Trump's Attack on American democracy continues

[Nostra]

1. Education is not mentioned anywhere in the Constitution.

2. The government puts conditions on funding every day, and this is no different.

3. /thread.

 

[martybegan]

Actually that is a very noble outcome to protect the Constitution. The Founding Fathers would like that I'm sure.

But it gets us decisions our base calls treason to the party and the cause.

I actually give more slack to Barrett than Roberts, because some of Robert's choices reflect politics and not interpretation.

 

[22lcidw]

We know.

View attachment 1100637


Not only hacks but corrupt, lying hacks.

The Supreme Court gave Trump immunity. He's using it as ...​

View attachment 1100638
CNN
https://www.cnn.com › 2025/02/19 › politics › trump-s...
Feb 19, 2025 — John Sauer represented Trump in the case that led to the Supreme Court's sweeping July 1 decision giving him personal immunity from prosecution.

Unfortunately sell out Republicans shove shills into the mix from time to time. After watching Kamala the last 4 years and seeing how she was with Kavanaugh it is now known that many of these politicians need a script to read from or are vacant. McConnell put to many shills into the judiciary. And he let Schumer put hundreds of Progressive Socialist Communist judges into the same judiciary the last two years of Joe with a 50/50 Senate. We need to clean up the system. Save money. reduce stealing, graft and corruption as to keep sending the checks and benefits out. To have high inflation to continue to do so, will not end well.

 

[kyzr]

But it gets us decisions our base calls treason to the party and the cause.
I actually give more slack to Barrett than Roberts, because some of Robert's choices reflect politics and not interpretation.

Absolutely true. Except these last few decisions that went against Trump were goofy, but I'm blanking on them????
Couldn't find them below either. You remember any?

I didn't even hear about most of these cases. They are really busy.

Opinions from 2025

2025 United States Supreme Court Opinions

supreme.justia.com

 

[martybegan]

Absolutely true. Except these last few decisions that went against Trump were goofy, but I'm blanking on them????
Couldn't find them below either. You remember any?

I didn't even hear about most of these cases. They are really busy.

Opinions from 2025

2025 United States Supreme Court Opinions

supreme.justia.com

The last few weren't even real decisions, just orders for the lower courts to try again, or to remove the TRO or the injunction and wait till the actual decision to enforce.

This is all due to these judges issuing TRO's like they are candy. The merits on most of these cases haven't even been argued yet.

 

[kyzr]

The last few weren't even real decisions, just orders for the lower courts to try again, or to remove the TRO or the injunction and wait till the actual decision to enforce.
This is all due to these judges issuing TRO's like they are candy. The merits on most of these cases haven't even been argued yet.

Yep. That's what it was. Roberts refuses to tell district judges that they can only rule in their district and not do nationwide injunctions that infringe on presidential authority. No district shopping either.
I think congress is making a law to that effect, but I don't think the senate has 60 votes, which is why Roberts needs to step up.

 

[Marener]

it says sex. Sorry, but I don't play the Orwellian leftist game of pretending words don't have meaning.

Stop referencing something you don't understand.

Of course words have meaning but that’s not good enough for major questions doctrine. It has to be very explicit and clear. You can’t just interpret laws that way.

 

[martybegan]

Of course words have meaning but that’s not good enough for major questions doctrine. It has to be very explicit and clear. You can’t just interpret laws that way.

It's perfectly good enough.

The President can, and is doing so.

 

[Marener]

It's perfectly good enough.

The President can, and is doing so.

Pretty good isn’t enough for the major questions doctrine.

At least it wasn’t when the president was Democratic

Surely there aren’t different standards for different presidents?

 

[martybegan]

Pretty good isn’t enough for the major questions doctrine.

At least it wasn’t when the president was Democratic

Surely there aren’t different standards for different presidents?

Stop quoting that like you understand what it means. It's pathetic.

Biden tried to include trans in title IX and was slapped down by a court, because the word "sex" is explicit in the text of title IX and cosplaying as a woman doesn't change your sex.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

What corruption? Any indictments or just DNC imagined?

Judges get impeached.
Then indicted.
The corrupt pansies of the republican congress protect corruption.

You want to talk about corruption? I can prove about $590b in democrat slush funds.

NO, you can't.

$375B EPA slush fund handled by John Podesta gave billions to charities founded only months earlier

By Isabel Vincent The Biden administration funneled at least $20 billion dollars into environmental groups, most of which had only recently been founded, The Post has discovered. In one case, forme…

www.climatedepot.com

ICYMI: Administrator Lee Zeldin Announces EPA Found Billions of Dollars Parked at an Outside Financial Institution by Biden Administration | US EPA

EPA News Release: ICYMI: Administrator Lee Zeldin Announces EPA Found Billions of Dollars Parked at an Outside Financial Institution by Biden Administration

www.epa.gov

ICYMI: Administrator Lee Zeldin Finds Gold Bars from EPA at Stacey Abrams’ Connected Group, Biden-Harris Ethical Red Flags | US EPA

EPA News Release: ICYMI: Administrator Lee Zeldin Finds Gold Bars from EPA at Stacey Abrams’ Connected Group, Biden-Harris Ethical Red Flags

www.epa.gov

The $42 billion internet program that has connected 0 people

The federal BEAD program makes little sense with the rate of private markets providing internet access.

www.washingtonpolicy.org

Elon Musk Says DOGE Will Save Government $150 Billion Next Fiscal Year

The Department of Government Efficiency and Elon Musk have been working for months to reduce government spending and its workforce.

www.forbes.com

More Muskrats lies.

Why are Trump and his cult soooooo, GULLIBLE?

Muskrat can't even be questioned, the ass lickers of Trump, made sure of that.

Committee blocks Musk subpoena - Live Updates​

Politico
https://www.politico.com › 2025/02/05 › congress › elo...
Feb 6, 2025 — In the end, the motion to subpoena Musk was shut down by Republicans on the committee on a 20-19 vote — with eight lawmakers missing the vote, ...

 

[Marener]

Stop quoting that like you understand what it means. It's pathetic.

Biden tried to include trans in title IX and was slapped down by a court, because the word "sex" is explicit in the text of title IX and cosplaying as a woman doesn't change your sex.

You mean a district court stopped a nationwide policy?

Seems like another case of judges overstepping their authority? right?

 

[Missourian]

WTF?

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 is a landmark federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in educational programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. It ensures equal opportunities for both male and female students in education, including athletics.

Trump threatens funding cut to colleges allowing 'illegal ...​

View attachment 1100609
Reuters
https://www.reuters.com › world › trump-says-federal-f...
Mar 4, 2025 — "All federal funding will STOP for any College, School or University that allows illegal protests," Trump wrote on social media.

"Agitators will be imprisoned/or permanently sent back to the country from which they came. American students will be permanently expelled or, depending on the crime, arrested. NO MASKS!"

ONE is a law passed by congress.
One is a personal vendetta by a lying SNOWFLAKE.

Isn't DEI literally discrimination based on race, sex, etc?

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Unfortunately sell out Republicans shove shills into the mix from time to time. After watching Kamala the last 4 years and seeing how she was with Kavanaugh it is now known that many of these politicians need a script to read from or are vacant. McConnell put to many shills into the judiciary. And he let Schumer put hundreds of Progressive Socialist Communist judges into the same judiciary the last two years of Joe with a 50/50 Senate. We need to clean up the system. Save money. reduce stealing, graft and corruption as to keep sending the checks and benefits out. To have high inflation to continue to do so, will not end well.

The lying communist, were put on the supreme court by McTurtle and the corrupt Trump cult.

 

[martybegan]

You mean a district court stopped a nationwide policy?

Seems like another case of judges overstepping their authority? right?

Actually it was stopped in several Districts first, the one linked below was just the first to issue a ruling.

Judge scraps Biden's Title IX rules, reversing expansion of protections for LGBTQ+ students

In a decision issued Thursday, U.S. District Judge Danny C. Reeves scrapped the entire 1,500-page regulation after deciding it was “fatally” tainted by legal shortcomings. The rule had already been halted in 26 states after a wave of legal challenges by Republican states.

Want to fix this issue? Very simple, have anything involving the executive branch applying laws be sent to the SC directly, or at least to a Circuit Court.

 

[Rambunctious]

Harvard is not the same as it once was... its full of radicals and extremists... they have more money than most small countries... so F em... and parents you can do so much better for your kids than a Harvard education of hate and anti Americanism....

 

[Marener]

Actually it was stopped in several Districts first, the one linked below was just the first to issue a ruling.

Judge scraps Biden's Title IX rules, reversing expansion of protections for LGBTQ+ students



Want to fix this issue? Very simple, have anything involving the executive branch applying laws be sent to the SC directly, or at least to a Circuit Court.

So it’s okay for district judges to wipe out federal regulations when they do it to Dems.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Isn't DEI literally discrimination based on race, sex, etc?

No, you must be confused.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964​

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (.gov)
https://www.eeoc.gov › statutes › title-vii-civil-rights-act-...
Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin.


It gave women the same chance/opportunities in SCHOOLS as men.
Women are the majority of people in the US.

 

[martybegan]

So it’s okay for district judges to wipe out federal regulations when they do it to Dems.

The SC needs to rule on it, and soon.

Personally I will be happy when it's gone, but until then, wind meet the whirlwind bitch.

At least here it was done in multiple districts, and it was an actual RULING. Not some TRO or injunction.

 

[Lesh]

What law says we have to fund Harvard, Simp?

What law says one school can be favored over another based on politics