Trump will announce end of birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants, officials say

[ThisIsMe]

It will be easier than doing the half-ass approach you propose to "reinterpret" the meaning of the 14th Amendment against all of history.

When you set the precedent that scotus can change laws, that precedent exists through time. Do you think if one court interprets something that theirs is the only one that can do it? Of course not, courts can reinterpret things down the line. That's why it's a bad idea.

 

[ThisIsMe]

I agree with what makes sense

Don’t let some 18 th century aristocratic slave owner define how a modern superpower should operate

Let your local government plow the snow from your streets, run your schools, build small infrastructure, police, fire depts

Let your states run universities, make laws, build highways

Let the Federal Government do the big stuff…foreign policy, the military……keeps states from ******* up

Ok...then the cotus says that congress "shall guarantee to every state a republican form of government" To me, that means a Democrat cannot be elected to office..


Now what?

 

[schmidlap]

It will be easier than doing the half-ass approach you propose to "reinterpret" the meaning of the 14th Amendment against all of history.

Contriving pretexts to revoke the citizenship of Americans (such as Marco Rubio) and deporting them to Guantanamo or Gaza or elsewhere is not going to happen, no matter who their parents were.

 

[San Souci]

When you set the precedent that scotus can change laws, that precedent exists through time. Do you think if one court interprets something that theirs is the only one that can do it? Of course not, courts can reinterpret things down the line. That's why it's a bad idea.

What LAW is being changed?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Was any of this between 1866 and 1898? Hamilton died in 1804

The policy was the same as it always was. There were no illegal immigrants.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

When you set the precedent that scotus can change laws, that precedent exists through time. Do you think if one court interprets something that theirs is the only one that can do it? Of course not, courts can reinterpret things down the line. That's why it's a bad idea.

You are the one claiming it is being misinterpreted and have regularly failed to make your case. I predict that will be the decision in the federal courts and SCOTUS will not even consider it. How is changing the wording to be explicit going to be reinterpreted? Not likely.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Ok...then the cotus says that congress "shall guarantee to every state a republican form of government" To me, that means a Democrat cannot be elected to office..


Now what?

We have a republican form of government in every state, you dumbass! That's not anything to do with the Democrat Party. Stop being an idiot.

 

[rightwinger]

Ok...then the cotus says that congress "shall guarantee to every state a republican form of government" To me, that means a Democrat cannot be elected to office..


Now what?

Makes no sense

 

[beagle9]

They very well may not, and all of this discussion will be for naught

I hope SCOTUS will be smarter than to believe the lame excuses and bull chit that these leftist apply or use on a daily basis in these forums and/or elsewhere. Time for their bull chit to end. MAGA.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Statists Opposed To Independence Of The Individual Perpetuating Dogma Of Antifederalism Red Herring "

* Revering Versus Reviling Citizenship *

You're right, but our federal government was set up to do a very specific job. The states are supposed to do the rest. One central government cannot please an entire country which is why it's a bad idea to have it be this big. Getting pulled and stretched into too many years directions.
As chartered, the federal government can work efficiently as it was designed, and if a change NEEDS to be made, they included the amendment process to do so.

A state does not have the power to abrogate a live birth requirement , or to abrogate an enumerated rite for equal protection , which necessarily requires live birth ; consequently , states are proscribed from providing equal protection to a fetus and from prohibiting a non enumerated rite to abortion .

If the abortion anti-choice want to strip us citizens of equal protection , its cabal is obligated to follow the amendment process , not the opposite where citizens must enumerate a non enumerated rite of abortion .

* Jus Sanguinis For National Sovereignty *

All visa holders in etas unis , seeking residence or naturalization , must maintain an obligation to remain in good standing , by remaining lawful and without need for social subsistence , which includes an agreement that the purpose of travel doe not include to have children , else be subject to deportation .

From us 14th amendment , the phrase " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " includes the term thereof , with an etymology " there of " , such that illegal migrants are subject to us jurisdiction and entitled to equal protection , however illegal migrants are not also subjects of us jurisdiction and therefore not entitled to endowments , one of which is citizenship for children born to them for not being citizens or visa holders .

 

[beagle9]

You are the one claiming it is being misinterpreted and have regularly failed to make your case. I predict that will be the decision in the federal courts and SCOTUS will not even consider it. How is changing the wording to be explicit going to be reinterpreted? Not likely.

That's why we have a supreme court, otherwise in order for these complicated issue's to get solved, but these days the SCOTUS has hell on it's hands in trying not to be manipulated by the greatest manipulator's of all time (the evil one's doing the works of Satan himself).

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Schizophrenics Retreat To Delusion As Reality "

* Sin Mythology Lunar Ticks Embrace Simplistic Personification Of Good Versus Evil *

That's why we have a supreme court, otherwise in order for these complicated issue's to get solved, but these days the SCOTUS has hell on it's hands in trying not to be manipulated by the greatest manipulator's of all time (the evil one's doing the works of Satan himself).

Discordianism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[rightwinger]

I hope SCOTUS will be smarter than to believe the lame excuses and bull chit that these leftist apply or use on a daily basis in these forums and/or elsewhere. Time for their bull chit to end. MAGA.

I hope the Supreme Court will be consistent in its literal interpretation of the Constitution and tell Trump he needs to amend the Constitution

 

[beagle9]

" Statists Opposed To Independence Of The Individual Perpetuating Dogma Of Antifederalism Red Herring "

* Revering Versus Reviling Citizenship *

A state does not have the power to abrogate a live birth requirement , or to abrogate an enumerated rite for equal protection , which necessarily requires live birth ; consequently , states are proscribed from providing equal protection to a fetus and from prohibiting a non enumerated rite to abortion .

If the abortion anti-choice want to strip us citizens of equal protection , its cabal is obligated to follow the amendment process , not the opposite where citizens must enumerate a non enumerated rite of abortion .

* Jus Sanguinis For National Sovereignty *

All visa holders in etas unis , seeking residence or naturalization , must maintain an obligation to remain in good standing , by remaining lawful and without need for social subsistence , which includes an agreement that the purpose of travel doe not include to have children , else be subject to deportation .

From us 14th amendment , the phrase " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " includes the term thereof , with an etymology " there of " , such that illegal migrants are subject to us jurisdiction and entitled to equal protection , however illegal migrants are not also subjects of us jurisdiction and therefore not entitled to endowments , one of which is citizenship for children born to them for not being citizens or visa holders .

Thought you all didn't want the court's intervening between mother and her child in the case of her being pregnant(?) but now you all want the courts to intervene between mother and child upon the birth taking place, and in doing so I think that it's strictly for political purposes in order to allow the father, mother, and child to stay here because of that birth.

How is it that the land that a person is standing on, somehow determines the status of a born child upon that land, and therefore gives it ownership of something (if the parents are trespassing upon that land to begin with) ?
The 14th makes no sense other than it proves that the leftist have been around since Ole Satan was thrown out of Heaven a day or so ago.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Lies Of Omission "

* Literal Would Rule On Subjects Of Us Jurisdiction "

I hope the Supreme Court will be consistent in its literal interpretation of the Constitution and tell Trump he needs to amend the Constitution

A caveat of the kim wong ark decision what that the parents were in good legal standing , having been invited by visa , non criminal and without need for social subsistence , and those are the requirements for any to become and remain a subject of the united states .

The term thereof has a colloquial and literal meaning , that the corrupt week to disavow by elucidating on " and subject to the jurisdiction " as encompassing the entirety of the phrase " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " .

 

[beagle9]

" Schizophrenics Retreat To Delusion As Reality "

* Sin Mythology Lunar Ticks Embrace Simplistic Personification Of Good Versus Evil *

Discordianism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

You again.... pffft... The people are on too you knuckleheads finally, so no matter how much you attempt to use your evil wisdemonic bull chit on the people, their eye's have finally been opened.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Abortion Choice And Jus Sanguinis For Illegal Migrant Children "

* Silly And Confused *

Thought you all didn't want the court's intervening between mother and her child in the case of her being pregnant(?) but now you all want the courts to intervene between mother and child upon the birth taking place, and in doing so I think that it's strictly for political purposes in order to allow the father, mother, and child to stay here because of that birth.
How is it that the land that a person is standing on, somehow determines the status of a born child upon that land, and therefore gives it ownership of something (if the parents are trespassing upon that land to begin with) ?
The 14th makes no sense other than it proves that the leftist have been around since Ole Satan was thrown out of Heaven a day or so ago.

This us republican moniker is abortion choice and against jus solis citizenship for children born of illegal migrants in us .

Keep this in mind , not providing us citizenship to children born of illegal migrants in the us does not assure that the children receive jus sanguinis citizenship to the country of maternal origin , and people without citizenship is a very bad idea .

 

[beagle9]

The country is not static. It changes with every generation. Jefferson and Marshall were fighting it over 220 years ago. It is not going to stop.

And that's why you leftist are working towards a goal in deleting the constitution throughout a long length of time, and this in order to eventually convert it completely into something that work's to allow some of the craziest bull crap like men in women's sport's, and many other crazy non-sensical ridiculous trends that you people have been engaging in (and forcing it onto other's as well), over the many decades looking back now.

 

[beagle9]

" Abortion Choice And Jus Sanguinis For Illegal Migrant Children "

* Silly And Confused *

This us republican moniker is abortion choice and against jus solis citizenship for children born of illegal migrants in us .

Keep this in mind , not providing us citizenship to children born of illegal migrants in the us does not assure that the children receive jus sanguinis citizenship to the country of maternal origin , and people without citizenship is a very bad idea .

I'm for or I am pro-abortion choice ? I'm anti-abortion you dummy.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

And that's why you leftist are working towards a goal in deleting the constitution throughout a long length of time, and this in order to eventually convert it completely into something that work's to allow some of the craziest bull crap like men in women's sport's, and many other crazy non-sensical ridiculous trends that you people have been engaging in (and forcing it onto other's as well), over the many decades looking back now.

Gaslighting. Destroying the modern definition is what you are failing to do.