Trump vs Biden, Evidence Against Edition

[The Banker]

The difference in the evidence against Trump and the evidence against Biden is astounding. On one hand Trump is caught red handed with overwhelming rock solid evidence of total guilt and corroboration of guilt. On the other hand is a bunch of non-credible lies, that have no real proof or evidence or corroboration or credibility to support them beyond the fabricated lies of known criminals and liars.

Here are the facts:

The DOJ asked Trump for the top secret documents, Trump told the DOJ he did not have them at all, at which point the DOJ got warrants and found the documents in Trumps possession. Dead to Rights.
Worse yet is the credible witness (key word credible) testimony from credible sources, such as Trump's own attorney's and actual video evidence of people moving the documents around in boxes, in an attempt to hide them from the DOJ.
Worse yet is the actual audio evidence of Trump stating the documents are classified and he did not declassify them.
Not only is Trump caught red handed possessing the documents, there is an extremely large amount of corroborating evidence to prove he knowingly lied and tried to hide the dope, I mean top secret documents.

This is the Gold standard of rock solid, dead to rights evidence. Literally the best evidence can get.

The evidence against Biden is a flimsy at it gets, with nothing to corroborate it at all.
First is the word of a biased partisan "whistle blower" Shapely has already been proven to be not credible because, Trump appointed US attorney Weiss clearly demonstrated that Shapely lied numerous times. Weiss indicated that Hunter was investigated and the reason Hunter was not charged was because there was no evidence of a crime at all, except the weak little misdemeanor he got charged with.
Second, the other magic whistle blower (Gal Luft) who had disappeared is a corrupt criminal looking to tell any lie to get out of serious prison time. There is no real substantial evidence or corroboration of any evidence.
There is no hard evidence against Biden, there is no corroboration of any wild claims against Hunter, there is no credible witness against Joe/Hunter, and Hunter had already been investigated by a Trump appointed US attorney.

Based on the facts, how can anybody say Trump is innocent, and Biden is guilty of anything??

I report the facts. You decide.

Hunter Biden prosecutor says he had OK to bring charges anywhere in U.S.

Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss also said he never asked to be named a special counsel, as Republican lawmakers and the whistleblower have claimed.

www.nbcnews.com

The Stupidest Crimes Imaginable

The federal indictment of Donald Trump depicts a man who knew that what he was doing was wrong and went to great lengths to cover it up.

www.theatlantic.com

 

[Godboy]

The difference in the evidence against Trump and the evidence against Biden is astounding. On one hand Trump is caught red handed with overwhelming rock solid evidence of total guilt and corroboration of guilt. On the other hand is a bunch of non-credible lies, that have no real proof or evidence or corroboration or credibility to support them beyond the fabricated lies of known criminals and liars.

Here are the facts:

The DOJ asked Trump for the top secret documents, Trump told the DOJ he did not have them at all, at which point the DOJ got warrants and found the documents in Trumps possession. Dead to Rights.
Worse yet is the credible witness (key word credible) testimony from credible sources, such as Trump's own attorney's and actual video evidence of people moving the documents around in boxes, in an attempt to hide them from the DOJ.
Worse yet is the actual audio evidence of Trump stating the documents are classified and he did not declassify them.
Not only is Trump caught red handed possessing the documents, there is an extremely large amount of corroborating evidence to prove he knowingly lied and tried to hide the dope, I mean top secret documents.

This is the Gold standard of rock solid, dead to rights evidence. Literally the best evidence can get.

The evidence against Biden is a flimsy at it gets, with nothing to corroborate it at all.
First is the word of a biased partisan "whistle blower" Shapely has already been proven to be not credible because, Trump appointed US attorney Weiss clearly demonstrated that Shapely lied numerous times. Weiss indicated that Hunter was investigated and the reason Hunter was not charged was because there was no evidence of a crime at all, except the weak little misdemeanor he got charged with.
Second, the other magic whistle blower (Gal Luft) who had disappeared is a corrupt criminal looking to tell any lie to get out of serious prison time. There is no real substantial evidence or corroboration of any evidence.
There is no hard evidence against Biden, there is no corroboration of any wild claims against Hunter, there is no credible witness against Joe/Hunter, and Hunter had already been investigated by a Trump appointed US attorney.

Based on the facts, how can anybody say Trump is innocent, and Biden is guilty of anything??

I report the facts. You decide.

Hunter Biden prosecutor says he had OK to bring charges anywhere in U.S.

Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss also said he never asked to be named a special counsel, as Republican lawmakers and the whistleblower have claimed.

www.nbcnews.com

The Stupidest Crimes Imaginable

The federal indictment of Donald Trump depicts a man who knew that what he was doing was wrong and went to great lengths to cover it up.

www.theatlantic.com

Nobody gives a fuck about paperwork crimes. The only thing that we care about is the alarming amount of evidence which plainly shows that the Bidens are selling policy for money from corrupt nations. They werent doing business in England or Germany, or even in the US or Canada; it was only in shady as fuck countries with shady as fuck people. The Bidens have ZERO explanation for how this money was earned. They are lambasted with accusations of bribery every single day in the world news and they make ZERO effort to dispell those rumors by simply explaning these payments, if they were in fact legitimate. We all know they werent, so the Bidens say NOTHING.

What do you think happens when he is on the debate stage and his opponents are crushing him with questions about this shit? Even the moderators are going to ask. Remember last time how he denied the laptop? You can expect that lie to come up too and they will question his honesty. He is going to look like a liar with no good excuses for his families business dealings. The debates are going to kill that senile old man.

 

[Donald H]

Nobody gives a fuck about paperwork crimes. The only thing that we care about is the alarming amount of evidence which plainly shows that the Bidens are selling policy for money from corrupt nations. They werent doing business in England or Germany, or even in the US or Canada; it was only in shady as fuck countries with shady as fuck people. The Bidens have ZERO explanation for how this money was earned. They are lambasted with accusations of bribery every single day in the world news and they make ZERO effort to dispell those rumors by simply explaning these payments, if they were in fact legitimate. We all know they werent, so the Bidens say NOTHING.

What do you think happens when he is on the debate stage and his opponents are crushing him with questions about this shit? Even the moderators are going to ask. Remember last time how he denied the laptop? You can expect that lie to come up too and they will question his honesty. He is going to look like a liar with no good excuses for his families business dealings. The debates are going to kill that senile old man.

Trump exhibits the persona that Americans are always ready to buy up. They would buy John Wayne for president regardless of his ability.

While Biden is ??? Not a chance, even running against the second worst choice in the whole country.

Ability of either one? Completely N.A.

America needs to be fixed but China and Russia together have made it too late.

 

[Lastamender]

The difference in the evidence against Trump and the evidence against Biden is astounding. On one hand Trump is caught red handed with overwhelming rock solid evidence of total guilt and corroboration of guilt. On the other hand is a bunch of non-credible lies, that have no real proof or evidence or corroboration or credibility to support them beyond the fabricated lies of known criminals and liars.

Here are the facts:

The DOJ asked Trump for the top secret documents, Trump told the DOJ he did not have them at all, at which point the DOJ got warrants and found the documents in Trumps possession. Dead to Rights.
Worse yet is the credible witness (key word credible) testimony from credible sources, such as Trump's own attorney's and actual video evidence of people moving the documents around in boxes, in an attempt to hide them from the DOJ.
Worse yet is the actual audio evidence of Trump stating the documents are classified and he did not declassify them.
Not only is Trump caught red handed possessing the documents, there is an extremely large amount of corroborating evidence to prove he knowingly lied and tried to hide the dope, I mean top secret documents.

This is the Gold standard of rock solid, dead to rights evidence. Literally the best evidence can get.

The evidence against Biden is a flimsy at it gets, with nothing to corroborate it at all.
First is the word of a biased partisan "whistle blower" Shapely has already been proven to be not credible because, Trump appointed US attorney Weiss clearly demonstrated that Shapely lied numerous times. Weiss indicated that Hunter was investigated and the reason Hunter was not charged was because there was no evidence of a crime at all, except the weak little misdemeanor he got charged with.
Second, the other magic whistle blower (Gal Luft) who had disappeared is a corrupt criminal looking to tell any lie to get out of serious prison time. There is no real substantial evidence or corroboration of any evidence.
There is no hard evidence against Biden, there is no corroboration of any wild claims against Hunter, there is no credible witness against Joe/Hunter, and Hunter had already been investigated by a Trump appointed US attorney.

Based on the facts, how can anybody say Trump is innocent, and Biden is guilty of anything??

I report the facts. You decide.

Hunter Biden prosecutor says he had OK to bring charges anywhere in U.S.

Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss also said he never asked to be named a special counsel, as Republican lawmakers and the whistleblower have claimed.

www.nbcnews.com

The Stupidest Crimes Imaginable

The federal indictment of Donald Trump depicts a man who knew that what he was doing was wrong and went to great lengths to cover it up.

www.theatlantic.com

 

[rightwinger]

Trump exhibits the persona that Americans are always ready to buy up. They would buy John Wayne for president regardless of his ability.

While Biden is ??? Not a chance, even running against the second worst choice in the whole country.

Ability of either one? Completely N.A.

America needs to be fixed but China and Russia together have made it too late.

Trump is more like Daddy Warbucks than John Wayne

People assume….he is rich, he must know what he is doing

 

[Donald H]

Trump is more like Daddy Warbucks than John Wayne

People assume….he is rich, he must know what he is doing

Yes, but personal appearance is the major selling point, or at least compared to the current vegetable.

Newsome might neutralize Trump's appeal but maybe not. DeSantis probably has it with his plan of outtrumping Trump's extremism.

DeSantis will be the next president if Trump is prevented from playing.

 

[Independentthinker]

The difference in the evidence against Trump and the evidence against Biden is astounding. On one hand Trump is caught red handed with overwhelming rock solid evidence of total guilt and corroboration of guilt. On the other hand is a bunch of non-credible lies, that have no real proof or evidence or corroboration or credibility to support them beyond the fabricated lies of known criminals and liars.

Here are the facts:

The DOJ asked Trump for the top secret documents, Trump told the DOJ he did not have them at all, at which point the DOJ got warrants and found the documents in Trumps possession. Dead to Rights.
Worse yet is the credible witness (key word credible) testimony from credible sources, such as Trump's own attorney's and actual video evidence of people moving the documents around in boxes, in an attempt to hide them from the DOJ.
Worse yet is the actual audio evidence of Trump stating the documents are classified and he did not declassify them.
Not only is Trump caught red handed possessing the documents, there is an extremely large amount of corroborating evidence to prove he knowingly lied and tried to hide the dope, I mean top secret documents.

This is the Gold standard of rock solid, dead to rights evidence. Literally the best evidence can get.

The evidence against Biden is a flimsy at it gets, with nothing to corroborate it at all.
First is the word of a biased partisan "whistle blower" Shapely has already been proven to be not credible because, Trump appointed US attorney Weiss clearly demonstrated that Shapely lied numerous times. Weiss indicated that Hunter was investigated and the reason Hunter was not charged was because there was no evidence of a crime at all, except the weak little misdemeanor he got charged with.
Second, the other magic whistle blower (Gal Luft) who had disappeared is a corrupt criminal looking to tell any lie to get out of serious prison time. There is no real substantial evidence or corroboration of any evidence.
There is no hard evidence against Biden, there is no corroboration of any wild claims against Hunter, there is no credible witness against Joe/Hunter, and Hunter had already been investigated by a Trump appointed US attorney.

Based on the facts, how can anybody say Trump is innocent, and Biden is guilty of anything??

I report the facts. You decide.

Hunter Biden prosecutor says he had OK to bring charges anywhere in U.S.

Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss also said he never asked to be named a special counsel, as Republican lawmakers and the whistleblower have claimed.

www.nbcnews.com

The Stupidest Crimes Imaginable

The federal indictment of Donald Trump depicts a man who knew that what he was doing was wrong and went to great lengths to cover it up.

www.theatlantic.com

Hunter, Hunter, Hunter, we already know you like your dad. You don't have to tell us with every post.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

 

[The Banker]

Nobody gives a fuck about paperwork crimes. The only thing that we care about is the alarming amount of evidence which plainly shows that the Bidens are selling policy for money from corrupt nations. They werent doing business in England or Germany, or even in the US or Canada; it was only in shady as fuck countries with shady as fuck people. The Bidens have ZERO explanation for how this money was earned. They are lambasted with accusations of bribery every single day in the world news and they make ZERO effort to dispell those rumors by simply explaning these payments, if they were in fact legitimate. We all know they werent, so the Bidens say NOTHING.

What do you think happens when he is on the debate stage and his opponents are crushing him with questions about this shit? Even the moderators are going to ask. Remember last time how he denied the laptop? You can expect that lie to come up too and they will question his honesty. He is going to look like a liar with no good excuses for his families business dealings. The debates are going to kill that senile old man.

Obviously you missed the point of the thread.
There is no credible evidence against Biden at all, you just made it up and continue to repeat debunked lies.
That is the problem. The evidence against Trump is rock solid, and Trump committed a very very serious crime.

The evidence against Biden is non-existent and not credible.

All you do is repeat lies and try to act like they are somehow true, despite no evidence of Biden crimes, and solid evidence of serious Trump crimes.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

 

[d0gbreath]

Didn't Donald used to host World's Biggest Loser?

 

[Godboy]

Obviously you missed the point of the thread.
There is no credible evidence against Biden at all, you just made it up and continue to repeat debunked lies.
That is the problem. The evidence against Trump is rock solid, and Trump committed a very very serious crime.

The evidence against Biden is non-existent and not credible.

All you do is repeat lies and try to act like they are somehow true, despite no evidence of Biden crimes, and solid evidence of serious Trump crimes.

"No evidence at all"? Uhuh, good luck employing that strategy. Denying the obvious is not going to work when Joe is in the debates. If he says anything remotely like "there is no evidence", he will be called out on it on live tv and instantly lose the election.

 

[elektra]

why do any of you fools respond to the bankers OP's

Arguing with an asshole makes you fucks bigger assholes

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump is simply a crook, not a very good one.

 

[elektra]

Trump is simply a crook, not a very good one.

yet never caught, irony

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

yet never caught, irony

Impeached twice. Indicted twice. Will be at least two more times. Found liable for sexual assault and battery. Head of a criminal business organization.

Slowly but surely.

 

[Clipper]

The difference in the evidence against Trump and the evidence against Biden is astounding. On one hand Trump is caught red handed with overwhelming rock solid evidence of total guilt and corroboration of guilt. On the other hand is a bunch of non-credible lies, that have no real proof or evidence or corroboration or credibility to support them beyond the fabricated lies of known criminals and liars.

Here are the facts:

The DOJ asked Trump for the top secret documents, Trump told the DOJ he did not have them at all, at which point the DOJ got warrants and found the documents in Trumps possession. Dead to Rights.
Worse yet is the credible witness (key word credible) testimony from credible sources, such as Trump's own attorney's and actual video evidence of people moving the documents around in boxes, in an attempt to hide them from the DOJ.
Worse yet is the actual audio evidence of Trump stating the documents are classified and he did not declassify them.
Not only is Trump caught red handed possessing the documents, there is an extremely large amount of corroborating evidence to prove he knowingly lied and tried to hide the dope, I mean top secret documents.

This is the Gold standard of rock solid, dead to rights evidence. Literally the best evidence can get.

The evidence against Biden is a flimsy at it gets, with nothing to corroborate it at all.
First is the word of a biased partisan "whistle blower" Shapely has already been proven to be not credible because, Trump appointed US attorney Weiss clearly demonstrated that Shapely lied numerous times. Weiss indicated that Hunter was investigated and the reason Hunter was not charged was because there was no evidence of a crime at all, except the weak little misdemeanor he got charged with.
Second, the other magic whistle blower (Gal Luft) who had disappeared is a corrupt criminal looking to tell any lie to get out of serious prison time. There is no real substantial evidence or corroboration of any evidence.
There is no hard evidence against Biden, there is no corroboration of any wild claims against Hunter, there is no credible witness against Joe/Hunter, and Hunter had already been investigated by a Trump appointed US attorney.

Based on the facts, how can anybody say Trump is innocent, and Biden is guilty of anything??

I report the facts. You decide.

Hunter Biden prosecutor says he had OK to bring charges anywhere in U.S.

Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss also said he never asked to be named a special counsel, as Republican lawmakers and the whistleblower have claimed.

www.nbcnews.com

The Stupidest Crimes Imaginable

The federal indictment of Donald Trump depicts a man who knew that what he was doing was wrong and went to great lengths to cover it up.

www.theatlantic.com

The have the orange one dead to rights & he knows it. Otherwise, he wouldn't be trying to delay the trial until 2024 & beyond.

 

[Clipper]

Nobody gives a fuck about paperwork crimes. The only thing that we care about is the alarming amount of evidence which plainly shows that the Bidens are selling policy for money from corrupt nations. They werent doing business in England or Germany, or even in the US or Canada; it was only in shady as fuck countries with shady as fuck people. The Bidens have ZERO explanation for how this money was earned. They are lambasted with accusations of bribery every single day in the world news and they make ZERO effort to dispell those rumors by simply explaning these payments, if they were in fact legitimate. We all know they werent, so the Bidens say NOTHING.

What do you think happens when he is on the debate stage and his opponents are crushing him with questions about this shit? Even the moderators are going to ask. Remember last time how he denied the laptop? You can expect that lie to come up too and they will question his honesty. He is going to look like a liar with no good excuses for his families business dealings. The debates are going to kill that senile old man.

You don't care about espionage either, right?

 

[Clipper]

Trump is simply a crook, not a very good one.

Roy Cohn will never be dead as long as Trump is alive.

 

[The Banker]

why do any of you fools respond to the bankers OP's

Arguing with an asshole makes you fucks bigger assholes

Translation,
you can't debate me or refute the solid facts I posted, so just ignore it and pray that the facts go away, like they do on Fake Fox News.

Get back to me when you have credible evidence against Biden, which you do not have at all.
BUT we have boxes and boxes of irrefutable evidence against Trump, and hours and hours credible corroborating testimony against Trump.