we were on the edge of WW3 over Ukraine, but it was just talk…sanctions, some weapons, no real escalation. Now? Trump’s letting Israel bomb Iran’s nuclear sites and take out their big-shot commanders, and he’s even thinking about jumping in with US forces.

Trump’s not pushing for a cease-fire and might green-light a US attack on Iran in a couple weeks. This ain’t the “America First” guy I voted for. Feels like he’s itching for a fight way more than Biden ever did.


Then there’s Russia, and they’re not playing around. They said they’d be pissed if Israel, with our help, tries to take out Iran’s top leader, calling it “unimaginable.” That’s a red flag, folks. Russia’s tight with Iran, and they’re already on edge from Ukraine. Biden kept things at arm’s length…proxy wars didn’t turn into world wars. But Trump’s all-in with Israel’s attacks and talking about US strikes, which could drag Russia or even China into this. I feel like we got duped. The guy we trusted to keep the peace is risking a real WW3, not the overhyped stuff we rolled our eyes at under Biden.


We gotta call BS on this as Trump supporters. Israel’s hitting Iran’s nuclear plants, and Trump’s not just cheering—he’s sending B-2 bombers and Navy ships to the region, according to the WSJ. Defensive? Yeah, right, that’s war prep. Biden got crap for being weak, but he didn’t have us facing off against a nuclear Iran with Russia threatening to step in. Trump’s supposed to be the deal guy, so where’s the deal to cool this down? I backed him to fix the system, not to drag us into a global disaster. Honestly, I’m starting to think we got the wrong warmonger pegged.

You’re a moonbat lying fucktard.

You’ve never been all in for Trump. You’ve always been a fraud here. From your dishonest username to the shit you spew in your libtard posting efforts.

Stop wasting your time lying so much. You tipped your hand long ago.

Now, then, toddle off and go play in traffic.

 

[eagle1462010]

This war has been going on for a few centuries

Ok ill rephrase. This LATEST Round of War was staryed by.........

 

[Mac-7]

Pascal's wager isn't an argument.

I asked if you are comfortable with the consequences of being wrong?

Or do you even concede the possibility ?

 

[Contumacious]

Well, you're either part of the solution or part of the problem.

What evidence can you show that would lead me to believe that Rat is part of the solution?

President Trump has never PUBLICLY attacked Hegseth or Tulsi Gabbard - about a month ago the majority in his Cabinet - including VP Vance and his Chief of Staff opposed attacking Iran . He agreed. He has stated that he would never promote/retain a General controlled by the opposition yet he has promoted Kurilla . a Biden appointee.

Too many moving parts - don't know what's going on behind the scenes - can't answer your question.

 

[Oddball]

I asked if you are comfortable with the consequences of being wrong?

Or do you even concede the possibility ?

Reiterating the same fallacious argument over and over again doesn't make it less fallacious.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Ok ill rephrase. This LATEST Round of War was staryed by.........

I have absolutely no problem with Israel taking it to Iran. Godspeed

 

[Contumacious]

I asked if you are comfortable with the consequences of being wrong?

Or do you even concede the possibility ?

If Iran had nuclear weapons the carnage in Gaza would have prompted them to use - they didn't , they ain't got it.

 

[Oddball]

President Trump has never PUBLICLY attacked Hegseth or Tulsi Gabbard - about a month ago the majority in his Cabinet - including VP Vance and his Chief of Staff opposed attacking Iran . He agreed. He has stated that he would never promote/retain a General controlled by the opposition yet he has promoted Kurilla . a Biden appointee.

Too many moving parts - don't know what's going on behind the scenes - can't answer your question.

What do Hegseth, Tulsi, and/or Vance have to do with Kurilla being in his position?

 

[Mac-7]

Reiterating the same fallacious argument over and over again doesn't make it less fallacious.

Obviously you refuse to answer the question

Thats cowardly

 

[Contumacious]

I have absolutely no problem with Israel taking it to Iran. Godspeed

If Trump doesn't bail them out Israel will have to unconditionally surrender

 

[SassyIrishLass]

If Trump doesn't bail them out Israel will have to unconditionally surrender

That's not going to happen. You know it

 

[Mac-7]

If Iran had nuclear weapons the carnage in Gaza would have prompted them to use - they didn't , they ain't got it.

No one including me thinks Iran has the bomb yet

Nor do I think they will use it till they have a stockpile

But sooner or later…

 

[BackAgain]

I asked if you are comfortable with the consequences of being wrong?

The trouble with that is clear: either way one can be wrong. And consequences of being wrong flow — either way.

Or do you even concede the possibility ?

I suspect that all of us grasp that we might be wrong on many different issues.

Even firm guiding principles can prove to be mistaken depending on the thinking and actions taken by the opposition.