Trump will announce end of birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants, officials say

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

" Tweedle Dee And Tweedle Dumb Predicate Logic Stalwart "

* Establishing Precedence Through Linguistic Determination For Meaning *

If " and subject to the jurisdiction " and " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " are different phraseology , what is the difference in meaning between the two phrases ?

Is there a difference between an individual whom is subject to us jurisdiction and an individual whom is a subject of us jurisdiction ?

An etymology of the term thereof , would be deconstructed to the terms there and of , which would implicitly relate only with individuals whom are of etas unis .

SCOTUS will most likely, at 7-2 at best, decide against your arguments.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

" Stalwart Stupidity On A Monumental Scale "

* Birth Tourism Interdiction *

The only thing your premise provides is a necessity for a police state for public protection against a vice , where a vice is an illicit behavior incurring public indemnity , whereby theft through 18 years of social subsistence and social services is a vice , and legitimately us borders are subject to strict enforcement through absolute exclusion of foreign national females .

* Ten Thirty Over Ride *

Trump will announce end of birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants, officials say

It is fun to watch the alt right immigrant haters flopple and flabble about birthright citizenship.

www.usmessageboard.com

You are babbling.

You and I, both, will accept SCOTUS's ruling.

 

[schmidlap]

" Water Shed For Upland Flooding "

* Disincentivizing Magnanimous Indemnity Without Cruelty *

There would not be a compelling justification to pursue the expense and disparagement of deporting those whose applications for citizenship have been approved and processed .

Alternatively , disincentivizing illegal immigration by disavowing national indemnities to opportunistic theft by incursion are justifiable reasons to enforce terminology and practices consistent with us constitution for an entitlement of us republic to solvency .

Read a synopsis of United States v. Wong Kim Ark - Wikipedia and respond as to whether the parents of wrong ark kim were subjects of us government , by virtue of being a subject by title in us legal immgration system - by visa .

Germane and interesting. Thank you.

Like any Amendment to the Constitution, the 14th could be repealed, of course, and pretexts for denying citizenship to Americans born in the United States concocted.

I'm sure we'll hear about it if and when that happens.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Exegesis Eisegesis Of Polysyllabic Terminology "

* Clauses Of Vernacular Premises Amenable Lexicon *

You are babbling.
You and I, both, will accept SCOTUS's ruling.

All will likely comply with the most compelling institutions of populism which are capable of and issuing a retort for violations of some legal construct .

Where ignorance of a law is not de facto acceptable for excuse , us scotus dobbs decision is dumbfounded and formal sedition against us 14th , 9th , 1st and 10th amendments , as well as malfeasance against title 1 section 8 of us code .

Morpheme - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I suspicion that SCOTUS will not be ignorant of the law.

You will comply.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Political Motifs And Jurisprudence At Large Challenged By More Valid Perspectives "

* Extensively Castigated With Scrutiny In Public Record Social Media *

I suspicion that SCOTUS will not be ignorant of the law.
You will comply.

In deed , scotus justices weighing in the affirmative for dobbs are subject to prosecution for suspending us constitution , as should any despot .

The us republic is founded upon independence of the individual , through equal protection among individuals , where an individual may be us federate , or us state , or a corporation , or a civil litigant .

As states cannot abrogate equal protection among individuals , and no individual can be produced which has been harmed by elective abortion , which scotus affirmed in response to texas on sb 8 , an opinion which contradicts scotus ruling in dobbs , those facilitating protection of individual health in elective abortion are relieved of either civil or criminal prosecution .

The dobbs opinion violates an enumerated rite of equal protection , which suspended articles of us constitution , such that scotus is simply another individual subject to civil or criminal prosecution

 

[beagle9]

It is fun to watch the alt right immigrant haters flopple and flabble about birthright citizenship.

No laughing matter when it comes to the leftist cheering in the streets for HAMAS, and saying things like Laken Riley was just an incident that took place or something to that affect.

Democrat's have blood on their hands in more ways than one, but they claim that it's the Republicans who are the bad guy's and gal's in all of it. I call bull chit.

Are you attempting to be like those that represent the Democrat's in a horrific way, and then try to defend the indefensible as lunatics would do ? If you are, then join the dirt bag club with your fellow scum if that's what you are all about.

 

[beagle9]

Democrats are a party, not a form of government. You obviously failed your government/civics class in high school. and never passed your GED test either.

When empowered by the people, then they become the face of government, and they have the ability to change government if a consensus allows them to do just that.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

" Political Motifs And Jurisprudence At Large Challenged By More Valid Perspectives "

* Extensively Castigated With Scrutiny In Public Record Social Media *

In deed , scotus justices weighing in the affirmative for dobbs are subject to prosecution for suspending us constitution , as should any despot .

The us republic is founded upon independence of the individual , through equal protection among individuals , where an individual may be us federate , or us state , or a corporation , or a civil litigant .

As states cannot abrogate equal protection among individuals , and no individual can be produced which has been harmed by elective abortion , which scotus affirmed in response to texas on sb 8 , an opinion which contradicts scotus ruling in dobbs , those facilitating protection of individual health in elective abortion are relieved of either civil or criminal prosecution .

The dobbs opinion violates an enumerated rite of equal protection , which suspended articles of us constitution , such that scotus is simply another individual subject to civil or criminal prosecution

You have no idea how Constitutional law works. What a silly post above.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

When empowered by the people, then they become the face of government, and they have the ability to change government if a consensus allows them to do just that.

No, the party does not at all become the government. That is pure fascist theory you are claiming for you and yours. All parties are independent from the government.

 

[beagle9]

No, the party does not at all become the government. That is pure fascist theory you are claiming for you and yours. All parties are independent from the government.

After the abuse we just saw or experienced with a Democrat government that was representing a nation in which the left put into place, and into a super stressful situation, it is that you can say such thing's with a straight face is simply amazing.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

After the abuse we just saw or experienced with a Democrat government that was representing a nation in which the left put into place, and into a super stressful situation, it is that you can say such thing's with a straight face is simply amazing.

Nonsense. The government is separate from the party. I do notice that this government is adding party auxiliaries to government offices like the Nazis did in health, police, banking, so forth and so on.

 

[beagle9]

Nonsense. The government is separate from the party. I do notice that this government is adding party auxiliaries to government offices like the Nazis did in health, police, banking, so forth and so on.

Every 4 year's a party voted for runs government from the wheel house of the ship. You can't deny this, but nice try anyway. Now you people are constantly complaining about a party in charge of the wheel house that guides the ship, but lay silent when the last party ran the ship from it's wheel house.

Just a preview of the last party running the government -

Every Democrat or Rhino that authorized such outrages spending around the globe should be immediately fired from government if they are still there.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

beagle9, your party is imitating the Nazis, as has been shown time and time again.

Is that a good thing?

 

[beagle9]

beagle9, your party is imitating the Nazis, as has been shown time and time again.

Is that a good thing?

TDS is not a good thing, so get help for that soon.

 

[schmidlap]

No laughing matter when it comes to the leftist cheering in the streets for HAMAS, and saying things like Laken Riley was just an incident that took place or something to that affect.

Democrat's have blood on their hands in more ways than one, but they claim that it's the Republicans who are the bad guy's and gal's in all of it. I call bull chit.

Are you attempting to be like those that represent the Democrat's in a horrific way, and then try to defend the indefensible as lunatics would do ? If you are, then join the dirt bag club with your fellow scum if that's what you are all about.

Hyper-partisan, xenophobic ideologues infatuated with their pipe-dream of an absolutist monarchy aside, the U.S. Constitution remains the law of the land.

U.S. District Judge John C. — a Ronald Reagan appointee who has been on the bench since 1980—issued his own injunction. Trump is simply trying to amend the 14th Amendment—which grants citizenship to those born in the U.S. and subject to its jurisdiction—for political reasons, the judge said.

“The rule of law is, according to him, something to navigate around or something ignored, whether that be for political or personal gain,” Coughenour said. “In this courtroom and under my watch the rule of law is a bright beacon, which I intend to follow.”

​

 

[ThisIsMe]

Your argument leads to you changing the amendment. Go for it.

I don't see it that way. The amendment, as written, doesn't provide any definition, as has been pointed out. I look at what the intent was when it was written. This is why I also asked, if you can find any examples of BRC to aliens (non citizen) between 1866 and 1898, that would certainly indicate that maybe they allowed it, but until that time, I can only go off of what they said in their debates.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Abortion is NOT a "Law".

I agree. However, upon the roe decision, the left considered it to be law

 

[San Souci]

I agree. However, upon the roe decision, the left considered it to be law

And ROE is now dead.

 

[ThisIsMe]

And ROE is now dead.

Yep, so what are you disagreeing with me about?