The Banker
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1
The difference in the evidence against Trump and the evidence against Biden is astounding. On one hand Trump is caught red handed with overwhelming rock solid evidence of total guilt and corroboration of guilt. On the other hand is a bunch of non-credible lies, that have no real proof or evidence or corroboration or credibility to support them beyond the fabricated lies of known criminals and liars.
Here are the facts:
The DOJ asked Trump for the top secret documents, Trump told the DOJ he did not have them at all, at which point the DOJ got warrants and found the documents in Trumps possession. Dead to Rights.
Worse yet is the credible witness (key word credible) testimony from credible sources, such as Trump's own attorney's and actual video evidence of people moving the documents around in boxes, in an attempt to hide them from the DOJ.
Worse yet is the actual audio evidence of Trump stating the documents are classified and he did not declassify them.
Not only is Trump caught red handed possessing the documents, there is an extremely large amount of corroborating evidence to prove he knowingly lied and tried to hide the dope, I mean top secret documents.
This is the Gold standard of rock solid, dead to rights evidence. Literally the best evidence can get.
The evidence against Biden is a flimsy at it gets, with nothing to corroborate it at all.
First is the word of a biased partisan "whistle blower" Shapely has already been proven to be not credible because, Trump appointed US attorney Weiss clearly demonstrated that Shapely lied numerous times. Weiss indicated that Hunter was investigated and the reason Hunter was not charged was because there was no evidence of a crime at all, except the weak little misdemeanor he got charged with.
Second, the other magic whistle blower (Gal Luft) who had disappeared is a corrupt criminal looking to tell any lie to get out of serious prison time. There is no real substantial evidence or corroboration of any evidence.
There is no hard evidence against Biden, there is no corroboration of any wild claims against Hunter, there is no credible witness against Joe/Hunter, and Hunter had already been investigated by a Trump appointed US attorney.
Based on the facts, how can anybody say Trump is innocent, and Biden is guilty of anything??
I report the facts. You decide.
Here are the facts:
The DOJ asked Trump for the top secret documents, Trump told the DOJ he did not have them at all, at which point the DOJ got warrants and found the documents in Trumps possession. Dead to Rights.
Worse yet is the credible witness (key word credible) testimony from credible sources, such as Trump's own attorney's and actual video evidence of people moving the documents around in boxes, in an attempt to hide them from the DOJ.
Worse yet is the actual audio evidence of Trump stating the documents are classified and he did not declassify them.
Not only is Trump caught red handed possessing the documents, there is an extremely large amount of corroborating evidence to prove he knowingly lied and tried to hide the dope, I mean top secret documents.
This is the Gold standard of rock solid, dead to rights evidence. Literally the best evidence can get.
The evidence against Biden is a flimsy at it gets, with nothing to corroborate it at all.
First is the word of a biased partisan "whistle blower" Shapely has already been proven to be not credible because, Trump appointed US attorney Weiss clearly demonstrated that Shapely lied numerous times. Weiss indicated that Hunter was investigated and the reason Hunter was not charged was because there was no evidence of a crime at all, except the weak little misdemeanor he got charged with.
Second, the other magic whistle blower (Gal Luft) who had disappeared is a corrupt criminal looking to tell any lie to get out of serious prison time. There is no real substantial evidence or corroboration of any evidence.
There is no hard evidence against Biden, there is no corroboration of any wild claims against Hunter, there is no credible witness against Joe/Hunter, and Hunter had already been investigated by a Trump appointed US attorney.
Based on the facts, how can anybody say Trump is innocent, and Biden is guilty of anything??
I report the facts. You decide.
Hunter Biden prosecutor says he had OK to bring charges anywhere in U.S.
Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss also said he never asked to be named a special counsel, as Republican lawmakers and the whistleblower have claimed.
www.nbcnews.com
The Stupidest Crimes Imaginable
The federal indictment of Donald Trump depicts a man who knew that what he was doing was wrong and went to great lengths to cover it up.
www.theatlantic.com
Last edited: