Trump will announce end of birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants, officials say

[beagle9]

Contriving pretexts to revoke the citizenship of Americans (such as Marco Rubio) and deporting them to Guantanamo or Gaza or elsewhere is not going to happen, no matter who their parents were.

Nice try, but deporting non-citizens back to their home country with new baby in tow is not a sentence to prisons as you attempt to put it. Only the criminals that have committed crimes while visiting upon our soil get to go to places like that for detention, and it's all because of you Democrat's setting them up to come here thinking that they were free to do as they please until they got caught, and in many cases again after they were caught and released back into the interior.

 

[beagle9]

Gaslighting. Destroying the modern definition is what you are failing to do.

Modern leftist definition ?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Birthright citizenship is safe from anything but an amendment, beagle9.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Vernacular And Lexicon "

* Dismantling Convoluted Reasoning *

I'm for or I am pro-abortion choice ? I'm anti-abortion you dummy.

Being against choice of abortion is abortion anti-choice .

Being for choice of abortion is abortion choice .

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Do Not Stop At Subject To "

* The Term Thereof Matters "

Birthright citizenship is safe from anything but an amendment, beagle9.

Illegal migrants are not subjects of us jurisdiction .

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

" Do Not Stop At Subject To "

* The Term Thereof Matters "

Illegal migrants are not subjects of us jurisdiction .

Yeah, they are, and your opinion does not change how the law evaluates that term.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Pretentious Partisan Conclusions Without Having Reviewed Supposedly Precedence Judgement "

* Simplistic Babble Rabble *

Yeah, they are, and your opinion does not change how the law evaluates that term.

To be a subject of us jurisdiction requires an individual to be either a us citizen or as a subject by title in us legal immigration system - a visa holder .

The basis of citizenship for kim wong ark was jus solis with a contingency on subject of from the term thereof .

What do you believe the term thereof is supposed to mean in the clause " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " ?

 

[schmidlap]

Nice try, but deporting non-citizens back to their home country with new baby in tow is not a sentence to prisons as you attempt to put it. Only the criminals that have committed crimes while visiting upon our soil get to go to places like that for detention, and it's all because of you Democrat's setting them up to come here thinking that they were free to do as they please until they got caught, and in many cases again after they were caught and released back into the interior.

Folks born on American soil have been recognized as American citizens for nearly 160 years, as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.

So what if Marco Rubio's parents were Cubans who were not American citizens at the time of his birth? Would you deport him to Cuba?

Did you have a particular place in mind where you want to banish such American citizens?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Infidel Asylum Sneakers "

* Not A Blanket Conclusion *

Folks born on American soil have been recognized as American citizens for nearly 160 years, as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.
So what if Marco Rubio's parents were Cubans who were not American citizens at the time of his birth? Would you deport him to Cuba?
Did you have a particular place in mind where you want to banish such American citizens?

Petitions that have been approved and processed are not likely to be revoked , but if they could be , please , please , please , deport both desi arnez and lucille ball .

 

[schmidlap]

" Infidel Asylum Sneakers "

* Not A Blanket Conclusion *

Petitions that have been approved and processed are not likely to be revoked , but if they could be , please , please , please , deport both desi arnez and lucille ball .

Lucy, at least.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

" Pretentious Partisan Conclusions Without Having Reviewed Supposedly Precedence Judgement "

* Simplistic Babble Rabble *

To be a subject of us jurisdiction requires an individual to be either a us citizen or as a subject by title in us legal immigration system - a visa holder .

The basis of citizenship for kim wong ark was jus solis with a contingency on subject of from the term thereof .

What do you believe the term thereof is supposed to mean in the clause " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " ?

You are that kid in class saying the same thing over and over, when the class has already moved on.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Usurper Of Us Constitution And Sovereignty Ignores A Clear Challenge "

* Disingenuous Hackery *

You are that kid in class saying the same thing over and over, when the class has already moved on.

Diverting away from a challenge to elucidate meaning of the term thereof , from the phrase " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " , only demonstrates a lack of integrity and competence .

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

" Usurper Of Us Constitution And Sovereignty Ignores A Clear Challenge "

* Disingenuous Hackery *

Diverting away from a challenge to elucidate meaning of the term thereof , from the phrase " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " , only demonstrates a lack of integrity and competence .

No challenge exists except to your ability to understand.

 

[beagle9]

Birthright citizenship is safe from anything but an amendment, beagle9.

Not if it's proven over time to be destructive and disruptive to our immigration system, so it will be up to yourside to prove that what has unfolded over the year's has not led to the perversion of our immigration law's, and this by such a thing conflicting with those laws in a sort of loop hole way of getting around the laws.

 

[beagle9]

Lucy, at least.

Both post are ridiculous back and forths, just saying.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Disingenuous Farce Lacks Integrity "

* Slow Horse Self Describes Intuition *

No challenge exists except to your ability to understand.

The challenge exists and is overtly clear , whereas only your dishonesty and ineptitude exists for failing to address meaning of the term thereof from the phrase " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " .

Come on , do not be a ***** , man up , give it a go .

 

[Mashmont]

WASHINGTON –Incoming President Donald Trump will announce the end of birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants in an Executive Order on his first day of office, incoming White House officials said.

The federal government will no longer recognize the immediate citizenship of children of illegal immigrants born in the US “on a prospectivebasis,” the incoming official said on a call Monday morning.

Trump had discussed ending birthright citizenship on the campaign trail, but the action could raise legal questions, as the 14th amendment states, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Now before you all start, I quit caring about "legal" a while ago. We just need to get the needful done.

The Democrats don't care about laws, why should we?

Indeed, pulling a page out of the dem playbook of "it takes two years to overturn anything, I say why not....Go for it!

Excellent work, Mr. President!

 

[beagle9]

Folks born on American soil have been recognized as American citizens for nearly 160 years, as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.

American citizen's giving birth to American citizen's sure, and of course foreigners that come here legally can be considered for legality in strength there of, otherwise if they as two crime free productive parent's happen to give birth to a baby in the midst of their stay here working and living here legally, then it should strengthen their chances of becoming full legal citizen's if that's what they as a family want to become here.

The baby along with the parents willingness to operate like a family that wants the best for their family, of course can be considered as a plus for full citizenship to come as a result of their goals to become a productive American family by way of their actions and character that speaks loudly to us about their goal to do well in America if given the chance.

So what if Marco Rubio's parents were Cubans who were not American citizens at the time of his birth? Would you deport him to Cuba?

Depends on their status at his birth or before his birth at the time, otherwise if they came here legally under asylum status where their application was submitted for possible citizenship under review, then the answer is of course NO they would not be deported.

Did you have a particular place in mind where you want to banish such American citizens?

Falsehoods and question's like that is you just gaslighting, so stop embarrassing yourself. Oh wait, I'm talking to a leftist.. Nevermind..

 

[schmidlap]

American citizen's giving birth to American citizen's sure, and of course foreigners that come here legally can be considered for legality in strength there of, otherwise if they as two crime free productive parent's happen to give birth to a baby in the midst of their stay here working and living here legally, then it should strengthen their chances of becoming full legal citizen's if that's what they as a family want to become here.

The baby along with the parents willingness to operate like a family that wants the best for their family, of course can be considered as a plus for full citizenship to come as a result of their goals to become a productive American family by way of their actions and character that speaks loudly to us about their goal to do well in America if given the chance.


Depends on their status at his birth or before his birth at the time, otherwise if they came here legally under asylum status where their application was submitted for possible citizenship under review, then the answer is of course NO they would not be deported.

Falsehoods and question's like that is you just gaslighting, so stop embarrassing yourself. Oh wait, I talking to a leftist.. Nevermind..

I take it that you have not settled on a location where you would banish American citizens born in the U.S. who have never lived anywhere else.

​

Don't tax your brain. They are protected by the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It has been the law of the land since 1868.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States:
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,
are citizens of the United States
and of the State wherein they reside.
​

Prior to passage of the 14th Amendment, the nativist Know-Nothing Party flourished in the 1850s. It was an outgrowth of the strong anti-immigrant and especially anti- Roman Catholic sentiment of the time.

 

[beagle9]

I take it that you have not settled on a location where you would banish American citizens born in the U.S. who have never lived anywhere else.

View attachment 1076074
​

Don't tax your brain. They are protected by the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It has been the law of the land since 1868.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States:
and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,
are citizens of the United States
and of the State wherein they reside.
​

Prior to passage of the 14th Amendment, the nativist Know-Nothing Party flourished in the 1850s. It was an outgrowth of the strong anti-immigrant and especially anti- Roman Catholic sentiment of the time.

Very poorly written amendment, and so much so that it has been left exposed to interpretations by leftist like you, otherwise who ignore the real meaning of the amendment in which would have never allowed what you leftist have since created all due to your disingenuous interpretation of our constitution for nefarious purposes.